1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-29 02:02:41 +01:00
phorge-phorge/src/applications/differential/editor/DifferentialRevisionEditor.php

997 lines
29 KiB
PHP
Raw Normal View History

2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
<?php
/**
* Handle major edit operations to DifferentialRevision -- adding and removing
* reviewers, diffs, and CCs. Unlike simple edits, these changes trigger
* complicated email workflows.
*/
final class DifferentialRevisionEditor extends PhabricatorEditor {
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
protected $revision;
protected $cc = null;
protected $reviewers = null;
protected $diff;
protected $comments;
protected $silentUpdate;
private $auxiliaryFields = array();
private $contentSource;
private $isCreate;
private $aphrontRequestForEventDispatch;
public function setAphrontRequestForEventDispatch(AphrontRequest $request) {
$this->aphrontRequestForEventDispatch = $request;
return $this;
}
public function getAphrontRequestForEventDispatch() {
return $this->aphrontRequestForEventDispatch;
}
public function __construct(DifferentialRevision $revision) {
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$this->revision = $revision;
$this->isCreate = !($revision->getID());
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
public static function newRevisionFromConduitWithDiff(
array $fields,
DifferentialDiff $diff,
PhabricatorUser $actor) {
$revision = DifferentialRevision::initializeNewRevision($actor);
$revision->setPHID($revision->generatePHID());
$editor = new DifferentialRevisionEditor($revision);
$editor->setActor($actor);
$editor->addDiff($diff, null);
$editor->copyFieldsFromConduit($fields);
$editor->save();
return $revision;
}
public function copyFieldsFromConduit(array $fields) {
$actor = $this->getActor();
$revision = $this->revision;
$revision->loadRelationships();
$all_fields = DifferentialFieldSelector::newSelector()
->getFieldSpecifications();
$aux_fields = array();
foreach ($all_fields as $aux_field) {
$aux_field->setRevision($revision);
$aux_field->setDiff($this->diff);
$aux_field->setUser($actor);
if ($aux_field->shouldAppearOnCommitMessage()) {
$aux_fields[$aux_field->getCommitMessageKey()] = $aux_field;
}
}
foreach ($fields as $field => $value) {
if (empty($aux_fields[$field])) {
throw new Exception(
"Parsed commit message contains unrecognized field '{$field}'.");
}
$aux_fields[$field]->setValueFromParsedCommitMessage($value);
}
foreach ($aux_fields as $aux_field) {
$aux_field->validateField();
}
$this->setAuxiliaryFields($all_fields);
}
public function setAuxiliaryFields(array $auxiliary_fields) {
assert_instances_of($auxiliary_fields, 'DifferentialFieldSpecification');
$this->auxiliaryFields = $auxiliary_fields;
return $this;
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
public function getRevision() {
return $this->revision;
}
public function setReviewers(array $reviewers) {
$this->reviewers = $reviewers;
return $this;
}
public function setCCPHIDs(array $cc) {
$this->cc = $cc;
return $this;
}
public function setContentSource(PhabricatorContentSource $content_source) {
$this->contentSource = $content_source;
return $this;
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
public function addDiff(DifferentialDiff $diff, $comments) {
if ($diff->getRevisionID() &&
$diff->getRevisionID() != $this->getRevision()->getID()) {
$diff_id = (int)$diff->getID();
$targ_id = (int)$this->getRevision()->getID();
$real_id = (int)$diff->getRevisionID();
throw new Exception(
"Can not attach diff #{$diff_id} to Revision D{$targ_id}, it is ".
"already attached to D{$real_id}.");
}
$this->diff = $diff;
$this->comments = $comments;
$repository = id(new DifferentialRepositoryLookup())
->setViewer($this->getActor())
->setDiff($diff)
->lookupRepository();
if ($repository) {
$this->getRevision()->setRepositoryPHID($repository->getPHID());
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
return $this;
}
protected function getDiff() {
return $this->diff;
}
protected function getComments() {
return $this->comments;
}
protected function getActorPHID() {
return $this->getActor()->getPHID();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
public function isNewRevision() {
return !$this->getRevision()->getID();
}
/**
* A silent update does not trigger Herald rules or send emails. This is used
* for auto-amends at commit time.
