Summary: Ref T3663. Does what it says on the tin.
Test Plan: Ran `storage upgrade`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6778
Summary: Ref T3663. This is obsolete code which is used only in this migration, which Facebook has already performed and which isn't relevant for any other installs.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6777
Summary: Ref T3092. Same deal as D6771, but for branches rather than projects.
Test Plan: {F54855}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6775
Summary:
Ref T3092.
Releeph's objects basically go like this:
- At the top level, we have Projects (like "www" or "libphutil")
- Each project has Branches (like "LATEST" or "v1.1.3")
- Each branch has Requests (like pull requests, e.g. "please merge commit X into branch Y (in project Z)")
Currently, there's no real "project detail" or "branch detail" page. Instead, we have a search results page for their contained objects. That is, the "project detail" page shows a list of branches in the project, using ApplicationSearch.
This means that operations like "edit" and "deactivate" are one level up, on the respective list pages.
Instead, move details onto the detail pages. This gives us more room for actions and information, and simplifies the list views.
Basically, these are "detail pages" where the object content is a search interface. We do something simliar to this in Phame right now, although it's messier there (no ApplicationSearch yet).
@chad, you might have some ideas here. Roughly, the design question is "How should we present an object's detail view when its content is really a search interface (Phame Blog for Posts, Releeph Project for Branches)?"
I think the simple approach I've taken here (see screenshot) gives us reasonable results, but overall it's something we haven't done much or done too much thinking about, I think.
Test Plan: {F54774}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6771
Summary:
^\s+(['"])dust\1\s*=>\s*true,?\s*$\n
Test Plan: Looked through the diff.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6769
Summary: Ref T3092. Fixes T3724. Use modern/flexible UI for these interfaces. Removes the ability to retarget an existing branch (you can just close it and open a new one if you made a mistake).
Test Plan: {F54437} {F54438}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T3724
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6765
Summary:
Releeph branch lists in project views have a bunch of custom UI right now; give them more standard UI and ApplicationSearch.
This drops a small piece of functionality: we now show only a total open request count instead of a detailed enumeration of each request status. I assume this is reasonable (that is, the important piece is "is there something to do on this branch?"), but we can muck with it if the more detailed status is important.
Test Plan: {F54344}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6764
Summary:
Ref T3721. Releeph currently attempts to implement a flexible, field-driven search for branches, but it's building all of its own infrastructure and it ends up heading down some weird paths. In particular, it loads **every** request and then makes calls into fields to filter them. It also tries to be very very general, which isn't really necessary (for example, I think it's reasonable for us to assume that we won't let you disable the "requestor" field).
ApplicationSearch and CustomField provide more scalable approaches to this problem; move search on top of them. The query still ends up doing some filtering in-process, but it's now far more limited in scope and can be denormalized later.
Test Plan: {F54304}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3721
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6758
Summary:
Ref T3718. This moves custom field rendering on the edit screen to PhabricatorCustomField and makes all the APIs conformant.
We still run through edit with both old-school and new-school sets of fields, because the actual editing isn't on the new stuff yet. That will happen in a diff or two.
Test Plan: Edited a request; intentionally introduced errors and verified the form behaved as expected.
Reviewers: btrahan, testuser1122344
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6756
Summary: Ref T3718. This is not used and does not seem particularly useful.
Test Plan: Grep.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6755
Summary:
Fixes T3661. Ref T3718. This makes Releeph custom fields extend PhabricatorCustomField so we can start moving over other pieces of infrastructure (rendering, storage, etc) to run through the same pathways. It's roughly the minimum amount of work required to be able to move forward.
NOTE: This removes per-project custom field selectors. Fields are now configured for an entire install. My understanding is that Facebook does not use this feature, and modern field infrastructure has moved away from selectors.
Test Plan: Viewed and edited projects, branches, and requests in Releeph. Grepped for removed config. Grepped for `field_selector`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3661, T3718
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6750
Summary: Ref T3656. Releeph denormalizes branch cut point identifiers into Branch objects, but this information isn't useful or used for sorting, filtering, or enforcing unique constraints. Instead, derive it via noramlized pathways from the `cutPointCommitPHID`.
Test Plan: Ran storage upgrade. Ran `releephwork.getbranch` and `releeph.getbranches`. Grepped for `cutPointCommitIdentifier`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3656
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6636
Summary:
Fixes T3660. Releeph Projects currently have an unused one-to-one mapping to Phabricator projects. This isn't consistent with other applications and has no integrations or uses. Get rid of it.
NOTE: Waiting for signoff from @legneato on T3660 before pulling the trigger here.
Test Plan: Created and edited Releeph projects. Grepped for references to project ID; there are a dozen or so but they're all either Releeph projects or Arcanist projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3660
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6635
Summary: Ref T3655. Depends on D6633. This removes the writes and the column.
