mirror of
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git
synced 2024-09-20 01:08:50 +02:00
f50693de61
Summary: Ref T10537. Currently, Nuance has a `NuanceRequestor` object, intended to represent the external user who created content (e.g., a GitHub account or a Twitter account or whatever). This object is currently almost unused, and its design predates Doorkeeper. In D15541, I chose to use doorkeeper objects instead of NuanceRequestor objects to represent requestors. I don't currently anticipate a need for such an object, given that we have Doorkeeper. If we do need it in the future for some reason, it would be fairly easy to restore it, create a requestor type which wraps a Doorkeeper object, and then migrate. Not super thrilling to do that, but not a huge mess. `NuanceItem` still has a `requestorPHID`, but this is now a less formal object PHID instead of a more formal Requestor-object PHID, and holds a doorkeeper exeternal object PHID for GitHub events. Test Plan: - Grepped for `nuancerequestor`. - Ran `bin/storage upgrade -f`. - Grepped for `requestor`, remaining uses of this term seem reasonable/correct. Reviewers: chad Reviewed By: chad Maniphest Tasks: T10537 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15546
1 line
78 B
SQL
1 line
78 B
SQL
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS {$NAMESPACE}_nuance.nuance_requestortransaction_comment;
|