Summary:
Ref T2222. Brings the major mail features (affected files, patches) forward.
This drops some of the minor integrations which just show object state (like "Maniphest Tasks") since I think they're not very important. I'll put them back if users miss them.
Test Plan: Sent mail with inline/attached patches.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8459
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T3886. Medium term goal is to remove `DifferentialRevisionEditor`.
This temporarily reduces a couple of pieces of functionality unique to the RevisionEditor, but I'm going to go clean those up in the next couple diffs.
Test Plan: Used `arc diff --create` to create several revisions with different data.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8452
Summary: Ref T2222. Ref T3794. Medium term goal is to remove `DifferentialRevisionEditor`. This removes one of two callsites.
Test Plan: Used `arc diff --edit` to repeatedly update a revision, making changes to various fields.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3794, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8451
Summary: Ref T2222. Update this callsite; pretty straightforward.
Test Plan: Used Conduit to take actions and saw their effects in Differential.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8442
Summary: Ref T2222. Straightforward update to new stuff.
Test Plan:
- Tried to close an uncloseable revision.
- Closed a closeable revision.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8425
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T4484. See D8404 for discussion.
When a revision is updated with the new Editor, apply Herald rules. Additionally, apply them in a modern way which generates transactions.
Test Plan: {F122299}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran, chad
Maniphest Tasks: T2222, T4484
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8405
Summary:
Ref T2222. Ref T4484. This is a stepping stone to getting Herald supported in the new Differental code. Generally:
- Instead of an Editor either supporting or not supporting Herald, let it choose based on transactions. Specifically, Differential only runs rules on revision creation and diff updates.
- Optionally, allow an Editor to return some transactions to apply instead of having to apply everything itself. This lets us make it clear why changes happend in the transaction log, and share more code.
- I updated only one transaction type (owners in Maniphest) since it was the easiest and cleanest to update and test. Everything else still works like it used to, it just won't generate a transaction record yet.
- The transaction records are a touch rough, but we can clean them up later.
Test Plan: {F122282}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4484, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8404
Summary:
Ref T2222. Five very small improvements:
- I hit this exception and it took a bit to understand which transaction was causing problems. Add an `Exception` subclass which does a better job of making the message debuggable.
- The `oldValue` of a transaction may be `null`, legitimately (for example, changing the `repositoryPHID` for a revision from `null` to some valid PHID). Do a check to see if `setOldValue()` has been called, instead of a check for a `null` value.
- Add an additional check for the other case (shouldn't have a value, but does).
- When we're not generating a value, don't bother calling the code to generate it. The best case scenario is that it has no effect; any effect it might have (changing the value) is always wrong.
- Maniphest didn't fall back to the parent correctly when computing this flag, so it got the wrong result for `CustomField` transactions.
Test Plan: Resolved the issue I was hitting more easily, made updates to a `null`-valued custom field, and applied other normal sorts of transactions successfully.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4557, T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8401
Summary:
Fixes T4550 by changing supportsFeed to shouldPublishFeedStory, so things can be more granular like that are with mail. Attempts to fix things generally too, filtering out xactions that have no business in feed, etc.
Also return an updated Task HTML representation on drag and drop moves, etc. This is important so if the priority changes you can see it reflected in the UI.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around. observed no feed stories on subpriority drags. observed feed stories and updated color bars on stories that changed priority
Reviewers: epriestley, chad
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4550
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8399
Summary:
adds ManiphestTransaction::TYPE_PROJECT_COLUMN and makes it work. Had to clean up the Javascript ever so slightly as it was sending up the string "null" when it should just omit the data in these cases. Ref T4422.
NOTE: this is overall a bit buggy - e.g. move a task Foo from column A to top of column B; refresh; task Foo is at bottom of column B and should be at top of column B - but I plan on additional diff or three to clean this up.
Test Plan: dragged tasks around columns. clicked on those tasks and saw some nice transactions.
Reviewers: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4422
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8366
Summary:
Ref T2222. Differential has certain "words of power" (like `Ref T123` or `Depends on D345`) which should expand into a separate transaction when they appear anywhere in text.
Currently, they're respected in only some fields. I'm expanding them to work in any remarkup field, including comments and inline comments.
This partially generalizes transaction expansion/extraction in comments. Eventually, I'll probably implement some very soft sort of reference edge for T4036, maybe.
