Summary:
Ref T4266. This possibly moves us towards getting reasonable timeline grouping:
- Always sort icon stories to the top.
- Render one timestamp for the whole group, using the earliest tranaction date.
- Move any "Edit", "Edited", or "Preview" links to the top.
- Rendering just one timestamp implicitly fixes the JS issues.
- For stories without an icon, indent them if any member of the group has an icon.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, wotte
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7842
Summary: TimelineView on Maniphest is often kind of hard to parse because related/simultaneous transactions aren't visually grouped. Allow grouping. I'm going to clean this up a little bit more.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7107
Summary:
Fixes T3698. Sometimes views need to render differently depending on whether they contain content or not. The existing approach for this is `isEmptyContent()`, which doesn't work well and is sort of hacky (it implies double-rendering content, which is not always free or side-effect free).
Instead, provide a test for an element without children. This test is powerful enough to catch the easy cases of `null`, etc., and just do the expected thing, but will not catch a View which is reduced upon rendering. Since this is rare and we have no actual need for it today, just accept that as a limitation.
Test Plan:
Viewed Timeline and Feed UI examples. Viewed Feed (feed), Pholio (timelineview), and Differential (old transactionview).
{F53915}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6718
Summary:
We have a few interfaces where add "Edit", "Delete" or some other action to a list. Currently, this happens via icons, but these are cumbersome and weird, are inconsistent, can't be workflow'd, are hard to hit on desktops and virtually impossible to hit on mobile, and generally just feel iffy to me. Prominent examples are Projects and Flags. I'd like to try adding an "edit" action to Maniphest (to provide quick edit from list views, basically). It looks like some of Releeph would benefit here, as well.
Instead, provide first-class actions:
{F42978}
They produce targets which my meaty ham-fists can plausibly hit on mobile, too:
{F42979}
(We could do some kind of swipe-to-expose thing eventually, but I think putting them by default is OK?)
Test Plan: Added UIExamples. Checked desktop/mobile.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5890
Summary:
- Grouping inline comments made us render `array(null)` for the content of a single comment. Detect that this corresponds to empty text.
- Don't try to mention-subscribe automatic subscribers, like the author.
Test Plan: Tried to mention-subscribe the author, saw no "x subscribed y" transaction generate. Added a real subscriber, saw no empty content render.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5315
Summary: After D5305, this method does nothing since we automatically figure out what we need to do.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a page with the main menu on it (MainMenuView).
- Viewed a revision with transactions on it (TransactionView).
- Viewed timeline UIExample (TimelineView, TimelineEventView).
- Viewed a revision (PropertyListView).
- Viewed a profile (ProfileHeaderView).
- Viewed Pholio list (PinboardView, PinboardItemView).
- Viewed Config (ObjectItemView, ObjectItemListView).
- Viewed Home (MenuView).
- Viewed a revision (HeaderView, CrumbsView, ActionListView).
- Viewed a revision with an inline comment (anchorview).
- Viewed a Phriction diff page (AphrontCrumbsView).
- Filed T2721 to get rid of this.
- Looked at Pholio and made inlines and comments (mockimages, pholioinlinecomment/save/edit).
- Looked at conpherences.
- Browsed around.
Reviewers: chad, vrana
Reviewed By: chad
CC: edward, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5307
Summary: `renderChildren()` now returns array which isn't ideal but I prefer it to having two methods.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4910
Summary: They are same because render() returns safe HTML and raw strings are automatically escaped.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4909
Summary:
I like this abstraction better.
Result of `phutil_implode_html()` may be also used as a param of `hsprintf()`.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4904
Summary: Some content might be broken but it's hard to test since JS/Ajax is also a bit broken.
Test Plan: Looked at timeline examples.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4683
Summary:
- Implements `javelin_tag()`, which is `javelin_render_tag()` on top of `phutil_tag()` instead of `phutil_render_tag()`.
- Manually converts all or almost all of the trivial callsites.
Test Plan:
- Site does not seem any more broken than before.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4639
Summary:
Created with spatch:
lang=diff
- phutil_render_tag
+ phutil_tag
(X, Y, '...')
Then searched for `&` and `<` in the output and replaced them.
Test Plan: Loaded homepage.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4503
Summary:
Implements previews for Macros and Pholio.
(Design is nonfinal -- kind of split the difference between `diff_full_view.png`, laziness, and space concerns. Next couple diffs will add more stuff here.)
Test Plan: {F28055}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4246
Summary:
For text like "MMM", make the right parts of the element scroll.
Also fixed a couple of 1px issues here and there.
Test Plan: Added, viewed UIExamples.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4152
Summary: When possible, replace the edited or deleted transaction inline using Ajax.
Test Plan: Repeatedly edited and deleted transactions. Clicked their anchors to verify anchors were correctly preserved.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1082
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4150
Summary:
Allows you to edit or delete comments in appplications which support ApplicationTransactions.
UI/UX stuff:
- The dialogs are rough but I want to do a dialog design pass more generally, @chad has some mocks.
- When you add new mentions via edit, they don't currently count as mentions. I'm not sure what I want to do about this.
- When you edit or delete a comment, we do not publish any notifications about it. I think this is reasonable.
- I didn't separate "delete" out versus "edit"; I assume it will be reasonably intuitive that deleting all the text deletes effectively deletes the comment. I also want to discourage deletion somewhat (we still show the transaction, just show that the comment has been deleted).
Test Plan:
Transaction view, note "Edit" and "Edited" links:
{F26914}
Edit view, has some design issues but I want to do a pass on dialogs in general:
{F26915}
History view:
{F26913}
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1082
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4149
Summary: I got rid of the "#4" and just linked the timestamps.
Test Plan: {F26826}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4138
Summary:
This is still rough and not completely accurate to the mocks (and the mobile view is quite crude and mostly just "hey this technically works"), but I want to build Pholio on top of it rather than building it on something else and then swapping it out later and the API is reasonable enough.
This should probably be called `PhabricatorTransactionView` but we already have one of those. I might juggle the names in a future diff.
Test Plan:
Desktop
{F22352}
Mobile
{F22351}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2097
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3833
