1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-05 05:02:44 +01:00
Commit graph

2426 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
201634848e Make Phortune payment methods transaction-oriented and always support "Add Payment Method"
Summary:
Depends on D20718. Ref T13366. Ref T13367.

  - Phortune payment methods currently do not use transactions; update them.
  - Give them a proper view page with a transaction log.
  - Add an "Add Payment Method" button which always works.
  - Show which subscriptions a payment method is associated with.
  - Get rid of the "Active" status indicator since we now treat "disabled" as "removed", to align with user expectation/intent.
  - Swap out of some of the super weird div-form-button UI into the new "big, clickable" UI for choice dialogs among a small number of options on a single dimension.

Test Plan:
  - As a mechant-authority and account-authority, created payment methods from carts, subscriptions, and accounts. Edited and viewed payment methods.

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13367, T13366

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20719
2019-08-22 21:04:04 -07:00
epriestley
1fe6311167 Modernize user and repository "delete" workflows and improve documentation
Summary:
Fixes T8830. Fixes T13364.

  - The inability to destroy objects from the web UI is intentional. Make this clear in the messaging, which is somewhat out of date and partly reflects an earlier era when things could be destroyed.
  - `bin/remove destroy` can't rewind time. Document expectations around the "put the cat back in the bag" use case.

Test Plan: Read documentation, clicked through both workflows.

Maniphest Tasks: T13364, T8830

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20694
2019-08-02 09:30:50 -07:00
epriestley
b7aacaa4d3 Differentiate Remarkup header sizes more clearly
Summary:
Ref PHI1275. Previously, see T591. See also T7963. Headers are currently very visually similar to one another, and similar to the text size:

{F6485441}

I think the design intent was to make it hard to make bad-looking documents, but all the headers end up being very samey.

Differentiate the sizes of the headers better so they're much more obvious (e.g., when scrolling through a document) and the different levels are more distinct.

This might be a little overboard, but we can always pull it back a bit if it's too much, and I think giving users more control in Remarkup (in cases where it doesn't create some weird syntax/parsing nightmare) is generally a good thing.

Test Plan: {F6485447}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20569
2019-06-04 16:03:32 -07:00
epriestley
c6052b41a6 Label important data on charts
Summary:
Ref T13279. Adds client-side support for rendering function labels on charts, then labels every function as important data.

Works okay on mobile, although I'm not planning to target mobile terribly heavily for v0.

Test Plan: {F6438860}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: yelirekim

Maniphest Tasks: T13279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20500
2019-05-22 05:21:26 -07:00
epriestley
870b01f2d0 Distinguish between "bad record format" and "bad record value" when validating Trigger rules
Summary:
Depends on D20416. Ref T13269. See D20329.

If you try to save an "Assign to" rule with no assignee, we currently replace the control with an "InvalidRule" control that isn't editable. We'd prefer to give you an empty field back and let you pick a different value.

Differentiate between "bad record format" (i.e., we can't really do anything with this) and "bad record value" (i.e., everything is structurally fine, you just typed the wrong thing). In the latter case, we still build a properly typed rule for the UI, we just refuse to update storage until you fix the problem.

Test Plan:
First, hit the original issue and got a nicer UI with a more consistent control width (note full-width error):

{F6374205}

Then, applied the rest of the patch and got a normal "fix the issue" form state instead of a dead-end:

{F6374211}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13269

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20417
2019-04-17 12:40:55 -07:00
epriestley
b8551bb5f9 Reduce drag-and-drop jank on dashboards
Summary:
Depends on D20414. Ref T13272. Several minor things here:

  - Currently, you can drag panels underneath the invisible "there are no items in this column" div and the "Create Panel / Add Existing Panel" buttons. This is silly; stop it.
  - Currently, when viewing a tab panel on a dashboard, you can drag the panels inside it. This is extremely silly. Make "movable" off by default and pass it through the async flow only when we actually need it.
  - Make the whole "Add Tab..." virtual tab clickable to open the dropdown. This removes the rare exception/todo combo I added earlier. {key F}
  - Add or remove some icons or something.

Test Plan: Moved panels around on dashboards. Tried to drag panels inside tab panels. Added tab. Things were less obviously broken.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20415
2019-04-17 12:20:44 -07:00
Austin McKinley
0583f6dc50 Some formatting changes for showing auth provider config guidance
Summary:
Ref T7667. On the road to locking the auth config, also clean up some minor UI issues:

* Only show the warning about not Phacility instance auth if the user isn't a manager (see next diff).
* When rendering more than one warning in the guidance, add bullets.
* I didn't like the text in the `auth.config-lock` config setting.

Test Plan: Loaded the page, saw more reasonable-looking guidance: {F6369405}

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

Subscribers: Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T7667

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20400
2019-04-17 11:08:16 -07:00
epriestley
f13709b13b Update search indexes for Dashboards and Panels to Ferret, plus various minor fixes
Summary:
Depends on D20410. Ref T13272. Dashboards/Panels currently use older "ngram" indexing, which is a less-powerful precursor to Ferret. Throw away the ngram index and provide a Ferret index instead. Also:

  - Remove the NUX state, which links to the wrong place now and doesn't seem terribly important.
  - Add project tags to the search result list.
  - Make the "No Tags" tag a little less conspicious.

