Summary:
Fixes T12406. When importing commits, we automatically add auditors if the message lists "Auditors: username".
If the list of auditors includes the commit author, this edit fails because you can't audit your own commits (previously, you sometimes could and/or we didn't validate).
Instead, just ignore "Auditors: author".
Test Plan:
- Made a commit with "Auditors: epriestley".
- Pushed it.
- Saw the HeraldWorker get stuck with the error in T12406.
- Applied the change; worker now succeeded.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: alexmv
Maniphest Tasks: T12406
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17507
Summary: Ref T10978. This code (mostly related to the old ADD_AUDIT transaction and some to the "store English text in the database" audit reasons) is no longer reachable.
Test Plan:
Grepped for removed symbols:
- withAuditStatus
- getActionNameMap (unrelated callsites exist)
- getActionName (unrelated callsites exist)
- getActionPastTenseVerb
- addAuditReason
- getAuditReasons
- auditReasonMap
Also audited some commits.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17267
Summary:
Ref T10978. Updates how we implement "Auditors: ..." in commit messages:
- Use the same parsing code as everything else.
- (Also: parse package names.)
- Use the new transaction code.
Also, fix some UI strings.
Test Plan: Used `bin/repository reparse --herald <commit>` to re-run this code on commits with various messages (valid Auditors, invalid Auditors, no Auditors). Saw appropriate auditors added in the UI.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17262
Summary:
Ref T10978. Currently, too many "This audit now <something something>" transactions are posting, because this strict `===` check is failing to detect that the audit is already in the same state.
This is because audit states are currently integers, and saving an integer to the database and then reading it back turns it into a string. This is a whole separate can of worms. For now, just weaken the comparison. I'd eventually like to use string constants here instead of integer constants.
Test Plan:
Commented on a "no audit required" commit, didn't see a double "this doesn't need audit" transaction anymore.
Also made a legit state change and did see a state transaction.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10978
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17258
Summary:
Fixes T2393. This allows authors to explicitly say "I think I fixed everything, please accept my commit now thank you".
Also improves behavior of "re-accept" and "re-reject" after new auditors you have authority over get added.
Test Plan:
- Kicked a commit back and forth between an author and auditor by alternately using "Request Verification" and "Raise Concern".
- Verified it showed up properly in bucketing for both users.
- Accepted, added a project, accepted again (works now; didn't before).
- Audited on behalf of projects / packages.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2393
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17252
Summary:
Ref T2393. We had three copies of this code ("which packages/projects can a user accept on behalf of?"). I removed one in D17250. This consolidates the other two.
This still isn't perfect and it should probably live in a Query or something some day, but there's some weird stuff going on with the viewer in the editor context, and at least the code handles the viewer correctly now and isn't living somewhere weird and totally unrelated to auditing, and the callsites don't need to do a bunch of extra work.
This also moves towards fixing the "re-accept if you've already accepted but then a new package you have authority over was added" bug, which we fixed recently in Differential. This should be less common in Audit, but should still be fixed.
Test Plan: Viewed and audited commits with a mixture of user, package, and project auditors. Saw actions apply to the expected set of auditors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2393
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17251
Summary:
Ref T2393. This code is no longer reachable (we never had an API for auditing in Diffusion) and unused. Clean it up before implementing new states/actions.
(Note that code for displaying these transactions still needs to stick around for a bit, we'll just never apply new ones from here on out. They've been replaced with modular transactions.)
Test Plan: Grepped for usage, commentd on / audited a commit.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2393
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17250
Summary: Ref T2393. This adds a state-change transaction hint to Audit, like we have in Differential. This is partly for consistency and partly to make it more clear what should happen next.
Test Plan: {F2477848}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2393
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17243
Summary:
Fixes T6630. Long ago, "Audit", "Diffusion" and "Repositories" were three totally separate applications.
This separation isn't useful and the three rapidly became intertwined. Ideally, they would all be one application.
This doesn't take us quite that far, but Audit no longer has any controllers and has little actual behavior.
