Summary:
When system agent adds a comment then he is added to CC.
When I amend and update then I get message "Commit message references nonexistent ..."
Test Plan: Update revision with system agent in CC.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: michalburger1, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2100
Summary:
If the 'Summary' is not present and not inferred to be empty from a newline after the title with no explicit 'Summary' field, we'll copy all the field values from the revision (including NULL), not overwrite the 'Summary' value from the message (since it's not present) and then write the NULL back to the revision.
Instead, string cast the read from the Revision so we write back empty string in the not-provided case.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff --create --use-commit-message HEAD" with P336 in HEAD, didn't fail (previously, it failed).
Reviewers: btrahan, 20after4
Reviewed By: 20after4
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1019
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1956
Summary:
If we can't look up the name for a mailing list, don't put 'Unknown Mailing
List' in the commit message - it will confuse things later down the road.
Surely there is a better way of doing this than checking the name of the
handle for the mailing list.
Test Plan:
called differential.getcommitmessage on a revision that had an invalid mailing
list phid.
Reviewers: epriestley, schrockn, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1910
Summary:
Currently, we sort all results alphabetically. This isn't ideal. Instead, sort them like this:
- If the viewing user appears in the list, always sort them first. This is common in a lot of contexts and some "Ben Evans" guy is sorting first on secure.phabricator.com and causing me no end of aggravation.
- If the tokens match a "priority" component (e.g., username), sort that before results which do not have a "priority" match.
- Within a group (self, priority, everything else) sort tokens alphabetically.
NOTE: I need to go add setUser() to all the tokenizers to make the "self" rule work, but that's trivial so I figured I'd get this out first.
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/4s2a72l5hhyyqqkq4bnd/PHID-FILE-x2r6ubk7s7dz54kxmtwx/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.03_AM.png
Previously, "aaaaaepriestley" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "epriestley" (the viewing user). Now, "epriestley" sorts first because that is the viewer.
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/rmnxgnafz42f23fsjwui/PHID-FILE-yrnn55jl3ysbntldq3af/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.09_AM.png
Previously, "aaaagopher" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "banana" (the "priority" match). Now, "banana" sorts first because it priority matches on username.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T946
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1807
Summary:
Adds an optional "Auditors" field (like "Reviewers") to commit messages which gives installs a zero-config method for making audit requests.
This field does not appear on templates unless set, and is mostly ignored (but validated and preserved) by Differential.
It is then parsed by the daemons if present, and audit requests are pushed to valid users.
Test Plan: Made an "Auditors" commit and verified it was retained with "arc amend --show". Pushed it and verified the audit was triggered.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904, T880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1793
Summary:
Displaying reviewer who was by coincidence listed first is quite confusing, especially for committed revisions.
This displays the one who really reviewed the revision if available.
This implementation is pretty bad from performance perspective - O(N) queries to retrieve all comments.
The page load still feels quite fast.
Test Plan: /differential/filter/revisions/
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1772
Summary:
Build the revision list table out of custom fields instead of hard-coding it, so
installs can add all sorts of zany things to it.
NOTE: You may need to implement sortFieldsForRevisionList() if you have a custom
DifferentialFieldSelector, or some fields might show up out of order.
This implementation will preserve the expected behavior:
public function sortFieldsForRevisionList(array $fields) {
$default = new DifferentialDefaultFieldSelector();
return $default->sortFieldsForRevisionList($fields);
}
Test Plan:
- Loaded differential revision list, identical to old list.
- Profiled page to verify the cost increase isn't significant (it's quite
small).
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, davidreuss, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T773, T729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1388
Summary:
The main purpose of this change is to allow selecting the branch by
triple-click.
Plus it is not perfectly clear that the text in brackets means branch.
Test Plan: Display revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1585
Summary:
Links from lint errors for large diffs don't work.
This diff adds TODO for it because I am not sure how to do it.
Move of changeset links rendering to a separate method would be still useful.
Test Plan:
Display ToC of large diff, verify link.
Repeat for small diff.
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1476
Summary:
- Even for immutable-history Git workflows, we suggest "arc amend". Instead,
suggest "arc amend" or "arc merge" (ideally we'd know which, but we can't
currently get that information).