Test Plan:
  - Indexed dashboards and panels.
  - Searched for dashboards and panels via SearchEngine using Ferret "query" field.
  - Searched for panels via "Add Existing Panel" datasource typeahead.
  - Searched for dashboards via "Add Menu Item > Dashboard" on a ProfileMenu via typeahead.
  - Viewed dashboard NUX state (no special state, but no more bad link to "/create/").
  - Viewed dashboard list, saw project tags.
  - Viewed dashboards with no project tags ("No Tags" is now displayed but less visible).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20411
2019-04-14 10:28:19 -07:00
epriestley
fb994909cf Make "Move Panel" on dashboards use the new storage and transactions
Summary: Depends on D20408. Ref T13272. The actual JS is still a little bit iffy, but this makes the server side "move" operation work correctly by updating it to use the same code as everything else.

Test Plan: Moved panels around on single-column and multi-column dashboards, saw them move to reasonable places and stay there when I reloaded the page.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20409
2019-04-14 10:25:22 -07:00
epriestley
51f2ed498d On panel pages, show where panels are used
Summary:
Depends on D20398. Ref T13272. Fixes T6018. Previously, panels showed "used on dashboards: x, y", but this did not include cases where a panel was used by another container panel (today, a tab panel).

Do edge indexing when a dashboard or panel is saved, then pull the edges on the Panel page so we can provide a full list of uses.

Test Plan: {F6369289}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272, T6018

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20399
2019-04-12 06:14:21 -07:00
epriestley
d62f4dbfc9 Index and surface usage sites for Dashboards
Summary:
Depends on D20397. Ref T13272. Similar to the recent "where are Herald rules used" stuff, show which menus Dashboards are installed in.

This is mostly straightforward, except that I pulled some of the Herald logic into a parent class so it could be shared.

Test Plan: {F6369164}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20398
2019-04-12 06:13:44 -07:00
epriestley
9ad9ac9be6 On Dashboard tab panels in edit mode, make the "Tab Name" and the "Dropdown Edit Caret" into different links
Summary:
Ref T13272. In edit mode, tab panels now have a dropdown menu. However, this sort of overrlaps with the actual action of clicking the tab to select it.

Separate these into different click targets so that "select tab X" and "open dropdown menu for X" are different operations.

This is more work than it appears because:

  - We have an "action icon" already, used when you put a dashboard on a portal/home to create an "Edit" link. It makes sense to attach dropdowns to this, but it has some hard-coded stuff.
  - In applications with a "Create <thing>" in the crumbs (like Maniphest), we may use a dropdown menu if there are multiple create forms available. However, this menu renders in a weird way by reading all the properties out of an actual "View" object and building something else.
  - The "list of tabs" stuff shares code with different "list of tabs" navigation used by Diffusion and Instances.

..but I think I fixed everything and didn't break anything.

Test Plan:
  - Clicked "select tab" and "open dropdown menu" as separate actions.
  - Viewed Diffusion, Maniphest with multiple create forms, Instances.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20396
2019-04-12 06:08:32 -07:00
epriestley
299b6f420d Fix two minor main menu bar CSS issues
Summary:
Ref T13263.

  - Make the user profile section of the "Profile" dropdown menu have a transparent background, not a white background. This is a pre-existing issue. This is normally hard to see, but visible on Workboards with custom background colors.
  - Fix an alignment issue with the little "V" caret in the search scope dropdown. This is a recent issue caused by some tab-caret CSS I added recently for tabbed dashboard panels.

Test Plan:
Before:

{F6367723}

After:

{F6367724}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13263

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20388
2019-04-10 11:27:47 -07:00
epriestley
a35fda2019 Rebuild Dashboards on EditEngine: v1 Major Jank Edition
Summary:
Depends on D20383. Ref T13272. Fixes T12363. See PHI997. This gets the edit flows for tab panels functional again. They aren't //nice//, and a lot of the workflows are fairly janky: for example, most of them end up with you on the tab panel's page, which isn't useful if you started on a dashboard page.

However, these flows were extremely janky before anyway (see T12363) and I suspect this is a net improvement even though it's a bit of a mess. I anticipate cleaning this up bit-by-bit in future diffs.

Test Plan: {F6366372}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272, T12363

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20384
2019-04-10 08:59:32 -07:00
epriestley
a1a89589b1 Make the Dashboard dropshadow a little lighter and turn panel management into a menu
Summary:
Depends on D20372. Ref T13272.

  - There's a very heavy dropshadow on panels right now that looks out of place. Reduce it a bit.
  - Panels currently have unlabeled pencil and trash icons. Turn this into a menu. I'm likely planning to add options like "Change Query..." to this menu to make managing some types of panels easier.