The "Audit" screen has always just been a SearchEngine view of commits with some filters on it, and this formalizes that and puts a link to it in Diffusion. (This view has other uses, too.)
Test Plan:
- Accessed audit from home page.
- Accessed audit/commits from Diffusion.
- Could no longer uninstall Audit on its own.
- Grepped for `/audit/` and `AuditApplication`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6630
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17186
Summary:
Fixes T11610. Clean up some sketchy old code from long ago.
If you had rules that use conditions like "Accepted revision exists" and ran them in the test console, we'd never load the "CommitData" and fatal.
Instead, load CommitData in `newTestAdapter()` and generally make these pathways a little more modern.
Test Plan:
- Wrote an "Accepted Revision Exists" rule.
- Ran a commit in the test console.
- Before patch, got fatal from T11610.
- After patch, got clean test result.
- Also pushed a commit and reviewed the transcript to make sure the rule ran properly.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11610
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16522
Summary:
Ref T11035. This only fixes half of the issue: comment editing has been fixed, but normal transactions which edit things like descriptions haven't yet.
The normal edits aren't fixed because the "oldValues" are populated too late. The code should start working once they get populated sooner, but I don't want to jump the gun on that since it'll probably have some spooky effects. I have some other transaction changes coming down the pipe which should provide a better context for testing "oldValue" population order.
Test Plan:
- Mentioned `@dog` in a comment.
- Removed `@dog` as a subscriber.
- Edited the comment, adding some unrelated text at the end (e.g., fixing a typo).
- Before change: `@dog` re-added as subscriber.
- After change: no re-add.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16108
Summary:
Fixes T11017. We add packages as "uninteresting" auditors so that we can query commits by package later.
Until recently, this didn't matter because we didn't send mail to packages. But now we do, so stop mailing them when they don't actually need to do anything.
Test Plan:
- Made a commit to a file which was part of a package but which I owned (so it does not trigger auditing).
- `var_dump()`'d mail "To:" PHIDs.
- Before patch: included package.
- After patch: no package.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11017
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15970
Summary:
Ref T10939. Fixes T10174. We can currently trigger "uninteresting" auditors in two ways:
- Packages with auditing disabled ("NONE" audits).
- Packages with auditing enabled, but they don't need an audit (e.g., author is a pacakge owner; "NOT REQUIRED" audits).
These audits aren't interesting (we only write them so we can list "commits in this package" from other UIs) but right now they take up the audit slot. In particular:
- They show in the UI, but are generally useless/confusing nowadays. The actual table of contents does a better job of just showing "which packages do these paths belong to" now, and shows all packages for each path.
- They block Herald from adding real auditors.
Change this:
- Don't show uninteresting auditors.
- Let Herald upgrade uninteresting auditors into real auditors.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/repository reparse --owners <commit> --force`, and `--herald` to trigger Owners and Herald rules.
- With a package with auditing disabled, triggered a "None" audit and saw it no longer appear in the UI with the patch applied.
- With a package with auditing disabled, added a Herald rule to trigger an audit. With the patch, saw it go through and upgrade the audit to "Audit Required".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10174, T10939
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15940
Summary:
Fixes T10519. Two issues:
First, the acting user wasn't explicitly included in the mail. This usually didn't matter, but could matter if you unsubscribed and then interacted.
Second, we had some logic which tried to hide redundant "added inline comment" transactions, but could hide them inappropriately. In particular, if another action (like a subscribe) was present in the same group, we could hide the inlines because of that other transaction, then //also// hide the subscribe. This particular issue is likely an unintended consequence of hiding self-subscribes.
Instead of hiding inlines if //anything else// happened, hide them only if:
- there is another "added a comment" transaction; or
- there is another "added an inline comment" transaction.
This prevents the root issue in T10519 (incorrectly hiding every transaction, and thus not sending the mail) and should generally make behavior a little more consistent and future-proof.
Test Plan:
- Submitted //only// an inline comment on a commit I had not previously interacted with.
- Before patch: no mail was generated (entire mail was improperly hidden).
- After patch: got some mail with my comment.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10519
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15407
Summary: Ref T4245. These are all straightforward to remove.
