Summary:
This attempts some consistency in form layouts. Notably, they all now contain headers and are 16px off the sides and tops of pages. Also updated dialogs to the same look and feel. I think I got 98% of forms with this pass, but it's likely I missed some buried somewhere.
TODO: will take another pass as consolidating these colors and new gradients in another diff.
Test Plan: Played in my sandbox all week. Please play with it too and let me know how they feel.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6806
Summary: Touches a lot of little spacing things here and there, stuck to 4px grid when possible, checked mobile views.
Test Plan: Mobile, Logging In, Multiple Providers.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6220
Summary: Ref T1536. Error state is a bit gross but we need to sort that out in general.
Test Plan:
{F46549}
{F46550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6208
Summary: We were clipping this to 300px, which is arbitrary to iPhone.
Test Plan: test on Nexus, iPhone
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6089
Summary:
Fixes T3252. Other enhancements:
- Header in widget panel was 2px too short.
- Typeahead in add people only allowed one person
- Typeahead in add people was cutoff by overflow:hidden
- X in remove has been changed to unicode (multiply)
- Add people dialog form fields are full width
- Some other CSS tweaks.
Test Plan: Add, Remove people.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3252
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6076
Summary: We're baking some useful things into ActionHeader, would like to consolidate it's use around the site for consistency.
Test Plan: Tested log out dialog, attach dependencies, delete document in phriction.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5635
Summary: Updated the dialog styles for exceptions.
Test Plan: Broke my sandbox, fixed the colors and spacing.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4597
Summary: This updates dialogs to look more inline with other headers.
Test Plan: Tested what dialogs I could find.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4594
Summary: We have enough z-index rules that they're fairly hard to visualize with "git grep". Consolidate them. Then fix T2253 (missing z-index on left menu background).
Test Plan: Made a Differential window really narrow, then scrolled it horizontally.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad, ender
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2253
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4302
Summary:
Allows you to edit or delete comments in appplications which support ApplicationTransactions.
UI/UX stuff:
- The dialogs are rough but I want to do a dialog design pass more generally, @chad has some mocks.
- When you add new mentions via edit, they don't currently count as mentions. I'm not sure what I want to do about this.
- When you edit or delete a comment, we do not publish any notifications about it. I think this is reasonable.
- I didn't separate "delete" out versus "edit"; I assume it will be reasonably intuitive that deleting all the text deletes effectively deletes the comment. I also want to discourage deletion somewhat (we still show the transaction, just show that the comment has been deleted).
Test Plan:
Transaction view, note "Edit" and "Edited" links:
{F26914}
Edit view, has some design issues but I want to do a pass on dialogs in general:
{F26915}
History view:
{F26913}
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1082
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4149
Summary: See D3795 / D3797. Also made the mask darker.
Test Plan: Mask now sizes properly on window resize in all browsers / mask uses.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3798
Summary:
Provides a basic start for access policies. Objects expose various capabilities, like CAN_VIEW, CAN_EDIT, etc., and set a policy for each capability. We currently implement three policies, PUBLIC (anyone, including logged-out), USERS (any logged-in) and NOONE (nobody). There's also a way to provide automatic capability grants (e.g., the owner of an object can always see it, even if some capability is set to "NOONE"), but I'm not sure how great the implementation feels and it might change.
Most of the code here is providing a primitive for efficient policy-aware list queries. The problem with doing queries naively is that you have to do crazy amounts of filtering, e.g. to show the user page 6, you need to filter at least 600 objects (and likely more) before you can figure out which ones are 500-600 for them. You can't just do "LIMIT 500, 100" because that might have only 50 results, or no results. Instead, the query looks like "WHERE id > last_visible_id", and then we fetch additional pages as necessary to satisfy the request.
The general idea is that we move all data access to Query classes and have them do object filtering. The ID paging primitive allows efficient paging in most cases, and the executeOne() method provides a concise way to do policy checks for edit/view screens.
We'll probably end up with mostly broader policy UIs or configuration-based policies, but there are at least a few cases for per-object privacy (e.g., marking tasks as "Security", and restricting things to the members of projects) so I figured we'd start with a flexible primitive and the simplify it in the UI where we can.
Test Plan: Unit tests, played around in the UI with various policy settings.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2210
Summary: See T1021. Raise configuration or implementation exceptions immediately. When all engines fail, raise an aggregate exception with details.
Test Plan: Forced all engines to fail, received an aggregate exception. Forced an engine to fail with a config exception, recevied it immediately.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2157
Summary:
Make the unhandled exception dialogs slightly more useful:
- Make them easier to read.
- Link to files from Phabricator libraries.
- Don't show traces by default.
- Show traces in development mode.
- Rename button from "Cancel" to "Close" and only show it for Ajax.
Test Plan: Rigged DirectoryHomeController to throw, loaded home page. Changed
stack trace setting in config. Clicked some files in the trace.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, codeblock
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 823
Summary:
Provide a quick workflow for adding a new project. This ended up being sort of
complicated because we don't currently put forms in dialogs. I separated the
actual <form /> tag out of the display/layout of AphrontFormView to enable this
(the dialog is itself a form).
Limitations: if you create a new project and then remove it, it won't appear in
the tokenizer until you reload the page. We need to add the ability for the
datasource to drop its cache to enable this, which is super complicated.
Test Plan:
Used "Create new project" to add a new project when creating a task.
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: anjali, aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 422
Summary:
The transparent mask around the dialogs was too dark. Code was hard to
read. Now opacity has a value of 37, which makes the code easy to read,
but still clearly indicates that the dialog is present.
Test Plan:
I was able to read the code easily through the mask.
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
Differential Revision: 139
