Summary:
- If you're an administrator and there are users waiting for approval, show a count on the home page.
- Sort out the `isUserActivated()` access check.
- Hide all the menu widgets except "Logout" for disabled and unapproved users.
- Add a "Log In" item.
- Add a bunch of unit tests.
Test Plan: Ran unit tests, clicked around as unapproved/approved/logged-in/logged-out users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7574
Summary:
Nothing fancy here, just:
- UI to show users needing approval.
- "Approve" and "Disable" actions.
- Send "Approved" email on approve.
- "Approve" edit + log operations.
- "Wait for Approval" state for users who need approval.
There's still no natural way for users to end up not-approved -- you have to write directly to the database.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7573
Summary:
Small step forward which improves existing stuff or lays groudwork for future stuff:
- Currently, to check for email verification, we have to single-query the email address on every page. Instead, denoramlize it into the user object.
- Migrate all the existing users.
- When the user verifies an email, mark them as `isEmailVerified` if the email is their primary email.
- Just make the checks look at the `isEmailVerified` field.
- Add a new check, `isUserActivated()`, to cover email-verified plus disabled. Currently, a non-verified-but-not-disabled user could theoretically use Conduit over SSH, if anyone deployed it. Tighten that up.
- Add an `isApproved` flag, which is always true for now. In a future diff, I want to add a default-on admin approval queue for new accounts, to prevent configuration mistakes. The way it will work is:
- When the queue is enabled, registering users are created with `isApproved = false`.
- Admins are sent an email, "[Phabricator] New User Approval (alincoln)", telling them that a new user is waiting for approval.
- They go to the web UI and approve the user.
- Manually-created accounts are auto-approved.
- The email will have instructions for disabling the queue.
I think this queue will be helpful for new installs and give them peace of mind, and when you go to disable it we have a better opportunity to warn you about exactly what that means.
Generally, I want to improve the default safety of registration, since if you just blindly coast through the path of least resistance right now your install ends up pretty open, and realistically few installs are on VPNs.
Test Plan:
- Ran migration, verified `isEmailVerified` populated correctly.
- Created a new user, checked DB for verified (not verified).
- Verified, checked DB (now verified).
- Used Conduit, People, Diffusion.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7572
Summary: Ref T4064. The response code here isn't normally relevant, but we can hit these via `git clone http://../`, etc., and it's clearly more correct to use HTTP 500.
Test Plan: Added a fake `throw new Exception()` and verified I got an HTTP 500 response.
Reviewers: jamesr, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4064
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7507
Summary:
Mostly ripped from D7391, with some changes:
- Serve repositories at `/diffusion/X/`, with no special `/git/` or `/serve/` URI component.
- This requires a little bit of magic, but I got the magic working for Git, Mercurial and SVN, and it seems reasonable.
- I think having one URI for everything will make it easier for users to understand.
- One downside is that git will clone into `X` by default, but I think that's not a big deal, and we can work around that in the future easily enough.
- Accept HTTP requests for Git, SVN and Mercurial repositories.
- Auth logic is a little different in order to be more consistent with how other things work.
- Instead of AphrontBasicAuthResponse, added "VCSResponse". Mercurial can print strings we send it on the CLI if we're careful, so support that. I did a fair amount of digging and didn't have any luck with git or svn.
- Commands we don't know about are assumed to require "Push" capability by default.
No actual VCS data going over the wire yet.
Test Plan:
Ran a bunch of stuff like this:
$ hg clone http://local.aphront.com:8080/diffusion/P/
abort: HTTP Error 403: This repository is not available over HTTP.
...and got pretty reasonable-seeming errors in all cases. All this can do is produce errors for now.
Reviewers: hach-que, btrahan
Reviewed By: hach-que
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2230
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7417
Summary: See IRC. Someone got a `null` in CCPHIDs somehow. Moving to subscriptions should prevent this, but paper over it for now.
Test Plan: Will have @dctrwatson check.
Reviewers: btrahan, dctrwatson
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: dctrwatson, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7330
Summary:
Ref T603. Fixes T2823. This updates Paste and Macro.
- **Paste**
- Added default view policy.
- I didn't add a "create" policy, since I can't come up with any realistic scenario where you'd give users access to pastes but not let them create them.
- **Macro**
- Added a "manage" policy, which covers creating and editing macros. This lets an install only allow "People With An Approved Sense of Humor" or whatever to create macros.
