epriestley 87c6c270b4 Fix an issue where inlines could be duplicated in the client list ... Summary: Ref T13559. D21261 added caching here, but the logic in rebuilding inlines wasn't quite correct, and could lead to us double-appending. Instead, when rebuilding, unconditionally discard the old list. Test Plan: - Added inline comments to a file in Differential. - Marked some done. - Scrolled so the inline comment header was visible, saw "X / Y Comments" button in header. - Clicked "Show 20 more lines" on the changeset with inlines (or toggle "View Unified" / "View Side-by-Side", or other interactions likely work too). - Before: saw "X / Y" change improperly (because inlines in that file were double-counted). - After: saw stable count. - Grepped for "differential-inline-comment-refresh", got no hits, concluded this event has no listeners. Maniphest Tasks: T13559 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D21642		2021-03-29 09:00:23 -07:00
..
rsrc	Fix an issue where inlines could be duplicated in the client list	2021-03-29 09:00:23 -07:00
index.php	Make it easier to parse "X-Forwarded-For" with one or more load balancers	2019-09-05 04:30:13 -07:00