Summary:
Ref T1536. Currently, we have separate panels for each link/unlink and separate controllers for OAuth vs LDAP.
Instead, provide a single "External Accounts" panel which shows all linked accounts and allows you to link/unlink more easily.
Move link/unlink over to a full externalaccount-based workflow.
Test Plan:
- Linked and unlinked OAuth accounts.
- Linked and unlinked LDAP accounts.
- Registered new accounts.
- Exercised most/all of the error cases.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6189
Summary: Ref T1536. Error state is a bit gross but we need to sort that out in general.
Test Plan:
{F46549}
{F46550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6208
Summary:
Ref T1445. Ref T1536. Although we have separate CSRF protection and have never been vulnerable to OAuth hijacking, properly implementing the "state" parameter provides a little more certainty.
Before OAuth, we set a random value on the client, and pass its hash as the "state" parameter. Upon return, validate that (a) the user has a nonempty "phcid" cookie and (b) the OAuth endpoint passed back the correct state (the hash of that cookie).
Test Plan: Logged in with all OAuth providers, which all apparently support `state`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, arice
Maniphest Tasks: T1445, T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6179
Summary:
Ref T1536. LDAP is very likely the worst thing in existence.
This has some rough edges (error handling isn't perfect) but is already better than the current LDAP experience! durrr
Test Plan: Registered and logged in using LDAP.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6177
Summary: Ref T1536. Support for GitHub on new flows.
Test Plan: Registered and logged in with GitHub.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6166
Summary: Ref T1536. Adds Disqus as a Provider.
Test Plan: Registered and logged in with Disqus.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6165
Summary:
Ref T1536. Ref T1930. Code is not reachable.
This provides password authentication and registration on the new provider/adapter framework.
I sort of cheated a little bit and don't really route any password logic through the adapter (instead, this provider uses an empty adapter and just sets the type/domain on it). I think the right way to do this //conceptually// is to treat username/passwords as an external black box which the adapter communicates with. However, this creates a lot of practical implementation and UX problems:
- There would basically be two steps -- in the first one, you interact with the "password black box", which behaves like an OAuth provider. This produces some ExternalAccount associated with the username/password pair, then we go into normal registration.
- In normal registration, we'd proceed normally.
This means:
- The registration flow would be split into two parts, one where you select a username/password (interacting with the black box) and one where you actually register (interacting with the generic flow). This is unusual and probably confusing for users.
- We would need to do a lot of re-hashing of passwords, since passwords currently depend on the username and user PHID, which won't exist yet during registration or the "black box" phase. This is a big mess I don't want to deal with.
- We hit a weird condition where two users complete step 1 with the same username but don't complete step 2 yet. The box knows about two different copies of the username, with two different passwords. When we arrive at step 2 the second time we have a lot of bad choices about how to reoslve it, most of which create security problems. The most stragihtforward and "pure" way to resolve the issues is to put password-auth usernames in a separate space, but this would be incredibly confusuing to users (your login name might not be the same as your username, which is bizarre).
- If we change this, we need to update all the other password-related code, which I don't want to bother with (at least for now).
Instead, let registration know about a "default" registration controller (which is always password, if enabled), and let it require a password. This gives us a much simpler (albeit slightly less pure) implementation:
- All the fields are on one form.
- Password adapter is just a shell.
- Password provider does the heavy lifting.
We might make this more pure at some point, but I'm generally pretty satisfied with this.
This doesn't implement the brute-force CAPTCHA protection, that will be coming soon.
Test Plan: Registered with password only and logged in with a password. Hit various error conditions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1536, T1930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6164
Summary:
Ref T1536. Code is intentionally made unreachable (see PhabricatorAuthProviderOAuthFacebook->isEnabled()).
This adds:
- A provider-driven "start" screen (this has the list of ways you can login/register).
- Registration actually works.
- Facebook OAuth works.
@chad, do you have any design ideas on the start screen? I think we poked at it before, but the big issue was that there were a limitless number of providers. Today, we have:
- Password
- LDAP
- Facebook
- GitHub
- Phabricator
- Disqus
- Google
We plan to add:
- Asana
- An arbitrary number of additional instances of Phabricator
Users want to add:
- OpenID
- Custom providers
And I'd like to have these at some point:
- Stripe
- WePay
- Amazon
- Bitbucket
So basically any UI for this has to accommodate 300 zillion auth options. I don't think we need to solve any UX problems here (realistically, installs enable 1-2 auth options and users don't actually face an overwhelming number of choices) but making the login forms less ugly would be nice. No combination of prebuilt elements seems to look very good for this use case.
Test Plan: Registered a new acount with Facebook.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6161
Summary:
Ref T1536. None of this code is reachable.
`PhabricatorAuthLoginController` provides a completely generic login/link flow, similar to how D6155 provides a generic registration flow.
`PhabricatorAuthProvider` wraps a `PhutilAuthAdapter` and glues the generic top-level flow to a concrete authentication provider.
Test Plan: Static only, code isn't meaningfully reachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6159
