Summary:
In ~2012, the first of these options was added because someone who hates dogs and works at Asana also hated `[Differential]` in the subject line. The use case there was actually //removing// the text, not changing it, but I made the prefix editable since it seemed like slightly less of a one-off.
These options are among the dumbest and most useless config options we have and very rarely used, see T11760. A very small number of instances have configured one of these options.
Newer applications stopped providing these options and no one has complained.
You can get the same effect with `translation.override`. Although I'm not sure we'll keep that around forever, it's a reasonable replacement today. I'll call out an example in the changelog to help installs that want to preserve this option.
If we did want to provide this, it should just be in {nav Applications > Settings} for each application, but I think it's wildly-low-value and "hack via translations" or "local patch" are entirely reasonable if you really want to change these strings.
Test Plan: Grepped for `subject-prefix`.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19993
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI683. Currently, you can "Change subtype..." via Conduit and the bulk editor, but not via the comment action stack or edit forms.
In PHI683 an install is doing this often enough that they'd like it to become a first-class action. I've generally been cautious about pushing this action to become a first-class action (there are some inevitable rough edges and I don't want to add too much complexity if there isn't a use case for it) but since we have evidence that users would find it useful and nothing has exploded yet, I'm comfortable taking another step forward.
Currently, `EditEngine` has this sort of weird `setIsConduitOnly()` method. This actually means more like "this doesn't show up on forms". Make it better align with that. In particular, a "conduit only" field can already show up in the bulk editor, which is goofy. Change this to `setIsFormField()` and convert/simplify existing callsites.
Test Plan:
There are a lot of ways to reach EditEngine so this probably isn't entirely exhaustive, but I think I got pretty much anything which is likely to break:
- Searched for `setIsConduitOnly()` and `getIsConduitOnly()`, converted all callsites to `setIsFormField()`.
- Searched for `setIsLockable()`, `setIsReorderable()` and `setIsDefaultable()` and aligned these calls to intent where applicable.
- Created an Almanac binding.
- Edited an Almanac binding.
- Created an Almanac service.
- Edited an Almanac service.
- Edited a binding property.
- Deleted a binding property.
- Created and edited a badge.
- Awarded and revoked a badge.
- Created and edited an event.
- Made an event recurring.
- Created and edited a Conpherence thread.
- Edited and updated the diff for a revision.
- Created and edited a repository.
- Created and disabled repository URIs.
- Created and edited a blueprint.
- Created and edited tasks.
- Created a paste, edited/archived a paste.
- Created/edited/archived a package.
- Created/edited a project.
- Made comments.
- Moved tasks on workboards via comment action stack.
- Changed task subtype via comment action stack.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19842
Summary:
Depends on D19585. Ref T13164.
Almost all transactions require CAN_EDIT on the object, but they generally do not enforce this directly today. Instead, this is effectively enforced by Controllers, API methods, and EditEngine doing a `CAN_EDIT` check when loading the object to be edited.
A small number of transactions do not require CAN_EDIT, and instead require only a weaker/lesser permission. These are:
- Joining a project which you have CAN_JOIN on.
- Leaving a project which isn't locked.
- Joining a Conpherence thread you can see (today, no separate CAN_JOIN permission for Conpherence).
- Leaving a Conpherence thread.
- Unsubscribing.
- Using the special `!history` command from email.
Additionally, these require CAN_INTERACT, which is weaker than CAN_EDIT:
- Adding comments.
- Subscribing.
- Awarding tokens.
Soon, I want to add "disabling users" to this list, so that you can disable users if you have "Can Disable User" permission, even if you can not otherwise edit users.
It's possible this list isn't exhaustive, so this change might break something by adding a policy check to a place where we previously didn't have one. If so, we can go weaken that policy check to the appropriate level.
Enforcement of these special cases is currently weird:
- We mostly don't actually enforce CAN_EDIT in the Editor; instead, it's enforced before you get to the editor (in EditEngine/Controllers).