Test Plan: {F6332838}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20373
2019-04-09 13:58:38 -07:00
epriestley
12b9224387 Make the "Install Dashboard" flow smoother
Summary:
Depends on D20362. Ref T13272. Currently, Dashboards have an "Install Dashboard" flow which is pretty janky and only allows you to install things to the home page.

Instead, allow users to install things to any valid target (home, favorites, portals, projects). This also provides URIs like `dashboard/install/1/home/personal/` which allow you to link users to an "install a dashboard" page; this may or may not get used.

Test Plan: Installed dashboards on home, favorites, projects, and portals.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13272

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20364
2019-04-09 13:34:09 -07:00
epriestley
248d79f36d Fix "Actions" button on Phame standalone/live pages (bonus: JX.sprintf())
Summary:
See <https://discourse.phabricator-community.org/t/non-functional-actions-menu-on-live-phame-views/2593>. Several layers here:

The "Actions" button is broken because a menu behavior is failing, since we aren't rendering the menu.

When a behavior fails to initialize, catch and log the exception and continue. Previously, we stopped initializing behaviors if any failed, but behaviors are usually independent and continuing with an explicit exception seems reasonable.

Give "JX.log()" some "sprintf()" semantics to make logging the behavior failure easier. We can probably afford these extra 200 bytes now in 2019.

This fixes the button and gives us explicit errors in the log. So far, so good.

Then, when a page won't render chrome, don't try to render the main menu. This fixes the actual errors (we no longer try to initialize menu behaviors for nodes which don't exist).

Completely hide the "Actions" and "Comment" flows if the viewer isn't logged in. Although this isn't completely consistent with other applications, I think it's more appropriate for Phame. In applications like Maniphest, we show a full set of controls (but disable them) so that users who are not currently logged in have a clear path to interact with the content, under the assumption that this is a relatively common workflow. This is probably less common for Phame, where we expect most anonymous viewers not to log in or interact.

Finally, parametrize a one-off border color and add a border under the crumbs at the top of the page.

Test Plan:
  - Viewed a "Live" Phame blog post page, clicked "Actions", got a dropdown.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20378
2019-04-04 06:10:14 -07:00
epriestley
47bf382435 Allow profile menu items to be locked to the top or bottom of the menu
Summary:
Depends on D20353. Ref T13275. This is just some small quality-of-life fixes:

  - When you add items to menus, they currently go below the "Edit Menu/Manage Menu" links by default. This isn't a very good place for them. Instead, lock "edit" items to the bottom of the menu.
  - Lock profile pictures to the top of the menu. This just simplifies things a little.
  - Show more iconography hints on the "edit menu items" UI.
  - Add a "drag stuff to do things" hint if some stuff can be dragged.

Test Plan:
  - Added new items to a Portal, they didn't go to the very bottom. Instead, they went above the "Edit/Manage" links; a sensible place for them.
  - Viewed the "edit menu items" screen, saw more hints and visual richness.
  - Viewed/edited Home, Projects, Portals, Favorites

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13275

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20355
2019-04-02 15:08:20 -07:00
epriestley
e586ed439a Improve overflow/ellipsis behaivor for very wide task graphs
Summary:
See downstream <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T171648>. The `T123 Task Name` column in graphs can currently fold down to 0 pixels wide.

Although it's visually nice to render this element without a scroll bar when we don't really need one, the current behavior is excessive and not very useful.

Instead, tweak the CSS so:

  - This cell is always at least 320px wide.
  - After 320px, we'll overflow/ellipsis the cell on small screens.

This generally gives us better behavior:

  - Small screens get a scrollbar to see a reasonable amount of content.
  - The UI doesn't turn into a total mess if one task has a whole novel of text.

Test Plan:
Old behavior, note that there's no scrollbar and the cell is so narrow it is useless:

{F6320208}

New behavior, same default view, has a scrollbar:

{F6320209}

Scrolling over gives you this:

{F6320210}

On a wider screen (this wide or better), we don't need to scroll:

{F6320211}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20345
2019-03-28 21:16:48 -07:00
epriestley
c4856c37e7 Fix content overflow in user hovercards
Summary:
Fixes T13273. This element is a bit weird, but I think I fixed it without breaking anything.

The CSS is used by project hovercards and user hovercards, but they each have a class which builds mostly-shared-but-not-really-identical CSS, instead of having a single `View` class with modes. So I'm not 100% sure I didn't break something obscure, but I couldn't find anything this breaks.

The major issue is that all the text content has "position: absolute". Instead, make the image "absolute" and the text actual positioned content. Then fix all the margins/padding/spacing/layout and add overflow. Seems to work?

Plus: hide availability for disabled users, for consistency with D20342.

Test Plan:
Before:

{F6320155}

After:

{F6320156}

I think this is pixel-exact except for the overflow behavior.

Also:

  - Viewed some other user hovercards, including a disabled user. They all looked unchanged.
  - Viewed some project hovercards. They all looked good, too.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13273

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20344
2019-03-28 21:10:09 -07:00
epriestley
3e1ffda85d Give workboard column header actions a more clickable appearance
Summary: Ref T13269. Make it visually more clear that the "Trigger" and "New Task / Edit / Bulk" dropdown menu items are buttons, not status icons or indicators of some kind.