- Removed the "edit" policy, since giving individual users access to specific macros doesn't make much sense to me.
- Changed the view policy to the "most public" policy the install allows.
- Added view policy information to the header.
Also fix a couple of minor things in Maniphest.
Test Plan:
- Set Paste policy, created pastes via web and Conduit, saw they got the right default policies.
- Set Macro policy, tried to create/edit macros with valid and unauthorized users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2823, T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7317
Summary: Ref T603. When the user encounters an action which is controlled by a special policy rule in the application, make it easier for applications to show the user what policy controls the action and what the setting is. I took this about halfway before and left a TODO, but turn it into something more useful.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7265
Summary: Ref T603. Use the new hotness.
Test Plan: Edited Herald in Applications, tried to create rules / global rules without capabilities, got reasonable error messages.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7263
Summary:
Ref T603. Herald is a bit of a policy minefield right now, although I think pretty much everything has straightforward solutions. This change:
- Introduces "create" and "create global" permisions for Herald.
- Maybe "create" is sort of redundant since there's no reason to have access to the application if not creating rules, but I think this won't be the case for most applications, so having an explicit "create" permission is more consistent.
- Add some application policy helper functions.
- Improve rendering a bit -- I think we probably need to build some `PolicyType` class, similar to `PHIDType`, to really get this right.
- Don't let users who can't use application X create Herald rules for application X.
- Remove Maniphest/Pholio rules when those applications are not installed.
Test Plan:
- Restricted access to Maniphest and uninstalled Pholio.
- Verified Pholio rules no longer appear for anyone.
- Verified Maniphest ruls no longer appear for restricted users.
- Verified users without CREATE_GLOBAL can not create global ruls.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7219
Summary:
Ref T603. I had to partially revert this earlier because it accidentally blocked access to Conduit and File data for installs without "policy.allow-public", since the applications are available to "all users" but some endpoints actually need to be available even when not logged in.
This readjusts the gating in the controller to properly apply application visibility restrictions, and then adds a giant pile of unit test coverage to make sure it sticks and all the weird cases are covered.
Test Plan:
- Added and executed unit tests.
- Executed most of the tests manually, by using logged in / admin / public / disabled users.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7211
Summary:
Ref T603. Enables:
- Application policies can be edited.
- Applications can define custom policies (this will be used for setting defaults, like "what is the default visibiltiy of new tasks", and meta-policies, like "who can create a task?").
Test Plan: Edited application policies. A future diff does more with custom policies.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7205
Summary:
Ref T603. Broadly, this allows you to implement a policy like "Only users in Engineering can use Differential."
This isn't complete, and there will be a long tail of special cases to deal with. Some examples:
- If you can't use Differential, should you still be able to attach/detach revisions from tasks?
- You currently will be able to.
- This actually seems pretty reasonable.
- But in other cases it might not be: the "send user a message" action should probably require access to Conpherence.
- If you can't use Differential, should you still be able to see feed stories about it?
- You currently will be able to, if you can see the revisions.
- This seems not-so-reasonable and we should probably lock it down.
- If you can't use Differential, can users CC you on revisions?
- Currently, they can, and you can't do anything about it.
- Probably they shouldn't be able to? This seems challenging to explain in the UI.
- If you can't use Differential, can you write a Herald rule against it?
- You currently will be able to.
- Seems like you obviously shouldn't be able to.
- I think this is a general issue right now (you can still write Differential herald rules even if you uninstall the application, I believe).
There are probably a few more things I haven't thought of. However, there are a finite number of these things and I suspect there aren't //too/ many more than this -- I can't come up with like 100 of them, and half of the ones above have easy fixes.
Despite the rough edges, I think this accomplishes 95% of what installs expect from it.
Test Plan: Restricted Differential and saw it vanish from the home page.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7203
Summary:
Fixes T3894. The "Log Out" icon has moved away from its rightmost position in the menubar.
In rP2e5ac12, I added a "Policy" application. This was the root cause.
The reordering logic (below) is slightly wrong. The `array_select_keys()` call is actually using the //strings// (like "Admnistration") to select the groups, not the correct constants (like "admin"). Use the constants instead and get the expected group ordering.
Test Plan: Loaded page, "Log Out" is in the rightmost position.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3894
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7177
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))
Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
Summary: Depends on D6769, removes 'dust' and uses a similar color background.
Test Plan: Review colors in sandbox.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6772
Summary:
Ref T1536.