- To apply a weaker requirement (like leaving comments or leaving a project), we let you get through the Controller without CAN_EDIT, then apply the weaker policy check in the Editor.
- Some transactions apply a confusing/redundant explicit CAN_EDIT policy check. These mostly got cleaned up in previous changes.
Instead, the new world order is:
- Every transaction has capability/policy requirements.
- The default is CAN_EDIT, but transactions can weaken this explicitly they want.
- So now we'll get requirements right in the Editor, even if Controllers or API endpoints make a mistake.
- And you don't have to copy/paste a bunch of code to say "yes, every transaction should require CAN_EDIT".
Test Plan:
- Tried to add members to a Conpherence thread I could not edit (permissions error).
- Left a Conpherence thread I could not edit (worked properly).
- Joined a thread I could see but could not edit (worked properly).
- Tried to join a thread I could not see (permissions error).
- Implemented `requireCapabilites()` on ManiphestTransactionEditor and tried to edit a task (upgrade guidance error).
- Mentioned an object I can not edit on another object (works).
- Mentioned another object on an object I can not edit (works).
- Added a `{F...}` reference to an object I can not edit (works).
- Awarded tokens to an object I can not edit (works).
- Subscribed/unsubscribed from an object I can not edit (works).
- Muted/unmuted an object I can not edit (works).
- Tried to do other types of edits to an object I can not edit (correctly results in a permissions error).
- Joined and left a project I can not edit (works).
- Tried to edit and add members to a project I can not edit (permissions error).
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19586
Summary: Ref T13054. Fixes T12714. Applies read locks to all transactions instead of only a very select subset (chat messages in Conpherence).
Test Plan: See <T13054#235650> for discussion and testing.
Maniphest Tasks: T13054, T12714
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19059
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary: Moves Conpherence to use EditEngine. This removes the "First Message" field, but I think that's ok until we have direct messaging of some sort, then maybe have built-ins cover that case.
Test Plan:
- Visit /new/ and /edit/ for creating new rooms.
- Edit a room in full conpherence
- Edit a room in durable column
- grep for METADATA calls
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16677
Summary: Moves participants over to ModularTransactions, simplified a lot of the code. Fixes T12550
Test Plan:
Create a new room with just myself and myself + fake accounts.
Remove a person.
Remove myself.
Edit a room, topic.
Type some messages.
???
Profit
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17685
Summary:
Pathway to D17685. This column is (mostly) a denormalization of `dateModified` on the thread.
Just use a JOIN instead.
This isn't //exactly// the same: we'll bump threads to the top now for non-message changes (e.g., a topic or title change). That seems fine, but we could put a `lastMessageDate` on Thread later if we want to refine it.
Also got rid of a lot of other unused stuff. There's a big garbage TODO here, I'll fix that in the next change.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `dateTouched`.
- Grepped for `participantCursor`.
- Grepped for `ConpherenceParticipantQuery::LIMIT`.
- Looked for callsites to `setOrder()`, found none.
- Added a message to an older thread, saw it bump up to the top.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17731
Summary:
Pathway to D17685. This column is a very complicated cache of: is participant.messageCount equal to thread.messageCount?
We can just ask this question with a JOIN instead and simplify things dramatically.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Browsed around.
- Sent a message, saw unread count go up.
- Read the message, saw unread count go down.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17730
Summary: Pathway to D17685. Nothing reads this field and it has no use or value.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration.
- Grepped for `behindTransactionPHID`.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17729
Summary:
I think these got munged when I removed CAN_JOIN.
- If you can view the room, you can join it.
- ~~If you can view the room, you can add others to it.~~ This rule adjustment was removed, see discussion on the revision.
- If you are a participant in the room, you can remove yourself.
- If you can edit a room, you can remove anyone.
Test Plan:
Normal feature set:
- Create a new room that only I can edit, viewable by all users.
