1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-14 19:02:41 +01:00
Commit graph

10 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
fe5bc764b3 Support multiple payment accounts and account switching in Phortune
Summary: Ref T2787. Support multiple payment accounts so you can have personal vs company payment accounts.

Test Plan: See screenshots.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10673
2014-10-09 16:59:03 -07:00
epriestley
43215bf0bd Make Fund backers render a little more nicely
Summary: Ref T5835. Mostly UI smoothing. Also add a "Risks" field to initiatives.

Test Plan: {F214952}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10660
2014-10-08 05:32:42 -07:00
epriestley
608465da1e Track total funding amount on Fund initiatives
Summary: Ref T5835. Show total funding amount and payable merchant on initiatives.

Test Plan: {F214936}

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10657
2014-10-08 05:31:48 -07:00
epriestley
9c4b8a0fb2 Adjust payment workflows to deal with merchants and configurable providers in Phortune
Summary:
Ref T2787. Builds on D10649 by rebining existing objects (carts, charges, etc) to merchantPHIDs and providerPHIDs instead of an implicit global merchant and weird global artifacts (providerType / providerKey).

Basically:

  - When you create something that users can pay for, you specify a merchant to control where the payment goes.
  - Accounts are install-wide, but payment methods are bound to merchants. This seems to do a reasonable job of balancing usability and technical concerns.
  - Replace a bunch of weird links between objects with standard PHIDs.
  - Improve "add payment method" flow.

Test Plan: Went through the Fund flow with Stripe and WePay, funding an initiative.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10652
2014-10-07 14:41:59 -07:00
epriestley
0beb8228da Give applications control over Phortune cart logic
Summary: Ref T2787. Similar to D10634, give applications more control over the cart workflow. For now this just means they get to pick exit URIs, but in the future they can manage more details of cart behavior.

Test Plan: Funded an initiative and got returned to the initiative instead of dead-ending in Phortune.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10638
2014-10-06 14:19:08 -07:00
epriestley
35dc510e18 Add more structure to Phortune product purchasing flow
Summary:
Ref T2787. When a user purchases a product in Phortune, transition the cart through a purchased state and invoke product callbacks so applications can respond to the workflow.

Also shore up some stuff like preventing negative amounts of funding.

Test Plan: Backed an initiative and saw it show up on the initiative after completing the purcahsing workflow.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10635
2014-10-06 10:36:43 -07:00
epriestley
e9615b74a5 Move Phortune product logic into applications
Summary: Ref T2787. `Product` is currently a fairly heavy object, but as Phortune develops it makes a lot of sense to make it a lighter object and put more product logic in applications. Convert it into a fairly lightweight reference to applications. The idea is that Phortune is mostly providing a cart flow, and applications manage the details of products.

Test Plan: Funded an initiative for $1.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10634
2014-10-06 10:30:06 -07:00
epriestley
f86f9dc512 Make Currency a more formal type
Summary:
Ref T2787. Phortune currently stores a bunch of stuff as `...inUSDCents`. This ends up being pretty cumbersome and I worry it will create a huge headache down the road (and possibly not that far off if we do Coinbase/Bitcoin soon). Even now, it's more of a pain than I figured it would be.

Instead:

  - Provide an application-level serialization mechanism.
  - Provide currency serialization.
  - Store currency in an abstract way (currently, as "1.23 USD") that can handle currencies in the future.
  - Change all `...inUSDCents` to `..asCurrency`.
  - This generally simplifies all the application code.
  - Also remove some columns which don't make sense or don't make sense anymore. Notably, `Product` is going to get more abstract and mostly be provided by applications.

Test Plan:
  - Created a new product.
  - Purchased a product.
  - Backed an initiative.
  - Ran unit tests.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T2787

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10633
2014-10-06 10:26:48 -07:00
epriestley
09fb5667cc Allow users to back initiatives in Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is still completely made up (no payment integration), but you can "back" an initiative, type a number in the box, and generate a database row. You can then seach for backers and things you've backed and such.

Notable changes:

  - Renamed "FundBacking" to "FundBacker". The former name was sort of because you can back things multiple times, but stuff like `$backings` was just too weird.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Backed an initiative.
  - Viewed that I became a backer.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10486
2014-09-12 06:31:11 -07:00
epriestley
e4f399b9fa Scaffolding for Fund
Summary:
Ref T5835. This is all pretty boilerplate, and does not interact with Phortune at all yet.

You can create "Initiatives", which have a title and description, and support most of the expected infrastructure (policies, transactions, mentions, edges, appsearch, remakrup, etc).

Only notable decisions:

  - Initiatives have an explicit owner. I think it's good to have a single clearly-responsible user behind an initiative.
  - I think that's it?

Test Plan:
  - Created an initiative.
  - Edited an initiative.
  - Changed application policy defaults.
  - Searched for initiatives.
  - Subscribed to an initiative.
  - Opened/closed an initiative.
  - Used `I123` and `{I123}` in remarkup.
  - Destroyed an initiative.

Reviewers: chad, btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

Subscribers: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T5835

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10481
2014-09-11 13:38:58 -07:00