Summary: Corrects relative vs absolute branch name when using 'arc commit'
Test Plan: 'arc commit' on a release branch gave an error before making the change (change was generated from 'branches/yyy' but working copy root is 'https://xxx/branches/yyy', now it does not.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6743
Summary:
If you are trying to commit someone else's diff, arc commit gives warnings about path mismatch. This changes the path comparison to be based on the repo url rather than the local working directory. E.g. if both the author and committer are working in branches/release/2013_08_07 despite being checked out in ~/dev/2013_08_07 (system user being different, of course) it no longer warns that the WC path is different
Original behavior:
eric@Eric-MBP ~/dev/2013_07_31: arc commit --revision 21
You are not the author of 'D21: WeMerge Automatic Request'. Commit this
revision anyway? [y/N] y
Revision 'D21: WeMerge Automatic Request' was generated from '', but
current working copy root is '/Users/eric/dev/2013_07_31/'. Commit this
revision anyway? [y/N] y
Committing 'D21: WeMerge Automatic Request'...
Adding test
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 52676.
Closing revision D21 'WeMerge Automatic Request'...
Exception
ERR-CONDUIT-CORE: You can not mark a revision you don't own as closed.
(Run with --trace for a full exception trace.)
New behavior:
eric@Eric-MBP ~/dev/2013_07_31: arc commit --revision 24
You are not the author of 'D24: WeMerge Automatic Request'. Commit this
revision anyway? [y/N] y
Committing 'D24: WeMerge Automatic Request'...
Adding test
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 52679.
Closing revision D24 'WeMerge Automatic Request'...
Exception
ERR-CONDUIT-CORE: You can not mark a revision you don't own as closed.
(Run with --trace for a full exception trace.)
Test Plan: 'arc diff' changes with one user. 'arc patch Dxx' on a different working copy by a different user to review and test changes. accept review. 'arc commit --revision xx' as reviewer to land the patch. complaint goes away.
Reviewers: epriestley, ghostwriter78
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6665
Test Plan: Copied the code in a script, changed `phutil_passthru()` to `echo csprintf()` and ran it.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4805
Summary: Fixes T2438. We currently escape everything with '@', but SVN rejects that for '.'
Test Plan:
Unit tests. Performed this commit:
$ svn st
M .
A x@123
$ arc commit --conduit-uri=http://local.aphront.com:8080/ --revision 53
Revision 'D53: asdf' has not been accepted. Commit this revision anyway?
[y/N] y
Committing 'D53: asdf'...
Sending .
Adding x@123
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 37.
Done.
I grepped for more '@' adding but couldn't find any. It's a bit tricky to grep for though, so it's possible I missed some.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T2438
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4703
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in unit tests and LICENSE file.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, davidrecordon
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3881
Summary: turns out retina has files like image.png and image@2x.png. The latter breaks since '@' is a special command telling svn to "look for image at revision 2x.png" -- nonsensical garbage. If we add it to the end every time this error goes way.
Test Plan: touch 2@2.png; svn add '2@2@'; arc diff; <fill out form, accept commit>; arc commit -- observe commit working
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: mbishopim3, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1999
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3845
Summary:
Currently, adding a new workflow requires you to override ArcanistConfiguration, which is messy. Instead, just load everything that extends ArcanistBaseWorkflow.
Remove all the rules tying workflow names to class names through arcane incantations.
This has a very small performance cost in that we need to load every Workflow class every time now, but we don't hit __init__ and such anymore and it was pretty negligible on my machine (98ms vs 104ms or something).
Test Plan: Ran "arc help", "arc which", "arc diff", etc.
Reviewers: edward, vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran, zeeg
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3691
Summary: cd && cmd won't work so use chdir; -m $multiline_message won't work so use -F $tmp_file
Test Plan: this is actually un-tested at the moment.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1617
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3592
Summary:
This object is highly useful in many client event handlers (particularly for access to the CLI) and allows them to be implemented less intrusively.
This also slightly reduces code duplication.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff".
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1753
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3421