- Move all the provider-specific help into contextual help in Auth.
- This provides help much more contextually, and we can just tell the user the right values to use to configure things.
- Rewrite account/registration help to reflect the newer state of the word.
- Also clean up a few other loose ends.
Test Plan: {F46937}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6247
Summary:
Ref T1536. This is extremely reachable and changes the login code to the new stuff.
Notes:
- I've hard-disabled password registration since I want installs to explicitly flip it on via config if they want it. New installs will get it by default in the future, but old installs shouldn't have their auth options change.
- Google doesn't let us change the redirect URI, so keep the old one working.
- We need to keep a bit of LDAP around for now for LDAP import.
- **Facebook:** This causes substantive changes in what login code is executed.
Test Plan:
- Logged in / logged out / registered, hit new flows.
- Logged in with google.
- Verified no password registration by default.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: wez, nh, aran, mbishopim3
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6222
Summary:
Ref T1536.
- When we render a dialog on a page by itself, put it on a dust background.
- Currently, we render "Logout" in two different places. Stop doing that.
- Make sure the surviving one has workflow so we get a modal ajax dialog if possible.
Test Plan: {F46731}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6226
Summary: Ref T1536. Error state is a bit gross but we need to sort that out in general.
Test Plan:
{F46549}
{F46550}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1536
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6208
Summary:
This prevents security by obscurity.
If I have read-only access to the database then I can pretend to be any logged-in user.
I've used `PhabricatorHash::digest()` (even though we don't need salt as the hashed string is random) to be compatible with user log.
Test Plan:
Applied patch.
Verified I'm still logged in.
Logged out.
Logged in.
$ arc tasks
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6080
Summary: Ref T3166. I moved the create logic into a static method in the editor class to keep things tidy.
Test Plan: created a conpherence from UI. purdy. tried errors and got UI to show "required". for conduit, created a thread with all the bells and whistles and it worked. verified i got proper exceptions with bum conduit calls
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: chad, aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T3166
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6083
Summary:
Fixes T3218.
- Currently, Paste pages don't clear notifications about the paste (notably, token notifications).
- Currently, Paste pages don't show tooltips on tokens.
- `buildApplicationPage()` stopped respecting `pageObjects` (which controls whether "this page has been updated" is shown). Restore that.
- Make `pageObjects` imply "clear notifications on this stuff".
Test Plan: Viewed a tokened Paste. Verified it cleared the notification and hovering over a token showed a tip.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3218
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5971
Summary:
Normalize the unit test environment by installing all applications.
The immediate issue this fixes is that `testDropUnknownSenderMail` depends on Maniphest being installed. Some possible fixes are:
# Don't rely on the Maniphest mail receiver for the test (e.g., write a stub/dummy/mock receiver).
# Explicitly make sure Maniphest is installed before running the test.
# Normalize the test environment to install all applications.
I don't like (1) much because it turns a pretty good 10 line test into a bunch of stub classes or mock junk. I'll do it if we have more uses after a few more diffs, but so far running these tests against real code hasn't created a dependency mess and we get more coverage.
I don't like (2) much because I think requiring tests to do this will do more harm than good. The number of issues we'll hypothetically uncover by exposing unrealized application interdependencies is probably very small or maybe zero, and they're probably all trivial. But tests with an undeclared but implicit dependency on an application (e.g., Differential tests depend on Differential) are common.
So here's (3), which I think is reasonable.
I also simplified some of this code a little bit, and moved the Application object cache one level down (this was sort of a bug -- installation status is variant across requests).
Test Plan: Added unit test.
Reviewers: wez, btrahan
Reviewed By: wez
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5938
Summary:
Ref T1205. Continuation of D5915.
Currently, `PhabricatorMetaMTAReceivedMail` has //all// the logic for routing mail. In particular:
- New mail receivers in applications must edit it.
- Mail receivers don't drop out when applications are uninstalled.
Applications have some logic in subclasses of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler`, but this class is a bit of a mess. It is also heavily based on the assumption that mail receivers are objects (like revisions), but this is not true in at least two cases today (creating new tasks with `bugs@`, creating a new Conpherence thread) and likely other cases in the future (e.g., revision-by-mail).
Move this logic into a new `PhabricatorMailReceiver` classtree. This is similar to `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` but a bit cleaner and more general. I plan to heavily reduce the responsibilities of `PhabricatorMailReplyHandler` or possibly eliminate it entirely.