- Leave room (bye k thx)
- Create another room, myself only
- Join room from second account
- See ability to only remove myself
- Remove myself
- Rejoin
- Add third account
- Log into first account
- Boot off randos
- Test joining by green button, message, and by + sign.
Policy consistency:
- As a user who can not edit the room, tried to add other members. Received policy exception. The `+` button is currently visible and enabled for all users (even users who have not joined the room) but this is pre-existing.
Reviewers: chad
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17696
Summary: We no longer display this any more in the UI, so go ahead and remove the callsites and db column.
Test Plan: New Room, with and without participants.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17683
Summary: Fixes T12178, Fixes T11704 Not sure this feature gets any use and I can't find a similar option in other software, so removing it I think simiplifies a number of things. Removes CAN_JOIN and joinable is basically now CAN_VIEW and !$participating. Also removed some old transaction strings for other policies. Don't seem used.
Test Plan: Create a new room, edit room policies, see changes. Log into second account, search for rooms, everything now is visible.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12178, T11704
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17675
Summary: Does a few things. Turns off feed stories (again), removes "action" transactions from notificiations, and only updates message count on actual messages. This feels a bit cleaner and less spammy... I guess... I think @epriestley will really like it and do me a favor or something.
Test Plan: Pull up two windows. test a message, see message count on second screen. Edit a topic or title, get no notification. At all. Ever.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17674
Summary: Begin converting Conpherence to ModularTransactions, this converts title, topic, and picture to use modular transactions. Participants seems hairy so I'll do that in another diff
Test Plan: Create a room with a topic, change room name, topic. Add people, remove people. Set a room image. Unset topic.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17668
Summary: This moves room pictures out of the dialog and into it's own PictureController. Also adds a standard image (and removes the "last person to chat" picture (though we could add that back. My plan is though that direct messages use auto use the other person's photo, after we have editengine and room pictures will have a plain, replaceable image.
Test Plan: Set a new room picture, remove a picture. Run migration, see old images properly set with new image.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11730
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16669
Summary: I believe these are left over from widgets, when we added a "Files" widget that kept track of everything added to the window.
Test Plan: Added files to a Conpherece, Set an image when editing. Anything else?
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16567
Summary: [Draft] Posting this up because feed is pulling `getTitle` and not `getTitleForFeed` and I'm super confused. Restarted phd and apache.
Test Plan: Create a new room, see link in feed. Change topic, see story, add people, don't see story.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11645
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16561
Summary:
Minor rebuild / redesign of Conpherence. Most of this is new UX and tossing out things like widgets, device fallbacks. I expect some of the UI to get more polished after next pass, but most everything here is in place.
- Removed "Widgets", now just a single Participants pane
- Added "Topic"
- New header
- Settings, Edit are action icons
- Removed a lot of JS
- Simplified CSS as much as I could
Test Plan:
Desktop, Tablet, Mobile. Adding and removing people. Setting new topics, new rooms.
{F1828662}
{F1828669}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16550
Summary:
Ref T4103. Ref T10078. This puts a user cache in front of notification and message counts.
This reduces the number of queries issued on every page by 4 (2x building the menu, 2x building Quicksand data).
Also fixes some minor issues:
- Daemons could choke on sending mail in the user's translation.
- No-op object updates could fail in the daemons.
- Questionable data access pattern in the file query coming out of the profile file cache.
Test Plan:
- Sent myself notifications. Saw count go up.
- Cleared them by visiting objects and clearing all notifications. Saw count go down.
- Sent myself messages. Saw count go up.
- Cleared them by visiting threads. Saw count go down.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103, T10078
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16041
Summary:
Ref T4103. Conpherence is doing some weird stuff and has its own redudnant settings object.
- Get rid of `ConpherenceSettings`.
- Use `getUserSetting()` instead of `loadPreferences()`.
- When applying transactions, add a new mechanism to efficiently prefill caches (this will still work anyway, but it's slower if we don't bulk-fetch).
Test Plan:
- Changed global Conpherence setting.