Test Plan: {F119368}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8369
Summary: Ref T2222. This updates the new JIRA field to be editable.
Test Plan: Used `/editpro/` to edit associated JIRA issues.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8364
Summary:
The intent of getOrBuildEngine() is to save some boilerplate in cases where we're just using a standard engine, but it didn't get cached so we'd rebuilt it over and over again.
This was especially bad in Differential with a large number of inlines.
Test Plan: "Query" tab of services is no longer quite so ridiculous in Differential.
Reviewers: btrahan, dctrwatson
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8352
Summary: Ref T2222. This enriches mail a little bit to get these rendering pretty much like they do now.
Test Plan: {F118255}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8343
Summary:
Ref T2222. This requires one new trick:
- When merging edge transactions which both add/update an edge, the Editor gets to control how the edge data is merged.
Specifically, we pick the "strongest" state to keep, so "accept + comment" leaves you with an accept instead of a comment.
Test Plan: Accepted, commented on, and comment + accepted revisions. Added some debugging dumps to verify that the merging was getting hit and working correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8340
Summary:
Ref T2222. This doesn't feel super clean, but doesn't feel too bad either.
Basically, Differential transactions can have secondary state-based effects (changing the overall revision status) when reviewers resign, are removed, accept, or reject revisions.
To deal with this in ApplicationTransactions, I did this:
- `applyFinalEffects()` can now alter the transaction set (notably, add new ones). This mostly matters for email, notifications and feed.
- In Differential, check for an overall revision state transition in `applyFinalEffects()` (e.g., your reject moving the revision to a rejected state).
- I'm only writing the transaction if the transition is implied and indirect.
- For example, if you "Plan Changes", that action changes the state on its own so there's no implicit state change transaction added.
The transactions themselves are kind of fluff, but it seems useful to keep a record of when state changes occurred in the transaction log. If people complain we can hide/remove them.
Test Plan: {F118143}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8339
Summary: Ref T2222. This mostly makes Accept/Reject work. The big missing piece is that overall revision status does not yet update properly. I need to think about how I want that to work a little bit more.
Test Plan: Accepted and rejected some stuff.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8333
Summary:
Ref T2222. This introduces two small new concepts:
- `expandTransactions()`: allows a transaction to expand into several transactions. For example, "resign" adds a "remove reviewers" transaction.
- We have some other cases which could use this, but currently hard-code things outside of the `Editor`.
- One example is that in Maniphest, closing a task implies claiming it if it is unowned.
- `setIgnoreOnNoEffect()`: The whole Editor can be set to continue or stop if any transactions have no effect, but this allows the behavior to be refined at the individual transaction level. This is primarily to make the UX less confusing, so the user gets only a single relevant error instead of one for each expanded transaction.
Otherwise, this is pretty straightforward.
Test Plan:
Rigged comment form to use SavePro controller, enabled resign action, then tried to resign from a bunch of stuff.
{F117743}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8328
Summary: Ref T2222. Makes the "pro" controller work with inlines.
Test Plan: Added a bunch of inlines and saved them with the "pro" controller.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8306
Summary: Ref T2222. Adds a mostly-functional "Pro" comment controller. This does the core stuff, but does not yet do actions (accept, reject, etc.) or inline comments.
Test Plan: Changed the `if (false)` to an `if (true)`, then made some comments, etc. This is normally unreachable.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8304
Summary: Ref T3886. Now that a custom field can emit a core transaction, just emit a subscribers transaction.
Test Plan: {F116014}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8289
Summary:
Ref T3886. Ref T418.
- Adds "View Policy" and "Edit Policy" fields.
- Allows CustomFields to produce arbitrary types of transactions, so these fields can produce standard view/edit policy transactions and get all the strings and validation associated with them.
Test Plan: {F116001}
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T418, T3886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8287
Summary:
Ref T3886. Ref T418. For fields like "Summary" and "Test Plan" where changes can't be summarized in one line, allow CustomField to provide a "(Show Details)" link and render a diff.
Also consolidate some of the existing copy/paste, and simplify this featuer slightly now that we've move to dialogs.
