Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary: Ref T603. Ref D6941.
Test Plan: Clicked around all over - looked good. I plan to re-test D6941 to make sure the executeOne case works now as intended
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6944
Summary: Adds plain support for object lists that just look like lists
Test Plan: review UIexamples and a number of other applications
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6922
Summary:
Ref T3599
Go through everything, grep a bit, replace some bits.
Test Plan: Navigate around a bit
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3599
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6871
Summary:
Ref T3775 (discussion here). Ref T2625.
T3775 presents two problems:
# Existing tools which linked to `/differential/active/epriestley/` (that is, put a username in the URL) can't generate search links now.
# Humans can't edit the URL anymore, either.
I think (1) is an actual issue, and this fixes it. I think (2) is pretty fluff, and this doesn't really try to fix it, although it probably improves it.
The fix for (1) is:
- Provide a helper to read a parameter containing either a list of user PHIDs or a list of usernames, so `/?users[]=PHID-USER-xyz` (from a tokenizer) and `/?users=alincoln,htaft` (from an external program) are equivalent inputs.
- Rename all the form parameters to be more digestable (`authorPHIDs` -> `authors`). Almost all of them were in this form already anyway. This just gives us `?users=alincoln` instead of `userPHIDs=alincoln`.
- Inside ApplicationSearch, if a request has no query associated with it but does have query parameters, build a query from the request instead of issuing the user's default query. Basically, this means that `/differential/` runs the default query, while `/differential/?users=x` runs a custom query.
Test Plan: {F56612}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2625, T3775
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6840
Summary: Some more callsites, let me know if you see others, I think think is 98% of them now.
Test Plan: tested each page
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6814
Summary:
This attempts some consistency in form layouts. Notably, they all now contain headers and are 16px off the sides and tops of pages. Also updated dialogs to the same look and feel. I think I got 98% of forms with this pass, but it's likely I missed some buried somewhere.
TODO: will take another pass as consolidating these colors and new gradients in another diff.
Test Plan: Played in my sandbox all week. Please play with it too and let me know how they feel.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6806
Summary: Ref T3657. We currently try to generate a project crumb on the "Create Project" page, but fail. Paper that over until I can sort out T3657.
Test Plan: Loaded project create page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3657
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6793
Summary: Ref T3663. Same as D6785, but for branches. No writes to this table yet.
Test Plan: Clicked "View History", got a blank but non-broken page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6787
Summary:
We can get this out of PHIDType reasonably in all cases and simplify implementation here.
None of these translate correctly anyway so they're basically debugging/development strings.
Test Plan: `grep`, browsed some transactions
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6786
Summary: Ref T3663. There's no data recorded in this table yet, but add the UI and controller for it. Edits and such will eventually go here.
Test Plan: Clicked "View History" on a project, got an empty but non-broken page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6785
Summary:
Ref T3663. This is a proto-transaction record which is obsoleted by real transactions. It has no UI, so I'm not bothering to retain/migrate the data since there's no regression.
Just get rid of it and all its writers. I'm keeping the table for now in case something crazy uses this somehow, so no data is actually destroyed.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6784
Summary: This has two use sites and no special logic.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6783
Summary: Ref T3718. Releeph has a custom implementation of this exception; a more general version exists in CustomField. Use the more general one. Nothing catches the specific one.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6782
Summary: Ref T3092. This was obsoleted recently and has no more call/use sites.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6779
Summary: Ref T3663. Does what it says on the tin.
Test Plan: Ran `storage upgrade`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6778
Summary: Ref T3663. This is obsolete code which is used only in this migration, which Facebook has already performed and which isn't relevant for any other installs.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6777
Summary: Ref T3092. Same deal as D6771, but for branches rather than projects.
Test Plan: {F54855}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6775
Summary:
Ref T3092.
Releeph's objects basically go like this:
- At the top level, we have Projects (like "www" or "libphutil")
- Each project has Branches (like "LATEST" or "v1.1.3")
- Each branch has Requests (like pull requests, e.g. "please merge commit X into branch Y (in project Z)")
Currently, there's no real "project detail" or "branch detail" page. Instead, we have a search results page for their contained objects. That is, the "project detail" page shows a list of branches in the project, using ApplicationSearch.
