Summary: Part of the groundwork for T11476.
Test Plan: ran `./bin/storage upgrade` and observed expected DB tables
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17736
Summary:
Ref T8116. Partially scavenged from D14152. This roughs in a new Packages application for Arcanist extensions and third-party applications, and adds a "Publisher" object.
A "Publisher" represents an individual or entity who is publishing a package, like "Phacility". It's explicitly //not// necessarily the original author -- just the primary entity vouching for the safety of the code.
A publisher just has a name and a unique key for now. For example, Phacility might have "Phacility" and "phacility", respectively.
Unique keys are immutable, e.g., the package "phacility/arcanist" will always be exactly the same package by exactly the same publisher.
Test Plan: {F1731621}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T8116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16314
Summary: Rename the XHPAST database from `{$NAMESPACE}_xpastview` to `{$NAMESPACE}_xhpast`.
Test Plan: Ran `./bin/storage --namespace test upgrade --no-quickstart`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14442
Summary: Use `PhutilClassMaQuery` instead of `PhutilSymbolLoader`, mostly for consistency. Depends on D13588.
Test Plan: Poked around a bunch of pages.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13589
Summary: DRAFT - throw together Phurl skeleton.
Test Plan: The idea is that `some/long/url` will become `install/Udet4d` and can be viewed and edited at `install/Udet4d/view` and `install/Udet4d/edit`, respectively?
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: joshuaspence, chad, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13681
Summary:
Basic plumbing for Badges application.
- You can make Badges.
- You can look at a list of them.
- They can be edited.
- They can be assigned to people.
- You can revoke them from people.
- You can subscribe to them.
Test Plan: Make Badges with various options. Give them to people. Take them away from people.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: tycho.tatitscheff, johnny-bit, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T6526
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13626
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary: Use `__CLASS__` instead of hard-coding class names. Depends on D12605.
Test Plan: Eyeball it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: hach-que, Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12806
Summary:
Ref T6930. This application collects and displays performance samples -- roughly, things Phabricator spent some kind of resource on. It will collect samples on different types of resources and events:
- Wall time (queries, service calls, pages)
- Bytes In / Bytes Out (requests)
- Implicit requests to CSS/JS (static resources)
I've started with the simplest case (static resources), since this can be used in an immediate, straghtforward way to improve packaging (look at which individual files have the most requests recently).
There's no aggregation yet and a lot of the data isn't collected properly. Future diffs will add more dimension data (controllers, users), more event and resource types (queries, service calls, wall time), and more display options (aggregation, sorting).
Test Plan: {F389344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6930
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12623
Summary:
Ref T6238. I'm building the instance management application now, but not putting it in the upstream -- I think the only use case for it is to build SAAS. If someone comes up with a use case (maybe a college course that wants to create an instance per-class or something?) we could open it up eventually, but it seems cleaner to keep it out of the upstream until we have such a use case.
I need to add schema patches. Make it easier for a subclass to just "add all the patches in this directory", like "autopatches/" works.
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage status`, saw all normal patches still valid.
- In some future diff, the instances application will use this to apply patches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6238
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10848
Summary:
Ref T4209. This creates storage for public keys against authorized hosts, such that servers can be authorized to make Conduit calls as the omnipotent user.
Servers are registered into this system by running the following command once:
```
bin/almanac register
```
NOTE: This doesn't implement authorization between servers, just the storage of public keys.
Placing this against Almanac seemed like the most sensible place, since I'm imagining in future that the `register` command will accept more information (like the hostname of the server so it can be found in the service directory).
Test Plan: Ran `bin/almanac register` and saw the host (and public key information) appear in the database.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T4209
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10400
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.
You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).
Only notable decisions:
- Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
- I think that's it?
Test Plan:
- Created an initiative.
- Edited an initiative.
- Changed application policy defaults.
- Searched for initiatives.
- Subscribed to an initiative.
- Opened/closed an initiative.
- Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
- Destroyed an initiative.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5835
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
Summary:
This adds a system which basically keeps a record of recent actions, who took them, and how many "points" they were worth, like:
epriestley email.add 1 1233989813
epriestley email.add 1 1234298239
epriestley email.add 1 1238293981
We can use this to rate-limit actions by examining how many actions the user has taken in the past hour (i.e., their total score) and comparing that to an allowed limit.