*/
public function setSilentUpdate($silent) {
$this->silentUpdate = $silent;
return $this;
}
public function save() {
$revision = $this->getRevision();
$is_new = $this->isNewRevision();
$revision->loadRelationships();
$this->willWriteRevision();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
if ($this->reviewers === null) {
$this->reviewers = $revision->getReviewers();
}
if ($this->cc === null) {
$this->cc = $revision->getCCPHIDs();
}
if ($is_new) {
$content_blocks = array();
foreach ($this->auxiliaryFields as $field) {
if ($field->shouldExtractMentions()) {
$content_blocks[] = $field->renderValueForCommitMessage(false);
}
}
$phids = PhabricatorMarkupEngine::extractPHIDsFromMentions(
$content_blocks);
$this->cc = array_unique(array_merge($this->cc, $phids));
}
$diff = $this->getDiff();
if ($diff) {
$revision->setLineCount($diff->getLineCount());
}
// Save the revision, to generate its ID and PHID if it is new. We need
// the ID/PHID in order to record them in Herald transcripts, but don't
// want to hold a transaction open while running Herald because it is
// potentially somewhat slow. The downside is that we may end up with a
// saved revision/diff pair without appropriate CCs. We could be better
// about this -- for example:
//
// - Herald can't affect reviewers, so we could compute them before
// opening the transaction and then save them in the transaction.
// - Herald doesn't *really* need PHIDs to compute its effects, we could
// run it before saving these objects and then hand over the PHIDs later.
//
// But this should address the problem of orphaned revisions, which is
// currently the only problem we experience in practice.
$revision->openTransaction();
if ($diff) {
$revision->setBranchName($diff->getBranch());
$revision->setArcanistProjectPHID($diff->getArcanistProjectPHID());
}
$revision->save();
if ($diff) {
$diff->setRevisionID($revision->getID());
$diff->save();
}
$revision->saveTransaction();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
// We're going to build up three dictionaries: $add, $rem, and $stable. The
// $add dictionary has added reviewers/CCs. The $rem dictionary has
// reviewers/CCs who have been removed, and the $stable array is
// reviewers/CCs who haven't changed. We're going to send new reviewers/CCs
// a different ("welcome") email than we send stable reviewers/CCs.
$old = array(
'rev' => array_fill_keys($revision->getReviewers(), true),
'ccs' => array_fill_keys($revision->getCCPHIDs(), true),
);
$xscript_header = null;
$xscript_uri = null;
$new = array(
'rev' => array_fill_keys($this->reviewers, true),
'ccs' => array_fill_keys($this->cc, true),
);
$rem_ccs = array();
$xscript_phid = null;
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
if ($diff) {
$unsubscribed_phids = PhabricatorEdgeQuery::loadDestinationPHIDs(
$revision->getPHID(),
PhabricatorEdgeConfig::TYPE_OBJECT_HAS_UNSUBSCRIBER);
$adapter = HeraldDifferentialRevisionAdapter::newLegacyAdapter(
2011-04-08 03:55:43 +02:00
$revision,
$diff);
$adapter->setExplicitCCs($new['ccs']);
$adapter->setExplicitReviewers($new['rev']);
$adapter->setForbiddenCCs($unsubscribed_phids);
$adapter->setIsNewObject($is_new);
2011-04-08 03:55:43 +02:00
$xscript = HeraldEngine::loadAndApplyRules($adapter);
$xscript_uri = '/herald/transcript/'.$xscript->getID().'/';
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$xscript_phid = $xscript->getPHID();
$xscript_header = $xscript->getXHeraldRulesHeader();
$xscript_header = HeraldTranscript::saveXHeraldRulesHeader(
$revision->getPHID(),
$xscript_header);
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$sub = array(
'rev' => $adapter->getReviewersAddedByHerald(),
2011-04-08 03:55:43 +02:00
'ccs' => $adapter->getCCsAddedByHerald(),
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
);
2011-04-08 03:55:43 +02:00
$rem_ccs = $adapter->getCCsRemovedByHerald();
$blocking_reviewers = array_keys(
$adapter->getBlockingReviewersAddedByHerald());
HarbormasterBuildable::applyBuildPlans(
$diff->getPHID(),
$revision->getPHID(),
$adapter->getBuildPlans());
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
} else {
$sub = array(
'rev' => array(),
'ccs' => array(),
);
$blocking_reviewers = array();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
// Remove any CCs which are prevented by Herald rules.
