mirror of
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git
synced 2024-09-20 09:18:48 +02:00
0a76d82a7c
Summary: Ref T1812. I think integer constants are going to be confusing and error prone for users to interact with. For example, because we use 0-5, adding a second "open" status like "needs verification" without disrupting the existing statuses would require users to define a status with, e.g., constant `6`, but order it between constants `0` and `1`. And if they later remove statuses, they need to avoid reusing existing constants. Instead, use more manageable string constants like "open", "resolved", etc. We must migrate three tables: - The task table itself, to update task status. - The transaction table, to update historic status changes. - The saved query table, to update saved queries which specify status sets. Test Plan: - Saved a query with complicated status filters. - Ran migrations. - Looked at the query, at existing tasks, and at task transactions. - Forced migrations to run again to verify idempotentcy/safety. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan Subscribers: epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T1812 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8583
2 lines
114 B
SQL
2 lines
114 B
SQL
ALTER TABLE {$NAMESPACE}_maniphest.maniphest_task
|
|
CHANGE status status VARCHAR(12) NOT NULL COLLATE latin1_bin;
|