One major thing I want to use this for is to limit the amount of error email we'll send to an email address. A big concern I have with sending more error email is that we'll end up in loops. We have some protections against this in headers already, but hard-limiting the system so it won't send more than a few errors to a particular address per hour should provide a reasonable secondary layer of protection.
This use case (where the "actor" needs to be an email address) is why the table uses strings + hashes instead of PHIDs. For external users, it might be appropriate to rate limit by cookies or IPs, too.
To prove it works, I rate limited adding email addresses. This is a very, very low-risk security thing where a user with an account can enumerate addresses (by checking if they get an error) and sort of spam/annoy people (by adding their address over and over again). Limiting them to 6 actions / hour should satisfy all real users while preventing these behaviors.
Test Plan:
This dialog is uggos but I'll fix that in a sec:
{F137406}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8683
Summary:
Ref T3583. General idea here is:
- Users will be able to create `DashboardPanel`s, which are things like the jump nav, or a minifeed, or recent assigned tasks, or recent tokens given, or whatever else.
- The `DashboardPanel`s can be combined into `Dashboard`s, which select specific panels and arrange them in some layout (and maybe have a few other options eventually).
- Then, you'll be able to set a specific `Dashboard` for your home page, and maybe for project home pages. But you can also use `Dashboard`s on their own if you just like dashboards.
My plan is pretty much:
- Put in basic infrastructure for dashboards (this diff).
- Add basic create/edit (next few diffs).
- Once dashboards sort of work, do the homepage integration.
This diff does very little: you can't create dashboards or panels yet, and thus there are no dashboards to look at. This is all skeleton code, pretty much.
IMPORTANT: We need an icon bwahahahahaha
Test Plan:
omg si purrfect
{F106367}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8109
Summary:
Currently, to add new migration patches you need to:
- Add a file to `resources/sql/patches/`; then
- add an entry to `src/infrastructure/storage/blahblah/BlahBlahBlah.php`.
The second step isn't actually necessary, and we've been using this system for a long time without any issues arising.
Instead of requiring manual adjustments to the patch list, infer the patch specifications from the files on disk so you don't need to do step 2.
Also, simplify the existing data, which can //mostly// be derived from patch names. There are a few exceptions/errors, noted inline, which are preserved for compatibility.
Test Plan:
- For the new genration of `name` and `type`, I added code to check that the old and new values were the same before converting. This caught the two inline exceptions ("emailtableport", "drydockresouces").
- Added new patches to `autopatches/` and ran `bin/storage status` to verify they got picked up correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7894
Summary:
Repositories currently have a no-UI "shortcut" feature which is only used by Facebook (and I'm not sure it's even used). As implemented, this feature is policy-oblivious and kind of nonsensical. Throw it away.
I'm open to reimplementing this, but I want to see some level of interest in it before I do. The new implementation would add shortcuts to each repository, similar to how mirrors work. My original plan was to follow this up with such an implementation (it's half-implemented in my sandbox), but as I worked through it I'm not sure it's really valuable.
Test Plan: Browsed repository list, grep.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: FacebookPOC, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7862
Summary:
Ref T4264. This gets most of the plumbing in for "object" rules, which will bind to a specific object, like a repository or project.
It does not yet let you actually create these rules.
Test Plan: Ran `storage upgrade`, created/edited rules, browsed Herald.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4264
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7847
Summary:
Ref T1049. Generally, it's useful to separate test/trial/manual runs from production/automatic runs.
For example, you don't want to email a bunch of people that the build is broken just because you messed something up when writing a new build plan. You'd rather try it first, then promote it into production once you have some good runs.
Similarly, test runs generally should not affect the outside world, etc. Finally, some build steps (like "wait for other buildables") may want to behave differently when run in production/automation than when run in a testing environment (where they should probably continue immediately).
So, formalize the distinction between automatic buildables (those created passively by the system in response to events) and manual buildables (those created explicitly by users). Add filtering, and stop the automated parts of the system from interacting with the manual parts (for example, we won't show manual results on revisions).
This also moves the "Apply Build Plan" to a third, new home: instead of the sidebar or Buildables, it's now on plans. I think this generally makes more sense given how things have developed. Broadly, this improves isolation of test environments.
Test Plan: Created some builds, browsed around, used filters, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7824
Summary: Ref T4010. I'll hold this for a bit, but we should eventually drop this table once the dust has settled.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7372
Summary: Ref T4195. We need these in Herald, since HeraldTranscripts need to refer to a PHID which they acted upon.