Test Plan: {F6313872}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13269

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20332
2019-03-27 14:56:18 -07:00
epriestley
686b03a1d5 Dim the action drop preview element when the cursor approaches
Summary:
Depends on D20308. Ref T5474. The element which previews what will happen when you drop a task somewhere can cover the bottom part of the rightmost column on a workboard.

To fix this, I'm trying to just fade it out if you put your cursor over it. I tried to do this in a simple way previously (":hover" + "opacity: 0.25") but it doesn't actually work because "pointer-events: none" stops ":hover" from working.

Instead, do this in Javascript. This is a little more complicated but: it works; and we can do the fade when you get //near// the element instead of actually over it, which feels a little better.

Test Plan:
  - Shrank window to fairly small size so that the preview could cover up stuff on the workboard.
  - Dragged a card toward the rightmost column.
  - Before: drop action preview covered some workboard stuff.
  - After: preview faded out as my cursor approached.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T5474

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20320
2019-03-25 14:35:55 -07:00
epriestley
c53ed72e4c Provide a clearer UI for "view all results" in partial result panels
Summary:
In some cases, we show a limited number of one type of object somewhere else, like "Recent Such-And-Such" or "Herald Rules Which Use This" or whatever.

We don't do a very good job of communicating that these are partial lists, or how to see all the results. Usually there's a button in the upper right, which is fine, but this could be better.

Add an explicit "more stuff" button that shows up where a pager would appear and makes it clear that (a) the list is partial; and (b) you can click the button to see everything.

Test Plan: {F6302793}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20315
2019-03-25 14:35:08 -07:00
epriestley
1277db9452 When users hover over a column trigger menu, show a "preview" with the rules instead of a tooltip
Summary:
Ref T5474. The first rough cut of triggers showed some of the trigger rules in a tooltip when you hover over the "add/remove" trigger menu.

This isn't great since we don't have much room and it's a bit finnicky / hard to read.

Since we have a better way to show effects now in the drop preview, just use that instead. When you hover over the trigger menu, preview the trigger in the "drop effect" element, with a "Trigger: such-and-such" header.

Test Plan:
  - This is pretty tough to screenshot.
  - Hovered over menu, got a sensible preview of the trigger effects.
  - Dragged a card over the menu, no preview.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T5474

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20304
2019-03-25 14:02:10 -07:00
epriestley
567dea5449 Mostly make the editor UI for triggers work
Summary:
Ref T5474. This provides a Herald-like UI for editing workboard trigger rules.

This probably has some missing pieces and doesn't actually save anything to the database yet, but the basics at least roughly work.

Test Plan: {F6299886}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T5474

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20301
2019-03-25 13:25:14 -07:00
epriestley
5dca1569b5 Preview the effects of a drag-and-drop operation on workboards
Summary:
Ref T10335. Ref T5474. When you drag-and-drop a card on a workboard, show a UI hint which lists all the things that the operation will do.

This shows: column moves; changes because of dragging a card to a different header; and changes which will be caused by triggers.

Not implemented here:

  - Actions are currently shown even if they have no effect. For example, if you drag a "Normal" task to a different column, it says "Change priority to Normal.". I plan to hide actions which have no effect, but figuring this out is a little bit tricky.
  - I'd like to make "trigger effects" vs "non-trigger effects" a little more clear in the future, probably.

Test Plan:
Dragged stuff between columns and headers, and into columns with triggers. Got appropriate preview text hints previewing what the action would do in the UI.

(This is tricky to take a screenshot of since it only shows up while the mouse cursor is down.)

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T10335, T5474

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20299
2019-03-25 13:22:56 -07:00
epriestley
a5226366d3 Make notifications visually clearer, like Feed
Summary: See downstream <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T166358>. The notifications menu is missing some CSS to color and style values in stories like "renamed task from X to Y".

Test Plan:
Before:

{F6302123}

After:

{F6302122}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20310
2019-03-25 11:37:00 -07:00
epriestley
a6e17fb702 Improve workboard "Owner" grouping, add "Author" grouping and "Title" sort
Summary:
Depends on D20277. Ref T10333.

  - Put profile icons on "Group by Owner".
  - Add a similar "Group by Author". Probably not terribly useful, but cheap to implement now.
  - Add "Sort by Title". Very likely not terribly useful, but cheap to implement and sort of flexible?

Test Plan: {F6265396}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T10333

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20278
2019-03-12 14:30:38 -07:00
epriestley
804be81f5d Provide better UI feedback about cards that can't be dragged or edited
Summary:
Depends on D20273. Fixes T10722. Currently, we don't make it very clear when a card can't be edited. Long ago, some code made a weak attempt to do this (by hiding the "grip" on the card), but later UI changes hid the "grip" unconditionally so that mooted things.