For now, the new classtree doesn't do much of interest. The only behavioral change this diff causes is that Phabricator will now reject mail to an application when that application is uninstalled.
I also moved all the `ReplyHandler` classes into `mail/` directories in their respective applications.
Test Plan: Unit tests, used receive test to route mail to various objects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: Afaque_Hussain, edward, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1205
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5922
Summary:
Also join concepts of installed and enabled applications.
Also respect uninstalled Maniphest where disabled Maniphest was checked.
Test Plan:
Visited T1, D1.
Uninstalled Maniphest then visited T1, D1.
Disabled Maniphest then visited T1.
Visited /config/edit/maniphest.enabled/.
Reviewers: epriestley, Afaque_Hussain, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5602
Summary:
Currently, `isInstalled()` and `getAllInstalledApplications()` are inconsistent:
- `isInstalled()` returns true for beta apps, even if `phabricator.show-beta-applications` is false.
- `getAllInstalledApplications()` omits beta apps if `phabricator.show-beta-applications` is false.
Making the beta config control installs (not just homepage visibility) makes far more sense as we roll out more thorough application integrations.
Make `isInstalled()` respect beta, and clean up some callsites.
D5602 builds on this.
Test Plan: Installed/uninstalled beta apps, verified Conpherence menu/panel and other application integrations dropped out of the UI.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5603
Summary:
So I don't have to copy/paste everything again.
Used them at places I could find with my limited `grep` skills.
Test Plan: Visited hovercards, revision and tasks. No crashes.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5592
Summary:
My browser was showing the url of phabricator as the title instead of the real
title. Fix it so the title set for the home page actually gets used.
Test Plan: load phabricator and see "Bacon Ice Cream for Breakfast" as the title
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5428
Summary: We currently inspect `phabricator.uninstalled-applications` in two places -- when building a list of `getAllInstalledApplications()` and when asking an application if it `isInstalled()`. This diff moves that all to the latter function, meaning we can override it in clever and subtle ways for applications that want to add extra defensiveness about whether they should be considered installed or not (e.g. Releeph, in D4932.)
Test Plan: Load the main Phabricator page, pick an application, uninstall it, notice it is absent, then install it and notice the launch icon reappear.
Reviewers: epriestley, Afaque_Hussain
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5326
Summary: Fixes T2698. When applications are installed, their Conduit calls should drop out. This will also let us land Releeph without exposing Conduit calls.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Conduit console; uninstalled some applications and verified their calls dropped out.
- Tried to make an uninstalled call; got an appropriate error.
Reviewers: edward, btrahan
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5302
Summary: This adds an option dust background for certain application designs, like Macro and Pholio to help make the list views pop more.
Test Plan: Reviewed Macro and Pholio.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5209
Summary:
- Unify all the reference/embed Remarkup rules for Differential, Maniphest, Paste and Ponder.
- Add rules for Pholio.
- Does not yet unify Diffusion or Files (both are a bit more involved).
- Prepare for hovercards.
Test Plan: {F33894}
Reviewers: chad, vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5120
Summary: Crumbs, phts, and mobile layouts for Countdown.
Test Plan: Tested new, edit and delete timer. Verified timer works. Unable to get 'remove chrome' to work, will investigate.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5101
Summary: Sgrepped for `"=~/</"` and manually changed every HTML.
Test Plan: This doesn't work yet but it is hopefully one of the last diffs before Phabricator will be undoubtedly HTML safe.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2432
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4927
Summary:
I like this abstraction better.
Result of `phutil_implode_html()` may be also used as a param of `hsprintf()`.
Test Plan: None.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4904
Summary:
By default, order applications in application order. See discussion in D4708.
Principally, this is intended to make sure that application event handlers are registered in order, and thus fire in order.
Test Plan:
Looked at /applications/, homepage tiles, verified they both still work.
I didn't actually test the event handler bit since it's fairly complicated to test blind; D4708 should provide a test case.
Reviewers: btrahan, Afaque_Hussain
Reviewed By: Afaque_Hussain
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4791
Summary: Disabled uninstalling of applications which can't be uninstalled. Also, applications which cannot be uninstalled always show that they are installed even if users somehow manually edit the configuration.
Test Plan: Manually edited the URI to uninstall applications which can't be unisntalled.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4741
Summary: Code Refactored as suggested by epriestley
Test Plan: Same test plan as of Installation & Uninstallation of Applications
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4740