Test Plan:
Ran migration, got PHIDs:
mysql> select phid from repository_pushlog limit 3;
+--------------------------------+
| phid |
+--------------------------------+
| PHID-PSHL-25jnc6cjgzw5rwqgmr7r |
| PHID-PSHL-2vrvmtslkrj5yv7nxsv2 |
| PHID-PSHL-34x262zkrwoka6mplony |
+--------------------------------+
3 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4195
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7780
Summary: This implements support for enforcing and setting policies in Phragment.
Test Plan: Set policies and ensured they were enforced successfully.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7751
Summary:
Ref T4212. This implements snapshots in Phragment, which allows you to take a snapshot of a fragment at a given point in time, and download a ZIP of the snapshot as it was in this state.
There's also functionality for deleting and promoting snapshots. You can promote a snapshot to either the latest version or any other snapshot of the fragment.
Test Plan: Clicked around, took some snapshots, promoted them to different points and deleted snapshots. Also downloaded ZIPs of the snapshots and saw the right versions coming through for all the files downloaded.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4205, T4212
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7741
Summary:
This implements support for creating and updating fragments from ZIP files. It allows you to upload a ZIP via the Files application, create a fragment from it, and have it recursively imported into Phragment. Updating that folder with another ZIP will recursively create, update and delete files as appropriate.
The logic for creating and updating fragments from files has also been centralized into the PhragmentFragment class. Directories are also now supported; a directory fragment is simply a fragment that has no patches; thus a directory fragment can be converted to a file fragment by uploading a first patch for it.
Test Plan: Uploaded ZIP files through the interface and saw all of the fragments get created and updated as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7729
Summary: Ref T4205. This is an initial implementation of Phragment. You can create and browse fragments in the system (but you can't yet view a fragment's patches / history).
Test Plan: Clicked around and created fragments.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7726
Summary: This implements support for explicitly marking the sequence of build steps. Users can now drag and re-order build steps in plans, and artifact dependencies are re-calculated so that if you move "Run Command" before "Lease Host", the "Run Command" step has it's artifact setting cleared and thus the step becomes invalid.
Test Plan: Re-ordered build steps and observed dependencies being correctly recalculated.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7715
Summary:
Ref T4195. This log serves two purposes:
- It's a log, so you can see what happened. Particularly, in Git/Hg, there is no other way to tell:
- Who //pushed// a change (vs committed / authored)?
- When was a change pushed?
- What was the old value of some tag/branch before someone destroyed it?
- We can hand these objects off to Herald to implement pre-commit rules.
This is a very basic implementation, but gets some data written and has a basic UI for it.
Test Plan: {F87339}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4195
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7705
Summary: This implements build targets as outlined in D7582. Build targets represent an instance of a build step particular to the build. Logs and artifacts have been adjusted to attach to build targets instead of build / build step pairs.
Test Plan: Ran builds and clicked around the interface. Everything seemed to work.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4111, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7703
Summary:
//(this diff used to be about applying policies to blueprints)//
This restructures Drydock so that blueprints are instances in the DB, with an associated implementation class. Thus resources now have a `blueprintPHID` instead of `blueprintClass` and DrydockBlueprint becomes a DAO. The old DrydockBlueprint is renamed to DrydockBlueprintImplementation, and the DrydockBlueprint DAO has a `blueprintClass` column on it.
This now just implements CAN_VIEW and CAN_EDIT policies for blueprints, although they are probably not enforced in all of the places they could be.
Test Plan: Used the `create-resource` and `lease` commands. Closed resources and leases in the UI. Clicked around the new and old lists to make sure everything is still working.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4111, T2015
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7638
Summary:
Ref T4038. This adds everything except the actual pushing part for mirrors.
This isn't the most beautiful or sophisticated UI, but I want get the authoritative repositories self-hosted and get users beta-ing hosting as soon as possible. We can do transactions, etc., later on.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4038
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7632
Summary: Fixes T4122. Ref T2230. Instead of storing credentials on each repository, store them in Passphrase. This allows easy creation/management of many repositories which share credentials.
Test Plan:
- Upgraded repositories.
- Created and edited repositories.