Instead:

  - Replace the edit pencil with a red lock.
  - Provide cursor hints for grabbable / not grabbable.
  - Don't let users pick up cards they can't edit.

Test Plan: On a workboard with a mixture of editable and not-editable cards, hovered over the different cards and was able to figure out which ones I could drag or not drag pretty easily. Picked up cards I could pick up, wasn't able to drag cards I can't edit.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T10722

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20274
2019-03-12 13:43:46 -07:00
epriestley
7574be5372 Remove opacity effects for left-side / right-side diff text selection
Summary:
These effects feel like they're possibly overkill, since other CSS rules make the selection reticle behave correctly and the implementation is relatively intuitive.

Or not, either way.

Test Plan: Selected text on either side of a 2-up diff, no more opacity effects.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20264
2019-03-12 12:40:01 -07:00
epriestley
14a433c773 Add priority group headers to workboard columns (display only)
Summary:
Ref T10333. When workboards are ordered (for example, by priority), add headers to the various groups. Major goals are:

  - Allow users to drag-and-drop to set values that no cards currently have: for example, you can change a card priority to "normal" by dragging it under the "normal" header, even if no other cards in the column are currently "Normal".
  - Make future orderings more useful, particularly "order by assignee". We don't really have room to put the username on every card and it would create a fair amount of clutter, but we can put usernames in these headers and then reference them with just the profile picture. This also allows you to assign to users who are not currently assigned anything in a given column.
  - Make the drag-and-drop behavior more obvious by showing what it will do more clearly (see T8135).
  - Make things a little easier to scan in general: because space on cards is limited, some information isn't conveyed very clearly (for example, priority information is currently conveyed //only// through color, which can be hard to pick out visually and is probably not functional for users who need vision accommodations).
  - Maybe do "swimlanes": this is pretty much a "swimlanes" UI if we add whitespace at the bottom of each group so that the headers line up across all the columns (e.g., "Normal" is at the same y-axis position in every column as you scroll down the page). Not sold on this being useful, but it's just a UI adjustment if we do want to try it.

NOTE: This only makes these headers work for display.

They aren't yet recognized as targets by the drag list UI, so you can't drag cards into an empty group. I'll tackle that in a followup.

Test Plan: {F6257686}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T10333

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20247
2019-03-09 10:32:55 -08:00
epriestley
be1e3b2cc0 When a user drags a card over a column, highlight the column border
Summary:
Ref T10334. Partly, this just improves visual feedback for all drag operations. After D20242, we can have cases where you (for example) drag a low-priority node to a very tall column on a priority-ordered workboard. In this case, the actual dashed-border-drop-target may not be on screen.

We might make the column scroll or put some kind of hint in the UI in this case, but an easy starting point is just to make the "yes, you're targeting this column" state a bit more clear.

Test Plan: Dragged tasks between columns, saw the border higlight on the target columns. This is very tricky to take a screenshot of.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T10334

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20245
2019-03-09 10:30:23 -08:00
epriestley
a3ebaac0f0 Tweak the visual style of the ">>" / "<<" depth change indicators slightly
Summary:
Ref T13249.

  - When a line has only increased in indent depth, don't red-fill highlight the left side of the diff. Since reading a diff //mostly// involves focusing on the right side, indent depth changes are generally visible enough without this extra hint. The extra hint can become distracting in cases where there is a large block of indent depth changes.
  - Move the markers slightly to the left, to align them with the gutter.
  - Make them slightly opaque so they're a little less prominent.

Test Plan: See screenshots.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13249

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20251
2019-03-07 11:46:26 -08:00
epriestley
d192d04586 Make it more visually clear that you can click things in the "Big List of Clickable Things" UI element
Summary:
Ref T13259. An install provided feedback that it wasn't obvious you could click the buttons in this UI.

Make it more clear that these are clickable buttons.

Test Plan:
{F6251585}

{F6251586}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13259

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20238
2019-03-05 11:32:38 -08:00
epriestley
f1a035d5c2 In Differential, give the "moved/copied from" gutter a more clear visual look
Summary:
Depends on D20196. See PHI985. When empty, the "moved/copied" gutter currently renders with the same background color as the rest of the line. This can be misleading because it makes code look more indented than it is, especially if you're unfamiliar with the tool:

{F6225179}

If we remove this misleading coloration, we get a white gap. This is more clear, but looks a little odd:

{F6225181}

Instead, give this gutter a subtle background fill in all casses, to make it more clear that it's a separate gutter region, not a part of the text diff:

{F6225183}

Test Plan: See screenshots. Copied text from a diff, added/removed inlines, etc.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20197
2019-02-20 10:12:16 -08:00
epriestley
a33409991c Remove an old Differential selection behavior
Summary:
Ref T12822. Ref PHI878. This is some leftover code from the old selection behavior that prevented visual selection of the left side of a diff if the user clicked on the right -- basically, a much simpler attack on what ultimately landed in D20191.

I think the change from `th` to `td` "broke" it so it didn't interfere with the other behavior, which is why I didn't have to remove it earlier. It's no longer necessary, in any case.

