Summary:
Ref T13222. In D19918, I refactored how timelines get "view data". Today, this is always additional data about which images/changesets/diffs are visible on the current revision/commit/mock, so we can tell if inline comments should be linked to a `#anchor` on the same page (if the inline is rendered there somewhere) or to a `/D123?id=1&vs=2` full link on a different page (if it isn't), but in general this could be any sort of state information about the current page that affects how the timeline should render.
Previously, comment previews did not use any specialized object code and always rendered a "generic" timeline story. This was actually a bug, but none of the code we have today cares about this (since it's all inline related, and inlines render separately) so it never impacted anything.
After the `TimelineEngine` change, the preview renders with Differential-specific code. This is more correct, but we were not passing the preview the "view data" so it broke.
This preview doesn't actually need the view data and we could just make it bail out if it isn't present, but pass it through for consistency and so this works like we'd expect if we do something fancier with view data in the future.
Test Plan: Viewed comment and inline comment previews in Differential, saw old behavior restored.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19943
Summary:
Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep.
`PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments.
The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern.
Try to clean this up:
- Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented.
- Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline.
- Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me.
- If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack.
This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation.
Test Plan:
- Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments.
- Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data").
- Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
Summary:
See PHI975. Ref T13216. Ref T2543. Previously, see D19204 and PHI433.
When you're acting on a draft revision, we change the button text to "Submit Quietly" as a hint that your actions don't generate notifications yet.
However, this isn't accurate when one of your actions is "Request Review", which causes the revision to publish.
Allow actions to override the submit button text, and make the "Request Review" action change the button text to "Publish Revision".
The alternative change I considered was to remove the word "Quietly" in all cases.
I'm not //thrilled// about how complex this change is to adjust one word, but the various pieces are all fairly clean individually. I'm not sure we'll ever be able to use it for anything else, but I do suspect that the word "Quietly" was the change in D19204 with the largest effect by far (see T10000).
Test Plan:
- Created a draft revision. Saw "Submit Quietly" text.
- Added a "Request Review" action, saw it change to "Publish Revision".
- Reloaded page, saw stack saved and "Publish Revision".
- Removed action, saw "Submit Quietly".
- Repeated on a non-draft revision, button stayed put as "Submit".
- Submitted the various actions, saw them have the desired effects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13216, T2543
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19810
Summary: See PHI871. Ref T13197. These sections are only divided visually and don't have textual headers. Add aural headers.
Test Plan: {F5875471}
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13197
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19654
Summary:
Depends on D19594. See PHI823. Ref T13164.
- Add a label for the "X" button in comment areas, like "Remove Action: Change Subscribers".
- Add a label for the floating header display options menu in Differential.
- Add `role="button"` to `PHUIButtonView` objects that we render with an `<a ...>` tag.
Test Plan:
Viewed a revision with `?__aural__=true`:
- Saw "Remove Action: ..." label.
- Saw "Display Options" label.
- Used inspector to verify that some `<a class="button" ...>` now have `<a class="button" role="button" ...>`. This isn't exhaustive, but at least improves things. A specific example is the "edit", "reply", etc., actions on inline comments.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19595
Summary:
Ref T12970. See PHI43. Currently, the "Show Older Comments" link gets auto-clicked if the user visits **any** anchor. This is not correct.
Instead, only auto-click it if the user visits a numeric anchor. This fixes the behavior approximately 98% of the time. See T12970 for a followup on the remaining ambiguous cases.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a revision with some folded transactions and a "Show Older Comments" link.
- Clicked a link to a file in the table of contents, with a hash like `#1234abcd`.
- Before: Timeline expanded and I ended up somewhere bad.
- After: Timeline no longer expanded.
- Manually changed hash to `#1234` (purely numeric), saw timeline expand.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12970
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D18458
Summary:
Add important objectives (like waygates and quest markers) to the minimap.
This also probably fixes @cspeckmim's bug with the {key @} keyboard shortcut.
Test Plan:
(This is probably easier to undestand if you `arc patch` + click around.)
{F4966037}
Reviewers: chad, amckinley
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17955
Summary:
Earlier, I made some changes so that when you create or edit an inline, the comment at the bottom of the page updates (even though you didn't fiddle with the stacked actions inputs).
At the last second I broke them by spelling this wrong while cleaning things up, so they didn't actually work. Spell the property correctly ("showPreview", not "shouldPreview").