- We suggest "arc amend --revision X", but this is less safe and less simple
than "arc amend", especially after D1480.
- For Mercurial, suggest "arc merge".
Test Plan: Looked at some "Accepted" revisions.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T662
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1481
Summary: There are lots of callsites to $changeset->getFilename() so it seemed
easier to rename getFileName() to getFilename() even if it includes database
change. Plus I think that getFilename() is better.
Test Plan:
Alter database.
Open revision.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1437
Summary:
We currently allow you to assign code review to disabled users, but
should not.
Test Plan:
- Created revisions with no reviewers and only disabled reviewers, was
appropriately warned.
- Looked at a disabled user handle link, was clearly informed.
- Tried to create a new revision with a disabled reviewer, was rebuffed.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1429
Test Plan:
Display diff with lint errors
Click on a line number in lint errors overview
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1400
Summary:
- We currently run ##parseValueFromCommitMessage()## on all fields present in
the message, but not ##validateField()##.
- This detects value errors (e.g., an invalid reviewer) but not higher-level
errors (e.g., a missing field).
- This can break the stacked-commits Git mutable history workflow by
recognizing too many commit messages as valid ("multiple valid commit messages,
this is ambiguous").
- This also gives you some errors ("Missing test plan") too late in "arc diff
--create" (after the diff has been built).
Test Plan:
- Grepped for validateField() calls, removed a couple of calls that had the
same implementation as the base class.
- Grepped for other calls to this to make sure I'm not stumbling into
unintended side effects, but it only runs from the diff workflow.
- Ran "arc diff --create" with an invalid test plan, got a good error early in
the process.
- Ran "arc diff master" with stacked local commits, got a correct selection of
the intended message.
Reviewers: cpiro, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: cpiro
CC: aran, cpiro
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1373
Phabricator
Summary: ...this breaks without D1328. Used good ole "codemod" to do this
work, with lots of manual edits around 80 chars.
Test Plan: clicked around phabricator tool suite, particular differential, a
bunch
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1351
Summary: The recent change to the field causes us to render "http://junk.com/D"
in some cases, just null the field if there's no data.
Test Plan: Ran "arc diff --create".
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1321
Summary:
See D1295. $unit_messages may be undefined.
I'll see if I can improve the visibility of warnings, the red dot in DarkConsole
is easy to miss right now. See T734.
Test Plan: Loaded a revision with no unit failures, didn't receive a warning.
Reviewers: nh, btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1306
Summary: This diffs adds support for marking up unittest result messages.
Test Plan: Verified that links in unittest results were markup'd.
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley, zeeg
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1298
Summary:
When all unit tests pass, a box appears between the unit test results and lint
status (for test failures to go in). This checks if there's anything to put
in that div/ul before putting it on the page.
Test Plan:
Loaded a revision with unit tests OK and saw no box. Loaded a revision with
failing unittests, and saw the same box from before.
Reviewers: tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: jungejason, aran, nh, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1295
Summary: There can be Dxxx, rXXXxxx or even full URL in //Blame Revision// field
so just highlighting it as normal text would work probably best
Test Plan:
Go to https://secure.phabricator.com/D277
You should see a link from //Blame Revision// (if it would be displayed)
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1274
Summary:
- Previously, used IDs like "33" to match a commit to a Differential revision.
This has a namespacing problem because we now have an arbitrarily large number
of Phabricator installs in the world, and they may want to track commits from
other installs.
- In Differential, parse raw IDs or full URIs. Emit only full URIs.
- In Repositories, parse only full URIs.
- This might cause a few commits to not be picked up in rare circumstances.
Users can fix them with "arc mark-committed". This should be exceedingly rare
because of hash matching.
- There are some caveats for reparsing older repositories, see comments
inline. I don't think there's much broad impact here.
Test Plan:
- Created a new revision, got a full URI.
- Updated revision, worked correctly.
- Ran unit tests.
- Monkeyed with "Differential Revision" field.
- Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Maniphest Tasks: T54, T692
Differential Revision: 1250
Summary:
Allow entry of "CC: alincoln" to match user "ALincoln".
Put both variations in the map and try the exact case version first since we'll
also match email addresses and mailables, and theoretically some mailable might
have the same name as a user, as we're effectively abandoning restriction of
which characters can appear in usernames.