$sub['ccs'] = array_diff_key($sub['ccs'], $rem_ccs);
$new['ccs'] = array_diff_key($new['ccs'], $rem_ccs);
$add = array();
$rem = array();
$stable = array();
foreach (array('rev', 'ccs') as $key) {
$add[$key] = array();
if ($new[$key] !== null) {
$add[$key] += array_diff_key($new[$key], $old[$key]);
}
$add[$key] += array_diff_key($sub[$key], $old[$key]);
$combined = $sub[$key];
if ($new[$key] !== null) {
$combined += $new[$key];
}
$rem[$key] = array_diff_key($old[$key], $combined);
$stable[$key] = array_diff_key($old[$key], $add[$key] + $rem[$key]);
}
// Prevent Herald rules from adding a revision's owner as a reviewer.
unset($add['rev'][$revision->getAuthorPHID()]);
self::updateReviewers(
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$revision,
$this->getActor(),
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
array_keys($add['rev']),
array_keys($rem['rev']),
$blocking_reviewers);
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
// We want to attribute new CCs to a "reasonPHID", representing the reason
// they were added. This is either a user (if some user explicitly CCs
// them, or uses "Add CCs...") or a Herald transcript PHID, indicating that
// they were added by a Herald rule.
2011-04-08 03:55:43 +02:00
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
if ($add['ccs'] || $rem['ccs']) {
$reasons = array();
foreach ($add['ccs'] as $phid => $ignored) {
if (empty($new['ccs'][$phid])) {
$reasons[$phid] = $xscript_phid;
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
} else {
$reasons[$phid] = $this->getActorPHID();
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
}
}
foreach ($rem['ccs'] as $phid => $ignored) {
if (empty($new['ccs'][$phid])) {
$reasons[$phid] = $this->getActorPHID();
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
} else {
$reasons[$phid] = $xscript_phid;
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
}
}
} else {
$reasons = $this->getActorPHID();
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
}
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
self::alterCCs(
$revision,
$this->cc,
array_keys($rem['ccs']),
array_keys($add['ccs']),
$reasons);
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
$this->updateAuxiliaryFields();
// Add the author and users included from Herald rules to the relevant set
// of users so they get a copy of the email.
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
if (!$this->silentUpdate) {
if ($is_new) {
$add['rev'][$this->getActorPHID()] = true;
if ($diff) {
$add['rev'] += $adapter->getEmailPHIDsAddedByHerald();
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
} else {
$stable['rev'][$this->getActorPHID()] = true;
if ($diff) {
$stable['rev'] += $adapter->getEmailPHIDsAddedByHerald();
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
}
$mail = array();
$phids = array($this->getActorPHID());
$handles = id(new PhabricatorHandleQuery())
->setViewer($this->getActor())
->withPHIDs($phids)
->execute();
$actor_handle = $handles[$this->getActorPHID()];
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$changesets = null;
Make "reject" and "blocking reviewer" block acceptance in Differential Summary: Ref T1279. This is a logical change. - "Reject" (nee "Request Changes") is now sticky. The review won't transition to "Accepted" until the reviewer clears their objection. In practice, I think it always worked like this anyway (without technical enforcement, users just followed this rule naturally, since disobeying this rule is kind of a dick move) so I don't expect this to change much. I think this rule is easier to understand than the old rule now, given the multi-reviewer status and blocking reviewers. - "Blocking Reviewer" and "Reject" now prevent a revision from transitioning to "Accepted". When reviewers accept, resign, or are removed, we do a check to see if the reivsion has: at least one user reviewer who has accepted; zero rejects; and zero blocks. If all conditions are satisfied, we transition it to "accepted". Practically, the primary net effect of this is just to make blocking reviews actually block. This is pretty messy, but there's not much we can do about it until after T2222, since we have two completely separate editor pathways which are both responsible for adjusting status. Eventually, these can merge into a single sane editor which implements reasonable rules in reaonable ways. But that day is not today. Test Plan: With three users and a project, made a bunch of accepts, rejects, resigns and reviewer removals. I think I probably covered most of the pathways? There are a lot of interactions here. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, wisutsak.jaisue.7 Maniphest Tasks: T1279 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7245
2013-10-07 02:09:56 +02:00
$old_status = $revision->getStatus();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
if ($diff) {
$changesets = $diff->loadChangesets();
// TODO: This should probably be in DifferentialFeedbackEditor?
