Summary:
Ref T2852. We need to distinguish between an API call which worked but got back nothing (404) and an API call which failed.
In particular, Asana hit a sync issue which was likely the result of treating a 500 (or some other error) as a 404.
Also clean up a couple small things.
Test Plan: Ran syncs against deleted tasks and saw successful syncs of non-tasks, and simulated random failures and saw them get handled correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6470
Summary:
Remove ocurrences of `loadRelations` in workers.
One was simply unnecesary, no subsequent call to `getReviewers` or `getCCPHIDs` was made.
The other was replaced with the nicer `DifferentialRevisionQuery` using `needRelations` and `needReviewerStatus` (for future upgrade).
Test Plan:
Land a revision into a tracked repository and check the parser worker attached the commit correctly.
For the owners worker I just checked it didn't crash into a hundred tiny pieces.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6467
Summary:
Change all instances of `id(new DifferentialRevision())->load($id)` for `DifferentialRevisionQuery` where reviewers are loaded.
Also make sure that the new reviewer status is being loaded so that all calls to `getReviewers` can be removed in the near future.
Test Plan: Use all three controllers with several revisions and check they still work in sane way
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6466
Summary:
Ref T1279.
Switched all differential conduit methods to use `DifferentialRevisionQuery` where `loadRelations` was being used.
Test Plan: Called all the methods changed and verified they still worked as advertised.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6452
Summary: Add `getReviewerStatus` to get an array of `DifferentialReviewer` objects. The method `needReviewerStatus` in `DifferentialRevisionQuery` loads the edges into the revisions loaded.
Test Plan: Added `->needReviewerStatus(true)` to `DifferentialRevisionSearchEngine` and checked through logging that the data was being loaded correctly.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6450
Summary: Ref T2231. Ref T2232. This form doesn't do anything yet and there are no link sto it, but it lets you enter all the data to create a repository in a relatively simple, straightforward way.
Test Plan:
{F49740}
{F49741}
{F49742}
{F49743}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2231, T2232
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6430
Summary: When user changed his mind for voting, counting does not work properly. If user vote up first and vote down, vote count must be decreased 2. fixed in javascript file
Test Plan:
http://cihad.phabricator.pompa.la/Q11
user : demo
pass : demodemo
Reviewers: aran, Korvin, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: simsekburak
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6446
Summary: Move some UI stuff to modern kit.
Test Plan: {F50024}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6447
Summary: Ref T603. Ref T2625. Start pushing Slowvote (the greatest app of all time) into the modern era.
Test Plan: Looked at vote detail. Used `V1` and `{V1}` embeds.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603, T2625
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6444
Summary: We attempt to choose the most reasonable actor when synchronizing to Asana, but Asana is seeing the sync choose a less-reasonable actor. I spotted two places where the order may get disrupted; make sure we retain order. This is somewhat tricky to repro locally (it depends on things like native account order) but I think this is the right fix. If not, I'll add more logging. Ref T2852.
Test Plan: Used `bin/feed republish` to sync Asana events.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6443
Summary: Fixes T3528. We won't be able to load the user if they've been deleted, and will fatal a few lines later on `$user->getID()`.
Test Plan: I'm going with my gut on this one.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3528
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6442
Summary: rPad17c99c1b0222292a47ca79561a356cb8b5a5d5 stopped the fatal and this provides the forward fix. I think this is what a forward fix is anyway.
Test Plan: viewed a revision (D63 is my boy) and no fatals
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6448
Summary:
Ref T2852. Asana has one bug which I'm having a little trouble figuring out. I want to get more information to debug it, but I'll need them to run `bin/feed republish <story_id>` to get that data.
Right now, it's incredibly hard to figure out the story ID for feed stories. So mostly this is to make that easier (click permalink; pull it out of the URL), but it also adds a little functionality and cleans the code up a bit.
The page itself could be prettier and maybe some day we'll add comments or whatever, but it seems reasonably functionalish.
Test Plan:
{F49962}
- Also loaded many pages of feed history to check that nothing broke.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6440
Summary:
Ref T2852.
- Respect the existing setting for `"[Differential]"`.
- Show `[Request, X lines]` to make this more similar to the email.
