Summary: Fixes T7680. Make it so the listen behavior can be initialized multiple times from the server by having the behavior only update a few static data variables on subsequent initializations.
Test Plan:
visited TX with user A and left a comment with user B and got the "reload" and "TX updated" bubbles.
Reloaded and navigated to /maniphest/ with user A and had user B leave another comment on TX - no "reload" bubble and correct "TX updated" bubble.
Navigated to TX again with user A and had user B leave a comment and got the "reload" and "TX updated" bubbles.
visited TX with user A and left a comment with user B and got the "reload" and "TX updated" bubbles. navigated away with user A and the "reload" bubble was automagically closed.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7680
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12448
Summary: Ref T7573. I only got this reproducing like 10% of the time in Firefox but I can't reproduce it anymore after this change.
Test Plan:
- Added some logging.
- Saw Firefox handing us nonsense state values (?)
- Read the Firefox documentation?
- Maybe state is expected to be an object? This shouldn't matter?
- I don't really know?
iiam
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12485
Summary: Ref D12448. Ref T7573. This changes quicksand up a bit so rather than caching just rendered HTML we also cache the initial response from the server. We also fire off a quicksand-redraw event which will let things like the page objects for notifications update correctly while using Quicksand (see D12448).
Test Plan: loaded up /p/btrahan/ Clicked the UI elements to navigate to various profile views up to maniphest. clicked back until back at /p/btrahan/ and it worked. clicked forward until all the way back to maniphest and it worked. clicked back 2x, then clicked new links, then back and it worked
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7573
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12449
Summary: Ref T4100. This integration into the "Browse" dialog is probably a little more heavy-handed than we should shoot for.
Test Plan:
{F377131}
{F377132}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12482
Summary: See {T7830}
Test Plan: I manually set this to `5` in Chrome inspector and checked a few pages.
Reviewers: chad, #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12481
Summary: Just adds some space, color.
Test Plan: test a long browse list
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12471
Summary: Ref T4100. Support viewer(), members(), and add a new none().
Test Plan:
- Used all new functions.
- Batch edited tasks with unassign action.
- Saved a query from master, upgrade it to this patch, checkbox migrated cleanly into a "no one" token.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12470
Summary: Ref T4100. Let datasources specify a more meaningful title than the class name.
Test Plan: Browsed some sources.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12469
Summary:
Ref T4100. This just makes the "specify stuff in query parameters" workflow a little better:
- You can now do `?projects=differential,diffusion`.
- You can now do `?projects=projects(alincoln)`.
Test Plan: Did that stuff ^^^^
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12468
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. This implements these fields in one mega-field:
- Projects
- Not in projects
- In any project
- Include results in no projects
- In users' projects
Hopefully, this is a step in the right direction.
Test Plan: {F375555}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: joshuaspence, chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12463
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. This allows you to execute all "Projects", "Any Project", "Not in projects" and "include no projects" operations in one field.
It doesn't actually implement such a field yet.
Test Plan: {F375516}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5595, T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12460
Summary: Ref T4100. Implement members() in terms of the real projects datasource.
Test Plan: Used members() functions in Differential, browsed members() functions.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12459
Summary:
Ref T4100. This is like members(), but is implemented on top of the raw datasource. This is a lot simpler and involves way less code duplication.
I'll go back and implement members() like this, too.
Nothing actually uses this yet.
Test Plan:
- Used browse view to browse datasource.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12458
Summary:
Ref T4100. I want to reduce the amount of code duplication that function datasources currently need to wrap some parameter datasource.
For example, `ProjectMembersDatasource` should really just be a little bit of logic on top of `ProjectsDatasource`, which should do most of the heavy lifting.
Moving rendering into datasources brings us a step closer to being able to do this.
Test Plan:
- Rendered normal, function, and invalid tokens.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12457
Summary:
Ref T4100. I can simplify the logic a bit here by moving some rendering into the datasources, but a few TokenizerControls currently don't have datasources.
Require datasources and always provide datasources.
Test Plan:
- Used previously-datasourceless controls (e.g., "Add Reviewers").
- Used normal controls.
- Manually verified that no other controls are missing datasources.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12456
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. This allows PolicyAwareQuery to write all the logic for AND, OR, NOT, and NULL (i.e., "not in any projects") queries against any edge type.
It accepts an edge type and a list of constraints (which are basically just operator-value pairs, like `<NOT, PHID-X-Y>`, meaning the results must not have an edge connecting them to `PHID-X-Y`).
This doesn't actually do anything yet; see future diffs.
Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12455
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595. These functions are trivial for now, but move us toward being able to define more default query behavior by default.
