Test Plan: Display revision list both with last reviewer and without.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, Koolvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2495
Summary:
I've tried colors, italics, strike-through and this is a compromise between me and @leebyron.
NOTE: I don't want to disturb @epriestley from playing Diablo 3.
Test Plan: {F11439, size=full}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley, leebyron
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D2481
Summary:
Currently, we sort all results alphabetically. This isn't ideal. Instead, sort them like this:
- If the viewing user appears in the list, always sort them first. This is common in a lot of contexts and some "Ben Evans" guy is sorting first on secure.phabricator.com and causing me no end of aggravation.
- If the tokens match a "priority" component (e.g., username), sort that before results which do not have a "priority" match.
- Within a group (self, priority, everything else) sort tokens alphabetically.
NOTE: I need to go add setUser() to all the tokenizers to make the "self" rule work, but that's trivial so I figured I'd get this out first.
Test Plan:
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/4s2a72l5hhyyqqkq4bnd/PHID-FILE-x2r6ubk7s7dz54kxmtwx/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.03_AM.png
Previously, "aaaaaepriestley" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "epriestley" (the viewing user). Now, "epriestley" sorts first because that is the viewer.
https://secure.phabricator.com/file/data/rmnxgnafz42f23fsjwui/PHID-FILE-yrnn55jl3ysbntldq3af/Screen_Shot_2012-03-07_at_9.18.09_AM.png
Previously, "aaaagopher" (first alphabetic match) would sort before "banana" (the "priority" match). Now, "banana" sorts first because it priority matches on username.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T946
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1807
Summary:
Adds an optional "Auditors" field (like "Reviewers") to commit messages which gives installs a zero-config method for making audit requests.
This field does not appear on templates unless set, and is mostly ignored (but validated and preserved) by Differential.
It is then parsed by the daemons if present, and audit requests are pushed to valid users.
Test Plan: Made an "Auditors" commit and verified it was retained with "arc amend --show". Pushed it and verified the audit was triggered.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T904, T880
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1793
Summary:
Displaying reviewer who was by coincidence listed first is quite confusing, especially for committed revisions.
This displays the one who really reviewed the revision if available.
This implementation is pretty bad from performance perspective - O(N) queries to retrieve all comments.
The page load still feels quite fast.
Test Plan: /differential/filter/revisions/
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: aran, epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1772
Summary:
Build the revision list table out of custom fields instead of hard-coding it, so
installs can add all sorts of zany things to it.
NOTE: You may need to implement sortFieldsForRevisionList() if you have a custom
DifferentialFieldSelector, or some fields might show up out of order.
This implementation will preserve the expected behavior:
public function sortFieldsForRevisionList(array $fields) {
$default = new DifferentialDefaultFieldSelector();
return $default->sortFieldsForRevisionList($fields);
}
Test Plan:
- Loaded differential revision list, identical to old list.
- Profiled page to verify the cost increase isn't significant (it's quite
small).
Reviewers: jungejason, btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, btrahan, davidreuss, epriestley
Maniphest Tasks: T773, T729
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D1388
Summary:
I think this is the last major step -- use the fields to parse commit messages,
not a hard-coded list of stuff. This adds two primary methods to fields, one to
get all the labels they'll parse (so we can do "CC" and "CCs" and treat them as
the same field) and one to parse the string into a canonical representation
(e.g., lookup reviewers and such).
You'll need to impelement the one block of task-specific stuff I removed in
Facebook's task field:
list($pre_comment) = split(' -- ', $data);
$data = array_filter(preg_split('/[^\d]+/', $pre_comment));
foreach ($data as $k => $v) {
$data[$k] = (int)$v;
}
$data = array_unique($data);
break;
Otherwise I think this is clean.
Test Plan:
- Called the conduit method with various commit messages, parsed fields/errors
seemed correct.
- "arc diff"'d this diff onto localhost, then updated it.
- "arc amend"'d this diff.
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
Reviewed By: jungejason
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 829
Summary:
When rendering commit messages, drive all the logic through field specification
classes instead of the hard-coded DifferentialCommitMessageData class. This
removes DifferentialCommitMessageData and support classes.
Note that this effectively reverts D546, and will cause a minor break for
Facebook (Task IDs will no longer render in commit messages generated by "arc
amend", and will not be editable via "arc diff --edit"). This can be resolved by
implementing the feature as a custom field. While I've been able to preserve the
task ID functionality elsewhere, I felt this implementation was too complex to
reasonably leave hooks for, and the break is pretty minor.
Test Plan:
- Made numerous calls to differential.getcommitmessage across many diffs in
various states, with and without 'edit' and with and without various field
overrides.
- General behavior seems correct (messages look accurate, and have the
expected information). Special fields like "Reviewed By" and "git-svn-id" seem
to work correctly.
- Edit behavior seems correct (edit mode shows all editable fields, hides
fields like "Reviewed By").
- Field overwrite behavior seems correct (overwritable fields show the correct
values when overwritten, ignore provided values otherwise).
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 814
Summary:
When we create or update a revision, we use a parsed commit message dictionary
to edit its fields. Drive consumption of the dictionary through custom fields
instead of hardcoding.
This requires adding some fields which don't really do anything right now to
cover fields which appear only in the commit message.
Test Plan: "arc diff"'d this revision against localhost, "arc diff"'d again to
update.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason
Differential Revision: 811
Summary:
Move all the rest of the fields into the custom field schema, for revision
views.
I left a couple of stubs in here (willWriteRevision, didWriteRevision) since I'd
planned to do edits here too, but this diff is sort of big-ish already. I'll do
all the edit fields in the next revision.
Depends on D808.
Test Plan: Viewed, edited and conduit'ed some revisions.
Reviewed By: jungejason
Reviewers: jungejason, tuomaspelkonen, aran
CC: aran, jungejason, epriestley
Differential Revision: 809