Test Plan: Created a project, edited a project. Verified the table doesn't have any keys including this column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6634
Summary:
Ref T3655. ReleephProject currently has both `repositoryID` and `repositoryPHID`, which point to the same object and are reudundant. Get rid of all reads of `repositoryID`.
NOTE: This makes project loads depend on repository loads. The eventual rule here will be that you must be able to see a repository in order to see projects for that repository, which seems like a reasonable rule. We might need to tailor it more than this (e.g., if there are branch read permissions down the line) but this seems like a reasonable minimum.
Test Plan: Grepped for `repositoryID` in `releeph/`. Called `releeph.getbranches`.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: LegNeato, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6633
Summary: Fixes a query in √D6260.
Test Plan: View a Releeph RQ and verify that the "churn" field renders and has the right numbers in it.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6702
Summary:
Ref T3092.
- Check for a duplicate key error;
- do less single loading and use Query classes;
- use responsive UI elements;
- add crumbs.
Test Plan: Created a new project, and hit error cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3092
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6629
Summary:
Ref T3373. The submit listener doesn't properly scope the form it listens to right now, so several forms on the page mean that comments post to one of them more or less at random.
Scope it properly by telling it which object PHID it is associated with.
Test Plan: Made Question comments, saw comments Ajax in on the question itself rather than on an arbitrary answer.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3373
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6611
Summary:
Ref T2715. Ref T3551. Ref T603. This does a few things, but they're all sort of small:
- We commonly use a `getX()` / `attachX()` pattern, but have very similar code in the `getX()` method every time. Provide a convenience method to make this pattern easier to write.
- We use `willFilterPage()` in many queries, but it currently is called with zero or more results. This means we have a lot of "if no results, return nothing" boilerplate. Make it call only for one or more results.
- Implement `PhabricatorPolicyInterface` on `ReleephBranch`. A branch has the same policy as its project.
- Implement `ReleephBranchQuery`.
- Move the branch PHID type to application PHID infrastructure.
Test Plan: Browsed Releeph. Used `phid.query` to query branch PHIDs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2715, T3551
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6512
Summary:
Ref T2715.
- Remove the "PHID" application. `phid.query` provides a reasonable way for developers to get this data without requiring a top-level application.
- Remove some dead/uncalled code.
Test Plan: No more PHID application. Grepped for callsites.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6511
Summary: Fixes T3548. Concrete Releeph controllers currently extend either from ReleephController or PhabricatorController directly. Instead, make them all extend ReleephController. Introduce ReleephProjectController for controllers which depend on project context. Project context code which lived in ReleephController moves to ReleephProjectController.
Test Plan: Viewed list, project, releases, requests.
Reviewers: btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3548
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6472
Summary: Fixes T3546. The Application just used an outdated method name. Use the modern method name.
Test Plan: {F50319}
Reviewers: btrahan, edward, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3546
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6471
Summary: Ref T603. This query isn't policy-aware yet, but prepare for it to be one day.
Test Plan: Looked at: home page; differential home; differential detail; diffusion browse. Made differential.query conduit call.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6337
Summary:
Ref T2222.
I'm thinking about how I want to approach the Asana sync, and I want to try to do T2222 first so that we can build it cleanly on top of ApplicationTransactions. I think we can at least walk down this road a little bit and if it turns out to be scary we can take another approach.
I was generally very happy with how the auth migration turned out (seemingly, it was almost completely clean), and want to pursue a similar strategy here. Basically:
- Wrap the new objects in the old objects for reads/writes.
- Migrate all the existing data to the new table.
- Everything hard is done; move things over a piece at a time at a leisurely pace in lots of smallish, relatively-easy-to-understand changes.
This deletes or abstracts all reads of the DifferentialComment table. In particular, these things are **deleted**:
- The script `undo_commits.php`, which I haven't pointed anyone at in a very long time.
- The `differential.getrevisionfeedback` Conduit method, which has been marked deprecated for a year or more.
- The `/stats/` interface in Differential, which should be rebuilt on Fact and has never been exposed in the UI. It does a ton of joins and such which are prohibitively difficult to migrate.
This leaves a small number of reading interfaces, which I replaced with a new `DifferentialCommentQuery`. Some future change will make this actually load transactions and wrap them with DifferentialComment interfaces.
Test Plan: Viewed a revision; made revision comments
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: edward, chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6260
Summary:
This diff covers a bit of ground.
- PHUIDocumentExample has been added
- PHUIDocument has been extended with new features
- PhabricatorMenuView is now PHUIListView
- PhabricatorMenuItemView is now PHUIItemListView
Overall - I think I've gotten all the edges covered here. There is some derpi-ness that we can talk about, comments in the code. Responsive design is missing from the new features on PHUIDocument, will follow up later.
