Summary:
Ref T7707. Handles currently have a "status" field and a "disabled" field.
The "status" field has these possible values: "open", "closed", "1", "2". durp durp durp
Instead, do:
- status = <open, closed>
- availability = <full, partial, none, disabled>
I think these make more sense? And are a bit more general? And use the same kind of constants for all values!
Test Plan: Looked at all affected handles in all states (probably).
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7707
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12832
Summary: Seems reasonable? At least, it always matches however a user might think about documents (app or document). Unclear if "Diffusion" for example, are actually needed.
Test Plan: tested searching for "phriction", "wiki", "document", etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12577
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPHIDType` subclasses for clarity (see discussion in D9839). I'm not too keen on some of the resulting class names, so feel free to suggest alternatives.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9986
Summary: Ref T5655. Some discussion in D9839. Generally speaking, `Phabricator{$name}Application` is clearer than `PhabricatorApplication{$name}`.
Test Plan:
# Pinned and uninstalled some applications.
# Applied patch and performed migrations.
# Verified that the pinned applications were still pinned and that the uninstalled applications were still uninstalled.
# Performed a sanity check on the database contents.
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: hach-que, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9982
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getTypeConstant` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPHIDType`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 for a similar implementation.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9985
Summary: Ref T4029. When checking the view policy of a document, require the viewer to also be able to see all of the ancestors.
Test Plan:
- Hard-coded `/x/y/` to "no one".
- Checked that `/x/y/` is not visible.
- Checked that `/x/y/z/` is not visible.
- Checked that `/x/`, `/x/q/`, etc., are still visible.
- Tested project pages and sub-pages for project visibility.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9199
Summary: Ref T4029. We use a lot of very outdated content loading in Phriction, which blocks T4029.
Test Plan:
- Called phriction.info
- Called phriction.history
- Called phriction.edit
- Viewed document list.
- Deleted a document.
- Viewed history.
- Viewed a diff.
- Created a document.
- Edited a document.
- Moved a document.
- Tried to overwrite a document with "new".
- Tried to overwrite a document with "move".
- Viewed a moved document note.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: shadowhand, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4029
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9194
Summary:
Fixes T4917. Currently, if a user doesn't have access to, e.g., Phriction, they still get a checkbox in the search results to search for Wiki Documents. Those results will be filtered anyway, so this is confusing at best.
Instead, bind PHID types to applications. This is a relatively tailored fix; some areas for potential future work:
- Go through every PHID type and bind them all to applications. Vaguely nice to have, but doesn't get us anything for now.
- If no searchable application is installed, we don't show you an error state. This isn't currently possible ("People" is always installed) but in the interest of generality we could throw an exception or something at least.
- The elasticserach thing could probably constrain types to visible types, but we don't have a viewer there easily right now.
Test Plan: Uninstalled Phriction, saw the checkbox vanish.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4917
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8904
Summary:
These just got copy/pasted like crazy, the base class has the correct default implementation.
(I'm adding "H" for Herald Rules, which is why I was in this code.)
I also documented the existing prefixes at [[ Object Name Prefixes ]].
Test Plan: Verified base implementation. Typed some object names into the jump nav.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: hach-que, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7785
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.
This has several parts:
- For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
- If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
- For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
Summary: Ref T603. Ref D6941.
Test Plan: Clicked around all over - looked good. I plan to re-test D6941 to make sure the executeOne case works now as intended
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6944
