Summary:
Updated .arcconfig to we.phorge.it
Refs T15006
I would also note, I created this revision using the container setup developed by @willson556 mentioned in T15011#370 and it worked great!
Test Plan:
Ran `arc install-certificate` and was able to get token from the right place and install it
Ran `arc which` saw that it identified `we.phorge.it`
Reviewers: speck, avivey, tobiaswiese, O1 Blessed Committers, eax, #blessed_committers
Reviewed By: speck, avivey, tobiaswiese, O1 Blessed Committers, eax, #blessed_committers
Subscribers: deadalnix, chris, willson556, speck
Maniphest Tasks: T15006
Differential Revision: https://we.phorge.it/D25003
Summary: Depends on D16364. See that revision for discussion.
Test Plan: Ran `arc get-config history.immutable` in `arcanist/`, saw setting.
Reviewers: chad, fooishbar
Reviewed By: fooishbar
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16365
Summary: Ref T5568. Use the `ArcanistConfigurationDrivenUnitTestEngine` automatically, if an `.arcunit` file exists. This behavior mimics the auto-detection for the configuration driven lint engine.
Test Plan:
Ran through the following scenarios:
- Ran `arc unit` and saw unit tests execute.
- Ran `arc unit --engine PhutilUnitTestEngine`
- Remove the `.arcunit` file and ran `arc unit`... got an exception.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5568
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13855
Summary: Ref T5568. As discussed in IRC. This is very rough and not widely useable, but represents a solid first step.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit` with a bunch of flags.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: rfreebern, aripringle, jaydiablo, BYK, tycho.tatitscheff, epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T5568
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D13579
Summary: Ref T2039. The `.arclint` file is reasonably complete now and we should start using it if possible, since we are trying to recommend it to others.
Test Plan: `arc lint`.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2039
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9057
Summary:
A couple of things actually still care about this:
- The code that detects if we're running `arc` on `arc`, and then runs the `arc` we're running on instead of the `arc` we ran, checks for the project being "arcanist" (`reenter_if_this_is_arcanist_or_libphutil()`).
- Some of the symbol stuff still relies on it.
- Removing it was really more to prove it works (which it seems to) than to accomplish any concrete goals.
Test Plan: looked at the file I guess
Reviewers: btrahan, talshiri
Reviewed By: talshiri
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8076
Summary:
Ref T4343. Continues the process of reducing the prominence of Arcanist Projects. Primarily:
- Query Phabricator to identify the working copy based on explicit configuration, or guess based on heuristics.
- Enhance `arc which` to explain the process to the user.
- The `project_id` key is no longer required in `.arcconfig`.
Minor/cleanup changes:
- Rename `project_id` to `project.name` (consistency, clarity).
- Rename `conduit_uri` to `phabricator.uri` (consistency, clairty).
- These both need documentation updates.
- Add `repository.callsign` to explicitly bind to a repository.
- Updated `.arcconfig` for the new values.
- Fix a unit test which broke a while ago when we fixed a rare definition of "unstaged".
- Make `getRepositoryUUID()` generic so we can get rid of one `instanceof`.
Test Plan:
- Ran `arc which`.
- Ran `arc diff`.
- This doesn't really change anything, so the only real risk is version compatibility breaks. This //does// introduce such a break, but the window is very narrow: if you upgrade `arc` after this commit, and try to diff against a Phabricator which was updated after yesterday (D8068) but before D8072 lands, the lookup will work so we'll add `repositoryPHID` to the `differential.creatediff` call, but it won't exist in Phabricator yet. This window is so narrow that I'm not going to try to fix it, as I'd guess there is a significant chance that no users will be affected. I don't see a clever way to fix it that doesn't involve a lot of work, either.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4343
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8073
Summary:
This flag disables normal libraries to make it easier to test library changes. Print that out explicitly.
Also update `.arcconfig` to use the modern configuration format.
Test Plan: Ran `arc list --trace`, `arc list --load-phutil-library=src --trace`.
Reviewers: zeeg, btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5768
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).
We are removing the headers for these reasons:
- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.
This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).
Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in unit tests and LICENSE file.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, davidrecordon
Maniphest Tasks: T2035
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3881
Summary:
`pht()` can be some random function.
Better solution would be to separate this linter to its own class but it would be slower.
Also use `PhutilLintEngine` as `lint.engine`.
Test Plan:
$ arc lint # on file with pht($a)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3480
Summary: Add `ruby -wc` as a linter and raise Error whenever there's a syntax error
Test Plan: Just a few dumb unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3447
Summary:
See D945. We have this kludgy "remote_hooks_installed" mess right now, but we
have enough information on the server nowadays to figure this out without it.
Also reduce code duplication by sharing the "mark-committed" workflow.
This causes "arc merge" to effect commit marks.
Test Plan:
In Git, Mercurial and SVN working copies ran like a million
amend/merge/commit/mark-committed commands with and without --finalize in
various states of revision completion.
This change is really hard to exhaustively test because of the number of
combinations of VCS, revision state, command, command flags, repository state
and tracking state. All the reasonable tests I could come up with worked
correctly, though.
Reviewers: Makinde, jungejason, nh, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 967
Summary:
Right now, if you specify "/api" instead of "/api/" the entire world breaks in a
horrible way. Generally, this whole thing is silly. Just use the right path.
Test Plan:
Edited .arcconfig to use the "wrong" path, so this diff demonstrates the change
works.
Reviewed By: llorca
Reviewers: jungejason, llorca, aran, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, llorca, epriestley
Differential Revision: 506
Summary:
When you run one copy of arcanist against another copy, you previously got a
meaningless error. After D311 you get a slightly more meaningful error.
Capture the new exception and raise an extremely specific error.
NOTE: Adding arcanist to .arcconfig forces the library conflict error to
trigger; otherwise there's just an implicit conflict because 'arc' reads the
running-copy library amp instead of the working-copy library map. This only
worked before because arcanist includes itself.
Test Plan:
Ran arcanist on a different copy of arcanist, got a good error message.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 312
