Summary:
I've tried colors, italics, strike-through and this is a compromise between me and @leebyron.
NOTE: I don't want to disturb @epriestley from playing Diablo 3.
Test Plan: {F11439, size=full}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, leebyron
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2481
Summary:
- Move email to a separate table.
- Migrate existing email to new storage.
- Allow users to add and remove email addresses.
- Allow users to verify email addresses.
- Allow users to change their primary email address.
- Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes.
- There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific.
- This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up.
Not included here (next steps):
- Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains.
- Allow configuration to require validated email.
Test Plan:
This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change.
- From "Email Addresses" interface:
- Added new email (verified email verifications sent).
- Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent).
- Resent verification emails (verified they sent).
- Removed email.
- Tried to add already-owned email.
- Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin".
- Created new users with "add_user.php".
- Created new users with web interface.
- Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email.
- Reset password.
- Linked/unlinked oauth accounts.
- Logged in with oauth account.
- Logged in with email.
- Registered with Oauth account.
- Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email.
- Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
Summary:
- In practice, 'edit' has two modes, 'create' and 'edit'. These seem like they should map to "create a revision" and "update a revision", but they are completely different.
- We use the "create" mode:
- When creating a message from the working copy.
- When creating a message from a file.
- When creating a message from a commit.
- When creating a message from a user template.
- When creating a message from an "--edit"!
- We use the "edit" mode:
- ONLY when updating a revision with `arc diff --verbatim`.
- The only difference is in which fields may be overwritten. Under "create", all fields may be overwritten. Under "edit", only safe fields may be overwritten.
- The "Differential Revision" field currently does not render in either edit mode. This is wrong. Even though it can not be updated in the "edit" mode, it should still render in both modes. This is the only material change this revision makes.
- Without this change, when we "create" a new message from a working copy and the working copy has a "Differential Revision" field, we incorrectly discard it.
- The only field which does not render on edit modes now is "Reviewed by" (not "Reviewers"), which is correct, since we do not read the value.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff" to create/update revisions. Ran "arc diff --verbatim" to create/update revisions with implicit edits (with D2411). Ran "arc diff --edit" to update revisions with explicit edits.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed by: jungejason
CC: vrana, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2412
Summary:
This adds support to differential fields to display warnings before a revision
gets accepted. Since lint and unit are differential fields, the code for their
warnings was moved into their respective field specification classes, so there
is only one code path for warnings (lint, unit, or custom).
Test Plan:
Select 'Accept' on a revision with lint/unit warnings and see messages appear
like they used to. Change it back to 'Comment' and they go away. Repeat with
a revision without lint/unit warnings and see no warnings appear. Checked
darkconsole to see no errors due to this.
Reviewers: jungejason, epriestley, vrana
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2363
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around Differential.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2103
Summary:
When system agent adds a comment then he is added to CC.
When I amend and update then I get message "Commit message references nonexistent ..."
Test Plan: Update revision with system agent in CC.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: michalburger1, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2100
Summary:
Adds an optional "Auditors" field (like "Reviewers") to commit messages which gives installs a zero-config method for making audit requests.
This field does not appear on templates unless set, and is mostly ignored (but validated and preserved) by Differential.
It is then parsed by the daemons if present, and audit requests are pushed to valid users.
Test Plan: Made an "Auditors" commit and verified it was retained with "arc amend --show". Pushed it and verified the audit was triggered.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904, T880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1793
Summary:
Build the revision list table out of custom fields instead of hard-coding it, so
installs can add all sorts of zany things to it.
NOTE: You may need to implement sortFieldsForRevisionList() if you have a custom
DifferentialFieldSelector, or some fields might show up out of order.
This implementation will preserve the expected behavior:
public function sortFieldsForRevisionList(array $fields) {
$default = new DifferentialDefaultFieldSelector();
return $default->sortFieldsForRevisionList($fields);
}
Test Plan:
- Loaded differential revision list, identical to old list.
- Profiled page to verify the cost increase isn't significant (it's quite
small).
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, davidreuss, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T773, T729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1388
Summary:
We currently allow you to assign code review to disabled users, but
should not.
Test Plan:
- Created revisions with no reviewers and only disabled reviewers, was
appropriately warned.
- Looked at a disabled user handle link, was clearly informed.
- Tried to create a new revision with a disabled reviewer, was rebuffed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1429
Summary:
Allow entry of "CC: alincoln" to match user "ALincoln".