Also, we have some JS which rewrites "Not Visible" into "View", but it fires in an inconvenient way now and is flickery for me. Ideally this should get cleaned up slightly better eventualy, but at least make is stop doing so much flickery layout for now.
Test Plan:
- Wrote no comment on a revision.
- Added an inline.
- Saw comment preview properly update immediately.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17229
Summary: Fixes T12065. Some of the normal behavior of these actions got juggled when I made "Accept" and "Reject" conflict.
Test Plan:
- Added "Accept".
- Added "Reject", saw it remove "Accept".
- Added "Change Projects".
- Added "Assign/Claim".
- Removed "Assign/Claim".
- Removed "Accept".
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12065
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17143
Summary:
Ref T11114. When a user selects "Accept", and then selects "Reject", remove the "Accept". It does not make sense to both accept and reject a revision.
For now, every one of the "actions" conflicts: accept, reject, resign, claim, close, commandeer, etc, etc. I couldn't come up with any combinations that it seems like users are reasonably likely to want to try, and we haven't received combo-action requests in the past that I can recall.
Test Plan:
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Reject". One replaced the other.
- Selected "Accept", then selected "Change Subscribers". Both co-existed happily.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17132
Summary:
Ref T11114. Recent changes broke the links to jump to inline comments from the previews because they get hooked up with JS.
Restore the linking behavior.
Test Plan: Clicked "View" on an inline comment preview, jumped to that comment.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17131
Summary: Ref T11114. This comments nearly working on EditEngine. Only significant issue I caught is that the "View" link doesn't render properly because it depends on JS which is tricky to hook up. I'll clean that up in a future diff.
Test Plan: {F2279201}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11114
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17116
Summary: Redesign the action comment box for better use in two column, mobile, nuance.
Test Plan: Test in mobile / desktop / tablet, adding and removing actions. Actionless comment boxes, etc.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: cspeckmim, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16811
Summary:
Two minor issues that I caught in the log while fixing Phame permissions:
- We had a JS bug which would cause us to immediately generate two comment previews at the exact same time -- one for loading the page, and one for "switching to desktop". Instead, only generate the "switch to desktop" preview if we really switched to desktop from a different device layout.
- These two requests could end up reading/writing the VersionedDraft table at exactly the same time fairly often (e.g., after a comment submission, the page would load, send two preview requests at exactly the same time, and they'd race fairly reliably for me locally). If we do race, recover from the race.
Test Plan:
Submitted some Phame comments.
- No more error log errors about VersionedDraft keys.
- Saw only one preview request when loading the page instead of two.
Here's the specific stack trace I caught:
```
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.639930 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] [2016-09-05 14:15:33] EXCEPTION: (AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) #1062: Duplicate entry 'PHID-POST-fknnpzjnsdgc3rqobhst-PHID-USER-pr5rjpuilpfserepsd2k-13' for key 'key_object' at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:314]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640801 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] arcanist(head=master, ref.master=9e82ef979e81), corgi(head=master, ref.master=5b9171222bc9), instances(head=stable, ref.master=485bc8128198, ref.stable=2983bc917601), ledger(head=master, ref.master=4da4a24b8779), libcore(), phabricator(head=phame2, ref.master=4b6da9735ba7, ref.phame2=4b6da9735ba7), phutil(head=stable, ref.master=97f05269fdb1, ref.stable=c14343ee620e), services(head=stable, ref.master=1fcb5cdb7582, ref.stable=2d8088a5b4b3)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640815 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #0 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwCommonException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:348]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640830 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #1 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryCodeException(integer, string) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:289]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640833 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #2 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::throwQueryException(mysqli) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/mysql/AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection.php:185]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640836 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #3 <#2> AphrontBaseMySQLDatabaseConnection::executeRawQuery(string) called at [<phutil>/src/xsprintf/queryfx.php:8]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640839 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #4 <#2> queryfx(AphrontMySQLiDatabaseConnection, string, string, string, array, string)
