Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: Ref T5058. The use of "enum" is confusing; we mean "choose one of these specific string constants". Make this more clear.
Test Plan: Viewed each call from the web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5058
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9127
Summary:
Ref T3551. Currently, there are many layers of indirection between pull requests and revisions. After D8822, revisions and other types of requested objects are recorded directly on the request. This allows us to simplify data access and querying.
A lot of stuff here is doing `instanceof` checks to keep APIs stable, but most of those can go away in the long run.
Test Plan:
- Browsed requests.
- Verified revision-dependent fields (like "Revision", "Size", "Churn") still render correctly.
- Called `releeph.queryrequests`.
- Called `releephwork.nextrequest`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8824
Summary:
Ref T3662. Releeph blocks users from requsting unparsed commits, but there's no real technical reason for this.
The `releephwork.getorigcommitmessage` method assumes data exists, but should be replaced with `diffusion.querycommits` anyway.
Test Plan: Ran `diffusion.querycommits`. Requested a commit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3662
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8823
Summary:
Ref T3551. Currently, ReleephRequests don't have a direct concept of the //object// being requested. You can request `D123`, but that is just a convenient way to write `rXyyyy`.
When the UI wants to display information about a revision, it deduces it by examining the commit.
This is primarily an attack on T3551, so we don't need to load <commit -> edge -> revision> (in an ad-hoc way) to get revisions. Instead, when you request a revision we keep track of it and can load it directly later.
Later, this will let us do more things: for example, if you request a branch, we can automatically update the commits (as GitHub does), etc. (Repository branches will need PHIDs first, of course.)
This adds and populates the column but doesn't use it yet. The second part of the migration could safely be run while Phabricator is up, although even for Facebook this table is probably quite small.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Verified existing requests associated sensibly.
- Created a new commit request.
- Created a new revision request.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8822
Summary: Ref T3551. Repository is guaranteed if a product is loaded with modern mechanisms.
Test Plan:
- Edited a request.
- Called `releephwork.getbranchcommitmessage`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8821
Summary: Ref T3551. Ref T3549. Mostly unnecessary with modern calls.
Test Plan:
- Called `releeph.queryrequests`.
- Called `releeph.request`.
- Called `releephwork.getbranchcommitmessage`.
- Called `releephwork.getcommitmessage`.
- Called `releephwork.nextrequest`.
- Viewed and edited branches and requests.
- Made a comment on a request.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549, T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8820
Summary:
Ref T3551. Releeph does a bunch of old-school on-object data loading; start cleaning that up.
This doesn't change anything, just makes the code more modern/consistent.
Test Plan: Edited a request; called `releephwork.nextrequest`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8819
Summary:
Ref T3662. Ref T3549. These methods are pretty conservative for now, but get the structure in place.
Also do a bunch more project -> product stuff.
Test Plan: Made calls to both methods, browsed around the UI a fair amount.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3549, T3662
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8816
Summary:
Fixes T3659. Releeph has some awkward complexity around who ends up as a commit author. Instead, we should always try to use the original author.
Metadata (like the requestor's identity) should be accessed via Conduit or other channels instead.
Test Plan: Saved some projects, grepped for all related symbols.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3659
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8630
Summary:
Instead of returning a blank result it throws exceptions. Fix this up a
little so we get some consistency with differential
Test Plan:
Loaded a bad phid for releeph, returns empty list.
Try a good phid and get 2 releeph merges.
Reviewers: epriestley, elenaperezrioja, dschleimer, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7302
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary: Ref T3656. Releeph denormalizes branch cut point identifiers into Branch objects, but this information isn't useful or used for sorting, filtering, or enforcing unique constraints. Instead, derive it via noramlized pathways from the `cutPointCommitPHID`.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade. Ran `releephwork.getbranch` and `releeph.getbranches`. Grepped for `cutPointCommitIdentifier`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6636
Summary:
Ref T3655. ReleephProject currently has both `repositoryID` and `repositoryPHID`, which point to the same object and are reudundant. Get rid of all reads of `repositoryID`.
NOTE: This makes project loads depend on repository loads. The eventual rule here will be that you must be able to see a repository in order to see projects for that repository, which seems like a reasonable rule. We might need to tailor it more than this (e.g., if there are branch read permissions down the line) but this seems like a reasonable minimum.
Test Plan: Grepped for `repositoryID` in `releeph/`. Called `releeph.getbranches`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6633
Summary: Ref T2784. This one was a wee bit complicated. Had to add PhabricatorUser and concept of initFromConduit (or not) to DiffusionRequest.
Test Plan: foreach repo, visited CALLSIGN and clicked a commit and verified they laoded correctly. Hacked code to hit NOT via Conduit and repeated tests to great success.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5928
Summary:
Migrate to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions` (`ReleephRequestTransactions` applied by `ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor`, instead of `ReleephRequestEvents` created by `ReleephRequestEditor`) and migrate all the old events into transactions. Email is supported in the standard way (no more `ReleephRequestMail`) as well.
This also collapses the Releeph request create and edit controllers into one class, as well as breaking everyone's subject-based mail rules by standardising them (but which should be more easily filtered by looking at headers.)
Test Plan:
* Make requests, then pick them.
* Pick and revert the same request so that discovery happens way after `arc` has told Releeph about what's been happening.
* Try to pick something that fails to pick in a project with pick instructions (and see the instructions are in the email.)
* Load all of FB's Releeph data into my DB and run the `storage upgrade` script.
* Request a commit via the "action" in a Differential revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5868
Summary: Instead of being able to ask if someone was a pusher or not, ask if they are "authoritative" enough to make decisions about Releeph requests. A person is authoritative if a project has pushers, and they are a pusher, or in the case of pusher-less projects, everyone is authoritative.
Test Plan: Make a request in a project with no pushers (it is immediately ready to be picked) and a project with pushers (where it requires approval.)
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5877
Summary:
Removing a bunch of cache-style columns from `ReleephRequest`, where it's actually much easier to just load the information at runtime.
This makes sense for migrating to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions`, where each xaction changes one aspect of a `ReleephRequest` at a time (rather than multiple columns at once.)
Test Plan: Request something, run `arc releeph` and watch the picks, pass on some RQs, run `arc releeph` and watch the reverts.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5851