This means that operations like "edit" and "deactivate" are one level up, on the respective list pages.
Instead, move details onto the detail pages. This gives us more room for actions and information, and simplifies the list views.
Basically, these are "detail pages" where the object content is a search interface. We do something simliar to this in Phame right now, although it's messier there (no ApplicationSearch yet).
@chad, you might have some ideas here. Roughly, the design question is "How should we present an object's detail view when its content is really a search interface (Phame Blog for Posts, Releeph Project for Branches)?"
I think the simple approach I've taken here (see screenshot) gives us reasonable results, but overall it's something we haven't done much or done too much thinking about, I think.
Test Plan: {F54774}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6771
Summary:
^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n
Test Plan: Looked through the diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
Summary: Ref T3092. Fixes T3724. Use modern/flexible UI for these interfaces. Removes the ability to retarget an existing branch (you can just close it and open a new one if you made a mistake).
Test Plan: {F54437} {F54438}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T3724
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6765
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.
This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.
Test Plan: {F54344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
Summary:
Ref T3721. Releeph currently attempts to implement a flexible, field-driven search for branches, but it's building all of its own infrastructure and it ends up heading down some weird paths. In particular, it loads **every** request and then makes calls into fields to filter them. It also tries to be very very general, which isn't really necessary (for example, I think it's reasonable for us to assume that we won't let you disable the "requestor" field).
ApplicationSearch and CustomField provide more scalable approaches to this problem; move search on top of them. The query still ends up doing some filtering in-process, but it's now far more limited in scope and can be denormalized later.
Test Plan: {F54304}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3721
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6758
Summary:
Ref T3718. This moves custom field rendering on the edit screen to PhabricatorCustomField and makes all the APIs conformant.
We still run through edit with both old-school and new-school sets of fields, because the actual editing isn't on the new stuff yet. That will happen in a diff or two.
Test Plan: Edited a request; intentionally introduced errors and verified the form behaved as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan, testuser1122344
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6756
Summary: Ref T3718. This is not used and does not seem particularly useful.
Test Plan: Grep.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6755
Summary:
Fixes T3661. Ref T3718. This makes Releeph custom fields extend PhabricatorCustomField so we can start moving over other pieces of infrastructure (rendering, storage, etc) to run through the same pathways. It's roughly the minimum amount of work required to be able to move forward.
NOTE: This removes per-project custom field selectors. Fields are now configured for an entire install. My understanding is that Facebook does not use this feature, and modern field infrastructure has moved away from selectors.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited projects, branches, and requests in Releeph. Grepped for removed config. Grepped for `field_selector`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3661, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6750
Summary: Ref T3656. Releeph denormalizes branch cut point identifiers into Branch objects, but this information isn't useful or used for sorting, filtering, or enforcing unique constraints. Instead, derive it via noramlized pathways from the `cutPointCommitPHID`.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade. Ran `releephwork.getbranch` and `releeph.getbranches`. Grepped for `cutPointCommitIdentifier`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6636
Summary:
Fixes T3660. Releeph Projects currently have an unused one-to-one mapping to Phabricator projects. This isn't consistent with other applications and has no integrations or uses. Get rid of it.
NOTE: Waiting for signoff from @legneato on T3660 before pulling the trigger here.
Test Plan: Created and edited Releeph projects. Grepped for references to project ID; there are a dozen or so but they're all either Releeph projects or Arcanist projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6635
Summary: Ref T3655. Depends on D6633. This removes the writes and the column.
Test Plan: Created a project, edited a project. Verified the table doesn't have any keys including this column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6634
Summary:
Ref T3655. ReleephProject currently has both `repositoryID` and `repositoryPHID`, which point to the same object and are reudundant. Get rid of all reads of `repositoryID`.
NOTE: This makes project loads depend on repository loads. The eventual rule here will be that you must be able to see a repository in order to see projects for that repository, which seems like a reasonable rule. We might need to tailor it more than this (e.g., if there are branch read permissions down the line) but this seems like a reasonable minimum.