Test Plan:
- Edited paths in a package.
- Ran `bin/audit delete --repositories ...` with various identifiers.
- Searched by repository for `R3`, `rAAAA` in Harbormaster.
- Did a Herald dry run on a commit.
- Browsed commits, made comments.
- Viewed a Releeph product list.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14927
Summary:
Ref T9845. In Differential, this is not a remarkup block -- it's a mail section. `addTextSection()` has special magic behavior when handed a prebuilt section since D9375.
Swapping to `addRemarkupSection()` causes the error in T9845 and renders nothing in the comment section.
Even if it were a block of text, it would not be appropriate to add it as remarkup. This would incorrectly render comments in files like `__init__.py`, which are common on Python (the filename would render as "__init__.py"). Okay that's a bad example since it works fine but, uh, a file named `T123` would be no good or whatever.
I'll realign T9845 to clean this up and fix it more durably.
Test Plan: Sent myself some mail with inline comments, saw them in the mail.
Reviewers: joshuaspence, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9845
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14589
Summary: Ref T992. I noticed that `ManiphestTask` mail doesn't render Remarkup properly (instead, it renders Remarkup literally). I //think// this is because the code calls `addTextSection()` rather than `addRemarkupSection()`.
Test Plan: Created a new Maniphest Task and saw Remarkup in the generated self-email (inspect the email contents with `./bin/mail show-outbound`). I didn't test the other affected applications.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T992
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14511
Summary:
Ref T8672. Ref T9187. Root issue in at least one case is:
- User makes a commit including a file with some non-UTF8 text (say, a Japanese file full of Shift-JIS).
- We pass the file to the TransactionEditor so it can inline or attach the patch if the server is configured for these things.
- When inlining patches, we convert them to UTF8 before inlining. We must do this since the rest of the mail is UTF8.
- When attaching patches, we send them in the original encoding (as file attachments). This is correct, and means we need to give the worker the raw patch in whatever encoding it was originally in: we can't just convert it to utf8 earlier, or we'd attach the wrong patch in some cases.
- TransactionEditor does its thing (e.g., creates the commit), then gets ready to send mail about whatever it did.
- The publishing work now happens in the daemon queue, so we prepare to queue a PublishWorker and pass it the patch (with some other data).
- When we queue workers, we serialize the state data with JSON.
So far, so good. But this is where things go wrong:
- JSON can't encode binary data, and can't encode Shift-JIS. The encoding silently fails and we ignore it.
Then we get to the worker, and things go wrong-er:
- Since the data is bad, we fatal. This isn't a permanent failure, so we continue retrying the task indefinitely.
This applies several fixes:
# When queueing tasks, fail loudly when JSON encoding fails.
# In the worker, fail permanently when data can't be decoded.
# Allow Editors to specify that some of their data is binary and needs special handling.
This is fairly messy, but some simpler alternatives don't seem like good ways forward:
- We can't convert to UTF8 earlier, because we need the original raw patch when adding it as an attachment.
- We could encode //only// this field, but I suspect some other fields will also need attention, so that adding a mechanism will be worthwhile. In particular, I suspect filenames //may// be causing a similar problem in some cases.
- We could convert task data to always use a serialize()-based binary safe encoding, but this is a larger change and I think it's correct that things are UTF8 by default, even if it makes a bit of a mess. I'd rather have an explicit mess like this than a lot of binary data floating around.
The change to make `LiskDAO` will almost certainly catch some other problems too, so I'm going to hold this until after `stable` is cut. These problems were existing problems (i.e., the code was previously breaking or destroying data) so it's definitely correct to catch them, but this will make the problems much more obvious/urgent than they previously were.
Test Plan:
- Created a commit with a bunch of Shift-JIS stuff in a file.
- Tried to import it.
Prior to patch:
- Broken PublishWorker with distant, irrelevant error message.
With patch partially applied (only new error checking):
- Explicit, local error message about bad key in serialized data.