- Pulled HTTP and SSH repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2230, T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7629
Summary: Ref T4122. Add an edge to keep track of where a credential is used, and show it in the UI.
Test Plan:
See "Used By":
{F84099}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7628
Summary: ...and get the basic edit flow "working" for a new NuanceSourceDefinition - the Phabricator Form. ...and fix a dumb bug in the query class so when you redirect to the view page / try to edit an existing NuanceSource you don't fatal.
Test Plan: played around with the edit form and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7585
Summary:
Ref T4122. Implements a credential management application for the uses described in T4122.
@chad, this needs an icon, HA HA HAHA HA BWW HA HA HA
bwahaha
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7608
Summary:
Ref T4110. This denormalized field used to power "Group By: Assigned" got dropped in the T2217 migration at some point.
Restore its population, and fix all the data in the database.
Test Plan: Ran migration, verified database came out reasonable-looking. Reassigned a task, verified database. Ran a "Group By: assigned" query.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7602
Summary:
Small step forward which improves existing stuff or lays groudwork for future stuff:
- Currently, to check for email verification, we have to single-query the email address on every page. Instead, denoramlize it into the user object.
- Migrate all the existing users.
- When the user verifies an email, mark them as `isEmailVerified` if the email is their primary email.
- Just make the checks look at the `isEmailVerified` field.
- Add a new check, `isUserActivated()`, to cover email-verified plus disabled. Currently, a non-verified-but-not-disabled user could theoretically use Conduit over SSH, if anyone deployed it. Tighten that up.
- Add an `isApproved` flag, which is always true for now. In a future diff, I want to add a default-on admin approval queue for new accounts, to prevent configuration mistakes. The way it will work is:
- When the queue is enabled, registering users are created with `isApproved = false`.
- Admins are sent an email, "[Phabricator] New User Approval (alincoln)", telling them that a new user is waiting for approval.
- They go to the web UI and approve the user.
- Manually-created accounts are auto-approved.
- The email will have instructions for disabling the queue.
I think this queue will be helpful for new installs and give them peace of mind, and when you go to disable it we have a better opportunity to warn you about exactly what that means.
Generally, I want to improve the default safety of registration, since if you just blindly coast through the path of least resistance right now your install ends up pretty open, and realistically few installs are on VPNs.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, verified `isEmailVerified` populated correctly.
- Created a new user, checked DB for verified (not verified).
- Verified, checked DB (now verified).
- Used Conduit, People, Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7572
Summary:
Depends on D7519.
This implements support for build logs in Harbormaster. This includes support for appending to a log from the "Run Remote Command" build step.
It also adds the ability to cancel builds.
Currently the build view page doesn't update the logs live; I'm sure this can be achieved with Javelin, but I don't have enough experience with Javelin to actually make it poll from updates to content in the background.
{F79151}
{F79153}
{F79150}
{F79152}
Test Plan:
Tested this by setting up SSH on a Windows machine and using a Remote Command configured with:
```
C:\Windows\system32\cmd.exe /C cd C:\Build && mkdir Build_${timestamp} && cd Build_${timestamp} && git clone --recursive https://github.com/hach-que/Tychaia.git && cd Tychaia && Protobuild.exe && C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\MSBuild.exe Tychaia.Windows.sln
```
and observed the output of the build stream from the Windows machine into Phabricator.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7521
Summary:
I updated the wiki too - https://secure.phabricator.com/w/projects/pebkac/ - with what I am thinking right now. Rough plan here is
- next diff:
- implement editors and transactions
- implement "web type" for contact source
- /pebkac/item/new/ will be the entry point for this
- implement "actions" on a contact
- probably some "polish" on the scaffolding laid out here; like "create" permissions maybs
- diffs after that:
- implement "twitter" type for source
- implement email reply handler stuff for item and source
Probs a great time to blast huge holes in all this stuff. :D
Test Plan: these pages load and arc lint doesn't complain
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7465
Summary:
Ref T1049. Ref T2222. `DifferentialDiff` does not currently have a PHID, but we need it for Harbormaster and ApplicationTransactions. See some discussion in D7501.
(I split the SQL into two sections so we can't fail in the middle. At some point, I'd like to do a pass on the migration stuff and get this happening automatically, and also simplify the PatchList.)
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade`.
- Checked for valid PHIDs in the database.
- Used `phid.query` to look up a diff by PHID.
- Created a new diff and verified it got a PHID.