- Created a new Conpherence, saw setting set to global default.
- Changed local room setting.
- Submitted messages.
- Saw cache prefill for all particpiants in database.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16025
Summary:
Ref T4103. This give preferences a PHID, policy/transaction interfaces, a transaction table, and a Query class.
This doesn't actually change how they're edited, yet.
Test Plan:
- Ran migrations.
- Inspected database for date created, date modified, PHIDs.
- Changed some of my preferences.
- Deleted a user's preferences, verified they reset properly.
- Set some preferences as a new user, got a new row.
- Destroyed a user, verified their preferences were destroyed.
- Sent Conpherence messages.
- Send mail.
- Tried to edit another user's settings.
- Tried to edit a bot's settings as a non-admin.
- Edited a bot's settings as an admin (technically, none of the editable settings are actually stored in the settings table, currently).
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4103
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15991
Summary:
Ref T9979. There are currently some hacks around Conpherence indexing: it does not really use the fulltext index, but its own specialized index. However, it's kind of hacked up so it can get reindexed by the normal indexing pipeline.
Lift it up into IndexEngine, instead of FulltextEngine. Specifically, the new stuff is going to look like this:
- IndexEngine: Rebuild all indexes.
- ConpherenceIndexExtension: Rebuild thread indexes.
- ProjectMemberIndexExtension: Rebuild project membership views.
- NgramIndexExtension: Rebuild ngram indexes.
- FulltextIndexExtension / FulltextEngine: Rebuild fulltext indexes, a special type of index.
- FulltextCommentExtension: Rebuild comment fulltext indexes.
- FulltextProjectExtension: Rebuild project fulltext indexes.
- etc.
Most of this is at least sort-of-in-place as of this diff, although some of the part in the middle is still pretty rough.
Test Plan:
- Made a unique comment in a Conpherence thread.
- Used `bin/search index --force` to rebuild the index.
- Searched for the comment.
- Found the thread.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14841
Summary:
Fixes T9787. Currently, file PHID extraction logic happens very early, before we normalize/merge/etc the transactions.
In D14390, I changed how the CONTENT transaction works: before, callers would pass in a file PHID. Afterward, they just pass in the content.
Passing in the content is generaly easier and feels more correct, but inadvertenly broke PHID extraction because converting the content into a file PHID now happened after we extracted the PHID. So we'd extract the entire text of the paste as a "file PHID", which wouldn't work.
Instead, extract file PHIDs later. This impacts a couple of other applications (Conpherence, Pholio) which receive an object or have an unusual file-oriented transaction.
Test Plan:
- Made a new paste, verified the raw file attached to it properly.
- Made and updated a mock, verified all the files attached properly.
- Updated a Conpherence room image, verified the files attached properly.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14494
Summary:
Ref T8488, T8469, T8485.
This is done in regards to T8488 as far as users are concerned. There's still some classes, and etc. that should be re-named probably. T8469 and T8485 are basically moot now though.
Rather than having "Send Message" exposed, just expose "Create Room". Users get the full form. One change is "title" is now required.
This diff removes the concept of "isRoom" entirely.
Test Plan: Verifed a user with no conpherences had sensible data in both column view and full conpherence view. Created rooms with various policies and things worked well.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8469, T8485, T8488
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13351
Summary: Remove the `*TransactionType` classes and define the constants in the corresponding `*Transaction` class instead.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13188
Summary: Fixes T8329. I was able to figure out a reasonable way to have the full conpherence default to the email settings panel. I think this is cleaner than making things a dialogue as I rambled about in the description for T8329.
Test Plan: using /bin/mail to verify correct email links were generated for conpherence notifications and maniphest (general) notifications.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8329
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13058
Summary: Ref T6403. Conpherence keeps track of comments for message counts so we needed some special attention there. Otherwise, straight-forward.