Future changes will give these methods meaningful, nontrivial behaviors.
Test Plan: `arc unit --everything`
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5595, T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12454
Summary:
Ref T4100. Ref T5595.
To support a unified "Projects:" query across all applications, a future diff is going to add a set of "Edge Logic" capabilities to `PolicyAwareQuery` which write the required SELECT, JOIN, WHERE, HAVING and GROUP clauses for you.
With the addition of "Edge Logic", we'll have three systems which may need to build components of query claues: ordering/paging, customfields/applicationsearch, and edge logic.
For most clauses, queries don't currently call into the parent explicitly to get default components. I want to move more query construction logic up the class tree so it can be shared.
For most methods, this isn't a problem, but many subclasses define a `buildWhereClause()`. Make all such definitions protected and consistent.
This causes no behavioral changes.
Test Plan: Ran `arc unit --everything`, which does a pretty through job of verifying this statically.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: yelirekim, hach-que, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100, T5595
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12453
Summary:
See some earlier discussion in D11593:
> One thing I'm vaguely thinking about is the possibilty that users may be able to invoice one another directly, eventually. For example, we might invoice a contracting client.
> We might need an `isInvoice` flag eventually, but `subscriptionPHID` is a reasonable stand-in for now.
This adds such a flag.
Test Plan:
- Generated an ad-hoc invoice and verified it showed up in the right place.
- Used `bin/phortune invoice` to invoice a subscription and verified it worked correctly.
- Paid an invoice and saw it leave "pending invoices" status.
{F377029}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12480
Summary:
This allows a merchant to send a user an invoice for something arbitrary, like services rendered.
Two major missing parts:
- These don't actually get marked as invoices. I'll fix that in the next diff, but it's not entirely trivial because `subscriptionPHID` is currently overloaded to also mean "is invoice".
- We don't send email automatically. I don't plan to fix that for now, since all our invoicing needs are covered by personal email.
Test Plan:
Merchants have a new "new invoice" option:
{F376999}
This leads to selecting a user and account, and then you can generate the invoice (only one actual "purchase" / line item for the moment). You can add a longer-form remarkup description to contextualize the billable items:
{F377001}
This sends the invoice and takes you to the merchant order overview screen:
{F377002}
For now, you copy/paste that link into a nice personal enterprisey business-to-business email; the recipient sees this:
{F377003}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12478
Summary:
Ref T5523. Adds a new workflow to make some kinds of bulk workboard operations easier.
New dropdown action:
{F376848}
This brings you into the existing bulk edit flow:
{F376849}
When you save an edit, you're taken back to the board:
{F376850}
If you try to edit a column with nothing in it, you get an error:
{F376851}
Note that the selected workboard filter is applied before choosing tasks, so if your filter is set to "open tasks" we only batch edit the open (i.e., currently visible) tasks in the column. I think this is more powerful (it lets you use filtering to select task subsets) but might not be completely obvious in all cases (although I do think it's more obvious than the alternative rule -- just an issue of neither rule being completely obvious).
Test Plan:
- Batch edited tasks in a column.
- Used "Batch Edit Tasks..." to move tasks to a different workboard by removing + adding a project.
- Batch edited a column with filtered-out tasks, verified only visible tasks were edited.
- Batch edited a column with no visible tasks, received error.
- Used the batch editor normally (Maniphest -> Maniphest, no boards).
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: johnny-bit, cburroughs, epriestley
Projects: #prioritized
Maniphest Tasks: T5523
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12475
Summary: These values aren't always provided. They should be, but just make things work for now.
Test Plan:
- Edited a task.
- Selected "Custom Policy" for "Edit Policy".
- Configured a policy like "Users: dog".
- Saved policy.
- Selected "Custom Policy" again to edit the policy.
- Before patch: tokenizer fails to render with an error (`config.types` is not an object).
- After patch: tokenizer renders properly, albeit with a missing icon.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12477
Summary: Uses shades for token colors, makes function tokens white/blue.
Test Plan:
Used the new tokens in UIExamples, Differential.
{F376191}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12465
Summary:
Ref T4100. See D12465.
- Instead of putting CSS color classes on the tokenizer icons, put them on the container tags.
- Note that this removes the "bluegrey" default classes.
- This doesn't actually add CSS for the classes so, e.g., "green" doesn't make things green yet. This just supports D12465.
Test Plan: Viewed markup, saw classes.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12467
Summary: Fixes T7830. Moves the callout to sit under the main header, which resolved Differential issues and Durable Column issues, but still some extra CSS shenanigans.
