Summary:
Add a new "Create Subtask" action that allows you to quickly split a task into
dependent subtasks, using the parent task as a template.
Followups:
- Cause "workflow=<parent>" to change "Create Another Task" into "Create
Another Subtask" (after D736).
- Show parent tasks (requires some schema stuff).
Test Plan:
- Created a new task.
- Created a new subtask.
Reviewed By: codeblock
Reviewers: hunterbridges, codeblock, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, codeblock
Differential Revision: 774
Summary:
This allows you to edit dependencies. It is a better patch than it used to be.
It depends on D725.
- If you create a cycle, it just throws an exception and aborts the workflow.
It should not do this.
- Tasks which depend on the current task aren't shown in the UI. Need to add a
new table for this.
- Transaction text says "attached Task" but should probably say "added a
dependency on task".
Test Plan: Created valid and invalid dependencies between tasks. Created valid
and invalid dependencies between revisions.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: davidreuss, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Commenters: codeblock
CC: aran, codeblock, tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 595
Summary:
Allow duplicate tasks to be selected and merged in Maniphest.
I didn't create a separate transaction type for this because that implies a
bunch of really complicated rules which I don't want to sort out right now
(e.g., do we need to do cycle detection for merges? If so, what do we do when we
detect a cycle?) since I think it's unnecessary to get right for the initial
implementation (my Tasks merge implementation was similar to this and worked
quite well) and if/when we eventually need the metadata to be available in a
computer-readable form that need should inform the implementation.
Plenty of room for improvement here, of course.
Test Plan:
Merged duplicate tasks, tried to perform invalid merge operations (e.g., merge a
task into itself).
Tested existing attach workflows (task -> revision, revision -> task).
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: anjali, aran
Differential Revision: 459
Summary:
Make 'gd' an explicit optional dependency, test for it in setup, and make the
software behave correctly if it is not available.
When generating file thumnails, provide reasonable defaults and behavior for
non-image files.
Test Plan:
Uploaded text files, pdf files, etc., and got real thumbnails instead of a
broken image.
Simulated setup and gd failures and walked through setup process and image
fallback for thumbnails.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: toulouse, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 446
Summary:
ReviewBoard has a fancier version of this feature that's more granular -- the
keyboard can focus on individual changes. I think that's good and intend to
implement something similar, but this gets us a step closer and gets rid of some
of the bookkeeping stuff like making shortcuts discoverable.
(I have another brnach with Maniphest merging which also uses fatcow icons,
which is why the README seems a little out of context.)
Test Plan:
Used "j" and "k" to jump between changesets. Pressed "?" and got a list of
available shortcuts.
Reviewed By: tuomaspelkonen
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: moskov, aran, epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 412
Summary:
- Provide a red version of the logo for the admin view.
- Make selected tabs in the admin view look correct.
- Fix a Chrome styling issue where the username and "settings" would have
weird offsets.
Test Plan:
Loaded Phabricator in chrome and clicked around tabs of an admin interface.
Hovered over logo.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: cadamo, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 371
Summary:
I ran a 99designs contest and this gear-eye thing was actually pretty okay. All
this stuff needs tweaks but at least it won't render with a big square on
windows anymore.
Test Plan:
Looked at menu, it seemed slightly more legitimate and designey than before?
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, jungejason, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 363
