Summary:
This addresses three issues with the current patch management system:
# Two people developing at the same time often pick the same SQL patch number, and then have to go rename it. The system catches this, but it's silly.
# Second/third-party developers can't use the same system to manage auxiliary storage they may want to add.
# There's no way to build mock databases for unit tests that need to do reads.
To resolve these things, you can now name your patches whatever you want and conflicts are just merge conflicts, which are less of a pain to fix than filename conflicts.
Dependencies are now a DAG, with implicit dependencies created on the prior patch if no dependencies are specified. Developers can add new concrete subclasses of `PhabricatorSQLPatchList` to add storage management, and define the dependency branchpoint of their patches so they apply in the correct order (although, generally, they should not depend on the mainline patches, presumably).
The commands `storage upgrade --namespace test1234` and `storage destroy --namespace test1234` will allow unit tests to build and destroy MySQL storage.
A "quickstart" mode allows an upgrade from scratch in ~1200ms. Destruction takes about 200ms. These seem like fairily reasonable costs to actually use in tests. Building from scratch patch-by-patch takes about 6000ms.
Test Plan:
- Created new databases from scratch with and without quickstart in a separate test namespace. Pointed the webapp at the test namespaces, browsed around, everything looked good.
- Compared quickstart and no-quickstart dump states, they're identical except for mysqldump timestamps and a few similar things.
- Upgraded a legacy database to the new storage format.
- Destroyed / dumped storage.
Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, nh
Maniphest Tasks: T140, T345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2323
Summary:
libphutil has some basic environmental sanity checks that we should use when initializing scripts in Phabricator. Principally this:
https://secure.phabricator.com/diffusion/PHU/browse/master/scripts/__init_script__.php;db643ee9f5f524e7$26
Without this, the default ini may set CLI errors to go to some logfile, which means exceptions aren't shown on stderr.
See https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/98/
Test Plan:
- Ran "php -derror_log=/dev/null -f ./bin/phd debug adslkfnasdfnalks" prior to change; got confusing lack of output.
- Ran "phd -derror_log=/dev/null -f ./bin/phd debug asdkflnaslfdnala" after change; got exception on stderr.
Reviewers: btrahan, killermonk
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1950
Summary: There are currently two files, but all scripts require both of them,
which is clearly silly. In the longer term I want to rewrite all of this init
stuff to be more structured (e.g., merge webroot/index.php and __init_script__
better) but this reduces the surface area of the ad-hoc "include files" API we
have now, at least.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for __init_env__.php (no hits)
- Ran a unit test (to test unit changes)
- Ran a daemon (to test daemon changes)
Reviewers: jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 976
Summary:
This is an attempt to satisfy a lot of the one-off requests a little more
generally, by providing a relatively generic piece of event architecture.
Allow the registation of event listeners which can react to various application
events (currently, task editing).
I'll doc this a bit better but I wanted to see if anyone had massive objections
to doing this or the broad approach. The specific problem I want to address is
that one client wants to do a bunch of routing for tasks via email, so it's
either build a hook, or have them override most of ManiphestReplyHandler, or
something slightly more general like this.
Test Plan: Wrote a silly listener that adds "Quack!" to a task every time it is
edited and edited some tasks. I was justly rewarded.
Reviewers: nh, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 881
Summary:
Provide a catchall mechanism to find unprotected writes.
- Depends on D758.
- Similar to WriteOnHTTPGet stuff from Facebook's stack.
- Since we have a small number of storage mechanisms and highly structured
read/write pathways, we can explicitly answer the question "is this page
performing a write?".
- Never allow writes without CSRF checks.
- This will probably break some things. That's fine: they're CSRF
vulnerabilities or weird edge cases that we can fix. But don't push to Facebook
for a few days unless you're prepared to deal with this.
- **>>> MEGADERP: All Conduit write APIs are currently vulnerable to CSRF!
<<<**
Test Plan:
- Ran some scripts that perform writes (scripts/search indexers), no issues.
- Performed normal CSRF submits.
- Added writes to an un-CSRF'd page, got an exception.
- Executed conduit methods.
- Did login/logout (this works because the logged-out user validates the
logged-out csrf "token").
- Did OAuth login.
- Did OAuth registration.
Reviewers: pedram, andrewjcg, erling, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran,
codeblock
Commenters: pedram
CC: aran, epriestley, pedram
Differential Revision: 777
Summary:
Some PHP has junky defaults for error_reporting / display_errors, and the "@"
silences fatals. The @ should never have been there, I just copied it from the
libphutil initializer where we use @ because the default error message can be
confusing and we display a more useful one.
Test Plan:
Added fatals to my conf file, got a decent error message instead of silent exit
with err=255.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, aran, jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 355
Summary: Amazon SES seems to be working well, except that it takes more than a
second to send mail in-process. Kick it out of process. (Between this and the
ImplementationAdapter layer, MetaMTA almost makes sense. :/)
Test Plan: Ran the daemon and got a flood of unsent test email.
Reviewers:
CC:
