Summary:
Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep.
`PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments.
The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern.
Try to clean this up:
- Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented.
- Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline.
- Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me.
- If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack.
This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation.
Test Plan:
- Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments.
- Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data").
- Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
Summary: There is still some general buginess with answer comments, trying to work them out. This replaces timeline rendering into one offs (less performant) but resolves many bugs. Or if there is a more performant way, let me know? Also when leaving an answer comment, you currently get redirected back to the page, but both the comment form is still populated and you dont see your answer without a reload. I feel like I'm missing some magical parameter to pass, so just redirecting back to the question itself.
Test Plan: Leave lots of answer comments.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13946
Summary: Update all Ponder callsites.
Test Plan: New Question, New Comment, New Answer, Vote Up and Down
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13679
Summary:
Ref T4712. Specifically...
- Differential
- needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented
- Audit
- needed getApplicationTransactionViewObject() implemented
- Repository
- one object needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true)
- Ponder
- BONUS BUG FIX - leaving a comment on an answer had a bad redirect URI
- both PonderQuestion and PonderAnswer needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) on both "history" controllers
- left a "TODO" on buildAnswers on the question view controller, which is non-standard and should be re-written eventually
- Phortune
- BONUS BUG FIX - fix new user "createNewAccount" code to not fatal
- PhortuneAccount, PhortuneMerchant, and PhortuneCart needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) on Account view, merchant view, and cart view controller
- Fund
- Legalpad
- Nuance
- NuanceSource needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- Releeph (this product is kind of a mess...)
- HACKQUEST - had to manually create an arcanist project to even be able to make a "product" and get started...!
- BONUS BUG FIX - make sure to "setName" on product edit
- ReleephProject (should be ReleepProduct...?), ReleephBranch, and ReleepRequest needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- Harbormaster
- HarbormasterBuildable, HarbormasterBuild, HarbormasterBuildPlan, and HarbormasterBuildStep all needed PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface implemented
- setShouldTerminate(true) all over the place
Test Plan: foreach application, viewed the timeline(s) and made sure they still rendered
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10925
Summary: ...also re-jiggers all the anchor stuff to use $xaction ID. This seemed like the simplest way once I got in the code, as well as having nice properties for if / when we want to re-add some ajax stuff since the ID is a pretty solid piece of data to key off. Fixes T6083.
Test Plan: mentioned DX in private DX+1. Could see on DX the mention as me and not as the other user. For transactions, I left a comment on Paste and it worked, and I edited an existing transaction and it worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10488
Summary:
Fixes T5424.
- One concrete issue: drafts were not being cleared properly because `__draft__` was not set on submission. This (mostly) fixes phantom drafts.
- This ajax comment magic feels weird and floaty and generally has problems. For example, if you add subscribers or inlines, all the stuff on the page which represents those won't update automatically. Instead, just reload. Maybe we'll ajax this stuff some day, but it feels like a net negative for now.
- Also remove it from other applications where it's currently used.
- Fix an issue with inline previews.
Test Plan: Made some comments on a mock, everything worked normally like I expected it to.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9649
Summary:
Ref T3373. This is still pretty messy:
- The JS bugs out a bit with multiple primary object PHIDs on a single page. I'll fix this in a followup.
- The comment form itself is enormous, I'll restore some show/hide stuff in a followup.
Test Plan: Added answer comments in Ponder.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6608
