Summary:
Ref T8488, T8469, T8485.
This is done in regards to T8488 as far as users are concerned. There's still some classes, and etc. that should be re-named probably. T8469 and T8485 are basically moot now though.
Rather than having "Send Message" exposed, just expose "Create Room". Users get the full form. One change is "title" is now required.
This diff removes the concept of "isRoom" entirely.
Test Plan: Verifed a user with no conpherences had sensible data in both column view and full conpherence view. Created rooms with various policies and things worked well.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8469, T8485, T8488
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13351
Summary: Remove the `*TransactionType` classes and define the constants in the corresponding `*Transaction` class instead.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13188
Summary: Fixes T7840. Add some unit tests. One explicitly covers the case in T7840. Other cases are "base" cases for rooms and threads, plus the version if T7840 for a thread, where a policy exception should be thrown.
Test Plan: `arc unit` and was able to successfully add a file to a conpherence room i did not have edit permissions on
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12443
Summary: These arrays looks a little odd, most likely due to the autofix applied by `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_ARRAY_SEPARATOR`. See D12296 in which I attempt to improve the autocorrection from this linter rule.
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12281
Summary: Ref T7670. Add a few unit tests to make sure deleting everyone works. Also change remaining processRequest to handleRequest while in there.
Test Plan: `arc unit` passed
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7670
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12179
Summary:
Fixes T7629 plus an un filed bug that's breaking creating new threads since we need to add participants EVEN EARLIER than we were doing it now that policy is actually enforced.
Back to the main thrust of this, there is one UI corner case - in the main view if you go from 1:1 to 1:1:1 (i.e. add a 3rd recipient, or Nth in a row) the icon only updates on page reload. I figure this will get sorted out at a later refactor as we make the client better / share more code with durable column.
One other small behavioral oddity is in the main view sometime we start loading with no conpherence. in that case, rather than show some incorrect icon, we show no icon (and "no title") and then things change at load. Seems okay-ish.
Finally, @chad - the CSS is a very work-man-like "use the built in stuff you can specify from PHP" so I'm sure it needs some love.
Test Plan: made all sorts of rooms and threads and liked the icons. noted smooth loading action as i switched around
Reviewers: chad, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7629
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12163
Summary:
...maybe anyway because I can't reproduce it live. This diff does two things that should help with bugginess though - uses $viewer rather than $user (...$user is who we are looking at...) *AND* upgrades a Conpherence util class to Calendar, and said util class has unit tests and came about from fixing a similar bug in Conpherence back in the day.
Wrote some comments in the util class because I think it has a tendency to trip people up. These comments are not partciularly good however.
Test Plan: viewed user profile - looked good. viewed conpherence - looked good. ran unit tests - they passed. (note I would also like to push this live and verify Chad's profile is fixed on secure.phabricator.com)
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8341
Summary: D6114 fixed some bugs but on production it shows up as a new bug where Saturday is the first day? stop messing with the DateTime object so much and do some old school epoch manipulation. This works correctly on my laptop and my still fail in production, but it will rule out DateTime suckage.
Test Plan: still works on laptop
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6115