Test Plan: Tested mobile and desktop menus, old phriction layout, new document views, new lists, and object lists.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6130
Summary:
In Releeph, `ReleephRequestHeaderView` will render you a "mark-manually-picked" button if (a) you are authoritative (chuckr) or (b) you are the person who created this Releeph request.
However `ReleephRequestActionController`, which handles these button presses, will only do something if you are (a). This patch honors your button pressing if you are (b) as well.
Test Plan: Push buttons. There's another bug in the Javascript do-stuff-without-reloading-the-page code that handles these button pushes, but I'd like to fix that separately from handling this hi-pri bug.
Reviewers: epriestley, wez
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6036
Summary: I want to use some of these for instructional text in Diffusion. Provide a concrete class to make one-offs cacheable and switch Releeph to use it.
Test Plan: {F44175}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6032
Summary: I introduced this helper at some point, clean up all the code duplication around content sources.
Test Plan: Grepped; hit edit interfaces for most/all of these.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, edward
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6030
Summary: I used the `PhabricatorEnv::getProductionURI()` in too many places to build Releeph URIs. The only places that should need full URIs are the links generated for Releeph emails, and in Conduit responses that link to Releeph objects.
Test Plan:
- Grep for `getProductionURI()` in Releeph, and make sure only sensible, non-DOM building places use it.
- Inspect the Releeph DOM to make sure hrefs etc. are relative.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5999
Summary:
Moves all remaining mail handling into ReplyHandlers.
Farewell, `getPhabricatorToInformation()`! You were a bad method and no one liked you.
Ref T1205.
Test Plan:
- Used test console to send mail to Revisions, Tasks, Conpherences and Commits (these all actually work).
- Used test console to send mail to Requests, Macros, Questions and Mocks (these accept the mail but don't do anything with it, but didn't do anything before either).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5953
Summary: This doesn't do anything, but touches a bunch of files so I split it out to reduce the size of the next diff. Basically, make `MailReceiver` classes responsible for loading their application objects. Ref T1205.
Test Plan: Inspection / next diff / code is not reached.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5941
Summary: Ref T2784. This one was a wee bit complicated. Had to add PhabricatorUser and concept of initFromConduit (or not) to DiffusionRequest.
Test Plan: foreach repo, visited CALLSIGN and clicked a commit and verified they laoded correctly. Hacked code to hit NOT via Conduit and repeated tests to great success.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2784
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5928
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary: This is just a bit of gardening in order to make the responsive-UI diff easier; I'll be putting `getColorFor($status)` type things in this class, following the pattern in `ManiphestTaskStatus`.
Test Plan: Poke around Releeph.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5893
Summary:
Migrate to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions` (`ReleephRequestTransactions` applied by `ReleephRequestTransactionalEditor`, instead of `ReleephRequestEvents` created by `ReleephRequestEditor`) and migrate all the old events into transactions. Email is supported in the standard way (no more `ReleephRequestMail`) as well.
This also collapses the Releeph request create and edit controllers into one class, as well as breaking everyone's subject-based mail rules by standardising them (but which should be more easily filtered by looking at headers.)
Test Plan:
* Make requests, then pick them.
* Pick and revert the same request so that discovery happens way after `arc` has told Releeph about what's been happening.
* Try to pick something that fails to pick in a project with pick instructions (and see the instructions are in the email.)
* Load all of FB's Releeph data into my DB and run the `storage upgrade` script.
* Request a commit via the "action" in a Differential revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, Korvin, wez
Maniphest Tasks: T3092, T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5868
Summary: Oops, `pht()` interpolates percent escape sequences, but this is a literal "%N".
Test Plan: Edit a Releeph project; notice no errors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5897
Summary: I wrote some of the Releeph-project edit-page's help in remarkup. This renders the remarkup using the `PhabricatorMarkupEngine` pipeline.
Test Plan:
* Edit a Releeph project.
* Feel the cool base of a laptop whose CPU is no longer being thrashed by onerous remarkup rendering duties.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5898
Summary: Instead of being able to ask if someone was a pusher or not, ask if they are "authoritative" enough to make decisions about Releeph requests. A person is authoritative if a project has pushers, and they are a pusher, or in the case of pusher-less projects, everyone is authoritative.
Test Plan: Make a request in a project with no pushers (it is immediately ready to be picked) and a project with pushers (where it requires approval.)
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5877
Summary: Adding mail-keys; required for `PhabricatorApplicationTransaction` support.
Test Plan: Upgrade an old database with this patch, observe the matrix: {F42620}
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5852
Summary:
Removing a bunch of cache-style columns from `ReleephRequest`, where it's actually much easier to just load the information at runtime.