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640841 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #5 <#2> call_user_func_array(string, array) called at [<phutil>/src/aphront/storage/connection/AphrontDatabaseConnection.php:42]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640844 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #6 <#2> AphrontDatabaseConnection::query(string, string, string, array, string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1261]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640846 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #7 <#2> LiskDAO::insertRecordIntoDatabase(string) called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1106]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640849 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #8 <#2> LiskDAO::insert() called at [<phabricator>/src/infrastructure/storage/lisk/LiskDAO.php:1075]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640851 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #9 <#2> LiskDAO::save() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/draft/storage/PhabricatorVersionedDraft.php:65]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640854 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #10 <#2> PhabricatorVersionedDraft::loadOrCreateDraft(string, string, integer) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:1669]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640857 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #11 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildCommentResponse(PhamePost) called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/transactions/editengine/PhabricatorEditEngine.php:894]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640859 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #12 <#2> PhabricatorEditEngine::buildResponse() called at [<phabricator>/src/applications/phame/controller/post/PhamePostEditController.php:60]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640862 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #13 <#2> PhamePostEditController::handleRequest(AphrontRequest) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:237]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640865 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #14 phlog(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/handler/PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler.php:27]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640868 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #15 PhabricatorAjaxRequestExceptionHandler::handleRequestException(AphrontRequest, AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:644]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640870 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #16 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::handleException(AphrontDuplicateKeyQueryException) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:242]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640873 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #17 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::processRequest(AphrontRequest, PhutilDeferredLog, AphrontPHPHTTPSink, MultimeterControl) called at [<phabricator>/src/aphront/configuration/AphrontApplicationConfiguration.php:149]
[Mon Sep 05 12:15:33.640879 2016] [:error] [pid 50608] [client 127.0.0.1:55278] #18 AphrontApplicationConfiguration::runHTTPRequest(AphrontPHPHTTPSink) called at [<phabricator>/webroot/index.php:17]
```
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16494
Summary:
Ref T10698. Currently, we show the spacer/continuation lines around previews, but these don't make sense in previews.
(Other stuff also uses this code so I can't simply remove `spacer`.)
Test Plan:
Before:
{F1199924}
After:
{F1199925}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15562
Summary: Fixes T10116.
Test Plan:
- Prior to patch: Control/Command + Enter submitted form but ignored actions.
- After patch: verifid command + enter submits actions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14991
Summary:
Ref T10004. This might be a little too funky or magical, but is probably not necessary too often and easier than doing new layout with the CSS.
Also make the desktop icons a little meatier.
Test Plan: Swiped things away on mobile. Clicked things away on desktop.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10004
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14857
Summary:
Fixes T1895. Now that we have on-demand prviews, we can use them on mobile. On mobile:
- don't show live previews;
- only save drafts every 10 seconds.
Also, show fewer remarkup buttons on mobile to try to make sure the more important ones (preview, e.g.) fit.
Test Plan:
- Made window narrower and wider to trigger preview/no-preview behavior.
- Used DarkConsole to verify request rate.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T1895
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14856
Summary:
Ref T9908. Fixes T6205.
This is largely some refactoring to improve the code. The new structure is:
- Each EditField has zero or one "submit" (normal edit form) controls.
- Each EditField has zero or one "comment" (stacked actions) controls.
- If we want more than one in the future, we'd just add two fields.
- Each EditField can have multiple EditTypes which provide Conduit transactions.
- EditTypes are now lower-level and less involved on the Submit/Comment pathways.
Test Plan:
- Added and removed projects and subscribers.
- Changed task statuses.
- In two windows: added some subscribers in one, removed different ones in the other. The changes did not conflict.
- Applied changes via Conduit.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6205, T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14789
Summary:
Ref T9132. Ref T9908. Puts reordering UI in place:
- For create forms, this just lets you pick a UI display order other than alphabetical. Seems nice to have.
- For edit forms, this lets you create a hierarchy of advanced-to-basic forms and give them different visibility policies, if you want.
Test Plan:
{F1017842}
- Verified that "Edit Thing" now takes me to the highest-ranked edit form.
- Verified that create menu and quick create menu reflect application order.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132, T9908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14704
Summary:
Ref T9132. Fixes T4580. Thhat might actually have been fixed a while ago or something since it describes a buggy/bad interaction which doesn't reproduce for me at HEAD.
This saves and restores all the stacked actions (subscribers, projects, etc) so that you don't lose anything if you close a window by accident.
Test Plan:
Added a bunch of actions in various states, reloaded the page, draft stuck around.