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
if (!$is_new) {
$this->createComment();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$mail[] = id(new DifferentialNewDiffMail(
$revision,
$actor_handle,
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$changesets))
->setActor($this->getActor())
->setIsFirstMailAboutRevision(false)
->setIsFirstMailToRecipients(false)
->setCommentText($this->getComments())
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
->setToPHIDs(array_keys($stable['rev']))
->setCCPHIDs(array_keys($stable['ccs']));
}
// Save the changes we made above.
$diff->setDescription(preg_replace('/\n.*/s', '', $this->getComments()));
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$diff->save();
$this->updateAffectedPathTable($revision, $diff, $changesets);
$this->updateRevisionHashTable($revision, $diff);
// An updated diff should require review, as long as it's not closed
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
// or accepted. The "accepted" status is "sticky" to encourage courtesy
// re-diffs after someone accepts with minor changes/suggestions.
$status = $revision->getStatus();
if ($status != ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus::CLOSED &&
$status != ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus::ACCEPTED) {
$revision->setStatus(ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus::NEEDS_REVIEW);
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
} else {
2011-01-30 22:20:56 +01:00
$diff = $revision->loadActiveDiff();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
if ($diff) {
2011-01-30 22:20:56 +01:00
$changesets = $diff->loadChangesets();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
} else {
$changesets = array();
}
}
$revision->save();
Make "reject" and "blocking reviewer" block acceptance in Differential Summary: Ref T1279. This is a logical change. - "Reject" (nee "Request Changes") is now sticky. The review won't transition to "Accepted" until the reviewer clears their objection. In practice, I think it always worked like this anyway (without technical enforcement, users just followed this rule naturally, since disobeying this rule is kind of a dick move) so I don't expect this to change much. I think this rule is easier to understand than the old rule now, given the multi-reviewer status and blocking reviewers. - "Blocking Reviewer" and "Reject" now prevent a revision from transitioning to "Accepted". When reviewers accept, resign, or are removed, we do a check to see if the reivsion has: at least one user reviewer who has accepted; zero rejects; and zero blocks. If all conditions are satisfied, we transition it to "accepted". Practically, the primary net effect of this is just to make blocking reviews actually block. This is pretty messy, but there's not much we can do about it until after T2222, since we have two completely separate editor pathways which are both responsible for adjusting status. Eventually, these can merge into a single sane editor which implements reasonable rules in reaonable ways. But that day is not today. Test Plan: With three users and a project, made a bunch of accepts, rejects, resigns and reviewer removals. I think I probably covered most of the pathways? There are a lot of interactions here. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, wisutsak.jaisue.7 Maniphest Tasks: T1279 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7245
2013-10-07 02:09:56 +02:00
// If the actor just deleted all the blocking/rejected reviewers, we may
// be able to put the revision into "accepted".
switch ($revision->getStatus()) {
case ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus::NEEDS_REVISION:
case ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus::NEEDS_REVIEW:
$revision = self::updateAcceptedStatus(
$this->getActor(),
$revision);
break;
}
$this->didWriteRevision();
$event_data = array(
'revision_id' => $revision->getID(),
'revision_phid' => $revision->getPHID(),
'revision_name' => $revision->getTitle(),
'revision_author_phid' => $revision->getAuthorPHID(),
'action' => $is_new
? DifferentialAction::ACTION_CREATE
: DifferentialAction::ACTION_UPDATE,
'feedback_content' => $is_new
? phutil_utf8_shorten($revision->getSummary(), 140)
: $this->getComments(),
'actor_phid' => $revision->getAuthorPHID(),
);
$mailed_phids = array();
if (!$this->silentUpdate) {
$revision->loadRelationships();
if ($add['rev']) {
$message = id(new DifferentialNewDiffMail(
$revision,
$actor_handle,
$changesets))
->setActor($this->getActor())
->setIsFirstMailAboutRevision($is_new)
->setIsFirstMailToRecipients(true)
->setToPHIDs(array_keys($add['rev']));
if ($is_new) {
// The first time we send an email about a revision, put the CCs in
// the "CC:" field of the same "Review Requested" email that reviewers
// get, so you don't get two initial emails if you're on a list that
// is CC'd.
