Test Plan:
Altered database.
Wrote a custom translation and selected it in preferences.
Verified that the text is custom translated.
Set language back to default.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2757
Summary: Made it possible to link and unlink LDAP accounts with Phabricator accounts.
Test Plan:
I've tested this code locally and in production where I work.
I've tried creating an account from scratch by logging in with LDAP and linking and unlinking an LDAP account with an existing account. I've tried to associate the same LDAP account with different Phabricator accounts and it failed as expected.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin, auduny, svemir
Maniphest Tasks: T742
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2722
Summary: We allow ".", "_" and "-" in usernames now, but not in the route.
Test Plan: Went to /p/.-_/, got 404'd at the route level before and now make it to the profile controller.
Reviewers: vrana, btrahan
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1348
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2729
Test Plan: Displayed e-mail preferences with and without multiplexing.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2699
Summary:
Give them a big essay about how it's dangerous, but allow them to do it formally.
Because the username is part of the password salt, users must change their passwords after a username change.
Make password reset links work for already-logged-in-users since there's no reason not to (if you have a reset link, you can log out and use it) and it's much less confusing if you get this email and are already logged in.
Depends on: D2651
Test Plan: Changed a user's username to all kinds of crazy things. Clicked reset links in email. Tried to make invalid/nonsense name changes.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1303
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2657
Summary:
See T1303, which presents a reasonable case for inclusion of these characters in valid usernames.
Also, unify username validity handling.
Test Plan: Created a new user with a valid name. Tried to create a new user with an invalid name. Ran unit tests.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1303
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2651
Summary:
See https://github.com/facebook/phabricator/issues/117
- The $user save can hit a duplicate key exception like the email, but we don't handle it correctly.
- When the $user saves but the $email does not, the $user is left with a (rolled-back, invalid) ID. This makes the UI glitch out a bit. Wipe the ID if we abort the transaction.
- We show the "Required" star marker even if the email is filled in.
The ID issue is sort of a general problem, but I think it's fairly rare: you must be doing inserts on related objects and the caller must catch the transaction failure and attempt to handle it in some way.
I can think of three approaches:
- Manually "roll back" the objects inside the transaction, as here. Seems OK if this really is a rare problem.
- Automatically roll back the 'id' and 'phid' columns (if they exist). Seems reasonable but maybe more complicated than necessary. Won't get every case right. For instance, if we inserted a third object here and that failed, $email would still have the userPHID set.
- Automatically roll back the entire object. We can do this by cloning all the writable fields. Seems like it might be way too magical, but maybe the right solution? Might have weird bugs with nonwritable fields and other random stuff.
We can trigger the rollback by storing objects we updated on the transaction, and either throwing them away or rolling them back on saveTransaction() / killTransaction().
These fancier approaches all seem to have some tradeoffs though, and I don't think we need to pick one yet, since this has only caused problems in one case.
Test Plan: Tried to create a new user (via People -> Create New User) with a duplicate username. Got a proper UI message with no exception and no UI glitchiness.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, hgrimberg, hgrimberg01
Reviewed By: hgrimberg01
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2650
Summary:
- `kill_init.php` said "Moving 1000 files" - I hope that this is not some limit in `FileFinder`.
- [src/infrastructure/celerity] `git mv utils.php map.php; git mv api/utils.php api.php`
- Comment `phutil_libraries` in `.arcconfig` and run `arc liberate`.
NOTE: `arc diff` timed out so I'm pushing it without review.
Test Plan:
/D1234
Browsed around, especially in `applications/repository/worker/commitchangeparser` and `applications/` in general.
Auditors: epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T1103
Summary: This is an example of code simplification with D2557.
Test Plan: Display user list, verify the SQL queries.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2558
Summary:
Allow allowed email addresses to be restricted to certain domains. This implies email must be verified.
This probably isn't QUITE ready for prime-time without a few other tweaks (better administrative tools, notably) but we're nearly there.
Test Plan:
- With no restrictions:
- Registered with OAuth
- Created an account with accountadmin
- Added an email
- With restrictions:
- Tried to OAuth register with a restricted address, was prompted to provide a valid one.
- Tried to OAuth register with a valid address, worked fine.
