Summary:
Depends on D20291. Ref T13259. Move all the simple cases (where paging depends only on the partial object and does not depend on keys) to a simple wrapper.
This leaves a smaller set of more complex cases where we care about external data or which keys were requested that I'll convert in followups.
Test Plan: Poked at things, but a lot of stuff is still broken until everything is converted.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13259
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D20292
Summary:
Depends on D19919. Ref T11351. This method appeared in D8802 (note that "get...Object" was renamed to "get...Transaction" there, so this method was actually "new" even though a method of the same name had existed before).
The goal at the time was to let Harbormaster post build results to Diffs and have them end up on Revisions, but this eventually got a better implementation (see below) where the Harbormaster-specific code can just specify a "publishable object" where build results should go.
The new `get...Object` semantics ultimately broke some stuff, and the actual implementation in Differential was removed in D10911, so this method hasn't really served a purpose since December 2014. I think that broke the Harbormaster thing by accident and we just lived with it for a bit, then Harbormaster got some more work and D17139 introduced "publishable" objects which was a better approach. This was later refined by D19281.
So: the original problem (sending build results to the right place) has a good solution now, this method hasn't done anything for 4 years, and it was probably a bad idea in the first place since it's pretty weird/surprising/fragile.
Note that `Comment` objects still have an unrelated method with the same name. In that case, the method ties the `Comment` storage object to the related `Transaction` storage object.
Test Plan: Grepped for `getApplicationTransactionObject`, verified that all remaining callsites are related to `Comment` objects.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19920
Summary:
Depends on D19918. Ref T11351. In D19918, I removed all calls to this method. Now, remove all implementations.
All of these implementations just `return $timeline`, only the three sites in D19918 did anything interesting.
Test Plan: Used `grep willRenderTimeline` to find callsites, found none.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19919
Summary:
Depends on D19914. Ref T11351. Some of the Phoilo rabbit holes go very deep.
`PhabricatorApplicationTransactionInterface` currently requires you to implement `willRenderTimeline()`. Almost every object just implements this as `return $timeline`; only Pholio, Diffusion, and Differential specialize it. In all cases, they are specializing it mostly to render inline comments.
The actual implementations are a bit of a weird mess and the way the data is threaded through the call stack is weird and not very modern.
Try to clean this up:
- Stop requiring `willRenderTimeline()` to be implemented.
- Stop requiring `getApplicationTransactionViewObject()` to be implemented (only the three above, plus Legalpad, implement this, and Legalpad's implementation is a no-op). These two methods are inherently pretty coupled for almost any reasonable thing you might want to do with the timeline.
- Simplify the handling of "renderdata" and call it "View Data". This is additional information about the current view of the transaction timeline that is required to render it correctly. This is only used in Differential, to decide if we can link an inline comment to an anchor on the same page or should link it to another page. We could perhaps do this on the client instead, but having this data doesn't seem inherently bad to me.
- If objects want to customize timeline rendering, they now implement `PhabricatorTimelineInterface` and provide a `TimelineEngine` which gets a nice formal stack.
This leaves a lot of empty `willRenderTimeline()` implementations hanging around. I'll remove these in the next change, it's just going to be deleting a couple dozen copies of an identical empty method implementation.
Test Plan:
- Viewed audits, revisions, and mocks with inline comments.
- Used "Show Older" to page a revision back in history (this is relevant for "View Data").
- Grepped for symbols: willRenderTimeline, getApplicationTransactionViewObject, Legalpad classes.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T11351
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19918
Summary:
Ref T13222. See PHI683. Currently, you can "Change subtype..." via Conduit and the bulk editor, but not via the comment action stack or edit forms.
In PHI683 an install is doing this often enough that they'd like it to become a first-class action. I've generally been cautious about pushing this action to become a first-class action (there are some inevitable rough edges and I don't want to add too much complexity if there isn't a use case for it) but since we have evidence that users would find it useful and nothing has exploded yet, I'm comfortable taking another step forward.
Currently, `EditEngine` has this sort of weird `setIsConduitOnly()` method. This actually means more like "this doesn't show up on forms". Make it better align with that. In particular, a "conduit only" field can already show up in the bulk editor, which is goofy. Change this to `setIsFormField()` and convert/simplify existing callsites.
Test Plan:
There are a lot of ways to reach EditEngine so this probably isn't entirely exhaustive, but I think I got pretty much anything which is likely to break:
- Searched for `setIsConduitOnly()` and `getIsConduitOnly()`, converted all callsites to `setIsFormField()`.
- Searched for `setIsLockable()`, `setIsReorderable()` and `setIsDefaultable()` and aligned these calls to intent where applicable.
- Created an Almanac binding.
- Edited an Almanac binding.
- Created an Almanac service.
- Edited an Almanac service.
- Edited a binding property.
- Deleted a binding property.
- Created and edited a badge.
- Awarded and revoked a badge.
- Created and edited an event.
- Made an event recurring.
- Created and edited a Conpherence thread.
- Edited and updated the diff for a revision.
- Created and edited a repository.
- Created and disabled repository URIs.
- Created and edited a blueprint.