$message->setCCPHIDs(array_keys($add['ccs']));
}
$mail[] = $message;
}
// If we added CCs, we want to send them an email, but only if they were
// not already a reviewer and were not added as one (in these cases, they
// got a "NewDiff" mail, either in the past or just a moment ago). You can
// still get two emails, but only if a revision is updated and you are
// added as a reviewer at the same time a list you are on is added as a
// CC, which is rare and reasonable.
$implied_ccs = self::getImpliedCCs($revision);
$implied_ccs = array_fill_keys($implied_ccs, true);
$add['ccs'] = array_diff_key($add['ccs'], $implied_ccs);
if (!$is_new && $add['ccs']) {
$mail[] = id(new DifferentialCCWelcomeMail(
$revision,
$actor_handle,
$changesets))
->setActor($this->getActor())
->setIsFirstMailToRecipients(true)
->setToPHIDs(array_keys($add['ccs']));
}
foreach ($mail as $message) {
$message->setHeraldTranscriptURI($xscript_uri);
$message->setXHeraldRulesHeader($xscript_header);
$message->send();
$mailed_phids[] = $message->getRawMail()->buildRecipientList();
}
$mailed_phids = array_mergev($mailed_phids);
}
id(new PhabricatorFeedStoryPublisher())
->setStoryType('PhabricatorFeedStoryDifferential')
->setStoryData($event_data)
->setStoryTime(time())
->setStoryAuthorPHID($revision->getAuthorPHID())
->setRelatedPHIDs(
array(
$revision->getPHID(),
$revision->getAuthorPHID(),
))
->setPrimaryObjectPHID($revision->getPHID())
->setSubscribedPHIDs(
array_merge(
array($revision->getAuthorPHID()),
$revision->getReviewers(),
$revision->getCCPHIDs()))
->setMailRecipientPHIDs($mailed_phids)
->publish();
Improve Search architecture Summary: The search indexing API has several problems right now: - Always runs in-process. - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it. - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster. - Instead, make the API phid-oriented. - No uniform indexing API. - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird. - Instead, provide a uniform API. - No uniform CLI. - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers. - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing. - Not application-oriented. - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world. - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader. Test Plan: - `bin/search index` - Indexed one revision, one task. - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types. - Indexed `--all`. - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it. - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing. - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing. - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot. Reviewers: btrahan, vrana Reviewed By: btrahan CC: 20after4, aran Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 23:21:31 +01:00
id(new PhabricatorSearchIndexer())
->queueDocumentForIndexing($revision->getPHID());
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
public static function addCC(
DifferentialRevision $revision,
$phid,
$reason) {
return self::alterCCs(
$revision,
$revision->getCCPHIDs(),
$rem = array(),
$add = array($phid),
$reason);
}
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
protected static function alterCCs(
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
DifferentialRevision $revision,
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
array $stable_phids,
array $rem_phids,
array $add_phids,
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
$reason_phid) {
$dont_add = self::getImpliedCCs($revision);
$add_phids = array_diff($add_phids, $dont_add);
id(new PhabricatorSubscriptionsEditor())
->setActor(PhabricatorUser::getOmnipotentUser())
->setObject($revision)
->subscribeExplicit($add_phids)
->unsubscribe($rem_phids)
->save();
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
private static function getImpliedCCs(DifferentialRevision $revision) {
return array_merge(
$revision->getReviewers(),
array($revision->getAuthorPHID()));
}
2011-02-05 03:16:02 +01:00
public static function updateReviewers(
DifferentialRevision $revision,
PhabricatorUser $actor,
array $add_phids,
array $remove_phids,
array $blocking_phids = array()) {
$reviewers = $revision->getReviewers();
$editor = id(new PhabricatorEdgeEditor())
->setActor($actor);
$reviewer_phids_map = array_fill_keys($reviewers, true);
$blocking_phids = array_fuse($blocking_phids);
foreach ($add_phids as $phid) {
// Adding an already existing edge again would have cause memory loss
// That is, the previous state for that reviewer would be lost
if (isset($reviewer_phids_map[$phid])) {
// TODO: If we're writing a blocking edge, we should overwrite an
// existing weaker edge (like "added" or "commented"), just not a
// stronger existing edge.