- Tried to accountadmin a restricted address, got blocked.
- Tried to accountadmin a valid address, worked fine.
- Tried to add a restricted address, blocked.
- Tried to add a valid address, worked fine.
- Created a user with People with an invalid address, got blocked.
- Created a user with People with a valid address, worked fine.
Reviewers: btrahan, csilvers
Reviewed By: csilvers
CC: aran, joe, csilvers
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2581
Summary:
- We currently have some bugs in account creation due to nontransactional user/email editing.
- We save $user, then try to save $email. This may fail for various reasons, commonly because the email isn't unique.
- This leaves us with a $user with no email.
- Also, logging of edits is somewhat inconsistent across various edit mechanisms.
- Move all editing to a `PhabricatorUserEditor` class.
- Handle some broken-data cases more gracefully.
Test Plan:
- Created and edited a user with `accountadmin`.
- Created a user with `add_user.php`
- Created and edited a user with People editor.
- Created a user with OAuth.
- Edited user information via Settings.
- Tried to create an OAuth user with a duplicate email address, got a proper error.
- Tried to create a user via People with a duplicate email address, got a proper error.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: tberman, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2569
Summary:
- If you have an unverified primary email, we show a disabled "Primary" button right now in the "Status" column. Instead we should show an enabled "Verify" button, to allow you to re-send the verification email.
- Sort addresses in a predictable way.
Test Plan:
- Added, verified and removed a secondary email address.
- Resent verification email for primary address.
- Changed primary address.
Reviewers: btrahan, csilvers
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2548
Summary:
Since user emails aren't in the user table, we had to do extra data fetching
for handles, and the emails are only used in MetaMTA, so we move the email
code into MetaMTA and remove it from handles.
Test Plan: send test emails
Reviewers: jungejason, vrana, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2494
Summary:
Allow installs to require users to verify email addresses before they can use Phabricator. If a user logs in without a verified email address, they're given instructions to verify their address.
This isn't too useful on its own since we don't actually have arbitrary email registration, but the next step is to allow installs to restrict email to only some domains (e.g., @mycompany.com).
Test Plan:
- Verification
- Set verification requirement to `true`.
- Tried to use Phabricator with an unverified account, was told to verify.
- Tried to use Conduit, was given a verification error.
- Verified account, used Phabricator.
- Unverified account, reset password, verified implicit verification, used Phabricator.
- People Admin Interface
- Viewed as admin. Clicked "Administrate User".
- Viewed as non-admin
- Sanity Checks
- Used Conduit normally from web/CLI with a verified account.
- Logged in/out.
- Sent password reset email.
- Created a new user.
- Logged in with an unverified user but with the configuration set to off.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, csilvers
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2520
Summary: we need a user (the viewer in this case) for the status to render correctly with respect to timezone
Test Plan: my profile no longer fatals with an away status
Reviewers: davidreuss, vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2504
Summary:
This is not so general as `getRequiredHandlePHIDs()`.
It allows bulk loading of user statuses only in revision list.
It also loads data in `render()`. I'm not sure if it's OK.
Maybe we can use the colorful point here.
Or maybe some unicode symbol?
Test Plan: {F11451, size=full}
Reviewers: btrahan, epriestley
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2484
Summary:
I want to use this to warn user if he specifies reviewers that are away.
We can also implement a general query method but I think that this usage is the
most useful not only for me but also in general case.
Test Plan:
Call the method for user which is away and which is not away.
Add user status through Conduit.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2492
Summary:
also fix some bugs where we weren't properly capturing the expiry value or scope of access tokens.
This code isn't the cleanest as some providers don't confirm what scope you've been granted. In that case, assume the access token is of the minimum scope Phabricator requires. This seems more useful to me as only Phabricator at the moment really easily / consistently lets the user increase / decrease the granted scope so its basically always the correct assumption at the time we make it.
Test Plan: linked and unlinked Phabricator, Github, Disqus and Facebook accounts from Phabricator instaneces
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: zeeg, aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1110
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2431
Summary: specify user table to make things not ambiguous
Test Plan: conduit console still works, including ID query...!
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1075
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2419
Summary:
- Move email to a separate table.
- Migrate existing email to new storage.
- Allow users to add and remove email addresses.
