Summary: Fixes T11201.
Test Plan:
Created bogus edges like this:
```
INSERT INTO edge (src, type, dst, dateCreated, seq) values ('PHID-TASK-vnddativbialb5p6ymis', 999999, 'quack', UNIX_TIMESTAMP(), 1);
```
Then ran `bin/remove destroy` on the relevant object.
Before the patch, destruction halted after hittin the bad edge.
After the patch, a warning is emitted but destruction continues.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11201
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16171
Summary:
Ref T11179. This splits "Edit Blocking Tasks" into two options now that we have more room ("Edit Parent Tasks", "Edit Subtasks").
This also renames "Blocking" tasks to "Subtasks", and "Blocked" tasks to "Parent" tasks. My goals here are:
- Make the relationship direction more clear: it's more clear which way is up with "parent" and "subtask" at a glance than with "blocking" and "blocked" or "dependent" and "dependency".
- Align language with "Create Subtask".
- To some small degree, use more flexible/general-purpose language, although I haven't seen any real confusion here.
Fixes T6815. I think I narrowed this down to two issues:
- Just throwing a bare exeception (we now return a dialog explicitly).
- Not killing open transactions when the cyclec check fails (we now kill them).
Test Plan:
- Edited parent tasks.
- Edited subtasks.
- Tried to introduce graph cycles, got a nice error dialog.
{F1697087}
{F1697088}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T6815, T11179
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16166
Summary:
Ref T10538. Ref T10537. This creates PHIDs which represent GitHub users, and uses them as the actors for synchronized comments.
I've just made them Doorkeeper objects. There are three major kinds of objects they //could// possibly be:
- Nuance requestor objects.
- External account objects.
- Doorkeeper objects.
I don't think we actually need distinct nuance requestor objects. These don't really do anything right now, and were originally created before Doorkeeper. I think Doorkeeper is a superset of nuance requestor functionality, and better developed and more flexible.
Likewise, doorkeeper objects are much more flexible than external account objects, and it's nice to imagine that we can import from Twootfeed or whatever without needing to build full OAuth for it. I also like less stuff touching auth code, when possible.
Making these separate from external accounts does make it a bit harder to reconcile external users with internal users, but I think that's OK, and that it's generally desirable to show the real source of a piece of content. That is, if I wrote a comment on GitHub but also have a Phabricator account, I think it's good to show "epriestley (GitHub)" (the GitHub user) as the author, not "epriestley" (the Phabricator user). I think this is generally less confusing overall, and we can add more linkage later to make it clearer.
Test Plan:
{F1194104}
{F1194105}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T10537, T10538
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15541
Summary: Ref T9979. Convert all DestructionEngine behaviors to extensions.
Test Plan:
{F1033244}
Destroyed an object, verifying:
- Herald transcripts were destroyed;
- edges were destroyed;
- flags were destroyed;
- tokens were destroyed;
- transactions were destroyed;
- worker tasks were cancelled.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9979
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14832
Summary: Ref T9494. Depends on D14216. Remove 10 copies of this code.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, browsed Config > Modules, clicked around Herald / etc.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T9494
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D14217
Summary: Use `PhutilClassMapQuery` where appropriate.
Test Plan: Browsed around the UI to verify things seemed somewhat working.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13429
Summary: All classes should extend from some other class. See D13275 for some explanation.
Test Plan: `arc unit`
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13283
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary: Modernize remaining edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Browsed around and performed various actions include subscribing, unsubscribing and watching.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11116
Summary: Modernize Dashboard edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Attached a panel to a dashboard, observed the expected comment in the transaction view (both ways).
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11114
Summary: Modernize Pholio edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Attached a mock to a task, observed the expected comment in the transaction view (both ways).
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11113
Summary: Modernize Project edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: Add a member to a project, saw new rows in the `phabricator_project.edge` and `phabricator_user.edge` tables.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11111
Summary: Modernize Differential edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: From previous experience, these changes are fairly trivial and safe. I poked around a little to make sure things looked reasonably okay.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin, Krenair, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11074
Summary: Modernize Ponder edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan: I couldn't actually figure out how to get these strings to show up anywhere.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Krenair, chad, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11083
Summary: Modernize Legalpad edges to subclass `PhabricatorEdgeType`. Largely based on D11045.
Test Plan:
# Created a Herald rule to require legal signatures on all diffs.
# Created a new diff.
# Saw the transaction string appear correctly.
I wasn't able to check the inverse transaction because there is none. Also, I couldn't see any text on the feed (presumably, transactions authored by Herald do not generate feed items)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Krenair, chad, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11082
Summary: This is dead code.
Test Plan: These edge types don't actually seem to be used?