Test Plan: Grepped for behavior name, selected stuff on both sides of a diff.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T12822

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20196
2019-02-20 10:09:34 -08:00
epriestley
cf048f4402 Tweak some display behaviors for indent indicators
Summary:
Ref T13161.

  - Don't show ">>" when the line indentation changed but the text also changed, this is just "the line changed".
  - The indicator seems a little cleaner if we just reuse the existing "bright" colors, which already have colorblind colors anyway.

Test Plan: Got slightly better rendering for some diffs locally.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13161

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20195
2019-02-19 15:34:30 -08:00
epriestley
fe7047d12d Display some invisible/nonprintable characters in diffs by default
Summary:
Ref T12822. Ref T2495. This is the good version of D20193.

Currently, we display various nonprintable characters (ZWS, nonbreaking space, various control characters) as themselves, so they're generally invisible.

In T12822, one user reports that all their engineers frequently type ZWS characters into source somehow? I don't really believe this (??), and this should be fixed in lint.

That said, the only real reason not to show these weird characters in a special way was that it would break copy/paste: if we render ZWS as "🐑", and a user copy-pastes the line including the ZWS, they'll get a sheep.

At least, they would have, until D20191. Now that this whole thing is end-to-end Javascript magic, we can copy whatever we want.

In particular, we can render any character `X` as `<span data-copy-text="Y">X</span>`, and then copy "Y" instead of "X" when the user copies the node. Limitations:

  - If users select only "X", they'll get "X" on their clipboard. This seems fine. If you're selecting our ZWS marker *only*, you probably want to copy it?
  - If "X" is more than one character long, users will get the full "Y" if they select any part of "X". At least here, this only matters when "X" is several spaces and "Y" is a tab. This also seems fine.
  - We have to be kind of careful because this approach involves editing an HTML blob directly. However, we already do that elsewhere and this isn't really too hard to get right.

With those tools in hand:

  - Replace "\t" (raw text / what gets copied) with the number of spaces to the next tab stop for display.
  - Replace ZWS and NBSP (raw text) with a special marker for display.
  - Replace control characters 0x00-0x19 and 0x7F, except for "\t", "\r", and "\n", with the special unicode "control character pictures" reserved for this purpose.

Test Plan:
- Generated and viewed a file like this one:

{F6220422}

- Copied text out of it, got authentic raw original source text instead of displayed text.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T12822, T2495

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20194
2019-02-19 15:21:44 -08:00
epriestley
efccd75ae3 Correct various minor diff copy behaviors
Summary:
Ref T12822. Fixes a few things:

  - Firefox selection of weird ranges with an inline between the start and end of the range now works correctly.
  - "Show More Context" rows now render, highlight, and select properly.
  - Prepares for nodes to have copy-text which is different from display-text.
  - Don't do anything too fancy in 1-up/unified mode. We don't copy line numbers after the `content: attr(data-n)` change, but that's as far as we go, because trying to do more than that is kind of weird and not terribly intuitive.

Test Plan:
  - Selected and copied weird ranges in Firefox.
  - Kept an eye on "Show More Context" rows across select and copy operations.
  - Generally poked around in Safari/Firefox/Chrome.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T12822

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20192
2019-02-19 15:18:45 -08:00
epriestley
37f12a05ea Behold! Copy text from either side of a diff!
Summary:
Ref T12822. Ref T13161. By default, when users select text from a diff and copy it to the clipboard, they get both sides of the diff and all the line numbers. This is usually not what they intended to copy.

As of D20188, we use `content: attr(...)` to render line numbers. No browser copies this text, so that fixes line numbers.

We can use "user-select" CSS to visually prevent selection of line numbers and other stuff we don't want to copy. In Firefox and Chrome, "user-select" also applies to copied text, so getting "user-select" on the right nodes is largely good enough to do what we want.

In Safari, "user-select" is only visual, so we always need to crawl the DOM to figure out what text to pull out of it anyway.

In all browsers, we likely want to crawl the DOM anyway because this will let us show one piece of text and copy a different piece of text. We probably want to do this in the future to preserve "\t" tabs, and possibly to let us render certain character codes in one way but copy their original values. For example, we could render "\x07" as "␇".

Finally, we have to figure out which side of the diff we're copying from. The rule here is:

  - If you start the selection by clicking somewhere on the left or right side of the diff, that's what you're copying.
  - Otherwise, use normal document copy rules.

So the overall flow here is:

  - Listen for clicks.
  - When the user clicks the left or right side of the diff, store what they clicked.
  - When a selection starts, and something is actually selected, check if it was initiated by clicking a diff. If it was, apply a visual effect to get "user-select" where it needs to go and show the user what we think they're doing and what we're going to copy.
  - (Then, try to handle a bunch of degenerate cases where you start a selection and then click inside that selection.)
  - When a user clicks elsewhere or ends the selection with nothing selected, clear the selection mode.
  - When a user copies text, if we have an active selection mode, pull all the selected nodes out of the DOM and filter out the ones we don't want to copy, then stitch the text back together. Although I believe this didn't work well in ~2010, it appears to work well today.