continue;
}
if (isset($blocking_phids[$phid])) {
$status = DifferentialReviewerStatus::STATUS_BLOCKING;
} else {
$status = DifferentialReviewerStatus::STATUS_ADDED;
}
$options = array(
'data' => array(
'status' => $status,
)
);
$editor->addEdge(
$revision->getPHID(),
PhabricatorEdgeConfig::TYPE_DREV_HAS_REVIEWER,
$phid,
$options);
}
foreach ($remove_phids as $phid) {
$editor->removeEdge(
$revision->getPHID(),
PhabricatorEdgeConfig::TYPE_DREV_HAS_REVIEWER,
$phid);
}
$editor->save();
}
public static function updateReviewerStatus(
DifferentialRevision $revision,
PhabricatorUser $actor,
$reviewer_phid,
$status) {
$options = array(
'data' => array(
'status' => $status
)
);
$active_diff = $revision->loadActiveDiff();
if ($active_diff) {
$options['data']['diff'] = $active_diff->getID();
}
id(new PhabricatorEdgeEditor())
->setActor($actor)
->addEdge(
$revision->getPHID(),
PhabricatorEdgeConfig::TYPE_DREV_HAS_REVIEWER,
$reviewer_phid,
$options)
->save();
}
private function createComment() {
$template = id(new DifferentialComment())
->setAuthorPHID($this->getActorPHID())
->setRevision($this->revision);
if ($this->contentSource) {
$content_source = $this->contentSource;
} else {
$content_source = PhabricatorContentSource::newForSource(
PhabricatorContentSource::SOURCE_LEGACY,
array());
}
$template->setContentSource($content_source);
// Write the "update active diff" transaction.
id(clone $template)
->setAction(DifferentialAction::ACTION_UPDATE)
->setMetadata(
array(
DifferentialComment::METADATA_DIFF_ID => $this->getDiff()->getID(),
))
->save();
// If we have a comment, write the "add a comment" transaction.
if (strlen($this->getComments())) {
id(clone $template)
->setAction(DifferentialAction::ACTION_COMMENT)
->setContent($this->getComments())
->save();
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}
private function updateAuxiliaryFields() {
$aux_map = array();
foreach ($this->auxiliaryFields as $aux_field) {
$key = $aux_field->getStorageKey();
if ($key !== null) {
$val = $aux_field->getValueForStorage();
$aux_map[$key] = $val;
}
}
if (!$aux_map) {
return;
}
$revision = $this->revision;
$fields = id(new DifferentialAuxiliaryField())->loadAllWhere(
'revisionPHID = %s AND name IN (%Ls)',
$revision->getPHID(),
array_keys($aux_map));
$fields = mpull($fields, null, 'getName');
foreach ($aux_map as $key => $val) {
$obj = idx($fields, $key);
if (!strlen($val)) {
// If the new value is empty, just delete the old row if one exists and
// don't add a new row if it doesn't.