- Created and edited tasks.
- Created a paste, edited/archived a paste.
- Created/edited/archived a package.
- Created/edited a project.
- Made comments.
- Moved tasks on workboards via comment action stack.
- Changed task subtype via comment action stack.
Reviewers: amckinley
Reviewed By: amckinley
Subscribers: PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Maniphest Tasks: T13222
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19842
Summary:
Depends on D19009. Ref T13053. For "Must Encrypt" mail, we must currently strip the "Thread-Topic" header because it sometimes contains sensitive information about the object.
I don't actually know if this header is useful or anyting uses it. My understanding is that it's an Outlook/Exchange thing, but we also implement "Thread-Index" which I think is what Outlook/Exchange actually look at. This header may have done something before we implemented "Thread-Index", or maybe never done anything. Or maybe older versions of Excel/Outlook did something with it and newer versions don't, or do less. So it's possible that an even better fix here would be to simply remove this, but I wasn't able to convince myself of that after Googling for 10 minutes and I don't think it's worth hours of installing Exchange/Outlook to figure out. Instead, I'm just trying to simplify our handling of this header for now, and maybe some day we'll learn more about Exchange/Outlook and can remove it.
In a number of cases we already use the object monogram or PHID as a "Thread-Topic" without users ever complaining, so I think that if this header is useful it probably isn't shown to users, or isn't shown very often (e.g., only in a specific "conversation" sub-view?). Just use the object PHID (which should be unique and stable) as a thread-topic, everywhere, automatically.
Then allow this header through for "Must Encrypt" mail.
Test Plan: Processed some local mail, saw object PHIDs for "Thread-Topic" headers.
Reviewers: amckinley
Maniphest Tasks: T13053
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D19012
Summary: I can't believe I've been staring at this page for so long without noticing this typo
Test Plan: doitlive
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: epriestley
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17791
Summary: Ref T11357. A lot of file creation doesn't go through transactions, so we only actually have one real transaction type: editing a file name.
Test Plan:
Created and edited files.
{F4559287}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T11357
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17610
Summary: Ships Badges. I can write up some basic docs too if needed.
Test Plan: /applications/
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17360
Summary: Ref T12270. These no longer have any callsites.
Test Plan: Used `grep` to search for each edge class constant, found no hits.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17562
Summary: Ref T12270. Builds out a BadgeCache for PhabricatorUser, primarily for Timeline, potentially feed? This should still work if we later let people pick which two, just switch query in BadgeCache.
Test Plan: Give out badges, test timeline for displaying badges from handles and without queries. Revoke a badge, see cache change.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17503
Summary: Fixes T12398. This adds `withBadgeStatuses` as a query parameter when searching for Awards to show. In most (all?) cases we currently only show active badges.
Test Plan: Assign myself a badge, archive it and verify it does not appear on profile, comment form, or timeline.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12398
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17499
Summary:
Ref T12270. This just drops the constraint for now, rather than dealing with all the typecasting stuff and putting us in a position which will almost certainly require backward compatibility breaks in the future.
Also renames "badges.*" to "badge.*" for consistency (all other methods are singular: token.*, project.*, differential.revision.*, etc).
Test Plan:
Saw "qualities" now "Not Supported", while other constraints continue to work:
{F3887194}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17487
Summary: Allow people to award and remove badges via conduit, but not from the standard badges form.
Test Plan:
Build a generator and generate awards. Didn't test the revoke yet.
{F3857766}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17482
Summary: This just adds a few more dimensions to the generator.
Test Plan: run `bin/lipsum generate badges`, verify new icons and quality work.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17474
Summary: Ref T9010. This adds more icons and lets the IconChooser handle more icons more easier.
Test Plan: Test Project Icons, Badges Icons
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9006, T9010
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17456
Summary: Fixes T10798. Separates these two since they don't need to be combined and it allows for more flexibility / scalability.
Test Plan:
- Add Badge
- Edit Badge
- Add myself as Recipient
- Remove myself
- Go to my profile
- Award Badge from there
- Assign myself a badge, try to re-assign it, see validation error.
Also, validation errors on dialog forms are ugly.
{F3495630}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10798, T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17447
Summary: Ref T12270. Adds the name of the badge to the subject, fixes the double description.
Test Plan: Edit lots of badges with and without descriptions, see good emails.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17449
Summary: Ref T12319. Ref T12270. Allow badges to be generated with `bin/lipsum`. These aren't hugely sophisticated but I'm not sure about the fate of T9010 yet or what's happening with the quality levels, and didn't want to make those changes more difficult.
Test Plan:
- Used `bin/lipsum generate badges --force --quickly` to generate badges.
- Made some coffee and came back to 20K badges.
{F3422200}
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: cspeckmim
Maniphest Tasks: T12319, T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17422
Summary: Ref T12270. Moves badges into their own page and menu item. Capable of displaying hundreds of useful tokens of appreciation and dedication.
Test Plan:
Test blank state, mobile, awards badges.
{F3284139}
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17410
Summary: Ref T12270. This converts Badges to modular transactions for editing and awarding.
