Summary: it's ugly. but it works. basically. See T2399 for a roughly prioritized list of what still needs to happen.
Test Plan:
- created a conpherence with myself from my profile
- created a conpherence with myself from "new conpherence"
- created a conphernece with another from "new conpherence"
- created a conpherence with several others
- created a conpherence with files in the initial post
- verified files via comment text ("{F232} is awesome!") and via traditional attach
- edited a conpherence image
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the left
- edited a conpherence title
- verified it showed up in the header and in the conpherence menu on the right
- verified each widget showed up when clicked and displayed the proper data
- calendar being an exception since it sucks so hard right now.
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, chad, codeblock, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2301
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4620
Summary:
When a user submits an action with no effect (like an empty comment, an "abandon" on an already-accepted revision, or a "close, resolved" on a closed task) we want to alert them that their action isn't effective. These warnings fall into two general buckets:
- User is submitting two or more actions, and some aren't effective but some are. Prompt them to apply the effective actions only.
- A special case of this is where the only effective action is a comment. We provide tailored text ("Post Comment") in this case.
- User is submitting one action, which isn't effective. Tell them they're out of luck.
- A special case of this is an empty comment. We provide tailored text in this case.
By default, the transaction editor throws when transactions have no effect. The caller can then deal with this, or use `PhabricatorApplicationTransactionNoEffectResponse` to provide a standard dialog that gives the user information as above. For cases where we expect transactions to have no effect (notably, "edit" forms) we just continue on no-effect unconditionally.
Also fix an issue where new, combined or filtered transactions would not be represented properly in the Ajax response (i.e., return final transactions from `applyTransactions()`), and translate some strings.
Test Plan:
- Submitted empty and nonempy comments in Macro and Pholio.
- Submitted comments with new and existing "@mentions".
- Submitted edits in both applications.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T912, T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4160
Summary: Publish feed stories, including from Pholio. Actual stories are somewhat garbage but it's all display-time; I'm going to do a pass on feed in general.
Test Plan: {F26832}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4140
Summary:
- Adds mail support to the generic transaction construct.
- Restores mail support to Pholio (now much improved; the mails are actually useful).
Test Plan: Updated a Pholio mock, got mail.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4139
Summary:
Split Pholio's transaction implementation into generic and application-specific parts. Moves us toward generic transactions, with support for:
- Editing and deleting comments.
- Setting visibility of individual comments (I'm not a fan of this feature but we'll see).
I want to move everything to a more generic piece of infrastructure but there's very little they can share right now so adding transactions to, e.g., Paste or Macros (T2157) means massive amounts of similar code.
Tons of work left to do here, but I think it basically works. Here's a screenshot:
{F26820}
Test Plan: Made transactions in Pholio.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2104
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4136
