Summary: Ref T13250. See D20149. Mostly: clarify semantics. Partly: remove magic "null" behavior.
Test Plan: Poked around, but mostly just inspection since these are pretty much one-for-one.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: yelirekim
Maniphest Tasks: T13250
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20154
Summary:
Fixes T12564. We already had some code which seems to deal with this properly, it just wasn't getting used.
Assign each application-level notification a unique ID, then ignore messages with duplicate IDs.
Test Plan:
- In browser A, loaded `/T123`.
- In browser B, loaded `/T123`.
- Made a comment as B.
- Saw notification as A.
- Mashed "Replay" a bunch.
- Before patch: piles of duplicate notifications.
- After patch: no duplicates.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12564
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17710
Summary:
Ref T6915. This allows multiple notification servers to talk to each other:
- Every server has a list of every other server, including itself.
- Every server generates a unique fingerprint at startup, like "XjeHuPKPBKHUmXkB".
- Every time a server gets a message, it marks it with its personal fingerprint, then sends it to every other server.
- Servers do not retransmit messages that they've already seen (already marked with their fingerprint).
- Servers learn other servers' fingerprints after they send them a message, and stop sending them messages they've already seen.
This is pretty crude, and the first message to a cluster will transmit N^2 times, but N is going to be like 3 or 4 in even the most extreme cases for a very long time.
The fingerprinting stops cycles, and stops servers from sending themselves copies of messages.
We don't need to do anything more sophisticated than this because it's fine if some notifications get lost when a server dies. Clients will reconnect after a short period of time and life will continue.
Test Plan:
- Wrote two server configs.
- Started two servers.
- Told Phabricator about all four services.
- Loaded Chrome and Safari.
- Saw them connect to different servers.
- Sent messages in one, got notifications in the other (magic!).
- Saw the fingerprinting stuff work on the console, no infinite retransmission of messages, etc.
(This pretty much just worked when I ran it the first time so I probably missed something?)
{F1218835}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6915
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15711
Summary:
Fixes T10783 (what little of it remains). Ref T10697.
Aphlict currently uses request paths for two different things:
- multi-tenant instancing in the Phacility cluster (each instance gets its own namespace within an Aphlict server);
- some users configure nginx and apache to do proxying or SSL termination based on the path.
Currently, these can collide.
Put a "~" before the instance name to make it unambiguous. At some point we can possibly just use a GET parameter, but I think there was some reason I didn't do that originally and this sequence of changes is disruptive enough already.
Test Plan: Saw local Aphlict unambiguously recognize "local.phacility.com" as instance "local", with a "~"-style URI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10697, T10783
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15705
Summary:
Fixes T10697. This finishes bringing the rest of the config up to cluster power levels.
Phabricator is now given an arbitrarily long list of notification servers.
Each Aphlict server is given an arbitrarily long list of ports to run services on.
Users are free to make them meet in the middle by proxying whatever they want to whatever else they want.
This should also accommodate clustering fairly easily in the future.
Also rewrote the status UI and changed a million other things. 🐗
Test Plan:
{F1217864}
{F1217865}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10697
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15703
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: This port is always HTTP, so use HTTP even if users have set the URI to "https".
Test Plan: Launched server and hit status page, status good.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11799
Summary:
Fixes T7130. Fixes T7041. Fixes T7012.
Major change here is partitioning clients. In the Phacility cluster, being able to get a huge pile of instances on a single server -- without needing to run a process per instance -- is desirable.
To accomplish this, just bucket clients by the path they connect with. This will let us set client URIs to `/instancename/` and then route connections to a small set of servers. This degrades cleanly in the common case and has no effect on installs which don't do instancing.
Also fix two unrelated issues:
- Fix the timeouts, which were incorrectly initializing in `open()` (which is called during reconnect, causing them to reset every time). Instead, initialize in the constructor. Cap timeout at 5 minutes.
- Probably fix subscriptions, which were using a property with an object definition. Since this is by-ref, all concrete instances of the object share the same property, so all users would be subscribed to everything. Probably.
Test Plan:
- Hit notification status page, saw version bump and instance/path name.
- Saw instance/path name in client and server logs.
- Stopped server, saw reconnects after 2, 4, 16, ... seconds.
- Sent test notification; received test notification.
- Didn't explicitly test the subscription thing but it should be obvious by looking at `/notification/status/` shortly after a push.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7041, T7012, T7130
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11769
Summary: Ref T5651. Currently, the Aphlict server returns either `200 OKAY` or `400 Bad Request`. We could return more specific errors in some cases and this may assist with debugging.
Test Plan:
Sent myself a test notification at `/notification/status/` and saw the Aphlict server process the request (running in debug mode). Also poked around with `curl`:
```
> curl http://localhost:22281/
405 Method Not Allowed
> curl http://localhost:22281/ -d ""
400 Bad Request
> curl http://localhost:22281/foobar/
404 Not Found
```
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5651
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9967
Summary:
Ref T4083. This needs some work (mostly in the Conpherence JS itself), but is sort of functional. In particular:
- On thread pages, add the thread as a `pageObject`.