Test Plan: Created a local revision with a reviewer in CrAzY CaPs.
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason
Maniphest Tasks: T697
Differential Revision: 1255
Summary:
We have this code in two places; split it into an editor class so we can share
it.
This also fixes some probems with this field not //detaching// tasks properly.
Test Plan:
- Created a revision with no attached tasks.
- Attached it to a task.
- Updated it.
- Detached it.
- Used web UI to attach/detach tasks/revisions.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1225
updated
Summary:
- If you update a revision with a nonempty "Maniphest Tasks" field, an empty
comment is posted (see T586).
- The transaction email currently says "Attached revision 'Unknown
Differential Revision'", move attaching to "didWriteRevision()" to make sure the
object has been written.
Test Plan: - Attached; updated a revision.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Maniphest Tasks: T685
Differential Revision: 1223
Summary:
Derped this one up; while my testing was successful in preventing runaway
attaching I missed the bit where it doesn't actually work.
This resolves the "Unknown Object" link seen on T661.
Test Plan:
- Created two new revisions, each attached to a local task.
- Verified that they attached additively, Maniphest and Differential were
linked to the right places, and nothign else bad happened.
Reviewers: btrahan, fratrik
Reviewed By: fratrik
CC: aran, fratrik, btrahan
Differential Revision: 1181
Summary:
add "Maniphest Task:" or "Maniphest Tasks:" followed by text that has TX in it.
foreach TX the task will be attached to the revision and the revision will be
attached to the task. parsing is pretty... ummm, robust such that it will pick
up any TX substring and parse that as a Maniphest Task just fine. it errors
out if there is not an actual task for TX and otherwise churns along pretty
nicely.
Also, make sure the PhabricatorObjectHandle loads the task ID as the alternateID
since we need that here and it should be that way anyhoo.
Test Plan:
made a diff and in the commit message added Maniphest Task(s): TX combination.
Tried various combinations of TX -- single, multiple with commas, multiple many
lines, single bad, multiple bad, multiple mix of bad and good. verified that the
good tasks were attached to the diff and diff was attached to the good tasks.
Maniphest Tasks: T137
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, btrahan, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1165
order to generate a template
Summary: See T614. This allows us to generate an empty template by calling
Conduit, so we can build command-line editing workflows for SVN, Mercurial, and
conservative-Git.
Test Plan: Used web console to invoke Conduit method; got a reasonable empty
template out of it.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, btrahan
Differential Revision: 1156
Summary:
See T643. We have some hard-coded checks in Arcanist for the existence of
'testPlan' and 'title', and don't properly validate those fields on the server.
Add a validation pass in the Conduit-based edit pathway.
In particular, this means that if you disable the "Test Plan" field, Arcanist
won't block you anymore.
Test Plan: Disabled Arcanist checks and ran "arc diff"; got blocked on the
server side.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan
Differential Revision: 1153
Summary: Girish wants to be able to do this.
Test Plan: Checked that I had the option in my sandbox on an accepted diff.
Reviewers: epriestley, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, epriestley
Differential Revision: 1020
Summary:
I think this is the last major step -- use the fields to parse commit messages,
not a hard-coded list of stuff. This adds two primary methods to fields, one to
get all the labels they'll parse (so we can do "CC" and "CCs" and treat them as
the same field) and one to parse the string into a canonical representation
(e.g., lookup reviewers and such).
You'll need to impelement the one block of task-specific stuff I removed in
Facebook's task field:
list($pre_comment) = split(' -- ', $data);
$data = array_filter(preg_split('/[^\d]+/', $pre_comment));
foreach ($data as $k => $v) {
$data[$k] = (int)$v;
}
$data = array_unique($data);
break;
Otherwise I think this is clean.
Test Plan:
- Called the conduit method with various commit messages, parsed fields/errors
seemed correct.
- "arc diff"'d this diff onto localhost, then updated it.
- "arc amend"'d this diff.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 829
Summary: While I thought this was complicated, there was nothing subtle or
tricky here -- I just misnamed a variable.
Test Plan: Created a revision with default CCs, got CCs instead of nothing.
