1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-12-01 19:22:42 +01:00
Commit graph

30 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
epriestley
a716fe99f3 Perform search indexing in the worker queue and respect bin/search index --background
Summary: Fixes T3857. Earlier work made this trivial and just left product questions, which I've answered by requiring the daemons to run on reasonable installs.

Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index` and `bin/search index --background`. Observed indexes write in the former case and tasks queue in the latter case. Commented with a unique string on a revision and searched for it a moment later, got exactly one result (that revision), verifying that reindexing works correctly.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3857

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7966
2014-01-14 13:22:56 -08:00
James Rhodes
7ffea0463e Use herald to trigger builds of revisions and commits.
Summary:
Depends on D7500.

This seemed like a pretty good idea once I thought of it.  Instead of having some custom triggering logic instead Harbormaster, I figured it best to leverage all of Herald's power so that users can create rules to apply builds to commits and differential revisions.  This gives the added advantage that they can trigger off builds for particular types of revisions and commits, which seems like it could be really useful (e.g. run extra tests against revisions that touch sensitive areas of the code).

Test Plan: Ran the usual daemons + the Harbormaster daemon.  Pushed a commit to the repository and saw both the buildable and build get created when the commit worked picked it up.  Submitted a diff and saw both the buildable and build get created when the Herald rules were evaluated for the diff.

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran, hwinkel

Maniphest Tasks: T1049

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7501
2013-11-08 16:58:39 -08:00
epriestley
32dd8af9e5 Reduce surface area of DifferentialComment API
Summary:
Ref T2222. Shrink the API to make it easier to move this object's storage to ApplicationTransactions.

Fixes T3415. This moves the "Summary" and "Test Plan" into the property list, and thereby fixes all the attribution problems associated with commandeering, creating a revision from another user's diff, etc.

Test Plan: Browsed several revisions.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T3415, T2222

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7375
2013-10-21 17:01:27 -07:00
epriestley
c69beb7988 Stop writes to the old Relationship table
Summary: Ref T1279. The new stuff seems stable, so stop writes to the old tables.

Test Plan:
  - Added and removed reviewers.
  - Grepped for `::RELATIONSHIP_TABLE` to verify we really have no more reads.
  - Grepped for `::RELATION_REVIEWER`.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7360
2013-10-21 16:59:22 -07:00
epriestley
436a403357 Add a "default view" policy to Differential
Summary:
Ref T603. Allows the Differential view policy to be configured with a default.

I've omitted "edit" because I want to wait and see how comment/comment-action policies work out. I could imagine locking "edit" down to only the owner at some point, and providing a wider "interact" capability, or something like that, which would cover accept/reject/commandeer. Users in this group could still edit indirectly by commandeering first.

Test Plan: Created new revisions from the CLI and conduit.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7269
2013-10-09 13:58:00 -07:00
epriestley
c6add6ae73 Make "reject" and "blocking reviewer" block acceptance in Differential
Summary:
Ref T1279. This is a logical change.

  - "Reject" (nee "Request Changes") is now sticky. The review won't transition to "Accepted" until the reviewer clears their objection. In practice, I think it always worked like this anyway (without technical enforcement, users just followed this rule naturally, since disobeying this rule is kind of a dick move) so I don't expect this to change much. I think this rule is easier to understand than the old rule now, given the multi-reviewer status and blocking reviewers.
  - "Blocking Reviewer" and "Reject" now prevent a revision from transitioning to "Accepted". When reviewers accept, resign, or are removed, we do a check to see if the reivsion has: at least one user reviewer who has accepted; zero rejects; and zero blocks. If all conditions are satisfied, we transition it to "accepted".

Practically, the primary net effect of this is just to make blocking reviews actually block.

This is pretty messy, but there's not much we can do about it until after T2222, since we have two completely separate editor pathways which are both responsible for adjusting status. Eventually, these can merge into a single sane editor which implements reasonable rules in reaonable ways. But that day is not today.

Test Plan: With three users and a project, made a bunch of accepts, rejects, resigns and reviewer removals. I think I probably covered most of the pathways? There are a lot of interactions here.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran, wisutsak.jaisue.7

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7245
2013-10-06 17:09:56 -07:00
epriestley
8aa8ef49da Provide an "Add blocking reviewer..." Herald action
Summary: Ref T1279. These reviewers don't actually create a logical block yet (that is, revisions still transition to "accepted" even in their presence), but this handles everything except that.

Test Plan: Added Herald rules and updated revisions; see screenshots.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7244
2013-10-06 17:09:24 -07:00
epriestley
4c0ec01ce5 Allow Herald rules to add reviewers
Summary:
Ref T1279. Although I think this is a bad idea in general (we once supported it, removed it, and seemed better off for it) users expect it to exist and want it to be available. Give them enough rope to shoot themselves in the foot.

I will probably write some lengthy treatise on how you shouldn't use this rule later.

Implementation is straightforward because Differential previously supported this rule.

This rule can also be used to add project reviewers.