Test Plan: This mostly seems to work in Safari, Chrome, and Firefox. T12822 has some errata. I haven't tested touch events but am satisfied if the touch event story is anything better than "permanently destroys data".

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13161, T12822

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20191
2019-02-19 15:17:07 -08:00
epriestley
d4b96bcf6b Remove hidden zero-width spaces affecting copy behavior
Summary:
Ref T13161. Ref T12822. Today, we use invisible Zero-Width Spaces to try to improve copy/paste behavior from Differential.

After D20188, we no longer need ZWS characters to avoid copying line numbers. Get rid of these secret invisible semantic ZWS characters completely.

This means that both the left-hand and right-hand side of diffs become copyable, which isn't desired. I'll fix that with a hundred thousand lines of Javascript in the next change: this is a step toward everything working better, but doesn't fix everything yet.

Test Plan:
  - Grepped for `zws`, `grep -i zero | grep -i width`.
  - Copied text out of Differential: got both sides of the diff (not ideal).

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13161, T12822

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20189
2019-02-19 15:10:04 -08:00
epriestley
98fe8fae4a Use <td class="n" data-n="3"> instead of <th>3</th> for line numbers
Summary:
Ref T13161. Ref T12822. See PHI870. Long ago, the web was simple. You could leave your doors unlocked, you knew all your neighbors, crime hadn't been invented yet, and `<th>3</th>` was a perfectly fine way to render a line number cell containing the number "3".

But times have changed!

  - In PHI870, this isn't good for screenreaders. We can't do much about this, so switch to `<td>`.
  - In D19349 / T13105 and elsewhere, this `::after { content: attr(data-n); }` approach seems like the least bad general-purpose approach for preventing line numbers from being copied. Although Differential needs even more magic beyond this in the two-up view, this is likely good enough for the one-up view, and is consistent with other views (paste, harbormaster logs, general source display) where this technique is sufficient on its own.

The chance this breaks //something// is pretty much 100%, but we've got a week to figure out what it breaks. I couldn't find any issues immediately.

Test Plan:
  - Created, edited, deleted inlines in 1-up and 2-up views.
  - Replied, keyboard-navigated, keyboard-replied, drag-selected, poked and prodded everything.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13161, T12822

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20188
2019-02-19 15:07:02 -08:00
epriestley
661c758ff9 Render indent depth changes more clearly
Summary:
Ref T13161. See PHI723. Our whitespace handling is based on whitespace flags like `diff -bw`, mostly just for historical reasons: long ago, the easiest way to minimize the visual impact of indentation changes was to literally use `diff -bw`.

However, this approach is very coarse and has a lot of problems, like detecting `"ab" -> "a b"` as "only a whitespace change" even though this is always semantic. It also causes problems in YAML, Python, etc. Over time, we've added a lot of stuff to mitigate the downsides to this approach.

We also no longer get any benefits from this approach being simple: we need faithful diffs as the authoritative source, and have to completely rebuild the diff to `diff -bw` it. In the UI, we have a "whitespace mode" flag. We have the "whitespace matters" configuration.

I think ReviewBoard generally has a better approach to indent depth changes than we do (see T13161) where it detects them and renders them in a minimal way with low visual impact. This is ultimately what we want: reduce visual clutter for depth-only changes, but preserve whitespace changes in strings, etc.

Move toward detecting and rendering indent depth changes. Followup work:

  - These should get colorblind colors and the design can probably use a little more tweaking.
  - The OneUp mode is okay, but could be improved.
  - Whitespace mode can now be removed completely.
  - I'm trying to handle tabs correctly, but since we currently mangle them into spaces today, it's hard to be sure I actually got it right.

Test Plan: {F6214084}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13161

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20181
2019-02-19 12:40:05 -08:00
epriestley
aa470d2154 Show user availability dots (red = away, orange = busy) in typeaheads, tokenizer tokens, and autocompletes
Summary:
Ref T13249. See PHI810. We currently show availability dots in some interfaces (timeline, mentions) but not others (typeheads/tokenizers).

They're potentially quite useful in tokenizers, e.g. when assigning tasks to someone or requesting reviews. Show them in more places.

(The actual rendering here isn't terribly clean, and it would be great to try to unify all these various behaviors some day.)

Test Plan:
{F6212044}

{F6212045}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13249

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20173
2019-02-19 10:57:20 -08:00
epriestley
3058cae4b8 Allow task statuses to specify that either "comments" or "edits" are "locked"
Summary:
Ref T13249. See PHI1059. This allows "locked" in `maniphest.statuses` to specify that either "comments" are locked (current behavior, advisory, overridable by users with edit permission, e.g. for calming discussion on a contentious issue or putting a guard rail on things); or "edits" are locked (hard lock, only task owner can edit things).

Roughly, "comments" is a soft/advisory lock. "edits" is a hard/strict lock. (I think both types of locks have reasonable use cases, which is why I'm not just making locks stronger across the board.)