Test Plan: Add Badge, edit badge, award and revoke... Still going to test this some more but feel free to comment on anything obviously wrong?
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T12270
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17402
Summary: Ref T10390. Simplifies dropdown by rolling out canUseInPanel in useless panels
Test Plan: Add a query panel, see less options.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10390
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17341
Summary: Ref T10798. Cleans up the UI a little and adds a sidenav.
Test Plan: Review badge and recipients in sandbox.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10798
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D17358
Summary: The default behavior of these methods is to return `true`, so these overrides have no effect.
Test Plan: `grep`; poked around.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16985
Summary:
This has been replaced by `PolicyCodex` after D16830. Also:
- Rebuild Celerity map to fix grumpy unit test.
- Fix one issue on the policy exception workflow to accommodate the new code.
Test Plan:
- `arc unit --everything`
- Viewed policy explanations.
- Viewed policy errors.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Subscribers: hach-que, PHID-OPKG-gm6ozazyms6q6i22gyam
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16831
Summary: Fixes T11164. At least, this fixes it locally for me. I don't know how to code. Copy Pasta!
Test Plan: Change name, don't see extra timeline entry on quality set anymore.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T11164
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D16169
Summary: Ref T10702
Test Plan: Open a user profile, attempt to award an archived or previously awarded badge, badges dialog should provide a typeahead, and the suggestions should offer details about whether a badge is archived or already awarded.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10702
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15665
Summary: Closes T10690
Test Plan: Open Badges application, go to Advanced Search, search for a badge by its name and see result.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10690
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15656
Summary: Going to render these all normal case instead of all caps, and bump up the font size. Should be more consistent. Yellow if you green anything orange.
Test Plan: grep, lint
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15645
Summary: Ref T10671
Test Plan: Open Conduit application, open `badges.edit` or `badges.search`, create, edit, or query for a badge.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10671
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15622
Summary: Closes T8940, recipient list in badge view should show awarder and date info. Took a first stab at how we want to make the date look, but not sure. Looks odd as it is.
Test Plan: Open badge that has awards. Each recipient in list should have a subheader such as "Awarded by ... on ..."
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8940
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15590
Summary: Ref T9007
Test Plan: Navigate to "Advanced Search" in Badges, order by rarity, then by commonality. Rarest and most common badges should be ordered, respectively.
Reviewers: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Reviewed By: #blessed_reviewers, epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T9007
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15555
Summary: Fixes T10672. Cleaning this up myself since I was responsible for the implementation.
Test Plan: Leave a comment, Edit a badge, create a badge.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10672
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15556
Summary: Uses BLUE_PROPERTY on Recipients box, removes redundent properties since we render the badge itself already.
Test Plan: View a badge with and without a description.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15553
Summary:
[WIP] Allows awarding a badge from a user profile. Unsure of the interactions here if a user can't award any badges, or if we should just hide this.
Fixes T10688
Fixes T10318
Test Plan: Award some badges. Steal them back.
Reviewers: lpriestley, epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10318, T10688
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15544
Summary: Ref T10677, Awarding/revoking badge should create a feed story on homepage with badge handle recipient handles
Test Plan: Award/revoke badge, open Feed, should see story with badge link and recipient links.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15534
Summary: Ref T10677, awarding/revoking a badge should create timeline entries with titles that are more clear (excludes homepage feed stories)
Test Plan: Award/revoke a badge to single or multiple users. See timeline entries that reflect those actions.
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T10677
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15533
Summary: Cleans up EditEngine, adds new layout to EditEngine and descendents
Test Plan: Test creating a new form, reordering, marking and unmarking defaults. View new forms.
Reviewers: epriestley
Reviewed By: epriestley
Subscribers: Korvin
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15531
Summary: Ref T8996, Convert badge recipients from Edges to actual BadgeAward objects
Test Plan: Create badge, award it to recipient. Make sure adding/removing recipients works. (Still need to migrate exisiting recipients to new table and need to create activity feed blurbs)
Reviewers: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Reviewed By: epriestley, #blessed_reviewers
Subscribers: chad, Korvin
Maniphest Tasks: T8996
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15014
Summary: Moves over everything except Maniphest, which has some special behavior.
Test Plan:
- Viewed a badge.
- Viewed a calendar event.
- Viewed a countdown.
- Viewed a Fund initiative.
- Viewed a Herald rule.
- Viewed a macro.
- Viewed an application.
- Viewed an owners package.
- Viewed a credential.
- Viewed a Ponder question.
- Viewed a poll.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15416
Summary:
Two minor changes here:
- Replace `get/setUser()` with `get/setViewer()` for consistency with everything else.
- `getViewer()` now throws if no viewer is set. We had a lot of code that either "should" check this but didn't, or did check it in an identical way, duplicating work. In contrast, very little code checks for a viewer but works if one is not present.
Test Plan:
- Grepped for `->user`.
- Attempted to fix all callsites inside `*View` classes.
- Browsed around a bunch of applications, particularly Calendar, Differential and Diffusion, which seemed most heavily affected.
Reviewers: chad
Reviewed By: chad
Differential Revision: https://secure.phabricator.com/D15412