Submitted form, actions didn't stick around anymore.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4580, T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14675
Summary:
Ref T9132. We currently have an old preview/draft behavior and a new actions behavior.
Let the actions behavior do drafts/previews too, so we can eventually throw away the old thing.
This is pretty much just copying the old behavior into the new one, but with a few tweaks. The major change is that we submit all the stacked actions behavior now, so the preview reflects everything the change will do (and, soon, we can save it in the draft in a consistent way).
Also includes one hack-fix that I'll clean up at some point.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of stacked actions and observed meaningful previews.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14672
Summary: Ref T9132. Supports selects in stacked actions and adds "Change Status" + "Change Priority".
Test Plan: Changed status and priority from stacked actions.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14667
Summary: Ref T9132. Shhh this never happened shhhhhhh.
Test Plan: Selected multiple actions, saw them add at the bottom.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14664
Summary: Ref T9132. This still has a lot of rough edges but the basics seem to work OK.
Test Plan: {F1012627}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14653
Summary:
Ref T9132. This just makes edited forms do //something//, albeit not anything very useful yet.
You can now edit a form and:
- Retitle it;
- add a preamble (instructions on top of the form); and
- reorder the form's fields.
Test Plan:
{F974632}
{F974633}
{F974634}
{F974635}
{F974636}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T9132
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14503
Summary: Fixes T8182. See screenshot in that task. We currently render a line to nowhere at the bottom of these previews. Instead, only render a line at the top.
Test Plan:
{F409078}
Also looked at a couple other applications that use this and they looked correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, lpriestley, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8182
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12905
Summary:
Fixes T7069. When jumping to a comment anchor, we get the scroll positions wrong.
Partly this is fixing some calcaulations; partly, the "show older comments" and "scroll anchor" stuff were fighting over the scroll position. Since the anchor can take care of things on its own, just let it handle stuff.
Test Plan:
- Clicked comment anchors.
- Loaded pages with anchors in the URI.
- Loaded pages with anchors hidden behind "show older comments".
In all cases, got the right scroll position.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7069
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11540
Summary: (some) international keyboard layouts can not type "~" in a way as to trigger this so use "@" instead. Save the suggested "+" as that seems like it would be useful for some future "adding stuff" keyboard workflow. Pretty stoked to get this squared away as I am quite confident our unreleased product will now be a huge smashing success. Ref T6683.
Test Plan: made sure my choice was okay via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_key#Dead_keys_on_various_keyboard_layouts; used the "@" key to show all transactions
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10983
Summary: Fixes T6683.
Test Plan: clicked the yellow box and it worked! pressed '~' and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6683
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10932
Summary: Fixes T6693.
Test Plan:
Made a bunch of comments on a diff with differential, being sure to leave inlines here and there. This reproduced the issue in T6693. With this patch this issue no longer reproduces!
Successfully "showed older changes" in Maniphest too.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6693
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10931
Summary: Ref T4712. This adds pagination. Future diffs will need to deploy `buildTransactionTimeline` everywhere and massage this stuff as necessary if we hit any special cases.
Test Plan: Set page size to "5" to make it need to paginate often. Verified proper transactions loaded in and the javascript actions worked.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4712
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10887
Summary: Use cutlery icon for hilarity. Ref T5768.
Test Plan: made something with remarkup in it, used 'view raw' and saw the remarkup raw in a nice little dialogue.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5768
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10183
Summary: As advised by JSHint.
Test Plan: I'm not really sure how to comprehensively test this. It looks okay to me.
Reviewers: chad, epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9677
Summary: There are a bunch of unused variables in JavaScript files. These were identified with JSHint.
Test Plan: It's pretty hard to test this thoroughly... on inspection, it seems that everything //should// be okay (unless we are doing weird things with the JavaScript).
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9676
Summary:
Fixes T5424.
- One concrete issue: drafts were not being cleared properly because `__draft__` was not set on submission. This (mostly) fixes phantom drafts.
- This ajax comment magic feels weird and floaty and generally has problems. For example, if you add subscribers or inlines, all the stuff on the page which represents those won't update automatically. Instead, just reload. Maybe we'll ajax this stuff some day, but it feels like a net negative for now.
- Also remove it from other applications where it's currently used.
- Fix an issue with inline previews.