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11076
Summary:
...except the transaction class itself, which still needs some knowledge of these transactions for older installs.
Ref T5245. T5604 and T5245 are now in a similar place -- there's an unknown set of bugs introduced from my changes and there's still old display code lying around with some old transactions in the database. I'll stomp out the bugs if / when they surface and data migration is up next.
This revision also adds a "TransactionPreviewString" method to the edge objects so that we can have a prettier "Bob edited associated projects." preview of this transaction.
Test Plan: added a project from task detail and saw correct preview throughout process with correct project added. bulk removed a project from some tasks. added a project from the edit details pane.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11013
Summary: Fixes T3189. Now if you say #projects in a commit message they will associate nicely with the commit. Also we record transactions about all this project editing fun.
Test Plan: tested migration by associating some projects with commits and verifying they still showed up post migration. tested adding / removing projects by doing so from the UI, noting transactions written nicely as well
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Projects: #projects
Maniphest Tasks: T3189
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10877
Summary:
Ref T2787.
- Account members can add and remove other members (major use case is corporate accounts).
- Use a modern edge constant setup.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10678
Summary:
Ref T2787. These were still stuck in the stone ages.
(The handles are pretty skeletal but most aren't used anywehre.)
Test Plan: Funded an initiative without anything breaking. Grepped for removed constants.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T2787
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10647
Summary:
Fixes T5476. Using edges to store which objects are on which board columns ends up being pretty awkward. In particular, it makes T4807 very difficult to implement.
Introduce a dedicated `BoardColumnPosition` storage.
This doesn't affect ordering rules (T4807) yet: boards are still arranged by priority. We just read which tasks are on which columns out of a new table.
Test Plan:
- Migrated data, then viewed some boards. Saw exactly the same data.
- Dragged tasks from column to column.
- Created a task directly into a column.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5476
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10160
Summary: Ref T5245. Updates the project/object edge to use a modern class definition. Moves further toward real edges.
Test Plan: Added projects to some objects, viewed transactions in transaction record.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9849
Summary: Ref T5245. With work elsewhere (notably, D9839) we can remove this TODO and use real transactions.
Test Plan: Pushed a `closes Txxx` commit and got a close + transaction.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9848
Summary:
Ref T5245. These were a bad idea.
We no longer need actors for edge edits either, so remove those. Generally, edges have fit into the policy model as pure/low-level infrastructure, and they do not have any policy or capability information in and of themselves.
Test Plan: `grep`
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9840
Summary:
Ref T5245. See some discussion in D9838.
When we attach object A to object B, we'd like to write transactions on both sides but only write the actual edges once.
To do this, allow edge types to `shouldWriteInverseTransactions()`. When an edge type opts into this, have editors apply the inverse transactions before writing the edge. These inverse transactions don't actually apply effects, they just show up in the transaction log.
Test Plan: Attached and detached revisions from tasks, saw transactions appear on both sides of the operation.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: btrahan, joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9839
Summary:
Ref T5245. I want to add a new capability to edge types, which is a good opportunity to move away from `PhabricatorEdgeConfig`, which isn't modular.
This is basically the same as the modularization of PHID types, which has worked well. Add `PhabricatorEdgeType` and provide an adaption layer for the existing code.
This has no runtime changes, except the fixed edge constant.
Test Plan: Ran `var_dump(PhabricatorEdgeType::getAllTypes())` and got reasonable looking output.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan, joshuaspence
Reviewed By: joshuaspence
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5245
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9837
Summary:
Ref T3116. Add a Herald action "Require legal signatures" which requires revision authors to accept legal agreements before their revisions can be accepted.
- Herald will check which documents the author has signed, and trigger a "you have to sign X, Y, Z" for other documents.
- If the author has already signed everything, we don't spam the revision -- basically, this only triggers when signatures are missing.
- The UI will show which documents must be signed and warn that the revision can't be accepted until they're completed.
- Users aren't allowed to "Accept" the revision until documents are cleared.
Fixes T1157. The original install making the request (Hive) no longer uses Phabricator, and this satisfies our requirements.
Test Plan:
- Added a Herald rule.
- Created a revision, saw the rule trigger.
- Viewed as author and non-author, saw field UI (generic for non-author, specific for author), transaction UI, and accept-warning UI.
- Tried to accept revision.
- Signed document, saw UI update. Note that signatures don't currently //push// an update to the revision, but could eventually (like blocking tasks work).
- Accepted revision.
- Created another revision, saw rules not add the document (since it's already signed, this is the "no spam" case).
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: asherkin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1157, T3116
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9771
Summary: Ran `arc lint --apply-patches --everything` over rP, mainly to change double quotes to single quotes where appropriate. These changes also validate that the `ArcanistXHPASTLinter::LINT_DOUBLE_QUOTE` rule is working as expected.