Test Plan: left a comment on a diff with inline comments. sent messages in conpherence successfully. verified unread count incremented correctly for sent messages for users.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6403
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12932
Summary: Fixes T7254. This reverts the previous functionality, but makes pertinent updates like scaling the images to 35 x 35. Codebase had moved on quite a bit so far from a straight revert but nothing too tricky relative to the code that was here before. This does not allow for changing the images from the conpherence durable column view -- that would require some JS trickery, but also doesn't fit into the current notion of the column being "light". Can always modify this later.
Test Plan:
- from full conpherence, uploaded a square pic and things looked nice
- from full conpherence, uploaded a rectangular pic and wasnt happy, so reinvoked edit dialog and used crop control to make it better
- noted could not update picture from conpherence durable column
- used different user and noted could see custom picture
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: CodeMouse92, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7254
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12648
Summary: Fixes T7439. Also two callsites I missed earlier.
Test Plan: Tried to search for strings like `'E` and `"E`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7439
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12616
Summary: Fixes T7840. Add some unit tests. One explicitly covers the case in T7840. Other cases are "base" cases for rooms and threads, plus the version if T7840 for a thread, where a policy exception should be thrown.
Test Plan: `arc unit` and was able to successfully add a file to a conpherence room i did not have edit permissions on
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12443
Summary: Ref T7795. This fixes the behavior where you end up with a "a, b, c..." as the list of participants, and yet user a just left.
Test Plan: joined and left a thread. verified database had correct values. observed correct behavior in messages dropdown
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12338
Summary: Fixes T7693.
Test Plan: made a conpherence with my main test account and a throwaway test account. deleted the test account. removed myself from the thread. added myself back to the thread.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7693
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12306
Summary:
Ref T7566. This does a big chunk of what's left
- Main view
- "Rooms" sub header
- 5 Rooms shown at a time, with room you're looking at in the top on page load
- e.g. viewing /conpherence/x/ the room x is at top always
- solves corner case of when you have yet to "join" the room
- "See More" link takes you to application search for rooms you have participated in
- if no rooms, there is a "Create Room" and "Find Rooms" links.
- "Messages" sub header
- same as before
- policy icons showing up in the menu
- Durable column view - still just the latest N, no changes really there
- Transactions - special cased rendering to try to say room vs thread as appropos
- Bug fix - we weren't recording the initial participants transaction post D12177 / D12163. This fixes that.
Should probably test pagination, and if you want to show more than 5 rooms of have it behave more like messages (where you can wind up in the middle of a paginated list) that will be more work. Also, if lots of messages / rooms (100 is the limit) we might not display rooms if we're supposed to. Yay whale usage! :D
Test Plan: made a new room - success. made a new message - success. viewed a room from /conpherenece/room/ i wasn't a participant in and noted it showed up at the top of the five rooms. clicked around rooms and stuff loaded nicely.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7566
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12178
Summary:
Fixes T7629 plus an un filed bug that's breaking creating new threads since we need to add participants EVEN EARLIER than we were doing it now that policy is actually enforced.
Back to the main thrust of this, there is one UI corner case - in the main view if you go from 1:1 to 1:1:1 (i.e. add a 3rd recipient, or Nth in a row) the icon only updates on page reload. I figure this will get sorted out at a later refactor as we make the client better / share more code with durable column.
One other small behavioral oddity is in the main view sometime we start loading with no conpherence. in that case, rather than show some incorrect icon, we show no icon (and "no title") and then things change at load. Seems okay-ish.
Finally, @chad - the CSS is a very work-man-like "use the built in stuff you can specify from PHP" so I'm sure it needs some love.
Test Plan: made all sorts of rooms and threads and liked the icons. noted smooth loading action as i switched around
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7629
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12163
Summary: Fixes T7586. If you can't edit a room, the pertinent UI is greyed out. One exception is the title of the room in the full viewer; this crumb is not disabled as it would be hard to read. Otherwise though, everything is disabled nicely.
