Summary:
Ref T7199. Two notable changes:
- Process multiple commands.
- Process commands when creating //or// updating a task.
And generally clean things up a bit.
Test Plan:
- Used `receive-test` to execute all commands for new tasks.
- Used `receive-test` to execute all commands for existing tasks.
- Used a combination of commands to produce varied effects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12234
Summary:
Ref T7199. These were a bad idea which got copy-pasted a bunch.
- There is zero reason to ever set these to different things.
- Unsurprisingly, I don't know of any install which has them set to different things.
Unless I've completely forgotten about it, this option was not motivated by some obscure business need, it was just a bad decision which didn't catch anyone's attention at the time.
We partially remedied the mistake at some point by introducing `metamta.reply-handler-domain`, which works as a default for all applications, but never cleaned this mess up.
Test Plan: Sent some mail from applications, verified it picked up appropraite reply handler domains.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12231
Summary:
Ref T7199. This prepares for an exciting new world of more powerful "!action" commands. In particular:
- We parse multiple commands per mail.
- We parse command arguments (these are currently not used).
- We parse commands at the beginning or end of mail.
Additionally:
- Do a quick modernization pass on all handlers.
- Break legacy compatibility with really hacky Facebook stuff (see T1992). They've theoretically been on notice for a year and a half, and their setup relies on calling very old reply handler APIs directly.
- Some of these handlers had some copy/paste fluff.
- The Releeph handler is unreachable, but fix it //in theory//.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to a file; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a legalpad document; used "!unsubscribe".
- Sent mail to a task; used various "!close", "!claim", "!assign", etc.
- Sent mail to a paste.
- Sent mail to a revision; used various "!reject", "!claim", etc.
- Tried to send mail to a pull request but it's not actually reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12230
Summary:
Ref T7199. Although this is useful for discovery, it's un-useful enough that we already have an option to disable it, and most applications do not provide any meaningful instructions.
Throwing it away makes it easier to move forward and lets us get rid of a config option.
This is becoming a more advanced/power-user feature anyway, and the new syntax will be significantly more complex and hard to explain with a one-liner. I'm currently thinking that I'll maybe make the "help" menu a dropdown and give it some options like:
+---+
| O |
+---+---------------------+
| Maniphest Documentation |
| Maniphest Email Actions |
+-------------------------+
Then you click the "Email Actions" thing and get a runtime-derived list of available options. Not sure if I'll actually build that, but I think we can fairly throw the in-mail instructions away even if we don't go in that specific direction.
Test Plan: Grepped for `replyHandlerInstructions`, got no hits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12229
Summary: Fixes T7088. Mainly this updates the documentation but I also snuck in tweaking how the domain reply handler is built. This does two main things -- makes the behavior consistent as some applications who didn't override this behavior would send out emails with reply tos AND makes it easier for us to deprecate the custom domain thing on a per application basis, which is just silly. On that note, the main documentation doesn't get into how this can be overridden, though I left in that mini blurb on the config setting itself. We could deprecate this harder and LOCK things if you want as well.
Test Plan: read docs, looked good. reasoned through re-factor
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7088
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11725
Summary: due to typehints, passing null is going to barf here. Ref D11564, ref T5039.
Test Plan: made an edit to a task from the web ui and it didnt fatal
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11571
Summary:
Fixes T5039. The trick / possibly lame part here is we only match 1 application email and its undefined which one. e.g. if a user emails us at address x, y, and z only one of those will pick up the mail. Ergo, don't let users define non-sensical herald conditions like "matches all". Also document what I think was non-intuitive about the code with an inline comment; we have to return an array with just a phid from an object and out of context it feels very "what the...???"
Note this needs to be deployed to other applications still, but I think its okay to close T5039 aggressively here since its done from a user story perspective.
Test Plan: set up a herald rule to flag tasks created as blue via app email x. sent an email to x via `bin/mail receive-test` and verified the task had the blue flag
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11564
Summary: Fixes T5604. This should fix some random bugs, lets us move forward more easily, and all that good stuff about killing code debt.
