1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 19:22:42 +01:00
Commit graph

56 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
8fa8415c07 Automatically build all Lisk schemata
Summary:
Ref T1191. Now that the whole database is covered, we don't need to do as much work to build expected schemata. Doing them database-by-database was helpful in converting, but is just reudndant work now.

Instead of requiring every application to build its Lisk objects, just build all Lisk objects.

I removed `harbormaster.lisk_counter` because it is unused.

It would be nice to autogenerate edge schemata, too, but that's a little trickier.

Test Plan: Database setup issues are all green.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que

Maniphest Tasks: T1191

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10620
2014-10-02 09:51:20 -07:00
epriestley
943c62d1e9 Add missing expected keys and uniqueness
Summary:
Ref T1191.

  - Adds definitions for missing keys and keys with wrong uniqueness. Generally, I defined these before fixing the key query to actually pull all keys and support uniqueness.
  - Moves "key uniqueness" to note severity; this is fixable (probably?) and there are no remaining issues.
  - Moves "Missing Key" to note severity; missing keys are fixable and all remaining missing keys are really missing (either missing edge keys, or missing PHID keys):

{F210089}

  - Moves "Surplus Key" to note seveirty; surplus keys are fixable all remaining surplus keys are really surplus (duplicate key in Harbormaster, key on unused column in Worker):

{F210090}

Test Plan:
  - Vetted missing/surplus/unique messages.
  - 146 issues remaining.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1191

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10590
2014-10-01 07:53:50 -07:00
epriestley
e9ac3f436a Add expected schemata for Fund, Files, Flags and Legalpad
Summary: Ref T1191. Nothing too exciting in these.

Test Plan: Saw more blue in UI.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1191

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10521
2014-09-19 05:44:40 -07:00
epriestley
298604c9d3 Rename "beta" to "prototype" and document support policy
Summary:
Fixes T6084. Changes:

  - Rename `phabricator.show-beta-applications` to `phabricator.show-prototypes`, to reinforce that these include early-development applications.
  - Migrate the config setting.
  - Add an explicit "no support" banner to the config page.
  - Rename "Beta" to "Prototype" in the UI.
  - Use "bomb" icon instead of "half star" icon.
  - Document prototype applications in more detail.
  - Explicitly document that we do not support these applications.

Test Plan:
  - Ran migration.
  - Resolved "obsolete config" issue.
  - Viewed config setting.
  - Browsed prototypes in Applications app.
  - Viewed documentation.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley, hach-que

Maniphest Tasks: T6084

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10493
2014-09-17 18:25:57 -07:00
epriestley
09fb5667cc Allow users to back initiatives in Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.

Notable changes:

  - Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Backed an initiative.
  - Viewed that I became a backer.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
2014-09-12 06:31:11 -07:00
epriestley
e4f399b9fa Scaffolding for Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.

You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).

Only notable decisions:

  - Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Created an initiative.
  - Edited an initiative.
  - Changed application policy defaults.
  - Searched for initiatives.
  - Subscribed to an initiative.
  - Opened/closed an initiative.
  - Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
  - Destroyed an initiative.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
2014-09-11 13:38:58 -07:00