Test Plan:
Test lots of pages, Home, Dashboards, Conpherence, Durable Column, Inline Diff Replies, Mobile, Workboards, etc.
{F375821}
{F375822}
{F375823}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7830
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12466
Summary: This accidentally got disabled; we need to pull one more result that we'll use to tell if there's a next page.
Test Plan: Saw "more results" again.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12461
Summary: Moves the Browse... button into a Search Icon on the actual tokenizer. I played with a number of icon treatments, and Search seems to convey the right attribute, other things like lists and menus didn't quite feel right to me, but feel free to push back if you hate search.
Test Plan:
Tested lots of tokens, little tokens, small screens, etc.
{F375467}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12452
Summary: Ref T4100. This restores the simpler behavior. See discussion in T4100#107445
Test Plan: Used Differential search, saw my token.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12447
Summary:
Ref T4100. Overall:
- Use token background color to communicate token type (blue = object, yellow = function, grey = disabled/closed, red = invalid).
- Use token icon color to make color choices consistent (specifically, use project icon colors in project tokens).
- For functions, use token icon to communicate function result type (e.g., viewer() has a user icon; members(...) has a group icon), since we don't need the icon to indicate "this is a function" anymore.
Test Plan:
{F374615}
{F374616}
{F374617}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12446
Summary:
Ref T4100. This is still a bit rough around the edges, but mostly does what we're after.
- Implements viewer() and members(...) functions.
- The new browse workflow makes these discoverable.
Test Plan: {F374201}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: chad, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T4100
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12444
Summary: Ref T5750. This makes browse work for all of the dynamic tokenizers in Herald, Policies, batch editor, etc.
Test Plan: Used tokenizers in Herald, Policies, Batch editor.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12442
Summary: Ref T5750. This adds a basic browse view. Design is a bit rough, see T7841 for some screenshots.
Test Plan: Used browse view to add tokens to tokenizers.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12441
Summary:
Ref T5750. These are a pain to modernize and most don't matter, so cheat:
- Mark a bunch nonbrowsable, including some that probably should be browsable but which I don't want to deal with for now.
- For static datasources, add an easy server-side filter (this isn't really cheating, and is appropriate for the status/priority/application datasources).
- Make composite sources browsable if their components are browsable.
Test Plan:
- Tried to browse an unbrowsable source, got a 404.
- Browsed a composite source.
- Browsed static sources (priority/status/applications).
- Browsed normal sources (people/projects).
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12438
Summary: Ref T5750. Make browsing work and improve filtering.
Test Plan:
- Used browse UI.
- Used normal search UI.
{F373752}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12434
Summary: Ref T5750. Update the Almanac service query to be browsable.
Test Plan:
- Browsed and reordered Diffusion.
- Browsed and reordered services in Almanac.
{F373735}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12433
Summary:
Ref T5750. Same deal as D12427, but for projects.
(As before, mostly making the empty/browse view work instead of return nothing.)
Test Plan: {F372353}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12428
Summary: Ref T5750. Fix this query so it works better with the browse view. In particular, make it return results before the user types a query.
Test Plan:
- Used a people tokenizer.
- Used global search tokenizer to search for people.
- Ran new version of query in production to make sure it wasn't crazy.
- Browsed through results in browse view.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12427
Summary: Ref T5750. This adds a search filter which filters results (kind of: a lot of datasources don't do a great job with this right now -- but the correct data is sent to the server).
Test Plan: {F372313}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12426
Summary: Ref T5750. Adds a working "more results". Hard limits at 1000 results to mitigate the amount of trouble offset paging can get us into.
Test Plan:
Artificially set hard limit down; clicked through results.
{F372284}
{F372285}
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12425
Summary: Ref T5750. Move the server-side token rendering code to a shared location and use it in the browse view.
Test Plan: {F372252}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12424
Summary:
Ref T5750. Give up and use offset paging.
Each page will become progressively slower, but the amount of time I was sinking into T7803 without making real headway was not justified by fixing this. In comparison, this took 10 minutes. It isn't really useful to browse through tens of thousands of results anyway, and no one is realistically going to try to do that (later in this sequence, I'll explicitly prevent it).
Test Plan:
This is completely primitive right now:
{F372224}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
Subscribers: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T5750
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12423
Summary: Fixes T7840. Add some unit tests. One explicitly covers the case in T7840. Other cases are "base" cases for rooms and threads, plus the version if T7840 for a thread, where a policy exception should be thrown.
Test Plan: `arc unit` and was able to successfully add a file to a conpherence room i did not have edit permissions on
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T7840
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12443
Summary: I collapsed this into the incorrect rule
Test Plan: Test tablet and mobile breakpoints
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D12437
