epriestley 587e9cea19 Always require MFA to edit contact numbers ... Summary: Depends on D20023. Ref T13222. Although I think this isn't strictly necessary from a pure security perspective (since you can't modify the primary number while you have MFA SMS), it seems like a generally good idea. This adds a slightly new MFA mode, where we want MFA if it's available but don't strictly require it. Test Plan: Disabled, enabled, primaried, unprimaried, and edited contact numbers. With MFA enabled, got prompted for MFA. With no MFA, no prompts. Reviewers: amckinley Reviewed By: amckinley Maniphest Tasks: T13222 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20024		2019-01-23 14:19:56 -08:00
..
__tests__	Use PhutilClassMapQuery instead of PhutilSymbolLoader	2015-08-14 07:49:01 +10:00
aphront	Improve UI messaging around "one-shot" vs "session upgrade" MFA	2018-12-28 00:11:36 -08:00
applications	Always require MFA to edit contact numbers	2019-01-23 14:19:56 -08:00
docs	Update bin/auth MFA commands for the new "MFA Provider" indirection layer	2019-01-23 13:38:44 -08:00
extensions
infrastructure	Update Postmark adapter for multiple mail media	2019-01-16 13:00:34 -08:00
view	Improve UI for "wait" and "answered" MFA challenges	2018-12-28 00:18:53 -08:00
__phutil_library_init__.php
__phutil_library_map__.php	Always require MFA to edit contact numbers	2019-01-23 14:19:56 -08:00