Test Plan: tried to add participants when I wasn't allowed to and got an error. added participants otherwise okay. tried to edit title when i wasn't allowed and got an error. otherwise okay. left conpherence threads / rooms successfully.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7586
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12161
Summary:
Ref T7585. This implements everything specified, with a few caveats
- since rooms you have yet to join can't be viewed in the column yet, the column view has some bugs and isn't expected to work.
- the room you're looking at is just pre-pending to the top of the "recent" list
Test Plan: made a room that no one could join. verified when viewing that there was no comment ui. made a room that others could join. verified folks who had yet to join had a "join" button with an area for text. tried joining with / without message text and it worked in both cases
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7585
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12149
Summary: Ref T7584. This hits all the major bullets there. Next step on T7584 is figuring out how it integrates into the full UI and column UI. That said, this is a bit buggy feeling right now since Conpherence as is assumes you are a participant all over the place and rooms make no such assumption. I'll probably this bit up next.
Test Plan:
viewed /conpherence/room/ and saw stuff. viewed the "participant" query as two different users and saw different correct result sets. made a room via the button and it worked. tried to view a room I wasn't a participant in and it failed horribly, which is something to fix in a future diff
created a thread via "send message" on a user profile and it worked
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12113
Summary: Ref T7582. Also adds the basic logic for "rooms" implementation. Also makes sure we use the initializeNewThread method as appropriate.
Test Plan: made a new conpherence and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7582
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12103
Summary: The participant list can sometimes be `null`, which fails when we try to `array_fuse()` it.
Test Plan: Created a new thread cleanly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11969
Summary:
Ref T3165. Builds a dedicated index for Conpherence to avoid scale/policy filtering concerns.
- This is pretty one-off but I think it's generally OK.
- There's no UI for it.
- `ConpherenceFulltextQuery` is very low-level. You would need to do another query on the PHIDs it returns to actually show anything to the user.
- The `previousTransactionPHID` is so you can load chat context efficiently. Specifically, if you want to show results like this:
> previous line of context
> **line of chat that matches the query**
> next line of context
...you can read the previous lines out of `previousTransactionPHID` directly, and the next lines by issuing one query with `WHERE previousTransactionPHID IN (...)`.
I'm not 100% sure this is useful, but it seemed like a reasonable thing to provide, since there's no way to query this efficiently otherwise and I figure a lot of chat might make way more sense with a couple of lines of context.
Test Plan:
- Indexed a thread manually (whole thing indexed).
- Indexed a thread by updating it (just the new comment indexed).
- Wrote a hacky test script and got reasonable-looking query results.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3165
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11234
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary: Fixes T6690. The editor innards end up loading the conpherence object, whose policy is dictated by these participation objects.
Test Plan: pre patch could not create new conpherences. post patch I can create conpherences! i can also add people to conpherences and it works.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10927
Summary: Fixes T6343. Grepped for all callsites and added addLinkSection where needed.
Test Plan: Tested Differential, Maniphest, Conpherence, Ponder and Macro. Inspect HTML mail for anchor tags. Inspect text mails for non-disruption.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: talshiri, Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10762
Summary:
Ref T5861. Currently, mail tags are hard-coded; move them into applications. Each Editor defines its own tags.
This has zero impact on the UI or behavior.
Test Plan:
- Checked/unchecked some options, saved form.
- Swapped back to `master` and saw exactly the same values.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5861
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10238
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary: I'm pretty sure that `@group` annotations are useless now... see D9855. Also fixed various other minor issues.
Test Plan: Eye-ball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9859
Summary:
Ref T4083. This needs some work (mostly in the Conpherence JS itself), but is sort of functional. In particular:
- On thread pages, add the thread as a `pageObject`.
- After updating a thread, send a new "message" event to the server.
- Share a little more event posting code.
- In the browser, use event dispatch to respond to events.
- Add a listener for the new event type.
- Update conpherence threads (this part is really yucky).
Test Plan: With multiple browser windows / browsers open, posted a message to a thread, and saw it update everywhere.
Reviewers: joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4083
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9486