This makes sense for migrating to `PhabricatorApplicationTransactions`, where each xaction changes one aspect of a `ReleephRequest` at a time (rather than multiple columns at once.)
Test Plan: Request something, run `arc releeph` and watch the picks, pass on some RQs, run `arc releeph` and watch the reverts.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2720
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5851
Summary: Not every commit requested in Releeph has to have come from a Differential revision. If you have a Releeph request for a commit without a Differential revision, you currently get this lovely error in the logs: {P824}. This diff silences the howling.
Test Plan: Load a Releeph branch page; observe log silence.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran, SEJeff, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5823
Summary: Use a single `PhabricatorMarkupEngine` to render any markup in Releeph's fields, rather than rendering everything from scratch every time.
Test Plan: Check out the "Services" tab in the dark console when rendering a page on a branch page with 500x RQs!
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3098
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5822
Summary:
`ReleephRequest`s contain the PHID for a `PhabricatorRepositoryCommit`, and commits have an edge to a `DifferentialRevision`.
Commits are loaded with the `loadOneRelative()` method that loads the commits for every `ReleephRequest` in a `LiskDAOSet`, but the edges are loaded indivdually. A page with N RQs on it makes one DB query for the commits, but N queries for the `TYPE_COMMIT_HAS_DREV` edges.
This diff uses `loadRelativeEdges` instead to load the edges all in one query.
Test Plan: {F42290}
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, vrana, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2714
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5820
Summary: Went and pht'd most everything I could find, except exceptions. Fixes T3091
Test Plan: Bopped around the application, didn't seem to break anything but didn't test all flows. Should be safe.
Reviewers: epriestley, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3091
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5825
Summary: Migration doesn't delete differential.revisionPHID but maybe it should?
Test Plan: Reparsed commit, ran the migration, deleted differential.revisionPHID, looked at task with attached commit with attached revision.
Reviewers: epriestley, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5634
Summary:
Adds a policy-aware query class for selecting Releeph projects. This doesn't really change anything.
- Make `ReleephProject` implment `PhabricatorPolicyInterface`, beginning the long journey to make it policy-aware.
- Implement `ReleephProjectQuery`, for querying projects using cursor-based, policy-aware paging.
- Use it on the list view, so we load only ~100 projects instead of all of them.
- Tweaked some of the URI routing stuff to make it a little more consistent with common practices.
Ref T2714.
Test Plan:
{F36434}
{F36435}
Reviewers: edward
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2714
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5390
Summary:
When submitting a diff I noticed that the unit test `testEverythingImplemented` threw an error that did not fail a test.
```
[2013-03-18 16:35:16] ERROR 2048: Declaration of ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController::willProcessRequest() should be compatible with AphrontController::willProcessRequest(array $uri_data) at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php:99]
#0 PhutilBootloader::executeInclude called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/__phutil_library_init__.php:203]
#1 PhutilBootloader::executeInclude(/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/__phutil_library_init__.php:193]
#2 PhutilBootloader::loadLibrarySource(phabricator, applications/releeph/controller/request/ReleephRequestDifferentialCreateController.php) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/symbols/PhutilSymbolLoader.php:341]
#3 PhutilSymbolLoader::loadSymbol(Array of size 4 starting with: { type => class }) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/libphutil/src/symbols/PhutilSymbolLoader.php:246]
#4 PhutilSymbolLoader::selectAndLoadSymbols() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/phabricator/src/infrastructure/__tests__/PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase.php:15]
#5 PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase::testEverythingImplemented()
#6 call_user_func_array(Array of size 2 starting with: { 0 => Object PhabricatorInfrastructureTestCase }, Array ) called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/unit/engine/phutil/ArcanistPhutilTestCase.php:441]
#7 ArcanistPhutilTestCase::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/unit/engine/PhutilUnitTestEngine.php:60]
#8 PhutilUnitTestEngine::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/src/workflow/ArcanistUnitWorkflow.php:160]
#9 ArcanistUnitWorkflow::run() called at [/home/anhnhan/dev/vanilla/arcanist/scripts/arcanist.php:271]
```
Test Plan:
`arc unit --everything` before this change gave error.
applied this change. Re-ran `arc unit --everything`, no error.
Reviewers: edward
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5373
Summary: Return an array of renderables instead of rendering things ourselves (which we used to do with `AphrontView->renderSingleView()`.)
Test Plan: View a Releeph branch; gloriously notice no deprecated warnings.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5363
Summary: Oops. Functions only return stuff when you call the `return()` function on the `lvalue`.
Test Plan: Use `ReleephDefaultFieldSelector` is the field selector in a test Releeph project.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5362