- Allow users to verify email addresses.
- Allow users to change their primary email address.
- Convert all the registration/reset/login code to understand these changes.
- There are a few security considerations here but I think I've addressed them. Principally, it is important to never let a user acquire a verified email address they don't actually own. We ensure this by tightening the scoping of token generation rules to be (user, email) specific.
- This should have essentially zero impact on Facebook, but may require some minor changes in the registration code -- I don't exactly remember how it is set up.
Not included here (next steps):
- Allow configuration to restrict email to certain domains.
- Allow configuration to require validated email.
Test Plan:
This is a fairly extensive, difficult-to-test change.
- From "Email Addresses" interface:
- Added new email (verified email verifications sent).
- Changed primary email (verified old/new notificactions sent).
- Resent verification emails (verified they sent).
- Removed email.
- Tried to add already-owned email.
- Created new users with "accountadmin". Edited existing users with "accountadmin".
- Created new users with "add_user.php".
- Created new users with web interface.
- Clicked welcome email link, verified it verified email.
- Reset password.
- Linked/unlinked oauth accounts.
- Logged in with oauth account.
- Logged in with email.
- Registered with Oauth account.
- Tried to register with OAuth account with duplicate email.
- Verified errors for email verification with bad tokens, etc.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1184
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2393
Summary: The various interfaces here are in conflict about what a role is and isn't. Make them all consistent.
Test Plan: Edited some users into various roles, verified they reported correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1190
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2415
Summary:
I will use it for highlighting users which are not currently available.
Maybe I will also use it in the nagging tool.
I don't plan creating a UI for it as API is currently enough for us.
Maybe I will visualize it at /calendar/ later.
I plan creating `user.deletestatus` method when this one will be done.
Test Plan:
`storage upgrade`
Call Conduit `user.addstatus`.
Verify DB.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2382
Summary: basically by validating we have good user data when we set the user data.
Test Plan: simulated a failure from a phabricator on phabricator oauth scenario. viewed ui that correctly told me there was an error with the provider and to try again.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1077
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2337
Summary:
This is mostly in an effort to simplify D2323. Currently, we load one image into the database by default. This is a weird special case that makes things more complicated than necessary.
Instead, use a disk-based default avatar.
Test Plan: Verified that a user without an image appears with the default avatar as a handle, in profile settings, and on their person page.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, edward, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T345
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2331
Summary: "Committed" is SVN-specific language, and confusing in Git and Mercurial. Use neutral language instead.
Test Plan: Inspection.
Reviewers: btrahan, Makinde, vrana, jungejason
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T909
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2087
Summary:
We will need it for intl.
I've put it to User instead of UserProfile to be easier accessible.
Test Plan:
Apply SQL patch.
Change sex to Male.
Change sex to Unknown.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, Koolvin
Maniphest Tasks: T1139
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2287
Summary:
- Add an explicit multiplexing option, and enable it by default. This is necessary for Mail.app to coexist with other clients ("Re:" breaks outlook at the very least, and generally sucks in the common case), and allows users with flexible clients to enable subject variance.
- Add an option for subject line variance. Default to not varying the subject, so mail no longer says [Committed], [Closed], etc. This is so the defaults thread correctly in Gmail (not entirely sure this actually works).
- Add a preference to enable subject line variance.
- Unless all mail is multiplexed, don't enable or respect the "Re" or "vary subject" preferences. These are currently shown and respected in non-multiplex cases, which creates inconsistent results.
NOTE: @jungejason @nh @vrana This changes the default behavior (from non-multiplexing to multiplexing), and might break Facebook's integration. You should be able to keep the same behavior by setting the options appropriately, although if you can get the new defaults working they're probably better.
Test Plan:
Send mail from Maniphest, Differential and Audit. Updated preferences. Enabled/disabled multiplexing. Things seem OK?
NOTE: I haven't actually been able to repro the Gmail threading issue so I'm not totally sure what's going on there, maybe it started respecting "Re:" (or always has), but @cpiro and @20after4 both reported it independently. This fixes a bunch of bugs in any case and gives us more conservative set of defaults.
