mirror of
https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git
synced 2024-09-21 09:48:47 +02:00
77eae81e1a
Summary: Ref T7094. We should do a policy query on the files IMO because there exists a scenario where the file gets locked down directly. This requires being a bit more disciplined about setting user, which in turn requires deciding whether or not to show edit / reply links as a separate piece of logic, not conditional on user presence. This is not the best code but I don't think it gets worse with this and is just some other nuance in any larger cleanup we take on someday. Test Plan: looked at a revision and noted inline comments rendered correctly with reply / edit actions. looked at a diff standalone and noted no reply / edit actions as expected. looked at a "details" link on a transaction and it rendered correctly. looked at a diff in phriction of page edits and it looked good. grepped around and verified the remaining callsite in diffusion already has the setUser call. Reviewers: epriestley Reviewed By: epriestley Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley Maniphest Tasks: T7094 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D11579 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| application | ||
| conduit | ||
| config | ||
| constants | ||
| controller | ||
| editor | ||
| herald | ||
| markup | ||
| phid | ||
| query | ||
| search | ||
| storage | ||