Summary:
Fixes T6741. This allows Almanac services to be locked from the CLI. Locked services (and their bindings, interfaces and devices) can not be edited. This serves two similar use cases:
- For normal installs, you can protect cluster configuration from an attacker who compromises an account (or generally harden services which are intended to be difficult to edit).
- For Phacility, we can lock externally-managed instance cluster configuration without having to pull any spooky tricks.
Test Plan:
- Locked and unlocked services.
- Verified locking a service locks connected properties, bindings, binding properties, interfaces, devices, and device properties.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6741
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11006
Summary:
Ref T6240. Some discussion in that task. In instance/cluster environments, daemons need to make Conduit calls that bypass policy checks.
We can't just let anyone add SSH keys with this capability to the web directly, because then an adminstrator could just add a key they own and start signing requests with it, bypassing policy checks.
Add a `bin/almanac trust-key --id <x>` workflow for trusting keys. Only trusted keys can sign requests.
Test Plan:
- Generated a user key.
- Generated a device key.
- Trusted a device key.
- Untrusted a device key.
- Hit the various errors on trust/untrust.
- Tried to edit a trusted key.
{F236010}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6240
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10878
Summary:
Ref T5833. Currently, we have an `AlmanacDeviceProperty`, but it doesn't use CustomFields and is specific to devices. Make this more generic:
- Reuse most of the CustomField infrastructure (so we can eventually get easy support for nice editor UIs, etc).
- Make properties more generic so Services, Bindings and Devices can all have them.
The major difference between this implementation and existing CustomField implementations is that all other implementations are application-authoritative: the application code determines what the available list of fields is.
I want Almanac to be a bit more freeform (basically: you can write whatever properties you want, and we'll put nice UIs on them if we have a nice UI available). For example, we might have some sort of "ServiceTemplate" that says "a database binding should usually have the fields 'writable', 'active', 'credential'", which would do things like offer these as options and put a nice UI on them, but you should also be able to write whatever other properties you want and add services without building a specific service template for them.
This involves a little bit of rule bending, but ends up pretty clean. We can adjust CustomField to accommodate this a bit more gracefully later on if it makes sense.
Test Plan: {F229172}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5833
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10777
Summary:
Ref T4209. This creates storage for public keys against authorized hosts, such that servers can be authorized to make Conduit calls as the omnipotent user.
Servers are registered into this system by running the following command once:
```
bin/almanac register
```
NOTE: This doesn't implement authorization between servers, just the storage of public keys.
Placing this against Almanac seemed like the most sensible place, since I'm imagining in future that the `register` command will accept more information (like the hostname of the server so it can be found in the service directory).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/almanac register` and saw the host (and public key information) appear in the database.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10400