Test Plan:
- Conduit method maniphest.createtask
- verified creating user subscribed
- verified subscription transaction
- Conduit method maniphest.update
- verified subscribers set as specified to ccPHIDs parameter
- verified subscription transaction
- Herald
- verified herald rule to add subscriber worked
- verified no subscribers removed accidentally
- edit controller
- test create and verify author gets added IFF they put themselves in subscribers control box
- test update gets set to exactly what user enters
- lipsum generator'd tasks work
- bulk add subscribers works
- bulk remove subscriber works
- detail controller
- added myself by leaving a comment
- added another user via explicit action
- added another user via implicit mention
- task merge via search attach controller
- mail reply handler
- add subscriber via ./bin/mail receive-test
- unsubscribe via ./bin/mail receive-test
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5604
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10965
Summary: Fixes T5859. This doesn't change much, but makes the transaction record a little more accurate and activates stuff like `#hashtags` and `{F123}` causing policy associations.
Test Plan: Used `bin/mail receive-test` and mail receiver script to send bug mail, saw hashtags imply projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5859
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10229
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: This "Reply to comment, etc., etc." section got lost along the way at some point. Restore it for transaction mail.
Test Plan: Received mail from Maniphest with reply instructions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8700
Summary: Ref T1812. Moves most specialized status handling into `ManiphestTaskStatus`. The only real missing case is reports.
Test Plan:
Browsed most of the affected interfaces. Changed task status:
{F132697}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8579
Summary:
Ref T1812. This cleans up most of the easy hard-coded references to specific statuses:
- The "fixes" language moves into ManiphestTaskStatus.
- Add a method to list open statuses.
- Add a method to test if a status is open.
- Add a method to get default status for new tasks.
Test Plan: Browsed around, lint, grep, created, filtered and updated tasks.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1812
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8264
Summary: Drop the "Pro" bit.
Test Plan: Created/edited tasks, moved tasks around, generally made a mess. Nothing burned down.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7352
Summary:
also try to centralize some of the command parsing logic. note that differential is still an exception here. it uses a whitelist-style regex. i think long-term we should have this for every app but changing it seemed too big for this diff.
Fixes T3937.
Test Plan:
echo '!assign btrahan' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22 ; echo '!claim' | ./bin/mail receive-test --as xerxes --to T22
unit tests passed, though my new one is silly
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3937
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7307
Summary: These constants have moved to ManiphestTransaction. The other method only has one plausible callsite, just inline it.
Test Plan: Used Maniphest.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7113
Summary: Ref T2217. Pro is the new standard.
Test Plan: Lots of `grep`, made a pile of Maniphest views/edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7093
Summary: Ref T2217. Mail writes go through the new code now.
Test Plan: Shipped a bunch of mail in with `./bin/mail`, got reasonable edits as a result.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7086
Summary:
Ref T2217. This is the risky, hard part; everything after this should be smooth sailing. This is //mostly// clean, except:
- The old format would opportunistically combine a comment with some other transaction type if it could. We no longer do that, so:
- When migrating, "edit" + "comment" transactions need to be split in two.
- When editing now, we should no longer combine these transaction types.
- These changes are pretty straightforward and low-impact.
- This migration promotes "auxiliary field" data to the new CustomField/StandardField format, so that's not a straight migration either. The formats are very similar, though.
Broadly, this takes the same attack that the auth migration did: proxy all the code through to the new storage. `ManiphestTransaction` is now just an API on top of `ManiphestTransactionPro`, which is the new storage format. The two formats are very similar, so this was mostly a straight copy from one table to the other.
Test Plan:
- Without performing the migration, made a bunch of edits and comments on tasks and verified the new code works correctly.
- Droped the test data and performed the migration.
- Looked at the resulting data for obvious discrepancies.
- Looked at a bunch of tasks and their transaction history.
- Used Conduit to pull transaction data.
- Edited task description and clicked "View Details" on transaction.
- Used batch editor.
- Made a bunch more edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7068
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
2013-05-14 10:57:41 -07:00
Renamed from src/applications/maniphest/ManiphestReplyHandler.php (Browse further)