Test Plan: Grepped for `repositoryID` in `releeph/`. Called `releeph.getbranches`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6633
Summary: Fixes a query in √D6260.
Test Plan: View a Releeph RQ and verify that the "churn" field renders and has the right numbers in it.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6702
Summary:
Ref T3092.
- Check for a duplicate key error;
- do less single loading and use Query classes;
- use responsive UI elements;
- add crumbs.
Test Plan: Created a new project, and hit error cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6629
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.
Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.
Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
Summary:
Ref T2715. Ref T3551. Ref T603. This does a few things, but they're all sort of small:
- We commonly use a `getX()` / `attachX()` pattern, but have very similar code in the `getX()` method every time. Provide a convenience method to make this pattern easier to write.
- We use `willFilterPage()` in many queries, but it currently is called with zero or more results. This means we have a lot of "if no results, return nothing" boilerplate. Make it call only for one or more results.
- Implement `PhabricatorPolicyInterface` on `ReleephBranch`. A branch has the same policy as its project.
- Implement `ReleephBranchQuery`.
- Move the branch PHID type to application PHID infrastructure.
Test Plan: Browsed Releeph. Used `phid.query` to query branch PHIDs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2715, T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6512
Summary:
Ref T2715.
- Remove the "PHID" application. `phid.query` provides a reasonable way for developers to get this data without requiring a top-level application.
- Remove some dead/uncalled code.
Test Plan: No more PHID application. Grepped for callsites.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6511
Summary: Fixes T3548. Concrete Releeph controllers currently extend either from ReleephController or PhabricatorController directly. Instead, make them all extend ReleephController. Introduce ReleephProjectController for controllers which depend on project context. Project context code which lived in ReleephController moves to ReleephProjectController.
Test Plan: Viewed list, project, releases, requests.
Reviewers: btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3548
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6472
Summary: Fixes T3546. The Application just used an outdated method name. Use the modern method name.
Test Plan: {F50319}
Reviewers: btrahan, edward, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3546
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6471
Summary: Ref T603. This query isn't policy-aware yet, but prepare for it to be one day.
Test Plan: Looked at: home page; differential home; differential detail; diffusion browse. Made differential.query conduit call.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6337
Summary:
Ref T2222.
I'm thinking about how I want to approach the Asana sync, and I want to try to do T2222 first so that we can build it cleanly on top of ApplicationTransactions. I think we can at least walk down this road a little bit and if it turns out to be scary we can take another approach.
I was generally very happy with how the auth migration turned out (seemingly, it was almost completely clean), and want to pursue a similar strategy here. Basically:
- Wrap the new objects in the old objects for reads/writes.
- Migrate all the existing data to the new table.
- Everything hard is done; move things over a piece at a time at a leisurely pace in lots of smallish, relatively-easy-to-understand changes.
This deletes or abstracts all reads of the DifferentialComment table. In particular, these things are **deleted**:
- The script `undo_commits.php`, which I haven't pointed anyone at in a very long time.
- The `differential.getrevisionfeedback` Conduit method, which has been marked deprecated for a year or more.
- The `/stats/` interface in Differential, which should be rebuilt on Fact and has never been exposed in the UI. It does a ton of joins and such which are prohibitively difficult to migrate.
This leaves a small number of reading interfaces, which I replaced with a new `DifferentialCommentQuery`. Some future change will make this actually load transactions and wrap them with DifferentialComment interfaces.
Test Plan: Viewed a revision; made revision comments
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: edward, chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6260
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary:
In Releeph, `ReleephRequestHeaderView` will render you a "mark-manually-picked" button if (a) you are authoritative (chuckr) or (b) you are the person who created this Releeph request.
However `ReleephRequestActionController`, which handles these button presses, will only do something if you are (a). This patch honors your button pressing if you are (b) as well.
Test Plan: Push buttons. There's another bug in the Javascript do-stuff-without-reloading-the-page code that handles these button pushes, but I'd like to fix that separately from handling this hi-pri bug.
Reviewers: epriestley, wez
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6036
Summary: I want to use some of these for instructional text in Diffusion. Provide a concrete class to make one-offs cacheable and switch Releeph to use it.
Test Plan: {F44175}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6032
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.
Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
