mirror of
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git
synced 2025-02-26 05:29:06 +01:00
Summary: Move some `PhabricatorSearchField` subclasses to be adjacent to the application to which they belong. This seems generally better to me than lumping them all together in the `src/applications/search/field/` directory. I was also wondering if it makes sense to rename these subclasses as `PhabricatorXSearchField` rather than `PhabricatorSearchXField` (as per T5655), but wasn't really sure if these objects are meant to be search-fields, or just fields belonging to the #search application. Test Plan: N/A. Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13374
50 lines
1.2 KiB
PHP
50 lines
1.2 KiB
PHP
<?php
|
|
|
|
final class PhabricatorProjectSearchField
|
|
extends PhabricatorSearchTokenizerField {
|
|
|
|
protected function getDefaultValue() {
|
|
return array();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
protected function newDatasource() {
|
|
return new PhabricatorProjectLogicalDatasource();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
protected function getValueFromRequest(AphrontRequest $request, $key) {
|
|
$list = $this->getListFromRequest($request, $key);
|
|
|
|
$phids = array();
|
|
$slugs = array();
|
|
$project_type = PhabricatorProjectProjectPHIDType::TYPECONST;
|
|
foreach ($list as $item) {
|
|
$type = phid_get_type($item);
|
|
if ($type == $project_type) {
|
|
$phids[] = $item;
|
|
} else {
|
|
if (PhabricatorTypeaheadDatasource::isFunctionToken($item)) {
|
|
// If this is a function, pass it through unchanged; we'll evaluate
|
|
// it later.
|
|
$phids[] = $item;
|
|
} else {
|
|
$slugs[] = $item;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if ($slugs) {
|
|
$projects = id(new PhabricatorProjectQuery())
|
|
->setViewer($this->requireViewer())
|
|
->withSlugs($slugs)
|
|
->execute();
|
|
foreach ($projects as $project) {
|
|
$phids[] = $project->getPHID();
|
|
}
|
|
$phids = array_unique($phids);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return $phids;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|