Test Plan:
Sync'd to asana and got a task with the right subject:
{F49950}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6439
Summary:
Ref T2852. It's a little tricky to figure out Asana workspace IDs right now. If the viewer has a linked account, just pull their workspaces and show them which IDs are available.
(In theory, we could use a `<select>`, but it would have more edge cases; this seems like a pretty solid fix.)
Test Plan: {F49938}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2852
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6437
Summary: Fixes T2652. Did some testing post T2691 to see if I could close this and noted an error in the JS if you view the page not logged in. This fixes that error. Everything else I can think of seems to work...? :D
Test Plan: played around with a mock not logged in and got sensible interactions and no errors
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2652
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6438
Summary:
Fixes T2691. Now, all PhabricatorActionListViews in the codebase setObjectHref to $request->getRequestURI. This value is passed over to PhabricatorActionItems right before they are rendered. If a PhabricatorActionItem is a workflow and there is no user OR the user is logged out, we used this objectURI to construct a log in URI.
Potentially added some undesirable behavior to aggressively setUser (and later setObjectURI) from within the List on Actions... This should be okay-ish unless there was a vision of actions having different user objects associated with them. I think this is a safe assumption.
Test Plan: played around with a mock all logged out (Ref T2652) and it worked!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2691
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6416
Summary: Fixes T3525. This feels way better, although it's still a little hard for me to pick out of lists with otherwise default-colored items.
Test Plan: {F49910} {F49911}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3525
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6435
Summary: While the icons are sometimes pretty obvious ("X" for delete, "pencil" for edit), some are more obscure ("Disable", "Ignore"), especially if you haven't seen the interface before. If a name is available, render it as a tooltip.
Test Plan: {F49905}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6434
Summary:
- The dialog has no body text.
- It uses an "Ignore" link because it predates action items.
Test Plan:
{F49894}
{F49895}
{F49896}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6433
Summary: Currently, we always show "current picture" even if you don't have one. In this case, the first available picture becomes the "current picture". Instead, show "current picture" only if there's actually a current picture to show.
Test Plan: {F49875}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6432
Summary: Fixes T3069. Ref T3516. For a long time, LDAP import added trailing whitespace to real names when importing them (for example, `"John Smith"` would be imported as `"John Smith "`). We no longer do this, but should clean up the database since it seems highly unlikely that any user wants trailing whitespace in their real name.
Test Plan:
$ ./bin/storage upgrade -f --apply phabricator:20130711.trimrealnames.php
Applying patch 'phabricator:20130711.trimrealnames.php'...
Trimming trailing whitespace from user real names...
Trimming user 1 from 'Evan Priestley ' to 'Evan Priestley'.
User 4 is already trim.
User 5 is already trim.
User 6 is already trim.
User 7 is already trim.
User 8 is already trim.
User 9 is already trim.
User 10 is already trim.
User 11 is already trim.
User 12 is already trim.
User 13 is already trim.
User 14 is already trim.
User 15 is already trim.
User 21 is already trim.
User 22 is already trim.
User 26 is already trim.
User 28 is already trim.
User 29 is already trim.
User 32 is already trim.
User 33 is already trim.
User 35 is already trim.
User 39 is already trim.
User 51 is already trim.
User 53 is already trim.
User 54 is already trim.
User 55 is already trim.
Done.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3069, T3516
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6426
Summary: Fixes T3517. Moves the email verification page out of People and into Auth. Makes it look less awful.
Test Plan: {F49636} {F49637}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3517
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6425
Summary: Tell users to use the CLI, not the web UI.
Test Plan: Read the docs.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6424
Summary: One place used status, other used state. Killed state in favor of status.
Test Plan: None at all
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6422
Summary:
Ref T3306. This interface has a hard time balancing security/policy issues and I'm not sure what the best way forward is. Some possibilities:
# We just let you see everything from the web UI.
- This makes debugging easier.
- Anyone who can see this stuff can trivially take over any user's account with five seconds of work and no technical expertise (reset their password from the web UI, then go read the email and click the link).
# We let you see everything, but only for messages you were a recipient of or author of.
- This makes it much more difficult to debug issues with mailing lists.
- But maybe we could just say mailing list recipients are "public", or define some other ruleset.
- Generally this gets privacy and ease of use right.