if ($obj) {
$obj->delete();
}
} else {
if (!$obj) {
$obj = new DifferentialAuxiliaryField();
$obj->setRevisionPHID($revision->getPHID());
$obj->setName($key);
}
if ($obj->getValue() !== $val) {
$obj->setValue($val);
$obj->save();
}
}
}
}
private function willWriteRevision() {
foreach ($this->auxiliaryFields as $aux_field) {
$aux_field->willWriteRevision($this);
}
$this->dispatchEvent(
PhabricatorEventType::TYPE_DIFFERENTIAL_WILLEDITREVISION);
}
private function didWriteRevision() {
foreach ($this->auxiliaryFields as $aux_field) {
$aux_field->didWriteRevision($this);
}
$this->dispatchEvent(
PhabricatorEventType::TYPE_DIFFERENTIAL_DIDEDITREVISION);
}
private function dispatchEvent($type) {
$event = new PhabricatorEvent(
$type,
array(
'revision' => $this->revision,
'new' => $this->isCreate,
));
$event->setUser($this->getActor());
$request = $this->getAphrontRequestForEventDispatch();
if ($request) {
$event->setAphrontRequest($request);
}
PhutilEventEngine::dispatchEvent($event);
}
/**
* Update the table which links Differential revisions to paths they affect,
* so Diffusion can efficiently find pending revisions for a given file.
*/
private function updateAffectedPathTable(
DifferentialRevision $revision,
DifferentialDiff $diff,
array $changesets) {
assert_instances_of($changesets, 'DifferentialChangeset');
$project = $diff->loadArcanistProject();
if (!$project) {
// Probably an old revision from before projects.
return;
}
$repository = $project->loadRepository();
if (!$repository) {
// Probably no project <-> repository link, or the repository where the
// project lives is untracked.
return;
}
$path_prefix = null;
$local_root = $diff->getSourceControlPath();
if ($local_root) {
// We're in a working copy which supports subdirectory checkouts (e.g.,
// SVN) so we need to figure out what prefix we should add to each path
// (e.g., trunk/projects/example/) to get the absolute path from the
// root of the repository. DVCS systems like Git and Mercurial are not
// affected.
// Normalize both paths and check if the repository root is a prefix of
// the local root. If so, throw it away. Note that this correctly handles
// the case where the remote path is "/".
$local_root = id(new PhutilURI($local_root))->getPath();
$local_root = rtrim($local_root, '/');
$repo_root = id(new PhutilURI($repository->getRemoteURI()))->getPath();
$repo_root = rtrim($repo_root, '/');
if (!strncmp($repo_root, $local_root, strlen($repo_root))) {
$path_prefix = substr($local_root, strlen($repo_root));
}
}
$paths = array();
foreach ($changesets as $changeset) {
$paths[] = $path_prefix.'/'.$changeset->getFilename();
}
// Mark this as also touching all parent paths, so you can see all pending
// changes to any file within a directory.
$all_paths = array();
foreach ($paths as $local) {
foreach (DiffusionPathIDQuery::expandPathToRoot($local) as $path) {
$all_paths[$path] = true;
}
}
$all_paths = array_keys($all_paths);
$path_ids =
PhabricatorRepositoryCommitChangeParserWorker::lookupOrCreatePaths(
$all_paths);
$table = new DifferentialAffectedPath();
$conn_w = $table->establishConnection('w');
$sql = array();
foreach ($path_ids as $path_id) {
$sql[] = qsprintf(
$conn_w,
'(%d, %d, %d, %d)',
$repository->getID(),
$path_id,
time(),
$revision->getID());
}
queryfx(
$conn_w,
'DELETE FROM %T WHERE revisionID = %d',
$table->getTableName(),
$revision->getID());
foreach (array_chunk($sql, 256) as $chunk) {
queryfx(
$conn_w,
'INSERT INTO %T (repositoryID, pathID, epoch, revisionID) VALUES %Q',
$table->getTableName(),
implode(', ', $chunk));
}
}
/**
* Update the table connecting revisions to DVCS local hashes, so we can
* identify revisions by commit/tree hashes.