Test Plan:
{F115918}
- Viewed "description"-style field changes in phlux, pholio, legalpad, maniphest, differential, ponder (questions), ponder (answers), and repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886, T418
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8284
Summary: so it was said in IRC and so it is true
Test Plan: saving maniphest tasks with custom fields no longer barfs
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8279
Summary:
Ref T3886. Fixes the removed TODO. This also implements the generally reasonable policy "you have to be able to see an object in order to see its transactions". That was implicit before (we never load transactions without loading an object first) but is now explicit.
This fixes bad (nonspecialized) rendering of custom field transactions in Projects, and shortly in Differential, where stories would read "alincoln edited this object." instead of a more specific string.
Test Plan: Viewed a project edit, saw a more specific string. Browed ApplicationTransaction applications.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3886
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8273
Summary:
Ref T2222. This restores the "N older comments are hidden." shield to all ApplicationTransactions applications. Roughly the rule this uses is that transactions older than your most recent comment are hidden, under the assumption that you've already read and dealt with them, since you replied afterward. Then we show your last comment to remind/contextualize you, and anything afterward. We also don't hide transactions if we'd only be hiding a handfull, and we never hide the few most recent transactions.
This might need some #design help.
Test Plan:
The tricky part here is the anchor rule, which deals with the case where you follow a link to `T123#4`, but that would normally be hidden. We simulate a click on "show all" if you hit an anchor which is hidden. Here's what it looks like in Maniphest:
{F112891}
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T2222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8229
Summary: Fixes T4423. This works better and is simpler and more flexible.
Test Plan: Clicked "(Show Details)", got a popup with the details.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4423
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8227
Summary:
Updates PhabricatorTimeline to PHUITimeline. Uses standard colors and spacing, softens up the actors, and reduces visual spacing of action-only events.
- Also updated some 2x sprite images.
Test Plan: Tested Tasks Paste and Pholio in my sandbox.
Reviewers: epriestley, btrahan
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8205
Summary:
Ref T4379. Fixes T4359. Currently, `bin/search index` does not rebuild CustomField indexes. This is because they aren't really part of the main search index. However, from a user's point of view this is by far the most logical place to look for index rebuilds, and it's straightforward for us to write into this secondary store.
At some point, it might be nice to let you specify fields as "fulltext" too, although no one has asked for that yet. We could then dump the text of those fields into the fulltext index. Ref T418.
Test Plan: Used `bin/search index --type proj --trace`, etc., and examination of the database to verify that indexes rebuilt. Reindexed users, tasks, projects.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4359, T418, T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8185
Summary:
Ref T4379. Currently, you can edit away your edit capability in Projects. Prevent this in a general way.
Since some objects have complex edit policies (like "the owner can always edit"), we can't just check the value itself. We also can't fairly assume that every object has a `setEditPolicy()` method, even though almost all do right now. Instead, provide a way to pretend we've completed the edit and changed the policy.
Test Plan: Unit tests, tried to edit away my edit capability.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8179
Summary:
Ref T4379. Perform all editing with modern transaction infrastructure. A few practical changes here:
- Message for "project name required" should be a little nicer. I'll deal with this once more stuff gets straightened out. You get a reasonable message now, it's just not nicely handled as part of the form.
- Message for "project name is not unique" should be a little nicer. Same as above.
- Previously, we would automatically archive a project when the last member left or was removed. I'll probably restore this in a bit but am omitting it for the moment for simplicity.
- Previously, we would create projects with goofy nonsensical permissions. Now we create them with reasonable permissions.
Test Plan:
- Created project.
- Edited project.
- Ran unit tests.
- Viewed project edit history.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8168
Summary:
Ref T4379. When you add a redundant edge, we currently compare the values strictly, using `===`. However, the old and new versions of the edge have slightly different member data, because one has been synthetically constructed and one has been read from the database.
Instead, compare only the things we actually care about:
# Were any destintations added or removed?
# Was any edge data changed?
If the answer to both questions is "no", consider the update a no-op.
Test Plan: In the next diff, I'm making project members use the EDGE transaction type. Before this change, adding an existing project member would generate a transaction with no changes. Now, it is correctly detected as a no-op, while normal transactions continue to work properly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4379
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8166
Summary: ...and surface it in all adapters except commit adapters. Values are true or false. Ref T4294
Test Plan: made a herald rule to be cc'd on new tasks. was cc'd on new tasks and not cc'd on updates to existing tasks.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4294
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8142
Summary: I've only seen this be an issue with PhabricatorBot.
