1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://we.phorge.it/source/phorge.git synced 2024-11-15 11:22:40 +01:00
Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joshua Spence
b4d7a9de39 Simplify the implementation of PhabricatorPolicyCapability subclasses
Summary: Instead of implementing the `getCapabilityKey` method in all subclasses of `PhabricatorPolicyCapability`, provide a `final` implementation in the base class which uses reflection. See D9837 and D9985 for similar implementations.

Test Plan: N/A

Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10039
2014-07-25 08:25:42 +10:00
Joshua Spence
c34de83619 Rename policy capabilities
Summary: Ref T5655. Rename `PhabricatorPolicyCapability` subclasses for consistency.

Test Plan: Browsed a few applications, nothing seemed broken.

Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley

Subscribers: epriestley, Korvin, hach-que

Maniphest Tasks: T5655

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D10037
2014-07-25 08:20:39 +10:00
epriestley
f4582dc49d Allow "Default View" policies to be set to Public
Summary: Ref T603. Currently, we hard-code defense against setting policies to "Public" in several places, and special case only the CAN_VIEW policy. In fact, other policies (like Default View) should also be able to be set to public. Instead of hard-coding this, move it to the capability definitions.

Test Plan: Set default view policy in Maniphest to "Public", created a task, verified default policy.

Reviewers: btrahan, asherkin

Reviewed By: asherkin

CC: asherkin, aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7276
2013-10-09 15:06:18 -07:00
epriestley
436a403357 Add a "default view" policy to Differential
Summary:
Ref T603. Allows the Differential view policy to be configured with a default.

I've omitted "edit" because I want to wait and see how comment/comment-action policies work out. I could imagine locking "edit" down to only the owner at some point, and providing a wider "interact" capability, or something like that, which would cover accept/reject/commandeer. Users in this group could still edit indirectly by commandeering first.

Test Plan: Created new revisions from the CLI and conduit.

Reviewers: btrahan

Reviewed By: btrahan

CC: aran

Maniphest Tasks: T603

Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7269
2013-10-09 13:58:00 -07:00