Reviewers: btrahan, hach-que
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T2222, T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7513
Summary:
Depends on D7498.
This implements support for a "build step implementation". Build steps have an associated class name (which makes the class in PHP) and a details field, which is serialized JSON (same as PhabricatorRepository).
This also implements a SleepBuildStepImplementation which just pauses the build for a specified period of seconds.
Test Plan:
Inserted a build step with `insert into harbormaster_buildstep (phid, buildPlanPHID, className, details, dateCreated, dateModified) values ('', 'PHID-HMCP-zkh5w6czfbfpk2gxwdeo', 'SleepBuildStepImplementation', '{"seconds":5}', NOW(), NOW());` (adjusting the build plan PHID as appropriate).
Started the daemon and applied the build plan to a buildable, and saw the daemon take a 5 second delay after creating `SleepBuildStepImplementation`.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7499
Summary: This allows users to set their HTTP access passwords via Diffusion interface.
Test Plan: Clicked the "Set HTTP Access Password" link, set a password and saw it appear in the DB.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, hach-que, btrahan
Reviewed By: hach-que
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, jamesr
Maniphest Tasks: T2230
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7462
Summary:
`RepositoryStatusMessage` is basically a key/value table associated with a repository that I'm using to let the daemons store the most recent event of a given type, so we can easily show it on the status dashboard. I think this will be a lot easier for users to figure out than digging through logfiles.
I'm also going to write the "this needs a pull" status here eventually, for reducing the time lapse between pushes and discovery.
- Add storage for these messages.
- Have the pull engine populate the INIT phase. I'll do the FETCH phase next.
- Update the status readout to show all the various states.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7461
Summary:
Fixes T3416. Fixes T1733.
- Adds a flag to the commit table showing whether or not we have parsed it.
- The flag is set to `0` initially when the commit is discovered.
- The flag is set to `1` when the changes are parsed.
- The UI can now use the flag to distinguish between "empty commit" and "commit which we haven't imported changes for yet".
- Simplify rendering code a little bit.
- Fix an issue with the Message parser for empty commits.
- There's a key on the flag so we can do `SELECT * FROM repository_commit WHERE repositoryID = %d AND importStatus = 0 LIMIT 1` soon, to determine if a repository is fully imported or not. This will let us improve the UI (Ref T776, Ref T3217).
Test Plan:
- Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`.
- Created an empty commit.
- Without the daemons running, ran `bin/repository pull GTEST` and `bin/repository discover GTEST`.
- Viewed web UI to get the first screenshot ("Still Importing...").
- Ran the message and change steps with `scripts/repository/reparse.php`.
- Viewed web UI to get the second screenshot ("Empty Commit").
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T776, T1733, T3416, T3217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7428
Summary: No editing or view yet, just adds the schema and a policy default. Part of D7391.
Test Plan: `bin/storage upgrade`
Reviewers: hach-que, btrahan
Reviewed By: hach-que
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2230
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7415
Summary:
Ref T1049. I don't really want to sink too much time into this right now, but a seemingly reasonable architecture came to me in a dream. Here's a high-level overview of how things fit together:
- **"Build"**: In Harbormaster, "build" means any process we want to run against a working copy. It might actually be building an executable, but it might also be running lint, running unit tests, generating documentation, generating symbols, running a deploy, setting up a sandcastle, etc.
- `HarbormasterBuildable`: A "buildable" is some piece of code which build operations can run on. Generally, this is either a Differential diff or a Diffusion commit. The Buildable class just wraps those objects and provides a layer of abstraction. Currently, you can manually create a buildable from a commit. In the future, this will be done automatically.
- `HarbormasterBuildStep`: A "build step" is an individual build operation, like "run lint", "run unit", "build docs", etc. The step defines how to perform the operation (for example, "run unit tests by executing 'arc unit'"). In this diff, this barely exists.
- `HarbormasterBuildPlan`: This glues together build steps into groups or sequences. For example, you might want to "run unit", and then "deploy" if the tests pass. You can create a build plan which says "run step "unit tests", then run step "deploy" on success" or whatever. In the future, these will also contain triggers/conditions ("Automatically run this build plan against every commit") and probably be able to define failure actions ("If this plan fails, send someone an email"). Because build plans will run commands, only administrators can manage them.