Test Plan: Eyeballed it.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9431
Summary: Fixes T5021, UI labels for the fields, "Edit Dependencies" in the action list, transaction strings ("added dependent tasks", etc), UI strings in the dependencies dialog (title/submit/etc)
Test Plan: Open task, edit blocks, dialog should have new term, task history should show "blocks" instead of "dependencies"
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5021
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9270
Summary:
Ref T4967. Adds a "Watch" relationship to projects, which is stronger than member/subscribed.
Specifically, when a task is tagged with a project, we'll include all project watchers in the email/notifications. Normally we don't include projects unless they're explicitly CC'd, or have some other active role in the object (like being a reviewer or auditor).
This allows you to closely follow a project without needing to write a Herald rule for every project you care about.
Test Plan:
- Watched/unwatched a project.
- Tested the watch/subscribe/member relationships:
- Watching implies subscribe.
- Joining implies subscribe.
- Leaving implies unsubscribe + unwatch.
- You can't unsubscribe until you unwatch (slightly better would be unsubscribe implies unwatch, but this is a bit tricky).
- Watched a project, then recevied email about a tagged task without otherwise being involved.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4967
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9185
Summary:
Ref T3583. Adds edges, query relationships, etc. Lots of debugging/temporary UI.
My general intent here is to use edges to track where panels appear, and then put additional data on the dashboard itself to control layout, positioning, etc.
Dashboards don't actually render yet so this is still pretty boring.
Test Plan:
{F149175}
{F149176}
{F149177}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T3583
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8916
Summary:
There are quite a few tests in Arcanist, libphutil and Phabricator that do something similar to `$this->assertEqual(false, ...)` or `$this->assertEqual(true, ...)`.
This is unnecessarily verbose and it would be cleaner if we had `assertFalse` and `assertTrue` methods.
Test Plan: I contemplated adding a unit test for the `getCallerInfo` method but wasn't sure if it was required / where it should live.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8460
Summary: Ref T1344. Write edges and read them when reloading the board.
Test Plan: After reload, stuff stays mostly where I put it. In-column order isn't always persisted correctly yet.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1344
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7944
Summary: Ref T4264. Ref T2628. Ref T3102. Allows you to associate repositories with projects. In the future, you'll be able to write Herald object rules against projects, use Herald fields like "Repository's projects", and search by project.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3102, T4264, T2628
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7881
Summary: Ref T4122. Add an edge to keep track of where a credential is used, and show it in the UI.
Test Plan:
See "Used By":
{F84099}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7628
Summary:
Ref T1279. No actual logical changes, but:
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the revision view typeahead ("Add Reviewers" action).
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the revision detail typeahead.
- You can now add projects as reviewers from the CLI (`#yoloswag`).
- Generated commit messages now list project reviewers (`Reviewers: #yoloswag`).
I'll separate projects from users in the "Reviewers" tables in the next revision.
Test Plan:
- Added projects as reviewers using the web UI and CLI.
- Used `arc amend --show --revision Dnnn` to generate commit messages.
- Viewed revision with project reviewers in web UI.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1279
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7230
Summary: Ref T2217. Route transaction rendering through modern code. This just affects the detail page. Some rough edges but nothing significant.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2217
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7070
Summary:
Fixes T3821. Maybe. The existing code seemed to have a bug and actually return the //commit phid//. Judging by the function name this is not intended.
Also, sorry to step on toes here -- I thought no one was assigned and was curious about loadRelativeEdges and here we are...
Test Plan: lots of logic here as I have no idea how to use Releeph.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3821
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6967
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary:
Ref T3687. This adds a field which allows you to link Differential Revisions to JIRA issues.
This is just about as basic as it can get, but gets the job done. The field enables itself if you have a JIRA auth provide. You enter JIRA issues in a comma-delimited format and it generates appropriate edges.
Nothing is pushed to the issues yet.
The only real rough part here is that if you commandeer a revision which is linked to issues you can't see, editing it is difficult via the CLI. This seems pretty much like a non-issue, but at some point we can let the field throw some kind of "RecoverableInvalidFieldException" which just warns the user. The "no reviewers, continue anyway?" prompt could then use that too.
Test Plan:
- Edited via web UI, tried valid/invalid edits, checked that edges showed up in the database, added/removed issues, clicked issue links.
- Edited via CLI, tried valid/invalid edits.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3687
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6879
Summary: Ref T2715. Had to start loading status information in the query class. Debated trying to clean up some of the attach / load stuff but decided to just add status under the new paradigm for now.
Test Plan: phid.query also made a status and checked that out. also played in conpherence.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2715
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6585