Test Plan: Comment on something with characters that are automatically converted like "<>", and see what the irc bot reports
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8140
Summary:
Ref T4175.
- Add a configurable name for the clone-as directory, so you can have "Bits & Pieces" clone as "bits~n~pieces/" or simliar.
- By default, use "reasonable" heruistics to choose such a name.
- Generate a copy/pasteable clone commmand with this directory name.
Test Plan: Looked at some repositories.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4175
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D8097
Summary: Fixes T3857. Earlier work made this trivial and just left product questions, which I've answered by requiring the daemons to run on reasonable installs.
Test Plan: Ran `bin/search index` and `bin/search index --background`. Observed indexes write in the former case and tasks queue in the latter case. Commented with a unique string on a revision and searched for it a moment later, got exactly one result (that revision), verifying that reindexing works correctly.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T3857
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7966
Summary: Ref T4266. This implements rules similar to the old rules. With D7842, maybe this is reasonable? I think it's not like grotesquely bad, at least.
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, wrotte
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4266
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7843
Summary: We were getting a weird double box here, missed it my first pass
Test Plan: Review logged in Maniphest and Paste, as well as logged out versions. Test Login flow.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7716
Summary: Simplifies the code a bit and fixes all the wonky previews. Fixes T4053
Test Plan: Test all pages, logged in and logged out.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
CC: Korvin, epriestley, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7622
Summary:
Ref T4122. Implements a credential management application for the uses described in T4122.
@chad, this needs an icon, HA HA HAHA HA BWW HA HA HA
bwahaha
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: chad, aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4122
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7608
Summary:
Fixes T4060. The logic here is:
- When you take several actions at once, we show a single feed story for all of them.
- We choose the "most interesting" title for the feed story. For example, "close task" is more interesting than "add CC".
Currently, the issue with this is:
- "Add comment" is the //least interesting// title. I think this is correct: all other actions are more interesting than the fact that you added a comment.
- We try to conserve the number of objects we need to load by rendering only the most interesting transaction.
To fix this:
- Stop being so conservative; load all of the transactions and all of their PHIDs.
- Add bodies from any transactions which render bodies. In all cases (I think?) this is a maximum of one comment adding a body.
The end result is a story like this:
epriestley closed T123: the building is on fire.
"Okay guys I put the fire out"
Test Plan: See screenshot.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran, asherkin
Maniphest Tasks: T4060
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7504
Summary: Ref T4010. Adds a history page and restores the transaction title strings, which previously sort-of existed in the defunct feed story class.
Test Plan: See screenshots.
Reviewers: chad, btrahan
Reviewed By: chad
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7371
Summary:
Ref T4010. Projects have a weird proto-version of ApplicationTransactions which is very similar but not quite the same.
Move the storage to a modern format, but keep all the other code for now.
Test Plan: Migrated project transactions; edited projects.
Reviewers: btrahan, chad
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Maniphest Tasks: T4010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7370
Summary:
While we mostly have reasonable effective object accessibility when you lock a user out of an application, it's primarily enforced at the controller level. Users can still, e.g., load the handles of objects they can't actually see. Instead, lock the queries to the applications so that you can, e.g., never load a revision if you don't have access to Differential.
This has several parts:
- For PolicyAware queries, provide an application class name method.
- If the query specifies a class name and the user doesn't have permission to use it, fail the entire query unconditionally.
- For handles, simplify query construction and count all the PHIDs as "restricted" so we get a UI full of "restricted" instead of "unknown" handles.
Test Plan:
- Added a unit test to verify I got all the class names right.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a normal user with public policies on and off.
- Browsed around, logged in/out as a restricted user with public policies on and off. With restrictions, saw all traces of restricted apps removed or restricted.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7367
Summary:
This is primarily a client request, and a little bit use-case specific, but policies seem to be holding up well and I'm getting more comfortable about maintaining this. Much if it can run through ApplicationTransactions.
Allow the ability to edit status, policies, priorities, assignees and projects of a task to be restricted to some subset of users. Also allow bulk edit to be locked. This affects the editor itself and the edit, view and list interfaces.
Test Plan: As a restricted user, created, edited and commented on tasks. Tried to drag them around.
Reviewers: btrahan
Reviewed By: btrahan
CC: aran
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D7357