- After updating a thread, send a new "message" event to the server.
- Share a little more event posting code.
- In the browser, use event dispatch to respond to events.
- Add a listener for the new event type.
- Update conpherence threads (this part is really yucky).
Test Plan: With multiple browser windows / browsers open, posted a message to a thread, and saw it update everywhere.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9486
Summary:
Currently, the Aphlict server will crash if invalid JSON data is `POST`ed to it. I have fixed this to, instead, return a 400. Also made some minor formatting changes.
Ref T4324. Ref T5284. Also, modify the data structure that is passed around (i.e. `POST`ed to the Aphlict server and broadcast to the Aphlict clients) to include the subscribers. Initially, I figured that we shouldn't expose this information to the clients... however, it is necessary for T4324 that the `AphlictMaster` is able to route a notification to the appropriate clients.
Test Plan:
Making the following `curl` request: `curl --data "{" http://localhost:22281/`.
**Before**
```
sudo ./bin/aphlict debug
Starting Aphlict server in foreground...
Launching server:
$ 'nodejs' '/usr/src/phabricator/src/applications/aphlict/management/../../../../support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict'
[Wed Jun 11 2014 17:07:51 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 2033)
[Wed Jun 11 2014 17:07:55 GMT+0000 (UTC)]
<<< UNCAUGHT EXCEPTION! >>>
SyntaxError: Unexpected end of input
>>> Server exited!
```
**After**
(No output... the bad JSON is caught and a 400 is returned)
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4324, T5284
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9480
Summary:
Ref T4324. As well as sending the key for the notification, also publish the notification type and a list of subscribers to the Aphlict server.
The idea here is that the Aphlict server passes anything within the `data` key to the clients, whereas other keys (such as `subscribers`) will be used by the server to determine where the notifications should be routed.
Note that these changes don't do anything useful, but are a prerequisite for further work on T4324.
Test Plan:
Sent myself test notifications at `/notification/status/`. Also inspected the Aphlict server debug output:
```
> sudo ./bin/aphlict --foreground
Starting server in foreground, ignoring pidfile...
Launching server:
$ node '/usr/src/phabricator/support/aphlict/server/aphlict_server.js' --port='22280' --admin='22281' --host='localhost' --user='aphlict' --log='/var/log/aphlict.log'
[Thu Jun 05 2014 18:38:14 GMT+0000 (UTC)] Started Server (PID 15437)
[Thu Jun 05 2014 18:38:16 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <FlashPolicy> Policy Request From ::ffff:10.0.0.1
[Thu Jun 05 2014 18:38:16 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Connected from ::ffff:10.0.0.1
[Thu Jun 05 2014 18:38:19 GMT+0000 (UTC)] notification: {"data":{"key":"6021516228036848559","type":"notification"},"subscribers":["PHID-USER-cb5af6p4oepy5tlgqypi"]}
[Thu Jun 05 2014 18:38:19 GMT+0000 (UTC)] <Listener/1> Wrote Message
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9396
Summary:
Ref T4324. Currently, notifications data is `POST`ed to the Aphlict server in the `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` format. This works fine for simple data but is problematic for nested data. For example:
```lang=php
array(
'data' => array(
'key' => '6021329908492455737',
'type' => 'PhabricatorNotificationAdHocFeedStory',
),
'subscribers' => array(
'PHID-USER-y7ofqm276ejs62yqghge',
),
);
```
Is encoded as `data%5Bkey%5D=6021329908492455737&data%5Btype%5D=PhabricatorNotificationAdHocFeedStory&subscribers%5B0%5D=PHID-USER-y7ofqm276ejs62yqghge`. This string is then (incorrectly) decoded by `querystring.parse` as:
```lang=javascript
> querystring.parse('data%5Bkey%5D=6021329908492455737&data%5Btype%5D=PhabricatorNotificationAdHocFeedStory&subscribers%5B0%5D=PHID-USER-y7ofqm276ejs62yqghge');
{ 'data[key]': '6021329908492455737',
'data[type]': 'PhabricatorNotificationAdHocFeedStory',
'subscribers[0]': 'PHID-USER-y7ofqm276ejs62yqghge' }
```
Test Plan: Sent test notifications from `/notification/status/` and verified that the notifications still worked.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9386
Summary:
Ref T4324. The server code is probably going to get a fair amount more complicated, so allow it to load Javelin classes in a mostly-reasonable way.
This integration has a few warts, but should be good enough to let us manage complexity through the next iteration of the server.
(Mostly I just want the concicse Javelin mechanism for defining new classes.)
Version bump is just so I can figure stuff out if this creates any issues for users based on which version of things they're running.
Test Plan: Started server, posted some messages through it.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8253
Summary: Ref T4324. Centralize communication with the notification server. This will probably get less messy eventually.
Test Plan: Posted some messages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8252
Summary: Ref T4324. Add some version information to the server status output, and setup checks to test for an unreachable or out-of-date server.
Test Plan:
- With server down, hit reasonable setup check.
- With server up and at a bad version, hit reasonable setup check.
- Viewed `/notification/status/`.
- The CSS thing fixes this:
{F114445}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4324
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8251