When "edits" are locked:

  - The edit policy looks like "no one" to normal callers.
  - In one special case, we sneak the real value through a back channel using PolicyCodex in the specific narrow case that you're editing the object. Otherwise, the policy selector control incorrectly switches to "No One".
  - We also have to do a little more validation around applying a mixture of status + owner transactions that could leave the task uneditable.

For now, I'm allowing you to reassign a hard-locked task to someone else. If you get this wrong, we can end up in a state where no one can edit the task. If this is an issue, we could respond in various ways: prevent these edits; prevent assigning to disabled users; provide a `bin/task reassign`; uh maybe have a quorum convene?

Test Plan:
  - Defined "Soft Locked" and "Hard Locked" statues.
  - "Hard Locked" a task, hit errors (trying to unassign myself, trying to hard lock an unassigned task).
  - Saw nice new policy guidance icon in header.

{F6210362}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13249

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20165
2019-02-15 19:18:40 -08:00
epriestley
8810cd2f4d Add a standalone view for the Maniphest task graph
Summary:
See PHI1073. Improve the UX here:

  - When there are a small number of connected tasks, no changes.
  - When there are too many total connected tasks, but not too many directly connected tasks, show hint text with a "View Standalone Graph" button to view more of the graph.
  - When there are too many directly connected tasks, show better hint text with a "View Standalone Graph" button.
  - Always show a "View Standalone Graph" option in the dropdown menu.
  - Add a standalone view which works the same way but has a limit of 2,000.
    - This view doesn't have "View Standalone Graph" links, since they'd just link back to the same page, but is basically the same otherwise.
  - Increase the main page task limit from 100 to 200.

Test Plan:
Mobile View:

{F6210326}

Way too much stuff:

{F6210327}

New persistent link to the standalone page:

{F6210328}

Kind of too much stuff:

{F6210329}

Standalone view:

{F6210330}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: 20after4

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20164
2019-02-15 14:43:38 -08:00
epriestley
8f8e863613 When users follow an email login link but an install does not use passwords, try to get them to link an account
Summary:
Ref T13249. See PHI774. When users follow an email login link ("Forgot password?", "Send Welcome Email", "Send a login link to your email address.", `bin/auth recover`), we send them to a password reset flow if an install uses passwords.

If an install does not use passwords, we previously dumped them unceremoniously into the {nav Settings > External Accounts} UI with no real guidance about what they were supposed to do. Since D20094 we do a slightly better job here in some cases. Continue improving this workflow.

This adds a page like "Reset Password" for "Hey, You Should Probably Link An Account, Here's Some Options".

Overall, this stuff is still pretty rough in a couple of areas that I imagine addressing in the future:

  - When you finish linking, we still dump you back in Settings. At least we got you to link things. But better would be to return you here and say "great job, you're a pro".
  - This UI can become a weird pile of buttons in certain configs and generally looks a little unintentional. This problem is shared among all the "linkable" providers, and the non-login link flow is also weird.

So: step forward, but more work to be done.

Test Plan: {F6211115}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13249

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20170
2019-02-15 14:41:31 -08:00
epriestley
2ca316d652 When users confirm Duo MFA in the mobile app, live-update the UI
Summary: Ref T13249. Poll for Duo updates in the background so we can automatically update the UI when the user clicks the mobile phone app button.

Test Plan: Hit a Duo gate, clicked "Approve" in the mobile app, saw the UI update immediately.

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13249

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20169
2019-02-15 14:38:15 -08:00
epriestley
187356fea5 Let the top-level exception handler dump a stack trace if we reach debug mode before things go sideways
Summary:
Depends on D20140. Ref T13250. Currently, the top-level exception handler doesn't dump stacks because we might not be in debug mode, and we might double-extra-super fatal if we call `PhabricatorEnv:...` to try to figure out if we're in debug mode or not.

We can get around this by setting a flag on the Sink once we're able to confirm that we're in debug mode. Then it's okay for the top-level error handler to show traces.

There's still some small possibility that showing a trace could make us double-super-fatal since we have to call a little more code, but AphrontStackTraceView is pretty conservative about what it does and 99% of the time this is a huge improvement.

Test Plan: {F6205122}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Maniphest Tasks: T13250

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20142
2019-02-11 15:36:19 -08:00
epriestley
a20f108034 When an edit overrides an object lock, note it in the transaction record
Summary:
Ref T13244. See PHI1059. When you lock a task, users who can edit the task can currently override the lock by using "Edit Task" if they confirm that they want to do this.

Mark these edits with an emblem, similar to the "MFA" and "Silent" emblems, so it's clear that they may have bent the rules.

Also, make the "MFA" and "Silent" emblems more easily visible.

Test Plan:
Edited a locked task, overrode the lock, got marked for it.

{F6195005}

Reviewers: amckinley

Reviewed By: amckinley

Subscribers: aeiser

Maniphest Tasks: T13244

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20131
2019-02-09 06:10:07 -08:00