I'll see if I can buff out the Gmail story a bit but every client is basically a giant black box of mystery. :/
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: cpiro, 20after4, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T1097, T847
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2206
Summary:
I've considered that user may have set editor but not checked out Phabricator repositories.
But stack trace is useful mainly for developers.
Test Plan:
Click on path in Unhandled Exception.
Repeat with disabled editor.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2107
Summary:
turns out both github and Phabricator fall back to if the user already has a login session when accessing the pertinent profile picture data. Facebook on the other hand is a stingy bastard about have an actual access token. Ergo, in production (once I could test Facebook) this button failed.
The patch sets the access token properly such that the provider can use it properly when retrieving the profile image.
Test Plan: re-did my meta-Phabricator test and it still passed. setup my phabricator dev instance for Facebook OAuth (created a test app and everything... :/ ) and it worked end to end.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T870
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1986
Summary:
Resolves T989
- users can now disable the '/' keyboard shortcut which focuses the
search box
- users can now disable the jump nav functionality of the search box
Test Plan:
- verified that the '/' keyboard shortcut works with preference enabled
or unset
- verified that '/' no longer has any effect and disappears from
keyboard shortcuts help overlay with preference disabled
- verified that search boxes have jump nav capabilities with jump nav
functionality preference unset or enabled
- verified that search boxes do not jump with jump nav preference
disabled
- verified that the jump nav still works as a jump nav with jump nav
preference disabled
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: simpkins, aran, epriestley, vrana
Maniphest Tasks: T989
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1902
Summary:
We give you a pretty bad error right now if your server doesn't have, say, png support, saying "only png is supportd loololloo".
Instead, show you which formats are supported in the error messsage, and tell you upfront.
Test Plan: Tried to upload supported and unsupported images, got appropriate errors and supported format text.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T981
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1894
Summary: Last of the big final patches. Left a few debatable classes (12 out of about 400) that I'll deal with individually eventually.
Test Plan: Ran testEverythingImplemented.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1881
Summary:
These are all unambiguously unextensible. Issues I hit:
- Maniphest Change/Diff controllers, just consolidated them.
- Some search controllers incorrectly extend from "Search" but should extend from "SearchBase". This has no runtime effects.
- D1836 introduced a closure, which we don't handle correctly (somewhat on purpose; we target PHP 5.2). See T962.
Test Plan: Ran "testEverythingImplemented" unit test to identify classes extending from `final` classes. Resolved issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T795
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1843
Summary:
We can drive this query better from the Audit tool now; get rid of the Diffusion
version.
Preserve usernames in URIs as per T900.
Test Plan: Clicked "Commits" from profile. Browsed audit commit filters.
Reviewers: btrahan, jungejason
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1713
Summary:
A few similar requests have come in across several tools and use cases that I
think this does a reasonable job of resolving.
We currently send one email for each update an object receives, but these aren't
always appreciated:
- Asana does post-commit review via Differential, so the "committed" mails are
useless.
- Quora wants to make project category edits to bugs without spamming people
attached to them.
- Some users in general are very sensitive to email volumes, and this gives us
a good way to reduce the volumes without incurring the complexity of
delayed-send-batching.
The technical mechanism is basically:
- Mail may optionally have "mail tags", which indicate content in the mail
(e.g., "maniphest-priority, maniphest-cc, maniphest-comment" for a mail which
contains a priority change, a CC change, and a comment).
- If a mail has tags, remove any recipients who have opted out of all the
tags.
- Some tags can't be opted out of via the UI, so this ensures that important
email is still delivered (e.g., cc + assign + comment is always delivered
because you can't opt out of "assign" or "comment").
Test Plan:
- Disabled all mail tags in the web UI.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag, it was
immediately dropped.
- Used test console to send myself mail with an opt-outable tag and a custom
tag, it was delivered.
- Made Differential updates affecting CCs with and without comments, got
appropriate delivery.
- Made Maniphest updates affecting project, priority and CCs with and without
comments, got appropriate delivery.
- Verified mail headers in all cases.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, moskov
Maniphest Tasks: T616, T855
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1635
Summary: Provide some documentation for this feature since it's not super
obvious how it works.
Test Plan: Generated documentation, read documentation.
Reviewers: btrahan, vrana, jungejason, nh
Reviewed By: vrana
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1521
