Summary: Fixes T8908. We sometimes receive hypothetical requests (usually when existing companies are thinking about adopting Phabricator) in the form of "No users have actually done this yet, but bad thing Y might happen". We can almost never move forward with these. Explain this in detail.
Test Plan: Reading.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T8908
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13663
Summary:
This mentions "like GitHub", but we purged all the issues and no longer accept them.
Generally, feature requests should be coming to the upstream only nowadays.
Also, don't overpromise IRC.
Test Plan: Read documentation.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11777
Summary: @btrahan asked about this but I gave the wrong answer. These
currently do not turn into links. I think they might have in the past,
but if they did the rule is a little weird and feels specific to my
use. We can reexamine this at some point, but for now just make the
links work in a normal, reasonable sort of way.
Auditors: btrahan
Summary:
Fixes T6347. This refines the "contributor guide" documents to basically lock down support further. Notable changes in policy:
- Bugs: Emphasis on reproduction steps, strong emphasis on using Maniphest. Emphasis on what we support.
- Features: Emphasis on describing problems instead of solutions, emphasis on realistic expecations about timelines. Strong emphasis on using Maniphest.
- Code: Strong emphasis on coordinating with us first. No GitHub pull requests. Emphasis on us ignoring contributions we don't have time to deal with. Suggests local forks.
Test Plan: Read these through; let me generate them and take some screenshots for easier reading.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T6347
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10764