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: aran
CC: aran
Differential Revision: 834
Summary:
When rendering commit messages, drive all the logic through field specification
classes instead of the hard-coded DifferentialCommitMessageData class. This
removes DifferentialCommitMessageData and support classes.
Note that this effectively reverts D546, and will cause a minor break for
Facebook (Task IDs will no longer render in commit messages generated by "arc
amend", and will not be editable via "arc diff --edit"). This can be resolved by
implementing the feature as a custom field. While I've been able to preserve the
task ID functionality elsewhere, I felt this implementation was too complex to
reasonably leave hooks for, and the break is pretty minor.
Test Plan:
- Made numerous calls to differential.getcommitmessage across many diffs in
various states, with and without 'edit' and with and without various field
overrides.
- General behavior seems correct (messages look accurate, and have the
expected information). Special fields like "Reviewed By" and "git-svn-id" seem
to work correctly.
- Edit behavior seems correct (edit mode shows all editable fields, hides
fields like "Reviewed By").
- Field overwrite behavior seems correct (overwritable fields show the correct
values when overwritten, ignore provided values otherwise).
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 814
Summary:
See T354. List every rule which has ever been applied in X-Herald-Rules, not
just the ones which most recently triggered.
Also some random fixes while I was debugging this:
- When conduit methods throw non-conduit exceptions, make sure they get
logged.
- Trigger the Facebook "tasks" backcompat block only if we were going to fail
(this should reduce the shakniess of the transition).
- Fix some log spew from the new field stuff.
Test Plan:
- Created a rule (ID #3) "No Zebras" which triggers for revisions without
"zebra" in the title.
- Created a revision without "zebra" in the title, got X-Herald-Rules: <2>,
<3>
- Updated revision to have "zebra" in the title, verified rule did not trigger
in Herald transcript.
- Verified X-Herald-Rules is still: <2>, <3>
Reviewed By: aran
Reviewers: aran, jungejason, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: 817
Summary:
When we create or update a revision, we use a parsed commit message dictionary
to edit its fields. Drive consumption of the dictionary through custom fields
instead of hardcoding.
This requires adding some fields which don't really do anything right now to
cover fields which appear only in the commit message.
Test Plan: "arc diff"'d this revision against localhost, "arc diff"'d again to
update.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 811
Summary:
Move all the rest of the fields into the custom field schema, for revision
views.
I left a couple of stubs in here (willWriteRevision, didWriteRevision) since I'd
planned to do edits here too, but this diff is sort of big-ish already. I'll do
all the edit fields in the next revision.
Depends on D808.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited and conduit'ed some revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 809
Summary:
Move additional fields (which rely on loading handles) to the extensible field
classes and out of hardcoding in the controller.
Depends on D807.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited, and hit conduit for revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 808
Summary:
Differential has a bunch of display-only fields, implement them all as field
specifications instead of hard-coded fields.
Also add some more documentation and fix redundant string constants in blame
rev/revert plan fields.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited, and hit conduit for revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 807
Summary: Similar to D785 for Maniphest, expose auxiliary field values via
Conduit.
Test Plan: Ran revision.getinfo on a revision with aux fields, got them in the
response.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 802
Summary:
This is just to ease transitions for any installs which use these fields (e.g.,
Facebook). I'll write some docs and a migration script once this stuff is a
little more solid, too.
Depends on D800.
Technically these are "better" than the current fields since they show up other
places than the edit screen (derp derp).
Test Plan: Created a field selector which provides these; verified they work by
typing stuff into them and saving the revision.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 801
Summary: Depends on D798. Extends custom fields and makes the vaguely useful:
they can appear on the edit and view interfaces. This does not integrate them
with commit messages yet; that's more complicated but I plan to do it shortly.
Test Plan: Implemented a custom field per P123, it correctly appears on the edit
interface, persists, validates, and shows up when viewing the revision.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, epriestley, jungejason
Differential Revision: 800
Summary:
Precursor to building this out to solve T343. This is similar to the Maniphest
fields we landed recently, although I think they're dissimilar enough that it
isn't worth going crazy trying to make them share code, at least for now.
This doesn't really do anything yet, just adds a storage object and a couple of
selector/field indirection classes.
Test Plan: Ran SQL upgrade script, created an aux field.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 798
