Summary:
Ref T2222.
I'm thinking about how I want to approach the Asana sync, and I want to try to do T2222 first so that we can build it cleanly on top of ApplicationTransactions. I think we can at least walk down this road a little bit and if it turns out to be scary we can take another approach.
I was generally very happy with how the auth migration turned out (seemingly, it was almost completely clean), and want to pursue a similar strategy here. Basically:
- Wrap the new objects in the old objects for reads/writes.
- Migrate all the existing data to the new table.
- Everything hard is done; move things over a piece at a time at a leisurely pace in lots of smallish, relatively-easy-to-understand changes.
This deletes or abstracts all reads of the DifferentialComment table. In particular, these things are **deleted**:
- The script `undo_commits.php`, which I haven't pointed anyone at in a very long time.
- The `differential.getrevisionfeedback` Conduit method, which has been marked deprecated for a year or more.
- The `/stats/` interface in Differential, which should be rebuilt on Fact and has never been exposed in the UI. It does a ton of joins and such which are prohibitively difficult to migrate.
This leaves a small number of reading interfaces, which I replaced with a new `DifferentialCommentQuery`. Some future change will make this actually load transactions and wrap them with DifferentialComment interfaces.
Test Plan: Viewed a revision; made revision comments
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: edward, chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D6260
Summary:
This was mentioned in T2928 and nobody objected.
It just references the task instead of fixing it as that would be too aggressive.
It also doesn't check assignee of the task (by purpose).
Test Plan: Created diff from a branch named T2928.
Reviewers: epriestley, edward
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2928
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5640
Summary:
Ref T2785
Looks for hosts in `conduit.servers` config and if any exist route any conduit calls through any one of the hosts.
Test Plan:
Make some curl calls to public methods (`conduit.ping`), watch the access log for two requests. Make some calls from the UI that require authentication, watch the access log a bit more.
Also ran the unit tests.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T2785
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5970
Summary: Randomly displaying tips about different features of arc.
Test Plan: Will test by running arc diff and seeing if the tips appear in text-based UI of arc
Reviewers: epriestley, AnhNhan
Reviewed By: AnhNhan
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5351
Summary: Same as the title
Test Plan: Will test locally by running arc diff
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, AnhNhan, starruler
Maniphest Tasks: T2663
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5297
Summary: Fixes T2698. When applications are installed, their Conduit calls should drop out. This will also let us land Releeph without exposing Conduit calls.
Test Plan:
- Viewed Conduit console; uninstalled some applications and verified their calls dropped out.
- Tried to make an uninstalled call; got an appropriate error.
Reviewers: edward, btrahan
Reviewed By: edward
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2698
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5302
Summary: Ported the the loadAuxiliaryfields method from differential.getrevision method to modern conduit differential.query method
Test Plan: Created a test diff in differential to see if nothing has been broken
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5230
Summary:
Unmuck almost all of the we-sort-of-have-viewers-some-of-the-time mess.
There are a few notable cases here:
- I used Omnipotent users when indexing objects for search. I think this is correct; we do policy filtering when showing results.
- I cheated in a bad way in the Remarkup object rule, but fixing this requires fixing all the PhabricatorRemarkupEngine callsites (there are 85). I'll do that in the next diff.
- I cheated in a few random places, like when sending mail about package edits. These aren't a big deal.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for all PhabricatorObjectHandleData references.
- Gave them viewers.
Reviewers: vrana
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, edward
Maniphest Tasks: T603
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5151
Summary: Mostly applies a new call spacing rule; also a few things that have slipped through via pull requests and such
Test Plan: `find src/ -type f -name '*.php' | xargs -n16 arc lint --output summary --apply-patches`
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D5002
Summary:
After D4825, this information is often available to us in a safe way. Provide it explictly.
This removes or reduces functionality in some cases, but I think we can plug those holes with Conpherence addresses and/or explicit user acknowledgement/config.
Test Plan: Patched a commit with `arc patch` and got the original address out.
Reviewers: btrahan, edward, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4828
Summary: Used only by Facebook.
Test Plan: Moved to Facebook repo and verified it still works.
Reviewers: nh, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D4515