Test Plan: Made some comments on a mock, everything worked normally like I expected it to.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5424
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9649
Summary:
man I sure hate Javascript
I removed the ajax-edit and ajax-remove interactions, becuase they were prohibitively complex to get working given that the entire menu has to change too. Instead, the page just reloads. This works perfectly fine in practice.
If we want to restore these in the future, we should have the server re-render the entire transaction group or something. I think very little is lost here, though.
Test Plan:
- Took all the actions.
- Used existing dropdown menus.
{F150196}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8966
Summary:
Ref T4119. This is ugly for now, but technically works.
The comment area and transaction log don't realy know about each other, so for the moment the linking is a bit manual. Differential/Maniphest are special cases anyway.
Test Plan: {F149992}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4119
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8957
Summary:
Fixes T4909. Adds a "remove" link next to the edit link, which permanently hides a comment. Addresses two use cases:
- Allowing administrators to clean up spam.
- Allowing users to try to put the genie back in the bottle if they post passwords or sensitive links, etc.
The user who removed the comment is named in the removal text to enforce some level of administrative accountability.
No data is deleted, but there's currently no method to restore these comments. We'll see if we need one.
This is cheating a little bit by storing "removed" as "2" in the isDeleted field. This doesn't seem tooooo bad for now.
Test Plan:
- Removed some of my comments.
- As an administrator, removed other users' comments.
- Failed to view history of a removed comment.
- Failed to edit a removed comment.
- Failed to remove a removed comment.
- Verified feed doesn't show the old comment after comment removal.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: qgil, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8945
Summary: ...the key is to move a layer lower and beam down the updated comment. There is a wee bit of Javascript gymnastics going on here. Fixes T4608.
Test Plan: made a comment + resolve. clicked edit and made changes. noted transaction updated correctly and "history" link worked. edited again to a deletion and noted the "this is deleted" looked right and history link still worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T4608
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8702
Summary:
Ref T3886. Ref T418. For fields like "Summary" and "Test Plan" where changes can't be summarized in one line, allow CustomField to provide a "(Show Details)" link and render a diff.
Also consolidate some of the existing copy/paste, and simplify this featuer slightly now that we've move to dialogs.
Test Plan:
{F115918}
- Viewed "description"-style field changes in phlux, pholio, legalpad, maniphest, differential, ponder (questions), ponder (answers), and repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8284
Summary: form.reset() resets a form to whatever values were present when the form was loaded into the DOM. Instead, grab all the pertinent form bits and set there values to "clear". I don't think there's too much utility in putting this somewhere more general, but it could be something like DOM.clearForm(form) or something. Fixes T3629.
Test Plan:
repro'd original issue
- open legalpad doc (or your favorite application transaction powered app)
- type in a comment but do not submit (you are creating a draft) e.g. "foo"
- reload page and note comment appears e.g. "foo"
- change comment e.g. "foobar"
- submit comment
- BUG - after submission, the comment reverts to the comment at initial page load e.g. "foo"
then after this patch, I can't repro it anymore with these steps - the comment is correctly blank
NOTE: this will need to be tested with more complicated forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3629
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8220
Summary: Fixes T2213
Test Plan: Updated a pholio mock description. Observed that when I first showed details there was a round trip made. Toggled show / hide noting no more trips made to server.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2213
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6801
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.
Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.
Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
Summary:
Ref T3373. This is still pretty messy:
- The JS bugs out a bit with multiple primary object PHIDs on a single page. I'll fix this in a followup.
- The comment form itself is enormous, I'll restore some show/hide stuff in a followup.
Test Plan: Added answer comments in Ponder.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6608
Summary: ...also make it so in Pholio when you add an inline comment the preview refreshes. Fixes T2649.
Test Plan: played around in pholio leaving commentary. noted that a new inline comment would refresh the preview.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2649
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6267
Summary: If `jsxmin` is not available, use a pure PHP implementation instead (JsShrink).
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc lint --lintall` on all JS and fixed every relevant warning.
- Forced minification on and browsed around the site using JS behaviors. Didn't hit anything problematic.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5670
Summary:
This is straightforward, except that `form.submit()` does not call onsubmit handlers. Create a `didSyntheticSubmit` event and have everything which listens for form submits listen for it too.
Fixes T704.
Test Plan: Hit control + enter in inline comments, main commetns, Pholio, conpherence. Verified it triggered appropriate JS (workflow / special behaviors).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T704
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4704