*/
private function updateRevisionHashTable(
DifferentialRevision $revision,
DifferentialDiff $diff) {
$vcs = $diff->getSourceControlSystem();
if ($vcs == DifferentialRevisionControlSystem::SVN) {
// Subversion has no local commit or tree hash information, so we don't
// have to do anything.
return;
}
$property = id(new DifferentialDiffProperty())->loadOneWhere(
'diffID = %d AND name = %s',
$diff->getID(),
'local:commits');
if (!$property) {
return;
}
$hashes = array();
$data = $property->getData();
switch ($vcs) {
case DifferentialRevisionControlSystem::GIT:
foreach ($data as $commit) {
$hashes[] = array(
ArcanistDifferentialRevisionHash::HASH_GIT_COMMIT,
$commit['commit'],
);
$hashes[] = array(
ArcanistDifferentialRevisionHash::HASH_GIT_TREE,
$commit['tree'],
);
}
break;
case DifferentialRevisionControlSystem::MERCURIAL:
foreach ($data as $commit) {
$hashes[] = array(
ArcanistDifferentialRevisionHash::HASH_MERCURIAL_COMMIT,
$commit['rev'],
);
}
break;
}
$conn_w = $revision->establishConnection('w');
$sql = array();
foreach ($hashes as $info) {
list($type, $hash) = $info;
$sql[] = qsprintf(
$conn_w,
'(%d, %s, %s)',
$revision->getID(),
$type,
$hash);
}
queryfx(
$conn_w,
'DELETE FROM %T WHERE revisionID = %d',
ArcanistDifferentialRevisionHash::TABLE_NAME,
$revision->getID());
if ($sql) {
queryfx(
$conn_w,
'INSERT INTO %T (revisionID, type, hash) VALUES %Q',
ArcanistDifferentialRevisionHash::TABLE_NAME,
implode(', ', $sql));
}
}
Make "reject" and "blocking reviewer" block acceptance in Differential Summary: Ref T1279. This is a logical change. - "Reject" (nee "Request Changes") is now sticky. The review won't transition to "Accepted" until the reviewer clears their objection. In practice, I think it always worked like this anyway (without technical enforcement, users just followed this rule naturally, since disobeying this rule is kind of a dick move) so I don't expect this to change much. I think this rule is easier to understand than the old rule now, given the multi-reviewer status and blocking reviewers. - "Blocking Reviewer" and "Reject" now prevent a revision from transitioning to "Accepted". When reviewers accept, resign, or are removed, we do a check to see if the reivsion has: at least one user reviewer who has accepted; zero rejects; and zero blocks. If all conditions are satisfied, we transition it to "accepted". Practically, the primary net effect of this is just to make blocking reviews actually block. This is pretty messy, but there's not much we can do about it until after T2222, since we have two completely separate editor pathways which are both responsible for adjusting status. Eventually, these can merge into a single sane editor which implements reasonable rules in reaonable ways. But that day is not today. Test Plan: With three users and a project, made a bunch of accepts, rejects, resigns and reviewer removals. I think I probably covered most of the pathways? There are a lot of interactions here. Reviewers: btrahan Reviewed By: btrahan CC: aran, wisutsak.jaisue.7 Maniphest Tasks: T1279 Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7245
2013-10-07 02:09:56 +02:00
/**
* Try to move a revision to "accepted". We look for:
*
* - at least one accepting reviewer who is a user; and
* - no rejects; and
* - no blocking reviewers.
*/
public static function updateAcceptedStatus(
PhabricatorUser $viewer,
DifferentialRevision $revision) {
$revision = id(new DifferentialRevisionQuery())
->setViewer($viewer)
->withIDs(array($revision->getID()))
->needRelationships(true)
->needReviewerStatus(true)
->needReviewerAuthority(true)
->executeOne();
$has_user_accept = false;
foreach ($revision->getReviewerStatus() as $reviewer) {
$status = $reviewer->getStatus();
if ($status == DifferentialReviewerStatus::STATUS_BLOCKING) {
// We have a blocking reviewer, so just leave the revision in its
// existing state.
return $revision;
}
if ($status == DifferentialReviewerStatus::STATUS_REJECTED) {
// We have a rejecting reviewer, so leave the revisoin as is.
return $revision;
}
if ($reviewer->isUser()) {
if ($status == DifferentialReviewerStatus::STATUS_ACCEPTED) {
$has_user_accept = true;
}
}
}
if ($has_user_accept) {
$revision
->setStatus(ArcanistDifferentialRevisionStatus::ACCEPTED)
->save();
}
return $revision;
}
2011-01-26 02:17:19 +01:00
}