1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-25 08:12:40 +01:00
Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
fef3c778fd Replace user "status" with "availability"
Summary:
Ref T7707. Ref T8183.

  - Currently, user status is derived by looking at events they //created//. Instead, look at non-cancelled invites they are attending.
  - Prepare for on-user caching.
  - Mostly remove "Sporradic" as a status, although I left room for adding more information later.

Test Plan:
- Called user.query.
- Viewed profile.
- Viewed hovercard.
- Used mentions.
- Saw status immediately update when attending/leaving/cancelling a current event.
- Created an event ending at 6 PM and an event from 6:10PM - 7PM, saw "Away until 7PM".

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T8183, T7707

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12833
2015-05-14 11:15:04 -07:00
Joshua Spence
4ea9d76f66 Add some missing type hints
Summary: Add some typehints for Remarkup rules.

Test Plan: Browsed around some Remarkup text.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12694
2015-05-05 07:33:00 +10:00
Fabian Stelzer
cd677161e1 Do not CC users without permissions to view an object
Summary:
Ref T4411
I'm not quite sure if this is the right place for this as it will be difficult to provide proper user feedback of why we removed a particular subscriber.
Is the ApplicationTransactionEditor generally the right place to extract mentioned phids in comments?
On the other hand in some cases we cannot really give user feedback why a user was not subscribed (e.g.: commits & diffs)

Adding a diff to a repo where the user mentioned has no view permissions the subscriber is currently still added. Still would have to find where this is donet...

Any other places?

Unrelated: Is there any way to remove a subscriber from a commit/audit ?

Test Plan:
 - Edited tasks with the mentioned user having view permissions to this specific task and without
 - Raised concern with a commit and commented on the audit with the user having view permissions to the repo and without
 - Added a commit to a repo with and without the mentioned user having permissions
 - Mention a user in a task & commit comment with and without permissions
 - Mentioning a user in a diff description & comments with and without permissions to the specific diff

Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T4411

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11049
2015-01-01 08:05:52 -08:00
lkassianik
1b438a8bd1 Process Remarkup in text and HTML email bodies appropriately
Summary: Ref T6343, adding HTMLMailMode to remarkup, and most objects should now be processed and appear pretty in emails.

Test Plan: Add a comment to a Maniphest task containing a mention of an object like '{T1}' or 'T1'. Emails should show a styled version of the object similar to how the object looks in the context of the Maniphest task in the UI.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: chad, Korvin, epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T6343, T2617

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10859
2014-11-17 18:27:21 -08:00
Joshua Spence
f055736eca Rename PhutilRemarkupRule subclasses
Summary: Ref T5655. Depends on D9993.

Test Plan: See D9993.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T5655

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9994
2014-08-05 00:55:43 +10:00
Renamed from src/applications/people/remarkup/PhabricatorRemarkupRuleMention.php (Browse further)