Summary:
Ref T8116. A version has:
- a package (like "Arcanist") which it belongs to;
- a name (like "v3.1.5").
The name is immutable and unique, like the package key and publisher key.
Policy stuff:
- Versions have the exact same policies as their packages.
- You must be able to edit a package to create new versions of it.
This is still entirely uninteresting.
Test Plan: {F1731703}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16316
Summary:
Ref T8116. A package has:
- a publisher (like "Phacility"), from the previous revision;
- a name (like "Arcanist");
- a package key (like "arcanist").
The package key is immutable, like the publisher key.
This gives a package a full key like "phacility/arcanist".
Policy stuff:
- You must be able to view a publisher to view a package (currently, everyone can always see all publishers).
- You must be able to edit a publisher to create a new package inside it.
- Packages have separate view/edit permissions.
This still does nothing interesting.
Test Plan: {F1731663}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: eadler
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16315
Summary:
Ref T8116. Partially scavenged from D14152. This roughs in a new Packages application for Arcanist extensions and third-party applications, and adds a "Publisher" object.
A "Publisher" represents an individual or entity who is publishing a package, like "Phacility". It's explicitly //not// necessarily the original author -- just the primary entity vouching for the safety of the code.
A publisher just has a name and a unique key for now. For example, Phacility might have "Phacility" and "phacility", respectively.
Unique keys are immutable, e.g., the package "phacility/arcanist" will always be exactly the same package by exactly the same publisher.
Test Plan: {F1731621}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16314
