Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
<?php
|
|
|
|
|
Rename Conduit classes
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename Conduit classes and provide a `getAPIMethodName` method to declare the API method.
Test Plan:
```
> echo '{}' | arc --conduit-uri='http://phabricator.joshuaspence.com' call-conduit user.whoami
Waiting for JSON parameters on stdin...
{"error":null,"errorMessage":null,"response":{"phid":"PHID-USER-lioqffnwn6y475mu5ndb","userName":"josh","realName":"Joshua Spence","image":"http:\/\/phabricator.joshuaspence.com\/res\/1404425321T\/phabricator\/3eb28cd9\/rsrc\/image\/avatar.png","uri":"http:\/\/phabricator.joshuaspence.com\/p\/josh\/","roles":["admin","verified","approved","activated"]}}
```
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que
Maniphest Tasks: T5655
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9991
2014-07-25 02:54:15 +02:00
|
|
|
final class DiffusionUpdateCoverageConduitAPIMethod
|
|
|
|
extends DiffusionConduitAPIMethod {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public function getAPIMethodName() {
|
|
|
|
return 'diffusion.updatecoverage';
|
|
|
|
}
|
Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public function getMethodStatus() {
|
|
|
|
return self::METHOD_STATUS_UNSTABLE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
public function getMethodDescription() {
|
|
|
|
return pht('Publish coverage information for a repository.');
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 00:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
protected function defineReturnType() {
|
Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
return 'void';
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-04-13 00:59:07 +02:00
|
|
|
protected function defineParamTypes() {
|
2015-11-06 23:30:32 +01:00
|
|
|
$modes = array(
|
|
|
|
'overwrite',
|
|
|
|
'update',
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
|
Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
return array(
|
|
|
|
'repositoryPHID' => 'required phid',
|
|
|
|
'branch' => 'required string',
|
|
|
|
'commit' => 'required string',
|
|
|
|
'coverage' => 'required map<string, string>',
|
2015-11-06 23:30:32 +01:00
|
|
|
'mode' => 'optional '.$this->formatStringConstants($modes),
|
Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protected function execute(ConduitAPIRequest $request) {
|
|
|
|
$viewer = $request->getUser();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$repository_phid = $request->getValue('repositoryPHID');
|
|
|
|
$repository = id(new PhabricatorRepositoryQuery())
|
|
|
|
->setViewer($viewer)
|
|
|
|
->withPHIDs(array($repository_phid))
|
|
|
|
->executeOne();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!$repository) {
|
|
|
|
throw new Exception(
|
|
|
|
pht('No repository exists with PHID "%s".', $repository_phid));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$commit_name = $request->getValue('commit');
|
|
|
|
$commit = id(new DiffusionCommitQuery())
|
|
|
|
->setViewer($viewer)
|
|
|
|
->withRepository($repository)
|
|
|
|
->withIdentifiers(array($commit_name))
|
|
|
|
->executeOne();
|
|
|
|
if (!$commit) {
|
|
|
|
throw new Exception(
|
|
|
|
pht('No commit exists with identifier "%s".', $commit_name));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$branch = PhabricatorRepositoryBranch::loadOrCreateBranch(
|
|
|
|
$repository->getID(),
|
|
|
|
$request->getValue('branch'));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$coverage = $request->getValue('coverage');
|
|
|
|
$path_map = id(new DiffusionPathIDQuery(array_keys($coverage)))
|
|
|
|
->loadPathIDs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$conn = $repository->establishConnection('w');
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$sql = array();
|
|
|
|
foreach ($coverage as $path => $coverage_info) {
|
|
|
|
$sql[] = qsprintf(
|
|
|
|
$conn,
|
|
|
|
'(%d, %d, %d, %s)',
|
|
|
|
$branch->getID(),
|
|
|
|
$path_map[$path],
|
|
|
|
$commit->getID(),
|
|
|
|
$coverage_info);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$table_name = 'repository_coverage';
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$conn->openTransaction();
|
2015-11-06 23:30:32 +01:00
|
|
|
$mode = $request->getValue('mode');
|
|
|
|
switch ($mode) {
|
|
|
|
case '':
|
|
|
|
case 'overwrite':
|
|
|
|
// sets the coverage for the whole branch, deleting all previous
|
|
|
|
// coverage information
|
|
|
|
queryfx(
|
|
|
|
$conn,
|
|
|
|
'DELETE FROM %T WHERE branchID = %d',
|
|
|
|
$table_name,
|
|
|
|
$branch->getID());
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 'update':
|
|
|
|
// sets the coverage for the provided files on the specified commit
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
$conn->killTransaction();
|
|
|
|
throw new Exception(pht('Invalid mode "%s".', $mode));
|
|
|
|
}
|
Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foreach (PhabricatorLiskDAO::chunkSQL($sql) as $chunk) {
|
|
|
|
queryfx(
|
|
|
|
$conn,
|
2018-11-07 01:57:55 +01:00
|
|
|
'INSERT INTO %T (branchID, pathID, commitID, coverage) VALUES %LQ'.
|
|
|
|
' ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE coverage = VALUES(coverage)',
|
Provide a rough, unstable API for reporting coverage into Diffusion
Summary:
Ref T4994. This stuff works:
- You can dump a blob of coverage information into `diffusion.updatecoverage`. This wipes existing coverage information and replaces it.
- It shows up when viewing files.
- It shows up when viewing commits.
This stuff does not work:
- When viewing files, the Javascript hover interaction isn't tied in yet.
- We always show this information, even if you're behind the commit where it was generated.
- You can't do incremental updates.
- There's no aggregation at the file (this file has 90% coverage), diff (the changes in this commit are 90% covered), or directory (the code in this directory has 90% coverage) levels yet.
- This is probably not the final form of the UI, storage, or API, so you should expect occasional changes over time. I've marked the method as "Unstable" for now.
Test Plan:
- Ran `save_lint.php` to check for collateral damage; it worked fine.
- Ran `save_lint.php` on a new branch to check creation.
- Published some fake coverage information.
- Viewed an affected commit.
- Viewed an affected file.
{F151915}
{F151916}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: jhurwitz, epriestley, zeeg
Maniphest Tasks: T5044, T4994
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D9022
2014-05-18 01:10:54 +02:00
|
|
|
$table_name,
|
|
|
|
$chunk);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
$conn->saveTransaction();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|