Put both variations in the map and try the exact case version first since we'll
also match email addresses and mailables, and theoretically some mailable might
have the same name as a user, as we're effectively abandoning restriction of
which characters can appear in usernames.
Test Plan: Created a local revision with a reviewer in CrAzY CaPs.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Maniphest Tasks: T697
Differential Revision: 1255
Summary:
See T643. We have some hard-coded checks in Arcanist for the existence of
'testPlan' and 'title', and don't properly validate those fields on the server.
Add a validation pass in the Conduit-based edit pathway.
In particular, this means that if you disable the "Test Plan" field, Arcanist
won't block you anymore.
Test Plan: Disabled Arcanist checks and ran "arc diff"; got blocked on the
server side.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Differential Revision: 1153
Summary:
I think this is the last major step -- use the fields to parse commit messages,
not a hard-coded list of stuff. This adds two primary methods to fields, one to
get all the labels they'll parse (so we can do "CC" and "CCs" and treat them as
the same field) and one to parse the string into a canonical representation
(e.g., lookup reviewers and such).
You'll need to impelement the one block of task-specific stuff I removed in
Facebook's task field:
list($pre_comment) = split(' -- ', $data);
$data = array_filter(preg_split('/[^\d]+/', $pre_comment));
foreach ($data as $k => $v) {
$data[$k] = (int)$v;
}
$data = array_unique($data);
break;
Otherwise I think this is clean.
Test Plan:
- Called the conduit method with various commit messages, parsed fields/errors
seemed correct.
- "arc diff"'d this diff onto localhost, then updated it.
- "arc amend"'d this diff.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 829
Summary:
When rendering commit messages, drive all the logic through field specification
classes instead of the hard-coded DifferentialCommitMessageData class. This
removes DifferentialCommitMessageData and support classes.
Note that this effectively reverts D546, and will cause a minor break for
Facebook (Task IDs will no longer render in commit messages generated by "arc
amend", and will not be editable via "arc diff --edit"). This can be resolved by
implementing the feature as a custom field. While I've been able to preserve the
task ID functionality elsewhere, I felt this implementation was too complex to
reasonably leave hooks for, and the break is pretty minor.
Test Plan:
- Made numerous calls to differential.getcommitmessage across many diffs in
various states, with and without 'edit' and with and without various field
overrides.
- General behavior seems correct (messages look accurate, and have the
expected information). Special fields like "Reviewed By" and "git-svn-id" seem
to work correctly.
- Edit behavior seems correct (edit mode shows all editable fields, hides
fields like "Reviewed By").
- Field overwrite behavior seems correct (overwritable fields show the correct
values when overwritten, ignore provided values otherwise).
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 814
Summary:
When we create or update a revision, we use a parsed commit message dictionary
to edit its fields. Drive consumption of the dictionary through custom fields
instead of hardcoding.
This requires adding some fields which don't really do anything right now to
cover fields which appear only in the commit message.
Test Plan: "arc diff"'d this revision against localhost, "arc diff"'d again to
update.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 811
Summary:
Move all the rest of the fields into the custom field schema, for revision
views.
I left a couple of stubs in here (willWriteRevision, didWriteRevision) since I'd
planned to do edits here too, but this diff is sort of big-ish already. I'll do
all the edit fields in the next revision.
Depends on D808.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited and conduit'ed some revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 809
Summary:
Move additional fields (which rely on loading handles) to the extensible field
classes and out of hardcoding in the controller.
Depends on D807.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited, and hit conduit for revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 808
Summary:
Differential has a bunch of display-only fields, implement them all as field
specifications instead of hard-coded fields.
Also add some more documentation and fix redundant string constants in blame
rev/revert plan fields.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited, and hit conduit for revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 807
Summary: Similar to D785 for Maniphest, expose auxiliary field values via
Conduit.
Test Plan: Ran revision.getinfo on a revision with aux fields, got them in the
response.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 802
Summary: Depends on D798. Extends custom fields and makes the vaguely useful:
they can appear on the edit and view interfaces. This does not integrate them
with commit messages yet; that's more complicated but I plan to do it shortly.
Test Plan: Implemented a custom field per P123, it correctly appears on the edit
interface, persists, validates, and shows up when viewing the revision.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 800
Summary:
Precursor to building this out to solve T343. This is similar to the Maniphest
fields we landed recently, although I think they're dissimilar enough that it
isn't worth going crazy trying to make them share code, at least for now.
This doesn't really do anything yet, just adds a storage object and a couple of
selector/field indirection classes.
Test Plan: Ran SQL upgrade script, created an aux field.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 798
