1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-11 08:06:13 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
9352c76e81 Decouple some aspects of request routing and construction
Summary:
Ref T5702. This is a forward-looking change which provides some very broad API improvements but does not implement them. In particular:

  - Controllers no longer require `$request` to construct. This is mostly for T5702, directly, but simplifies things in general. Instead, we call `setRequest()` before using a controller. Only a small number of sites activate controllers, so this is less code overall, and more consistent with most constructors not having any parameters or effects.
  - `$request` now offers `getURIData($key, ...)`. This is an alternate way of accessing `$data` which is currently only available on `willProcessRequest(array $data)`. Almost all controllers which implement this method do so in order to read one or two things out of the URI data. Instead, let them just read this data directly when processing the request.
  - Introduce `handleRequest(AphrontRequest $request)` and deprecate (very softly) `processRequest()`. The majority of `processRequest()` calls begin `$request = $this->getRequest()`, which is avoided with the more practical signature.
  - Provide `getViewer()` on `$request`, and a convenience `getViewer()` on `$controller`. This fixes `$viewer = $request->getUser();` into `$viewer = $request->getViewer();`, and converts the `$request + $viewer` two-liner into a single `$this->getViewer()`.

Test Plan:
  - Browsed around in general.
  - Hit special controllers (redirect, 404).
  - Hit AuditList controller (uses new style).

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5702

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10698
2014-10-17 05:01:40 -07:00
epriestley
2172f59ed5 Support logged-out users in Fund
Summary: Ref T5835. Sprinkle `shouldAllowPublic()` around to let logged-out users gain access.

Test Plan: Viewed an initiative while logged out.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10683
2014-10-13 11:14:17 -07:00
epriestley
09fb5667cc Allow users to back initiatives in Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.

Notable changes:

  - Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Backed an initiative.
  - Viewed that I became a backer.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
2014-09-12 06:31:11 -07:00
epriestley
e4f399b9fa Scaffolding for Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.

You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).

Only notable decisions:

  - Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Created an initiative.
  - Edited an initiative.
  - Changed application policy defaults.
  - Searched for initiatives.
  - Subscribed to an initiative.
  - Opened/closed an initiative.
  - Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
  - Destroyed an initiative.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
2014-09-11 13:38:58 -07:00