Test Plan:
/rX1
Browse in Diffusion
Open in Editor
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2180
Summary:
- The UI is pretty straightforward, since Handle just works (tm)
- Added two methods to the owners object to handle the new layer of
indirection. Then ran git grep PhabricatorOwnersOwner and changed
callsites as appropriate.
Sending this to get a round of feedback before I test the non-trivial
changes in this diff.
Test Plan:
- owners tool: edit, view, list for basic functionality.
- phlog for the two new methods I added
Reviewers: epriestley, blair, jungejason
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2079
Summary: NOTE: This is not produced by a script so there might be errors. Please review carefully.
Test Plan: Browse around.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2091
Summary: Last of the big final patches. Left a few debatable classes (12 out of about 400) that I'll deal with individually eventually.
Test Plan: Ran testEverythingImplemented.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1881
Summary:
- Move table to Repository, since we have no Owners joins in the application anymore but would like to do a Repository join.
- Rename "packagePHID" to "auditorPHID", since this column may contain package, project, or user PHIDs.
Test Plan:
- Browsed Owners, Audit, and Differential interfaces to the Audit tool.
- Made comments and state changes.
- Ran "reparse.php --herald --owners" on several commits.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, nh, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1787
Summary:
Allows you to write a commit rule that triggers an audit by a user (personal
rules) or a project (global rules).
Mostly this is trying to make auditing more lightweight and accessible in
environments where setting up Owners packages doesn't make sense.
For instance, Disqus wants a rule like "trigger an audit for everything that
didn't have a Differential revision". While not necessarily scalable, this is a
perfectly reasonable rule for a small company, but a lot of work to implement
with Owners (and you'll get a lot of collateral damage if you don't make every
committer a project owner).
Instead, they can create a project called 'Unreviewed Commits' and write a rule
like:
- When: Differential revision does not exist
- Action: Trigger an Audit for project: "Unreviewed Commits"
Then whoever cares can join that project and they'll see those audits in their
queue, and when they approve/raise on commits their actions will affect the
project audit.
Similarly, if I want to look at all commits that match some other rule (say,
XSS) but only want to do it like once a month, I can just set up an audit rule
and go through the queue when I feel like it.
NOTE: This abuses the 'packagePHID' field to also store user and project PHIDs.
Through the magic of handles, this (apparently) works fine for now; I'll do a
big schema patch soon but have several other edits I want to make at the same
time.
Also:
- Adds an "active" fiew for /audit/, eventually this will be like the
Differential "active" view (stuff that is relevant to you right now).
- On commits, highlight triggered audits you are responsible for.
Test Plan: Added personal and global audit triggers to Herald, reparsed some
commits with --herald, got audits. Browsed all audit interfaces to make sure
nothing exploded. Viewed a commit where I was responsible for only some audits.
Performed audits and made sure the triggers I am supposed to be responsible for
updated properly.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1690
Summary:
enable herald commit rules to have access to auditing info.
Note that the new herald condition I added contains info for the
packages. I thought about using a simpler herald condition like
"Requires audit is true or false" and let it work together with the
existing "Affected package contains any of the package". It doesn't work
because we need the info about the package to decide if the commit
requires audit, but the herald conditions work separately.
Test Plan:
- A commit requiring auditing was detected by a herald rule that checks
the auditing status
- A commit not requiring auditing was not detected by a herald rule
which checks auditing status, but was detected by a rule which doesn't
check the auditing status
Reviewers: epriestley, nh
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1399
Summary:
For each commit, find the affected packages, and provide a way to
search by package.
Test Plan:
create commits that touch and don't touch two packages, and verify
that they display correctly in all the UI pages.
Reviewers: epriestley, blair, nh, tuomaspelkonen
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: benmathews, aran, epriestley, btrahan, jungejason, mpodobnik, prithvi
Maniphest Tasks: T83
Differential Revision: 1208
Summary:
- added a new config class for representing the kind of repetition a rule has
(once, every time, first time only)
- added an email action to herald rules for differential to allow someone to get
an email but only the first one
- changed the herald rule ui to allow a user to pick the amount of repetition
Test Plan:
created a test rule and ran it over and over
Reviewed By: epriestley
Reviewers: epriestley, tuomaspelkonen
CC: aran, epriestley, gc3
Revert Plan:
Tags:
- begin *PUBLIC* platform impact section -
Bugzilla: #
- end platform impact -
Differential Revision: 357