# We could move the whole thing to the CLI.
- Makes the UI/UX way worse.
# We could strike an awkward balance between concerns, as we do now.
- We expose //who// sent and received messages, but not the content of the messages. This doesn't feel great.
I'm inclined to probably go with (2) and figure something out for mailing lists?
Anyway, irrespective of that this should generally make things more clear, and improves the code a lot if nothing else.
Test Plan:
{F49546}
- Looked at a bunch of mail.
- Sent mail from different apps.
- Checked that recipients seem correct.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6413
Summary: Fixes T3509. Generally tried to make the code more consistently use get_image_scale, as well as make get_image_scale aware that sometimes images need to be scaled because they're too tall (as well as too wide).
Test Plan: used the file from T3509. noted comment box appearing correctly as clicked, or clicked and dragged. submitted some comments and noted the reticles moved / scaled correctly as I resized the browser window
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3509
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6418
Summary: Ref T3306. I'm going to add more information about To/Cc here, but here's a little cleanup first.
Test Plan: {F49524}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6410
Summary:
Ref T3306. Moves this from the web to the CLI, which is a tiny bit clunkier but way better as far as policies go and more repeatable for development.
See discussion in D6413.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/mail receive-test`, verified mail was received. Used and abused various options.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3306
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6417
Summary:
Keep track of the state of a reviewer in an edge between reviewer and revision.
The edge stores the state of the review, added or rejected. And if the revision was
accepted by that reviewer the id of the diff accepted.
Test Plan:
Create diffs and clowncopterize reviewer list changes. This includes:
* Adding new reviewers
* Resigning
* Commandering a revision
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6372
Conflicts:
src/applications/differential/editor/DifferentialCommentEditor.php
Summary:
These versions are broken, but package distros seem to be picking them up. :/
Since the error you get is completely useless, fatal immediately with a useful message.
Ref T2594.
Test Plan: Faked verisions and hit the issue.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: brennantaylor, Arijit, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2594
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6415
Summary: See discussion in D6403.
Test Plan: {F49488}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6409
Summary: Fixes T3481. Sort of - this thing be very ugly. Also it assumes that you'll "always" want to sign terms. I was thinking in a future diff that should be optional as well as configurable, though it was unclear to me if either was worth pursuing... Generally very hideous as the three main elements (PHUIDocument, AphrontErrorView, and AphrontForm with an AphrontFormInset) have never really played together before.
Test Plan: agreed to some test terms. noted UI displayed nicely. reloaded and noted UI told me I had signed it already. Went to different terms and filled them out wrong and got sensical errors.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3481
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6399
Summary:
Audit has some weird rules about who gets email. Make them less weird:
- When a user does "Add Auditors", email the auditors.
- When a commit is commented on, email anyone in "concern" or "audit required" states.
@staticshock, my claim that I can't reproduce was crazy, I just have weird test data and read it wrong.
Test Plan: Added a user to an audit and verified they got an email.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: staticshock, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6414
Summary:
1. Show add reviewer typehead when user selects resign as a reviewer.
2. Change the label for add reviewers typehead when user selects resign as a reviewer.
Test Plan:
1. Add yourself as a reviewer in a diff.
2. Select "Resign as Reviewer" in comment editor.
Add reviewer typehead should display, with label "Suggest Another Reviewer".
Add reviewer typehead is also displayed after user refreshed the page with "Resign as Reviewer"
selected.
Reviewers: wez, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, akramer, person
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6340
Summary:
This leaves the space between the properties and the blurb looking a bit empty, but there will be more stuff there soon (status, VCS names, email, phone/fax numbers, etc., and custom user fields).
I removed "view lint messages" since I'm pretty sure no one has ever clicked it. I think providing better search (e.g, T2625) to that UI in Diffusion is a preferable approach.
Test Plan: {F49423}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6403
Summary: I'll probably move "away" to a custom field, but this is technically broken right now.
Test Plan: {F49416}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6402
Summary:
Ref T1703. Drive "user since" with a custom field and make the other fields render into a property list.
Users can make their profiles a little more personal/obnoxious now.
Also delete a bunch of code.
Test Plan: {F49415}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1703
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6401
Summary: There are only a total of three options now, merge them into a single panel.
Test Plan:
Set all the settings.
{F49406}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6400