With patch fully applied:
- Import went fine and mail generated.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: devurandom, nevogd
Maniphest Tasks: T8672, T9187
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13939
Summary: Ref T8455. Use the standard actions in commit rules, instead of a custom action.
Test Plan: Wrote an "add cc" Herald rule for commits, pushed a commit, saw the rule fire correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8455
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13181
This fixes this, which only crops up some of the time:
```
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] [2015-06-04 03:03:10] EXCEPTION: (PhutilProxyException) Error while executing Task ID 902271. {>} (PhabricatorDataNotAttachedException) Attempting to access attached data on PhabricatorRepositoryCommit (via getCommitData()), but the data is not actually attached. Before accessing attachable data on an object, you must load and attach it.
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] Data is normally attached by calling the corresponding needX() method on the Query class when the object is loaded. You can also call the corresponding attachX() method explicitly. at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/PhabricatorLiskDAO.php:166]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=8c589f1f759f), phabricator(head=master, ref.master=4a45620b0458), phutil(head=master, ref.master=afc05a9a7f00)
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #0 <#2> PhabricatorLiskDAO::assertAttached(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/repository/storage/PhabricatorRepositoryCommit.php:129]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #1 <#2> PhabricatorRepositoryCommit::getCommitData() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/audit/editor/PhabricatorAuditEditor.php:669]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #2 <#2> PhabricatorAuditEditor::buildMailBody(PhabricatorRepositoryCommit, array) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor.php:2178]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #3 <#2> PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor::sendMailToTarget(PhabricatorRepositoryCommit, array, PhabricatorMailTarget) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor.php:2152]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #4 <#2> PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor::sendMail(PhabricatorRepositoryCommit, array) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editor/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor.php:998]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #5 <#2> PhabricatorApplicationTransactionEditor::publishTransactions(PhabricatorRepositoryCommit, array) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/worker/PhabricatorApplicationTransactionPublishWorker.php:21]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #6 <#2> PhabricatorApplicationTransactionPublishWorker::doWork() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/daemon/workers/PhabricatorWorker.php:91]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #7 <#2> PhabricatorWorker::executeTask() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/daemon/workers/storage/PhabricatorWorkerActiveTask.php:162]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #8 <#2> PhabricatorWorkerActiveTask::executeTask() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/daemon/workers/PhabricatorTaskmasterDaemon.php:20]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #9 PhabricatorTaskmasterDaemon::run() called at [<phutil>/src/daemon/PhutilDaemon.php:185]
Daemon 39827 STDE [Thu, 04 Jun 2015 03:03:11 +0000] #10 PhutilDaemon::execute() called at [<phutil>/scripts/daemon/exec/exec_daemon.php:125]
```
Auditors: btrahan
Summary:
Ref T6367. Do all mail, feed, notification and search stuff from the daemons, in all editors.
There are four relatively-stateful editors (Audit, Differential, Phriction, PhortuneCart) which needed special care to move state into the daemons properly.
Beyond that, I moved mailTo/mailCC/feedRelated/feedNotify to be computed before we enter the worker:
- This is simpler, since a lot of editors rely on being able to call `$object->getReviewers()` or similar to compute them.
- This is more correct, since we want to freeze the lists at this moment in time.
Finally, I renamed `loadEdges` to `willPublish` and made it a slightly more general hook.
---
This is a bit fragile and I'm not //thrilled// about it.
It would probably be cleaner to have separate Editor and Publisher classes (something like @fabe's D11329 did). However, I think that's quite a lot of work, and I'd like to see stronger motivation for it (either in this actually being more fragile than I think, or there being other things we get out of it). Overall, I'm comfortable with this change, just definitely not a big fan of the "save" + "load" pattern since I think it's really fragile, nonobvious, hard to debug/predict, etc.
Test Plan:
Directly updated editors:
- Created a new Phriction page, saw "Document Content".
- Edited a Phriction page, saw "Document Diff".
- Edited a revision, got normal looking mail.
- Faked in `changedPriorToCommitURI` and verified it survived the state boundary.
- Sent Audit mail.
- Sent invoice mail.