- `HarbormasterBuild`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildPlan` against a `Buildable`. It tracks the build status and collects results, so you can see if the build is running/successful/failed. A `Buildable` may have several `Build`s, because you can execute more than one `BuildPlan` against it. For example, you might have a "documentation" build plan which you run continuously against HEAD, but a "unit" build plan which you want to run against every commit.
- `HarbormasterBuildTarget`: This is the concrete result of running a `BuildStep` against a `Buildable`. These are children of `Build`. A step might be able to produce multiple targets, but generally this is something like "Unit Tests" or "Lint" and has an overall status, so you can see at a glance that unit tests were fine but lint had some issues.
- `HarbormasterBuildItem`: An optional subitem for a target. For lint, this might be an individual file. For unit tests, an individual test. For normal builds, an executable. For deploys, a server. For documentation generation, there might just not be subitems.
- `HarbormasterBuildLog`: Provides extra information, like command/execution transcripts. This is where stdout/stderr will get dumped, and general details and other messages.
- `HarbormasterBuildArtifact`: Stores side effects or results from build steps. For example, something which builds a binary might put the binary in "Files" and then put its PHID here. Unit tests might put coverage information here. Generally, any build step which produces some high-level output object can use this table to record its existence.
This diff implements almost nothing and does nothing useful, but puts most of these object relationships in place. The two major things you can't easily do with these objects are:
1) Run arbitrary cron jobs. Jenkins does this, but it feels tacked on and I don't know of anyone using it for that. We could create fake Buildables to get a similar effect, but if we need to do this I'd rather do it elsewhere in general. Build and cron/service/monitoring feel like pretty different problems to me.
2) Run parameterized/matrix steps (maybe?). Bamboo has this plan/stage/task/job breakdown where a build step can generate a zillion actual jobs, like "build client on x86", "build server on x86", "build client on ARM", "build server on ARM", etc. We can sort of do this by having a Step map to multiple Targets, but I haven't really thought about it too much and it may end up being not-great. I'd guess we have like an 80% chance of getting a clean implementation if/when we get there. I suspect no one actually needs this, or when they do they'll just implement a custom Step and it can be parameterized at that level. I'm not too worried about this overall.
The major difference between this and Jenkins/Bamboo/TravisCI is that all three of those are **plan-centric**: the primary object in the system is a build plan, and the dashboard shows you all your build plans and the current status. I don't think this is the right model. One disadvantage is that you basically end up with top-level messaging that says "Trunk is broken", not "Trunk was broken by commit af32f392f". Harbormaster is **buildable-centric**: the primary object in the system is stuff you can run build operations against (commits/branches/revisions), and actual build plans are secondary. The main view will be "recent commits on this branch, and whether they're good or not" -- which I think is what's most important in a larger/more complex product -- not the pass/fail status of all jobs. This also makes it easier and more natural to integrate with Differential and Diffusion, which both care about the overall status of the commit/revision, not the current status of jobs.
Test Plan: Poked around, but this doesn't really do anything yet.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: zeeg, chad, aran, seporaitis
Maniphest Tasks: T1049
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7368
Summary:
Ref T4010. Projects have a weird proto-version of ApplicationTransactions which is very similar but not quite the same.
Move the storage to a modern format, but keep all the other code for now.
Test Plan: Migrated project transactions; edited projects.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7370
Summary:
Ref T1344. This is //very// rough. Some UI issues:
- Empty states for the board and columns are junky.
- Column widths are crazy. I think we need to set them to fixed-width, since we may have an arbitrarily large number of columns?
- I don't think we have the header UI elements in M10 yet and that mock is pretty old, so I sort of very roughly approximated it.
- What should we do when you click a task title? Popping the whole task in a dialog is possible but needs a bunch of work to actually work. Might need to build "sheets" or something.
- Icons are slightly clipped for some reason.
- All the backend stuff is totally faked.
Generally, my plan is just to use these to implement all of T390. Specifically:
- "Kanban" projects will have "Backlog" on the left. You'll drag them toward the right as you make progress.
- "Milestone" projects will have "No Milestone" on the left, then "Milestone 9", "Milestone 8", etc.
- "Sprint" projects will have "Backlog" on the left, then "Sprint 31", "Sprint 30", etc.
So all of these things end up being pretty much exactly the same, with some minor text changes and new columns showing up on the left vs the right or whatever.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran, sascha-egerer
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7374