Test Plan: Made some "add reviewers" rules, created revisions, saw reviewers trigger.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7235
2013-10-05 14:10:51 -07:00
epriestley
874a9b7fe3 When creating or updating a revision, infer the repository from the diff
Summary:
Ref T603. When a diff is attached to a revision, try to guess the repository if possible. In cases where we succeed, this automatically gives us intuitive policy behavior (i.e., you can see a revision if you can see the repository the change is against).

I pulled this into a funky little "Lookup" class for two reasons:

  - It's used in two places;
  - I anticipate that we might need to add some sort of `explainWhy()` method if users find the heuristics confusing.

Test Plan: Created and updated revisions, saw them pick up the correct repository association. Ran Herald dry run against associable and nonassociable revisions, saw correct values populate.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7147
2013-09-26 15:28:42 -07:00
epriestley
b398ae5504 Dispatch Differential edit events from Editor, not Controller
Summary:
Currently, these events don't fire for Conduit updates, which makes them sort of silly.

This will get proper treatment after T2222.

Test Plan: Installed a `throw new Exception(...)` event listener. Performed Conduit and web updates of revisions, saw event listener fire.

Reviewers: btrahan, guywarner

Reviewed By: guywarner

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7004
2013-09-16 08:04:14 -07:00
Bob Trahan
b902005bed Kill PhabricatorObjectDataHandle
Summary: Ref T603. Killing this class is cool because the classes that replace it are policy-aware. Tried to keep my wits about me as I did this and fixed a few random things along the way. (Ones I remember right now are pulling a query outside of a foreach loop in Releeph and fixing the text in UIExample to note that the ace of hearts if "a powerful" card and not the "most powerful" card (Q of spades gets that honor IMO))

Test Plan: tested the first few changes (execute, executeOne X handle, object) then got real mechanical / careful with the other changes.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: Korvin, aran, FacebookPOC

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6941
2013-09-11 12:27:28 -07:00
epriestley
6badb05d64 Make Herald adapters provide content types
Summary:
Ref T2769. Get content types out of hard-coded config and into dynamic adapters.

This removes the "MERGE" and "OWNERS" content types, which were vestigal. These needs are likely better addressed through subscriptions/transactions, and are obsolete, and haven't existed for 2+ years and no one has asked for them to be restored.

Test Plan: Mostly a bunch of grep. Viewed rule list, rule edit. Edited a revision.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T2769

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6656
2013-08-07 18:03:51 -07:00
Juan Pablo Civile
fb9282452b Fix typo in D6372
Summary: One place used status, other used state. Killed state in favor of status.

Test Plan: None at all

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6422
2013-07-10 16:26:38 -07:00
Juan Pablo Civile
70fd3dd54f Store revision reviewer state as edges
Summary:
Keep track of the state of a reviewer in an edge between reviewer and revision.
The edge stores the state of the review, added or rejected. And if the revision was
accepted by that reviewer the id of the diff accepted.

Test Plan:
Create diffs and clowncopterize reviewer list changes. This includes:
 * Adding new reviewers
 * Resigning
 * Commandering a revision

Reviewers: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T1279

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6372

Conflicts:
	src/applications/differential/editor/DifferentialCommentEditor.php
2013-07-10 13:50:21 -07:00
Lauri-Henrik Jalonen
93e37e9060 Phabricator event timeline removed
Summary: Removed related files and references

Test Plan: Crossed my fingers

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan

Maniphest Tasks: T2003

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5744

Conflicts:
	src/__phutil_library_map__.php
	src/infrastructure/storage/patch/PhabricatorBuiltinPatchList.php
2013-07-09 18:07:42 -07:00
Jakub Vrana
2427d317b2 Reference task based on branch name in arc diff
Summary:
This was mentioned in T2928 and nobody objected.
It just references the task instead of fixing it as that would be too aggressive.
It also doesn't check assignee of the task (by purpose).

Test Plan: Created diff from a branch named T2928.

Reviewers: epriestley, edward

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2928

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5640
2013-05-30 17:33:17 -07:00
epriestley
31cc78cc35 Fix a missing setActor() on DifferentialNewDiffMail
Auditors: vrana
2013-02-28 17:23:23 -08:00
epriestley
0a069cb55a Require a viewer to load handles
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.

There are a few notable cases here:

  - I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
  - I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
  - I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.

Test Plan:
  - Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
  - Gave them viewers.

Reviewers: vrana

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran, edward

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
2013-02-28 17:15:09 -08:00
vrana
7063ee638e Pass actor to revision unsubscriber editor
Summary: I wonder how I tested this.

Test Plan: Subscribed, unsubscribed.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4860
2013-02-07 18:19:19 -08:00
vrana
8c99938aad Convert revision unsubscribers to edges
Test Plan: Ran the migration on a single revision, verified DB, called `loadUnsubscribedPHIDs()`.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4786
2013-02-04 11:36:55 -08:00
epriestley
f6b1964740 Improve Search architecture
Summary:
The search indexing API has several problems right now:

  - Always runs in-process.
    - It would be nice to push this into the task queue for performance. However, the API currently passses an object all the way through (and some indexers depend on preloaded object attributes), so it can't be dumped into the task queue at any stage since we can't serialize it.
    - Being able to use the task queue will also make rebuilding indexes faster.
    - Instead, make the API phid-oriented.
  - No uniform indexing API.
    - Each "Editor" currently calls SomeCustomIndexer::indexThing(). This won't work with AbstractTransactions. The API is also just weird.
    - Instead, provide a uniform API.
  - No uniform CLI.
    - We have `scripts/search/reindex_everything.php`, but it doesn't actually index everything. Each new document type needs to be separately added to it, leading to stuff like D3839. Third-party applications can't provide indexers.
    - Instead, let indexers expose documents for indexing.
  - Not application-oriented.
    - All the indexers live in search/ right now, which isn't the right organization in an application-orietned view of the world.
    - Instead, move indexers to applications and load them with SymbolLoader.