Indirect editors - for these, I just made a change and made sure the mail generated:
- Updated a paste.
- Updated an event.
- Updated a thread.
- Updated a task.
- Updated a mock.
- Updated a question.
- Updated a project.
- Updated a file.
- Updated an initiative.
- Updated a Legalpad document.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley, fabe
Maniphest Tasks: T6367
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13115
Summary: Fixes T8264. Broken in D12929. Sweep all the applyBuiltin implementations and always break; rather than return
Test Plan: added myself to a project successfully (showed up as a member)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403, T8264
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12940
Summary: Ref T6403. Conpherence keeps track of comments for message counts so we needed some special attention there. Otherwise, straight-forward.
Test Plan: left a comment on a diff with inline comments. sent messages in conpherence successfully. verified unread count incremented correctly for sent messages for users.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12932
Summary: Ref T6403. This one was pretty easy since no one does anything custom with subscribers.
Test Plan: subscribed / unscribed to a random commit ("audit"). joined / left, watched / unwatched a project
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12930
Summary: Ref T6403. This does TYPE_EDGE since I just had to deal with T8252. Look like this fixes a few editors (maybe) that would have had fatals with mentions like slowvote and ponder.
Test Plan: made a phame post mentioning a task and it worked! joined / left a project, watched / unwatched a project and that worked! blind faith for other sites.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12929
Summary: Currently adding auditors in commit message only works with the plural. Make "Auditor: bla" work.
Test Plan: Unit tests. I don't know if I am supposed to add a test.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10636
Summary:
...because its always at least the string <ATTACHABLE>... Not sure when we'd hit this / see the TODO about making it better, but its definitely a logic bug right now.
(an update to D12347 helped me notice that this conditional is always hit and may fatal later)
Test Plan: NA
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12348
Summary:
Fixes T7731. When a user writes a "Send me an email" rule, always try send them an email, even if their notification settings would normally downgrade it to a notification.
In particular, this is stronger than these downgrades:
- Downgrades due to "self actions";
- downgrades due to "mail tags".
Test Plan:
- Wrote various Herald rules with "Send me an email" rules.
- Used `bin/mail list-outbound` / `show-outbound` to vet generated mail.
- Mail reacted properly to a variety of conditions (disabled accounts, settings, "send me an email" rule, forced delivery).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7731
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12300
Summary:
Fixes T7199. This still isn't a shining example of perfect code, but the raw amount of copy/paste is much lower than it used to be.
- Reduce code duplication between existing receivers.
- Expose receiving objects in help menus where appropriate.
- Connect some "TODO" receivers.
Test Plan:
- Sent mail to every supported object type.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12249
Summary:
Ref T7199. In the vein of D12231, these options were a bad idea.
- They once served a very narrow, Facebook-specific need (see T1992), except even Facebook only used the Differential setting AFAIK.
- Outside of that special case, they are unused and essentially unusable (generally speaking, they do not meaningfully implement anything modular or replaceable).
- I have no knowledge of any install ever changing these settings, and can imagine no reason why they would.
Moving forward:
- If they really need to, they can fork locally and chagne one line.
- I expect "!actions" to make mail at least somewhat more modular soon, anyway.
- Any derived handlers would break after T7199 and need to be rewritten anyway, so this is just taking advantage of a BC break to do cleanup.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for removed configuration.
- Sent some mail from applications, verified the reply handlers set proper reply addresses.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7199
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12233
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T6403. Replace `Diffusion::INLINEDONE` with `Transactions::INLINESTATE` and generalize things enough that we can lift it into core.
The next change will lift Differential's similar implementation into the core.
Also start implementing a fix for T6403, providing an alternate hook for optional builtin transactions.
Test Plan: Changed inline state in Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12129
Summary:
Ref T1460. See D12126. This is essentially the same change, but for Diffusion.
This is a bit copy/pastey. I'm going to make an effort to lift inline handling into the core before pushing this in, so hopefully that will clean things up a bit.
Test Plan: Submitted stuff in Diffusion and got checkmarks to publish.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12128
Summary:
Ref T1460. Ref T2618.
When publishing a draft inline, mark the inline it replies to (if any) as replied to.
Also, don't load deleted comments as drafts (sets the stage for T2618).
I'll make an effort to clean up the loading mess here in the next revision, and find some more appropriate home for the shared code.
Test Plan: Made and replied to comments in Differential and Diffusion. Saw comments get marked as "Has Replies" and "Is Reply".
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2618, T1460
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12025
Summary:
Ref T6516. Although this behavior is somewhat-arguable as desirable, I think it's less surprising and more consistent to disable mentions when a repository is publishing.
In particular, if you import a repository developed on another Phabricator install, this stops all the `T123` in commit messages from creating mentions on your unrelated `T123` tasks.
We already disable autoclose, so `Closes T123` and `Ref T123` already have no effect, but a bare `T123` would generate a mention. Likewise, `@epriestley` would generate a mention.
If you import such a repository and then update it periodically, updates will activate autoclose and publishing (if you didn't disable them), but presumably this will hit a couple of tasks and you'll go change the settings if you forgot.
At some point, we may have some kind of use case for separating the "publish" setting into a "publish" setting and a "this is a local repository" setting. For example, if you work at Widget Corp, want to import Phabricator locally, //and// want to write Herald rules against it, you can't currently configure the repository to let you do all of this. But we haven't actually seen a use case for this yet.
Test Plan:
- Pushed some commits with bare `T11`, saw mentions.
- Disabled publishing for the repository, pushed some commits with
- Imported a bunch of commits without seeing pipeline failures.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6516
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11966
Summary:
Ref T7298. We are currently inconsistent about when we publish feed, email, notifications, audits and Herald rules.
Specifically, there are two settings which impact these things:
- The "importing" flag, which is set when we're importing old commits.
- The "herald-disabled" flag, which was expanded in scope some time ago and now actually means "disable publishing".
Various parts of the pipeline were checking only one of these flags. Instead, all of them should check both.
(For example, we should never email users about importing repositories, nor trigger audits on them.)
Test Plan: See next revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7298
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11826
Summary: Fixes T6343. Grepped for all callsites and added addLinkSection where needed.
Test Plan: Tested Differential, Maniphest, Conpherence, Ponder and Macro. Inspect HTML mail for anchor tags. Inspect text mails for non-disruption.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: talshiri, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10762
Summary: ...also truncate authorName to 255 so that we don't get database errors. Ref T6350.
Test Plan: see T6350 - mostly doing it live - but I did sanity check and commit something and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6350
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10734
Summary: as opposed to "requested". Also re-jigger how the "reason" works so the herald editor can get more specific data rather than a generic message. Fixes T6345 along with companion diff D10726.
Test Plan: made a herald rule to add auditors to a commit and saw it work!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10730
Summary: Fixes T6336. Turns out that the function to update the import status updates that database and doesn't update the object. If the object doesn't get the pertinent update AND there's a herald rule that runs, then the object is later re-saved without ever getting the update flag.
Test Plan: logic in the ole sandbox and going to push it to prod and run re-parse on impacted commits
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6336
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10723
Summary: we don't want to mention these phids... when expanding transactions, build the unmnentionable map and make it so. slightly hairy due to how the editor framework works, but overall i think this is the right place to put these hooks. Fixes T6331.
Test Plan: made a commit with a commit message that had fixes, refs, depends on, and auditors and saw no erroneous mentions
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6331
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10721
Summary: Fixes T2497. I'm not sure where we are with subscribers and custom vs normal codepath, but the mailtags implementation makes no assumptions and can handle it either way.
Test Plan: made a commit and got some sensible mail tags
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2497
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10712
Summary:
Fixes T4896, T6293.
Do most of the work in the editor, but pull the raw patch in the daemon and set that on the editor. This is somewhat of a pre-optimization but it was easy enough to do and makes sense to me.
Test Plan:
made a commit and saw it get parsed.
made a commit with "Auditors: foo" field and saw audit made for foo
turned on inline patch and attach patch and saw the patches
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6293, T4896
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10705