Test Plan:
  - `bin/search index`
    - Indexed one revision, one task.
    - Indexed `--type TASK`, `--type DREV`, etc., for all types.
    - Indexed `--all`.
  - Added the word "saboteur" to a revision, task, wiki page, and question and then searched for it.
    - Creating users is a pain; searched for a user after indexing.
    - Creating commits is a pain; searched for a commit after indexing.
    - Mocks aren't currently loadable in the result view, so their indexing is moot.

Reviewers: btrahan, vrana

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: 20after4, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1991, T2104

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4261
2012-12-21 14:21:31 -08:00
vrana
fc8d8b6f8c CC users mentioned in revision fields
Summary:
Users are used to this feature from comments.
Provide it also in title, summary and test plan.
It adds the users to CC only on creating the revision to avoid cases like:
"I mentioned this user but now I want to remove him from CC" or he unsubscribes.

Test Plan: Wrote `@epriestley` to summary.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4050
2012-11-29 10:14:30 -08:00
vrana
03aca35cce Create new paths in Differential
Summary: It is used by 'Pending Differential Revisions'.

Test Plan: Created a new file, `arc diff`, looked at this path in Diffusion, saw Pending Differential Revisions.

Reviewers: epriestley

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3991
2012-11-21 11:08:49 -08:00
vrana
ef85f49adc Delete license headers from files
Summary:
This commit doesn't change license of any file. It just makes the license implicit (inherited from LICENSE file in the root directory).

We are removing the headers for these reasons:

- It wastes space in editors, less code is visible in editor upon opening a file.
- It brings noise to diff of the first change of any file every year.
- It confuses Git file copy detection when creating small files.
- We don't have an explicit license header in other files (JS, CSS, images, documentation).
- Using license header in every file is not obligatory: http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new.

This change is approved by Alma Chao (Lead Open Source and IP Counsel at Facebook).

Test Plan: Verified that the license survived only in LICENSE file and that it didn't modify externals.

Reviewers: epriestley, davidrecordon

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: aran, Korvin

Maniphest Tasks: T2035

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3886
2012-11-05 11:16:51 -08:00
epriestley
7749c5abf3 Mark notifications as read in Differential if we also sent an email
Summary: See D3789. Same thing for Differential.

Test Plan: Created a new revision and made a comment. Verified reviewer got popup notifications but the in-app notifications were delivered already marked as read.

Reviewers: vrana, btrahan

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T1403

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3790
2012-10-23 12:03:11 -07:00
epriestley
29bdc3ffc5 Fix DifferentialRevisionEditor handling of actorPHID after D3645
Summary: `actorPHID` no longer gets set or exists.

Test Plan: Updated a revision without fataling.

Reviewers: btrahan, vrana

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3684
2012-10-11 14:34:16 -07:00
Bob Trahan
d9c6e07f2c If users are on the email to Phabricator, do not send them the Phabricator reply.
Summary: When we receive an email, figure out if any of the other tos and ccs are users. If they are, pass their phids through the stach as "exclude phids" and exclude them from getting the email.

Test Plan: used the various applications (audit, differential, maniphest) and noted emails were sent as expected.

Reviewers: epriestley, vrana

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran, Korvin, vrana

Maniphest Tasks: T1676

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D3645
2012-10-10 10:18:23 -07:00
epriestley
378feb3ffb Centralize rendering of application mail bodies
Summary: This is a minor quality-of-life improvement to prevent D2968 from being as nasty as it is.

Test Plan: Ran unit tests; generated Differential, Maniphest and Diffusion emails and verified the bodies looked sensible.

Reviewers: btrahan, vrana

Reviewed By: vrana

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T931

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2986
2012-07-16 19:01:43 -07:00
Keebuhm Park
c67f45734d Notification implementation for Differential
Summary: The notification implementation has been extended to Differential. Appropriate changes have been made to the Differential editors and Differential feed story.

Test Plan: Tested out various actions available for Differential and confirmed that the notifications get delivered correctly and feed is generated.

Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan

Reviewed By: epriestley

CC: allenjohnashton, ddfisher, aran, Korvin

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2696
2012-06-08 18:45:40 -07:00
vrana
6cc196a2e5 Move files in Phabricator one level up
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.

NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.

Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.

Auditors: epriestley

Maniphest Tasks: T1103
2012-06-01 12:32:44 -07:00
Renamed from src/applications/differential/editor/revision/DifferentialRevisionEditor.php (Browse further)